10/04/2021 0:00:01
Mr. Ismail Al-Saadawi.
Let us think while we are completely free from every information planted in our minds that we do not know how true or reliable it is, and think about this reality and try to find solutions and explanations for many questions in a scientific and logical manner.
We believe that reality is a storehouse of real and correct knowledge, and if real reality was left naturally as it is without tampering or falsification, we would find in it a large amount of real and reliable information, through which it is possible to find correct and non-false explanations for this reality without any difficulty.
But at the same time… we believe that there are those who wanted to falsify this real reality, by creating fake information and storing it in this reality, in order to make it reliable information in the mind of any researcher or thinker, to make it difficult for him to interpret this reality or to make the researcher provide explanations. Wrong for this fact.
We actually have reliable information, whether that information is real or fake…but there is information that exists in reality that seems unnatural and requires a logical, correct, and error-free interpretation from us.
⚫ The first information
In Misr, we have writing in pictorial script, most of which is written on stones and wood
Now… if we think about the information about this reality… we will find that we actually have pictorial writing present in Misr, and most of it is written on solid material (stones and wood), unless it is on walls or stone panels.
– This is factual information that is completely confirmed and reliable, because it has actually been witnessed by any human being.
We believe that pictorial writing (hieroglyphs) is the first written form used by the first human on Earth to record and preserve his first information on Earth, and the importance of that first information necessitates the existence of a material that is not affected by natural factors and remains for a very long life without any damage.
Therefore, we see in the reality of Misr pictorial writings recorded on solid materials such as stones and wood.
Not only that, but all the time you discover tombs with pictorial writing written on their stone walls, or coffins with pictorial writing written on them, or stone tablets are discovered.
But is this factual information real or fake?
Real information, not fake or fabricated information.
Why ?
For several reasons
Firstly, pictorial writing is discovered every time, and the discoveries are not restricted to a single number or a fixed number. Every time there is a discovery, the discoveries have not stopped.
Secondly… there is very great care in writing about antiquities.
Third… pictorial writing in Misr maintains its characteristics even with any new discovery. The characteristics are constant and the same are present in any new discovery. These characteristics are:
Nature of the effect: coffins + graves
Effect form: It has one type
Writing script: pictorial
Writing material: solid (stone – wood)
Writing quality: great care.
So…this is a natural reality and not an invented reality. This is a real reality and not a fake reality.
Therefore, it is logical that this natural and real reality will represent a real, ancient, natural and real history that took place on Earth.
However……we believe that a false reality like this can be created, and inserted inside this real natural reality for many purposes.
I mean, for example……. Everyone knows that there are antiquities dealers who earn a lot of money by deceiving people by selling fake antiquities… Therefore, there will be no difficulty for anyone in designing fake antiquities, such as a stone slab or a wooden coffin, in the same style. Which was discovered in Misr, with pictorial writing on it in his handwriting, and then presented to people as unearthed ancient antiquities.
It is not difficult, but such a fabrication can be discovered to be false in many ways.
how ?
It is natural that many of the antiquities discovered in Misr bear constant and recurring characteristics, meaning that most of them will be of one quality and in a large proportion… The material would have been of one type of stone or of one type of wood… Therefore, it is possible through a process of comparison Detecting falsehood.
For example :
The writing material can be compared between the artifact, the authenticity of which is doubtful, with the materials that are confirmed and reliable to be authentic and that are discovered from time to time with writing on them… unless the material is stone or wooden.
– Comparing the method of writing between antiquities whose authenticity is doubtful, with the method of writing in confirmed antiquities, in terms of calligraphy and ink or engraving material. etc
And there are other ways.
From this approach…we believe that the Rosetta Stone, which was discovered by the French occupier, has a strange, suspicious, and abnormal reality, and requires a correct, realistic, logical explanation.
Why ?
Because this stone… has departed from the true natural realism found in most antiquities in Misr, and also deviates from the fixed characteristics found in any antiquity discovered in Misr.
how ?
Firstly…no other antiquity similar to it has been discovered…that is, the discovery is restricted to a single number or a fixed number…and the discovery of any antiquity like it has stopped.
Secondly… there is no great care in the way it is written.
Thirdly… the pictorial writing on the stone did not preserve its characteristics found in other discoveries.
Nature of the effect: stone
Shape of the monument: It has a new style (stone with three texts)
Writing font: Three different fonts
Writing language: two languages
Writing material: solid (stone – a rare type of stone)
Writing quality: There is no care in it.
Therefore, it is logical that this abnormal and strange reality present in the case of the Rosetta Stone will be the subject of questions about its authenticity.
Therefore……. We believe that the possibility is very, very high that it is a fabricated and fake reality and has been placed within the real natural reality, in order to deceive people.
It can be discovered that it is fake in many ways, including the previous comparison process.
how ?
When comparing the Rosetta Stone material with materials that are confirmed and reliable to be authentic and that are discovered every now and then with writing on them… we will find that the quality of the stone is strange and rare and there is nothing like it in large quantities in Misr.
– The method of writing on the Rosetta Stone is different from the method of writing on other confirmed antiquities, in terms of the nature of the quality.
