08/06/2020 00:00
Its name is (the Pyramid of Khufu) and you say that it is Al-Masjid Al Haram?
My dear brother… Allah has distinguished us with reason.
The natural thing is that geography and the things around us do not have names. Geography and the things around us are irrational things. They do not give themselves names and tell us their names.
Geographical locations and things get their names in three ways:
1- As for an agreement between us
2- A name that has been my favorite since the beginning, especially in the names of holy places.
3- There is a force that imposed on people the names of things around us.
The third method is the answer to the question.
We have been subjected to an occupation, and it is not a normal or natural occupation… but a malicious occupation… and it came to us carrying a cunning and devilish strategic project, to falsify reality and distort the names of geography and the things around us that we lived with. , especially the names found in the Qur’an or related to religion… because the continued existence of the original names… means that the occupation cannot remain and after that it is not possible to dominate and control people and implement projects on them.
And the matter is very simple for any satanic occupier……. if he thought of a project to forge the original names of reality. And. By applying new names to reality and making them official names so that the Sunni people repeat them constantly…and it is all a matter of time (two generations) until the people’s tongue stops repeating the previous name, then it quickly disappears from their awareness and memory, and the new names take root in their awareness. .
This is something that many do not want to understand when we tell them that Cairo’s real, original name was (Misr) before Napoleon’s invasion and the West’s installation of Al-Albani as ruler of Misr.
When the West came to Misr and the region was an occupier, it came carrying this fraudulent project and applying new names to the world surrounding the people, so that the people would lose the first natural names by which they lived, and this work’s job is to occupy the land and make the peoples subject to the new texts. Which the occupier brought and which contain the new names that he invented and made into names in reality, so that he could imprison the peoples within his world that he had drawn and the peoples would not be able to leave it, to ensure control.
The new names for geography and things began to be given officially, by putting them in huge texts inside the printer’s books that Napoleon brought, and they were approved in transactions, evidence, newspapers, books, documents, letters, scientific institutions, schools, etc…. …And so people had to repeat it constantly and continuously since childhood, until the names of the places were lost from their tongue and memory.
Among them was the city (Misr), whose name was changed to the name (Cairo)…… However, despite the adoption of this new name Cairo, the authentic popular memory of the Egyptians continued to repeat the name Misr over Cairo…… When You see an Egyptian from the countryside and tell him where you are going. He will tell you: I am going to Misr… and by Misr he means the city of Cairo.
Example :
Imagine that one day Yemen decided to change the name of the city (Sanaa) to the name (Cairo), and the new name was adopted in newspapers, transactions, documentation, news, channels, and in books.
Then the people of Yemen will have to… repeat this new name in official conversations, and it is all a matter of time (about forty years), until the name Sana’a becomes a thing of the past… but… but people’s popular memory will continue to repeat the name (Sana’a). ) in their normal and informal daily lives.
For example, when a person in Yemen wants to tell his family that he will travel to the city of Cairo in Yemen, he will say: I am traveling to Sanaa.
Now let us assume that ………… after changing the name of the city (Sana’a) to the name of (Cairo), and after approximately seventy years, and we obtained an old book, and we found in it talk about a city called (Sana’a). …Does the author of this old book mean by the city (Sanaa) the city located in Yemen and whose name has now become (Cairo)… Or is it another city located in a place other than Yemen, and say in Iraq or Syria or… Libya?!
This hypothetical example is the same thing that happened in reality with the names (Misr) and (Bakkah), and it is the answer to your question about the name of the building (the Pyramid).
But the most important question that arises is: How did the name of Misr continue and the name of Bakkah did not continue on the people’s tongue?!
The reason is simple…because the place has been moved to another place, and this new place has become sacred in the souls of the people, and therefore people will be careful not to repeat the name on her tongue because it is blasphemous.
Forgetting the old name from the tongue for geography and things will be faster and easier, because it depends on a cunning trick in programming the tongue through the sacred with a crooked name (a distortion of one letter) and making the two names similar in pronunciation and different with one phonetic output.
When you invent a new name for a place that bears an old name, and the new name is different by one letter… especially when the two letters are close together in the phonetic output and you link the two names to the sacred, or you assign to it absolute, heavenly authority from the Creator, then it is natural that the name… The old place will disappear in just one generation and people will forget the place.
The survival of a place in the people’s memory depends on people’s continued repetition of its original name.
This is the story of (Bakkah and Mecca), the story of (Al-Haram and the Pyramid), and the story of (Ibrahim and the Sphinx).
—————————
Leave all of the above behind
Is the real, original name of that building located in Misr actually (The Pyramid – Pyramids) or is it a new, fake name that was imposed on the people by an occupying power?
