2020-04-01T09:35:00-09:00
Let us get rid of sensitivity towards any criticism we put forward, even if it carries a kind of harshness (which is wrong), as we are busy criticizing logic and thought, and we are not exposed at all to intellectual figures at all. On the contrary, we love them, revere them, and appreciate them.
We criticize an intellectual approach only, and it is wrong to comment on any criticism that it was written by someone who is arrogant to people or someone who is trying to rise at the expense of heights… This should not be the perception… The criticism should be directed to the material only… without any input. People.
Then the question: For whom do our thinkers write all these books?!
Isn’t it for everyone to read it… So, the reader has the right to criticize it without sensitivity or any other interpretation… Because it is wrong to turn intellectual production, regardless of its size, into a personal idol, because knowledge will become limited to what a person says. Whatever this statement is, it is not certain how true any statement is. .
I do not want to repeat my constant discussion on any topic that deals with the production of our thinkers, in order to break a psychological barrier that is always repeated when we discuss criticism of any thought….. I love and respect the thinkers Fadel Al-Rubaie and Ahmed Dawud, and my library contains their productions.
We have the right to criticize their production. It is true that we do not reach the cognitive and intellectual level, but this does not prevent us from criticizing their production at all. Until we get rid of this barrier, the subject can be considered a student presenting a point that the professor missed.
Why am I constantly focused on this aspect?
There are some people who believe that the issue is an internal complex regarding a certain idea that is repeated in the productions of Fadel Al-Rubaie or Ahmed Dawoud, but the truth is that the matter is not a complex at all, but because the ideas that are repeated in Fadel Al-Rubaie and Ahmed Dawoud are fundamental points that cause an increase in the difficulty of people getting out of… The ongoing Zionist awareness in the region… this is how I see it.
———————
Now, allow me to speak freely in criticizing Al-Fikri’s approach and explain the true location in which the production of thinkers Fadel Al-Rubaie, the historian, and Ahmed Dawoud exists… without sensitivity.
Where are Fadel Al-Rubaie and Ahmed Dawoud located?!
In the last rectangle in the picture… in brief.
Why ?
The structure of intellectual production by Fadel Al-Rubaie and Ahmed Dawood is based on a solid fundamental foundation, which is the theory of evolution, and the other foundation is relying on other people’s texts and reinterpreting them only.
Evolution is clearly the rule controlling their production……and this theory, which the West seeks to make a doctrine and the foundation of knowledge, has influenced many aspects of other sciences and created a structure of knowledge that explains the world with the same idea of evolution…and this will be reflected in every… The process of thinking about the phenomena around us.
how ?!
■ According to Fadel Al-Rubaie
Fadel Al-Rubaie relies on the Book of the Al-Yahoud as an authentic historical document and believes that it is authentic, and he always calls it the Torah, but he never relies on the Qur’an in producing it.
Although he is supposed to rely on the Qur’an as a historical document, just as he relies on the book of the Al-Yahoud as a historical document, and make it a basis and basis for reading history… especially since the Qur’an is an origin for him and belongs to him more than the book of the Al-Yahoud, and this point may be a reason for his awareness of something that he missed. And he doesn’t know.
For example, the Qur’an says to Fadil al-Rubaie: {Indeed, We sent down the Torah, in which is guidance and light. The prophets who submitted to it judged for those who were Al-Yahoud, and the Rabbis and the Rabbis, because they guarded themselves from the Book of Allah and were witnesses to it. So do not fear the people, but fear Me, and do not exchange My verses for a small price. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – those are the disbelievers.}
The Qur’an praises the Torah and never criticizes it……And this speech in the Qur’an, which is clear, frank, and commanding, will make us believe that it is assumed that the Muslim will carry with him (the Torah) alongside (the Qur’an)… or in other words, it will be (a book). The Al-Yahoud) alongside the Qur’an with the Muslim today.
That is, the Muslim is supposed to carry (the Book of the Al-Yahoud) and (the Qur’an) with him today… and when the Muslim carries (the Book of the Al-Yahoud) and (the Qur’an) we will be in an incorrect situation… because (the Book of the Al-Yahoud) contains different stories. Exactly about the stories in the Qur’an… Which is the Torah then?!
In the Qur’an there is the story of (the two sons of Adam)… and in the Jewish book there is the story of (Abel and Cain)… Which is the correct story?!
In the Qur’an, the story appears as news, and in the Book of the Al-Yahoud, it appears as a story from the past……and this is the point that Fadel al-Rubaie does not want to comprehend.
how ?!
There is a difference between people’s stories and news. People’s stories are told for entertainment and education, while news is a story that will happen in reality and people must know about it. This news is the essential tool from which the culture of prophets in our region emerged.
But Fadel Al-Rubaie looks at the issue from an evolutionary perspective. For example, he believes that there is no such thing as theft in religions, and that the word theft is faulty logic… It is one religious structure for one religious origin and has taken multiple forms for one essence due to time, for example. It is believed that the story of Abel and Cain in the Jewish book is a story that contains within it an ancient truth that was in previous religions talking about two people who had a dispute, and in Islam that truth developed until it reached the wording found in the Qur’an.
But the matter is different in our case… because the news was not said by anyone before the news. It is recent news that was revealed and can only be understood in the same wording in which it is found and in the original language in which it was revealed.