The Rosetta Stone is the only stone with three lines written on it, and nothing like it was discovered in Misr, even 250 years after Napoleon’s invasion.
It is the only one in Misr in which the Demotic script appeared. No clear stone monument with Demotic writing was discovered in Misr. All the monuments on which the Demotic script was discovered are paper papyri.
Let us stop at this strangeness and move on to another strangeness in another piece of information found in Misr.
⚫ The second information
In the reality of Misr, we have another ancient writing in the Demotic script. In fact, we have a writing in the Demotic script that exists in Misr as well, and most of the Demotic antiquities are always written on stationery (papyrus).
– This is factual information that is completely confirmed and reliable, because it has actually been witnessed by any human being.
-But is this factual information real or fake?
Information that is fabricated and false and not natural or real information.
Why ?
We believe that the reality of ancient Misr or any other reality does not require the appearance of two different lines at the same age.
But if the age of the pictographic script in Misr is chronologically the first in Misr… then we believe that if there was in fact another script besides the hieroglyphic, such as the Demotic, then it would be a script that came after a very long time in Misr and was not contemporary with the hieroglyphic script. After the use of the pictorial script stopped and it became a regular script only… and when the script becomes a regular script then it will become forbidden to write in this script, because it will represent the memory of the first ancestors, while the other script will be like a script in which all people write, but as a new memory and it will be treated. It applies to all segments of society.
But what is strange and unnatural… is that we see in the reality of Misr that all Demotic writings are recorded on papyrus, despite their contemporaneity with writing on stones, and we have not discovered Demotic writings on walls, coffins, or stone tablets.
The only case that deviates from the established rule is the Rosetta Stone with Demotic writing written on it, and we have not discovered another stone like it with Demotic writing on it.
And here we ask a question?
What is the objection to having demotic writings on solid materials such as stones and coffins?
If the explanation that the West came up with to explain the strangeness of the Rosetta Stone, about the presence of two Egyptian scripts in one stone, and two identical texts written in them in one language, is that Misr in ancient times lived in a class system and the classes in society had a different writing from the writing of the other class, The upper class of priests deals with hieroglyphics, while the lower class of people deals with demotic… He has convinced people, researchers, and thinkers… It is difficult to be convinced that such a class interpretation… can also apply to reality again, to explain the reasons for Is this the prohibition and disallowance of the popular class from writing on walls, coffins, or stone tablets, and the restriction of stone and wooden material to the priestly class?!
I mean, it is possible, with great difficulty, to be convinced of a story of writing that is limited to a class in society… but it is more difficult to be convinced of a story of materials that is limited to a class in society.
Priests write on stones and wood only
People write on papyrus only
Difficult equation
Not only that…there is a strange situation that exists in the reality of the demotic writings.
What is it ?
Firstly…..there is no great care in her writing.
Secondly, and most importantly, there is no clear and striking correspondence between the symbols of the demotic script and the symbols of the hieroglyphic script, even though they are two Egyptian scripts that emerged from a single reality in Misr.
So…what is the realistic obstacle that can be believed to be the reason behind the lack of symbols in the Demotic script that are similar to the symbols of the hieroglyphic script?
There is no realistic objection…so what is the realistic reason?
Is the class interpretation also…the reason for preventing the lower class of people from writing in a script that contains symbols similar and identical to the script symbols of the upper class of priests?!
This means that it is possible, with great difficulty, to be convinced of a story of writing that is limited to a class in society, but it is difficult to be convinced of a story of written symbols that is limited to a class in society.
Priests write with certain symbols
People write in different symbols
I think it’s a difficult equation.
This false, fabricated reality is exposed by factual information found somewhere outside Misr.
⚫ The third information
In Yemen, we have writing in Musnad script, all of which are written on stones.
Now… if we think about the information about this reality… we will find that we actually have writing in the Musnad script found in Yemen, and most of it is written on solid material (stones).
– This is factual information that is completely confirmed and reliable, because it has actually been witnessed by any human being.
-But is this factual information real or fake?
Real information, not fake or fabricated information.
Why ?
We believe that writing in Musnad script is the first written form used by ancient people in Yemen to record and preserve information, and the importance of that information requires the presence of a material that is not affected by natural factors and remains for a very long life without any damage.
Therefore, in the reality of Yemen, we see writings in the Musnad script recorded only on solid material such as stones.
From time to time, tablets written in Musnad script are discovered.
This is a natural reality, not a made-up reality…. This is a real reality, not a fake reality.
Why ?
For several reasons
Firstly…….. traces are discovered at all times written in Musnad script, and the discoveries are not restricted to a single number or a fixed number…… Every period of time a discovery occurs and the discoveries do not stop.
Secondly… in many of them, there is care in writing about antiquities.
Third… Writing maintains its qualities even with any new discovery. The qualities are constant and the same are present in any new discovery. These characteristics are:
Nature of the effect: Statue panels
Effect form: It has one type
Writing script: Musnad
Writing material: solid (stone)
Writing quality: attention.
Therefore, it is logical that this natural and real reality will represent a real, ancient, natural and real history that took place on Earth.