A new, fake name imposed on people by the occupier
How will we be sure?!
You have logical and realistic ways to make sure of this matter.. How?
When you have something of your own, that is, your property or right alone, you are the owner of the original and true name for this thing, and the name of this thing will be the official name that any other person will call it, even if they speak a different language than you.
Example :
1- Your name is (Magdi), and any person, whether Chinese, Indian, French, or English, will call you (Magdi)… with the same pronunciation.
You (the owner) have imposed the original name of the thing (you) on any other person.
2- The animal (kangaroo) is an animal that does not live with us, so we do not have a name for this animal, but it exists in one place on earth (Australia), and the inhabitants of that place call it (kangaroo). This name imposed itself on us and we began to call it ( Kangaroo)….with the same pronunciation
The owner (the inhabitants of Australia) imposed the original name of the thing (animal) on any other human being.
This is a natural and logical thing that will happen in reality
Now notice
The inhabitants of Misr, who are the true and original owners of the things….but they rightfully call the building (the Pyramid), and they rightfully call the statue (the Sphinx)…assuming that these are the original names for those things in their language. It is assumed that their names for these things will be the names of any other people… But what is illogical and unrealistic is that the West calls the building for the Egyptians “Pyramid,” and also calls the statue for the Egyptians “the Sphinx.”
The two names are not equal in pronunciation:
The name (Haram) is not equal to the name (Pyramid)… in pronunciation
The name (Sphinx) is not equal to the name (Sphynx)… in pronunciation
The real owner (the inhabitants of Misr) could not impose the original names of the things that no one else owns (the Pyramid and the Sphinx) on other peoples.
Even if we assume that the language of the ancient Egyptians was different, then their ancient nomenclature also did not impose itself on any other people on earth.
According to Western translations of Egyptian inscriptions, the ancient Egyptians called (the pyramid) the name (Mur) and the name of the Sphinx was (Sishbet).
What is the reason why the Egyptians did not impose their names on the West?!
The reason is because (the West) was the one who occupied Misr and the region…..and the occupation contradicted natural logic. Instead of imposing the original names that people used on the West, the West invented false names for the things owned by the Egyptians and imposed them on the residents of Misr and the region. And the world, and they made their fake names their official names, through printer’s books, transactions, documentation, letters, etc., until they became the names circulating in the tongue of all people.
If this same situation occurs with us and we find two names with different pronunciation, we have two possibilities:
Or are both names fake, or is one of the names original and the other is fake or made up?
In our case……..all four names are fabricated and fake (the Pyramid of the Sphinx).
Why ?!
If we return to our previous example (about changing the name of the city of Sanaa), and we ask an important question: If the name of the city of Sanaa was changed to Cairo, after a hundred years, how will I be sure that its name was (Sanaa) in the people’s tongue and not Cairo?!
In our case, we must ask this question: What was the original name of that building and that statue before people’s tongues changed or before Western invaders entered, and how can I be sure that they had names different from the current names?!
In our previous example (about changing the name of Sanaa), we found an old book that proves a city in Yemen called (Sanaa), and we also need an old book in the case of (the Pyramid and the Sphinx) that proves the existence of original designations before those false designations imposed by the occupier.
This is the realistic, logical question, and it is the essence of the Qur’an’s main speech and the first revolves around this point.
how ?
When the speech of revelation talks about the first verse that was created for people and says: {In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim. Whoever disbelieves, then Allah is Free of all worlds}.
The logical question is: What is meant by disbelief with this information and what is its relationship to something material in reality? ……How does a person become a disbeliever in reality? Does he declare disbelief through the mouth of the people, or does he keep people away from reality?!
Yes, he disbelieves in the original language of the book from which people came
how ?!
This reality that exists around people…in which there are things and geographical locations…and it was created by the original, natural language that created this reality…and these people have a religion that has extended since ancient times. This religion is a legacy of their ancient ancestors (the first centuries), and their ancestors wrote the names of places in ancient documents in their original tongue.
The first, original, endowmental designations for geographical places and sacred things, which were established from the first day on earth.
We will find these names in the book……. which contains the people’s ancient memory and whose original memory is recorded before the occupier and invader entered.
{That book no doubt guidance for the righteous}
{And We gave Musa the Book after We had destroyed the first generations, as insight for mankind and guidance and mercy that they might remember.}
Maybe they remember
There was a difference in the book… It is natural that the difference in the book will change people’s language and make their tongue repeat false names for the things around them… and this explains the reason for all this confusion.
They disbelieved in the Book.
Therefore, when the revelation speaks about disbelief… it is talking about disbelief in the Book (the ancient book in the example of Sana’a), which contains the rites and rituals of their religion, and the original names of the places and things around them.
