8/20/2021 0:00:01
Did the West reach secularism as a result of the movement of an ancient, natural religious reality that took place in Europe, events that prompted the emergence of the French Revolution that spread secularism, or did secularism and the Church appear at the same time as a result of a historical agreement between the West?
in another meaning
We always hear a lot of secularists in the region, and they repeat one cylinder when dealing with the problems of the region, by making a comparison between the reality of the region today with the reality of Europe in the past, and that the reality of the region existed in Europe in the past…..and the European solution must be imported. With the religion that changed the reality of Europe.
According to the historical context that took place in Europe…the Church ruled Europe with religious rule, and its rule resulted in many problems, such as wars, fighting, and fighting against science, and this thing made the reality of Europe under the religious rule of the Church produce many ideas in society, These ideas are what prompted some in France to revolutionize against church rule in France, and thanks to France, secularism spread in Europe.
Is this logic correct?
The truth is that the two realities are not identical at all.
If we assume that the historical context of Europe is correct… then the religious institution is the one that ruled Europe, while in our reality religion never rules. The religious institution is subordinate to the ruler and not the other way around.
However…this is not our topic…our topic is:
Is that historical context of Europe correct?
No… the context of history is completely false, and there was no French revolution against the church… Rather, there was a process of agreement between two occupying powers in Europe to create a new religion on earth and spread it globally.
This new industry of religion requires creating a false, ancient historical context for this new religion, in order to give it a historical origin on earth and hide its modernity on earth, to hide an ancient truth on earth as well.
These two powers want to share the project of this new religion between them, and each power needs a realistic event to confirm it…and that ancient, false historical context that was written for the religion, needs to be shared equally by the two powers, so that each section becomes an intellectual ideology for each. Power as they go out to conquer the world.
This thing… made one of the two powers adopt the church of the new religion, and this power proved to the world the reality of this new religion.
While…the other force adopted a historical event, which was the revolution against the Church of the new religion. This force proved to the world the reality of the false historical context of this new religion.
And this agreement… was not limited to this matter. Rather, the two powers shared the intellectual project resulting from the creation of this new religion. Each force carried an intellectual project sponsored by a central institution in which scientists worked, so that each force could export ideas to the people, in order to… Framing people within their intellectual borders, to preserve human societies within their circles of thought and world view, to ensure that societies remain under the auspices of their central institution affiliated with them, because this thing ensures that their control over people and their control over them remains, to ensure that any project anywhere on earth is passed easily, And ensuring that their plunder remains for the people.
The intellectual project resulting from this new religion is nothing but the Roman calendar, consisting of a zero point, which is the point of agreement, the point of creating the new religion.. and at that point the hypothetical character who will be attributed the founding of their new religion was killed.
And around that zero point there are two historical sides, a historical side from the left and a historical side from the right… like a cross.
The northern side is before the birth of the founder of the new religion, and it has a hypothetical historical context, creating in people’s imagination an intellectual view of the world, and this world view will be sponsored by the force that will revolt against the church of the new religion… in the name of secular and non-religious thought… to be the leader of secularism. In the world .
The side on the right is after the birth of the founder of the new religion, and it has a hypothetical historical context, creating in people’s imagination an intellectual view of the world, and this world view will be sponsored by the force that will build the church of the new religion… in the name of religious philosophical thought… to be the leader of the church. In the world .
This is the bottom line