However… there is no objection to fabricating a false reality and placing it within this real natural reality in Yemen or elsewhere.
But what is striking… is that we see in Yemen all the writings in the Musnad script, all recorded on stones, and we have not discovered writings in the Musnad script on papers, despite the knowledge of the Musnad script of Misr and its contemporaneity with the Demotic script that was written on papyri. .
how ?
According to the discoveries…a wooden coffin with an inscription in the Musnad script was discovered in Misr. This coffin was made at the same age as the Rosetta Stone, on which the Egyptian wrote in the Demotic script, and it was also written on the papyri in the Demotic script.
So the question?
Why did the culture of papyrus not spread among the Yemenis, given that they know Misr and it is logical that scientific and cultural exchange will occur, until the culture of papyrus spreads in Yemen?
what prevents you ?
It is illogical to believe that the current border interpretation could also apply to reality in order to prevent the ancient Yemenis from writing on paper papyrus, while the lower class people wrote on papyrus?!
Unless the class interpretation in the case of Misr also applies to Yemen
I mean, for example… it is possible, with great difficulty, to be convinced of a story of writing limited to one class in one society (the Egyptian), but it is difficult to be convinced of a story that materials are limited to a class in Egyptian society and to another class outside Misr.
Priests in Misr write only on stones and wood
People in Misr write only on papyrus
Priests in Yemen write only on stones and wood
Difficult equation
Not only that… there is something else very striking in the reality of the Musnad line.
What is it ?
There is a clear, striking and prominent correspondence between the symbols of the Musnad script and the symbols of the hieroglyphic script… even though they are two scripts that emerged from two different realities (Misr and Yemen).
Logical question:
What is the realistic explanation that can be believed to be the reason why all the symbols of the Musnad script are identical to the symbols of the hieroglyphic script?
Why is the predicate identical with the hieroglyphic in the symbols of calligraphy and in the writing material (stone) even though they are two scripts found in two different places (Yemen – Misr), while the Demotic is not identical with the hieroglyphic in the symbols of the calligraphy and in the writing material (stone – paper) even though they are Two lines exist in one place (Misr).
Is class also…the reason that allowed the priestly class in Yemen to write in a script whose symbols are all identical to the script symbols of the priestly class in Misr?!
This means that it is possible, with great difficulty, to be convinced of the story of writing that is limited to one class in one society, and it is also possible to be convinced of the story of different written symbols between the classes in one society……….but it is difficult to be convinced of the story of one writing symbols that is limited to one class. In two different societies.
The priestly class in Misr wrote with hieroglyphic symbols
The people in Misr write with different symbols
– The priestly class in Yemen writes with symbols identical to the symbols of the priestly class in Misr.
What is the explanation?
Were the priests of Misr the same as the priests of Yemen, and were they the ones who chose the same hieroglyphic symbols for them?
So…was religion the same in Misr and Yemen?!
If there was one religion… then what is the written line of the people in Yemen?
nothing .
It is clear that it is a very difficult reality…..and it is certain that there is false and fabricated information placed within a natural and real reality, which caused us difficulty in thinking about this reality, and made us produce wrong interpretations.
So…what is this fake information that was crammed into a natural and real reality that is the reason?
If we think carefully… we will find that it is… the Demotic line.
Yes…the Demotic script is a false and fabricated reality, exposed by the Musnad script found in Yemen.
Why ?
First… one of the reasons for the difficulty of understanding the story of reality… is that when people currently think about the ancient past, they always think through modern concepts, which people in ancient times, in all parts of the world, never knew, and they project them onto the past… These are the concepts of borders, nationalities, and nationalities.
In other words… people all over the earth were one nation… and one religion… and all differences today are a relatively recent phenomenon in human reality.
So
It is illogical… that people in Yemen, far from Misr, were keen to go to Misr to import their writing symbols from the hieroglyphic script in Misr, while the residents of Misr were prohibited from choosing their writing symbols from the hieroglyphic script.
It is illogical… that people in Yemen, far from Misr, were keen to choose the same materials on which the hieroglyphic script was written (stones and wood), while the residents of Misr were prevented from writing on stones. And wood, so they invented papyrus to write on.
The Demotic script… is fake and fabricated… and exposes the fact that most of the papyri are in Western museums… and most of the scientific material in them… is pictures of cartoon children’s stories… such as a deer He plays with a lion and a fox leading a flock of sheep while holding a stick in his hand.
The pictorial script that is called the hieroglyphic script is the first written script that appeared on earth. It is the first script with which the first human being on earth wrote. And the script that appeared in Misr after the hieroglyphs is the script that is called the Musnad script…….. Yes, the Musnad script. It is the script that the ancient Egyptian wrote on a wooden coffin and buried in sacred tombs next to what are falsely called the pyramids.
The ancient written lines in the region never knew the identities or concepts of geographical borders (the Sykes-Picot borders), and they are the lines from which all people emerged in ancient times. They are the lines of the beginnings of all people on earth, and in them is recorded the memory of the first man on earth.
{And We gave Musa the Book after We had destroyed the first generations, as insight for mankind and guidance and mercy so that they might remember.}