For this very important reason, the Qur’an begins his speech with:
{That book no doubt guidance for the righteous} .
And when the speech of revelation says:
{Indeed, the first House established for mankind is the one in Bakkah, blessed and a guidance for the worlds. (96) In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim.
What is meant by the phrase (and whoever disbelieves)…that is, whoever forges the book and hides it from the people.
{And when Allah took a covenant from those who were given the Book that you will make it clear to the people and do not conceal it, so they threw it behind their backs and bought it for a small price, so evil is what they bought.}
And when the speech of revelation speaks…about the first house that was established for the people in (Bakkah)…and that whoever disbelieves…..Allah is self-sufficient in the worlds.
For by the scholars he means……those who know the Book
{A Book whose verses are explained in detail. We recite it in Arabic for a people who know. The tongue of the one to whom they turn is foreign, and this is a clear Arabic tongue.}
The people who know = the worlds
A book consisting of verses that are read in an Arabic language, and there are people who know how to read the name of the verses of the book (the worlds).
The speech…..talks about things that exist in reality, and talks about the original names of those things that are present in the book.
How can a book talk about things in a book and reality at the same time?
Because the book is written with pictorial symbols of things in reality (verses).
Al-Masjid Al Haram has an icon depicted in the Book (verse), and the Maqam Ibrahim has an icon depicted in the Book (verse)…and the verses are read in clear Arabic.
■ Therefore, when the speech talks about the first house created for people, he says: {In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim}:
{Indeed, the first House established for mankind is that which is in Bakkah, blessed and a guidance for the worlds. (96) In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim. And whoever enters it will be safe. And for Allah is the obligation of the people to make the Hajj to the House, whoever is able to make a way to it, and whoever disbelieves, then Allah is of no need of the worlds. (97) Say, O People of the Book, why do you disbelieve in signs? Allah Allah is a witness to what you do (98) Say, “O People of the Book, why do you turn away from the path of Allah from those who believe? You seek it crookedly while you are witnesses, and Allah is not unaware of what you do. (99) O you who have believed, if you obey a party of those who were given the Book, they will turn you back into disbelief after you have believed. (100) }
– Say, O People of the Book, why do you disbelieve in the verses of Allah in His Book? (The verses = the place of Ibrahim + Al-Bayt Al-Haram)
He talks about disbelief in the verses found in the Book (Al-Bayt Al-Haram and the Shrine of Ibrahim).
– Say, “O People of the Book, why do you turn away from the path of Allah?”
He talks about their repelling people from the location of Al-Bayt Al-Haram and the shrine of Ibrahim in reality.
■ And when the speech talks about the direction of the Qiblah towards Al-Masjid Al Haram, he says: {And those who were given the Book would know that it is the truth} {And if you brought to those who were given the Book every sign} {Those to whom We have given the Book recognize it as they recognize their children}
{We may see the turning of your face in the sky. We will certainly turn you to a direction that pleases you. So turn your face toward Al-Masjid Al Haram, and wherever you are, turn your faces toward it. Indeed, those who were given the Book know that it is the truth from their Allah, and Allah is not unaware of what they do. (144) And if you brought to those who were given the Book every sign, they would not follow your direction, nor are you. Follow their qiblah, and some of them do not follow the qiblah of others. And if you were to follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, then you would certainly be among the wrongdoers. (145) To whom We have given the book recognize it as they recognize their own children. Indeed, a group of them conceal the truth while they know it. (146)}
Those who were given the Book know how to read the Book and read the verses of the Book that were written in clear Arabic…. And because they know how to read, they know the pictorial icon of Al-Masjid Al Haram in the Book (the verse)…. and they know Al-Masjid Al Haram in reality as they know their children in reality. ..But they concealed the truth while they knew
The book is made up of clear and clear pictorial icons (clear verses), and among those verses is (the verse of Al-Masjid Al Haram – the verse of the shrine of Ibrahim), and at the same time these verses exist in reality and are embodied in reality.
Therefore, the speech talks about two identical worlds (book and reality).
Look at the image of the article carefully, so you can understand the meaning more.
Now…we have a book that contains clear pictures of many things in reality.
I believe that the issue has been resolved once and for all… We have a book that contains clear pictures of material things around us… and all we have to do is search for the signs of the Pyramid and the signs of the Sphinx and find out their names. The original is in the book… and of course it will be in Arabic.
Then we will be sure of their original names before the West occupied Misr and the region, before they published the printing press, before they translated the Egyptian inscriptions and forged them… and after that we can be sure of everything.
Can we say that this is conclusive and final material evidence?!
On another topic…