That is, every story that resembles the news will be a story that was written after the news and does not contain any truth within it, and has no meaning. Rather, it serves the function of preventing and cutting off the news from reaching people… especially if you make this story older than the news… then it will be You are a thief and you did this work until time stopped for those who reported the news.. Your job will be to create corruption.
There is an explicit command in the Qur’an for the Muslim to have the Torah with him, but we find that the Muslim today did not take the book of the Al-Yahoud and content himself with the Qur’an, but rather considers it distorted.
And if the Book of the Al-Yahoud is the Torah, according to Al-Rubaie’s belief, then what is the benefit when Allah commands the Muslim to write the Book of the Al-Yahoud, which will be with the Muslim and the stories in the Book of the Al-Yahoud are the same as the stories of the Qur’an?! Rather, there will be a severe contradiction and contradiction among the Muslim… The Muslim knows only Allah, and in the book of the Al-Yahoud his name is Allah (Yahweh), so does Allah change his name from one book to another, and is it necessary for a Muslim to learn Hebrew in order to read the book of the Al-Yahoud? Or will we translate the book of the Al-Yahoud into Arabic so that we can read it?
But if the book of the Al-Yahoud is not the Torah and the Qur’an praises the Torah so much, then it is assumed that the Muslim now has the Torah in addition to the Qur’an… but this did not happen… why?!
Because the Qur’an is the reading (the Qur’an) of the Torah…………. Because the first written lines in which the Qur’an was written are called (the Torah)… Just as the Muslim Qur’an sanctifies the word of Allah, the Muslim also sanctified the Torah, the lines of the book. .
But the Torah was hidden from the people by a force, and because of its concealment, this force was able to write the book of the Al-Yahoud, which they made similar to the Qur’an, so that Fadel al-Rubaie thought it was the Torah and one religion that came from Allah.
Then a human group was brought from Asia and given this new book that was similar to the Qur’an. Then a hypothetical date was written for them inside a hypothetical Western calendar inside the house of Fadel Al-Rubaie, and then they settled them in the house of Fadel Al-Rubaie…and after For a while, they gathered them into a room in his house.
Due to the absence of this thing from Fadel Al-Rubaie… Fadel Al-Rubaie became present in rectangle number (3).
And Fadel Al-Rubaie, inside rectangle No. (3), became confused about the origins of this group that occupied a room in his house, due to the absence of any trace of them in the room in which they are now present…..and in order to fight the legitimacy of their presence in one of the rooms of his house, and After research, he found that their true origin was in another room inside his house, and that the descriptions in their book applied to the other room, and that their book was even written in the other room.
But he does not say that this group must be moved from the room in which they are currently present to the other room, but rather he says that their true origins are only the first, and that they were originally ancient Arabs who lived in the past in that other room and then were dispersed throughout all the rooms of the house after someone from the house took them captive. Today they were gathered in a room in his house.
And all of this is because Fadel Al-Rubaie… was not a witness to the reality during the period when the occupier entered his house while he was settling this human group inside the rooms of his house because he does not have documents for that period, as the printer did not enter him at that time……. .. Then he entered the printer and produced a hypothetical date for him to make an ancient original for them in his house, then after 150 years he collected them for a room inside his house and the occupier left his house.
And this is something that Fadel Al-Rubaie cannot comprehend… because he is more attached to books, and reads the reality of his home from within the books written by the occupier, who made that group occupy one of the rooms of his house, and he was absent from reading the reality without relying on any texts belonging to the other… He neglected an authentic and correct text, such as a will, which is present in his house… a will from his ancestors so that he would not get lost inside this game, which is (the Qur’an), which explains the whole game to him… and he replaced it with the book of the Al-Yahoud and the texts of the occupier who occupied his room. And the Al-Yahoud were placed there.
His belief in the Book of the Al-Yahoud as an authentic historical document and his abandonment of the Qur’an is the reason why he created this approach based on these foundations.
1- The theory of evolution (religions evolved until they reached their current state)
2- Relying on the texts of the occupier (Jewish writers, Western history books, Western translations of ancient inscriptions)
3- Neglecting reality.
And these foundations… are what placed him in rectangle No. (3), which the occupier designed for him… and made his production confined to a cell that the occupier made for him… and produced theories that were in line with perceptions. the West .
For example… these foundations made Fadel Al-Rubaie look at the Torah as an ancient Yemeni writer, which is the book of the Al-Yahoud, and he began to see the ancient world from the perspective of my identities, and he forgot that there are 450 million people in the region, in Iraq, in the Levant, in Yemen, in Misr, in the Naqraq. They have readers who tell them that the Torah is a book of guidance and light for all people and does not bear any regional character.
The world began to see the ancient world as multiple peoples with languages and religions, and forgot to see reality as having a unity that contradicts these perceptions found in the book of the Al-Yahoud.
If one reflects on the Qur’an that he inherited from his ancestors, he will find that it is based on completely different foundations from the foundations on which he built his approach.
1- There is no development in religion in the Qur’an.. It is one religion.
{Indeed, the religion with Allah is Islam, and those who were given the Book did not differ except after knowledge had come to them, out of envy among themselves, and whoever disbelieves in the verses of Allah, then Allah is swift in reckoning.}
2- People were one nation… from the beginning
{The people were one nation, so Allah sent the prophets as bearers of good tidings and warnings, and sent down with them the Book with the truth, that He might judge between the people in that in which they differed, and none differed in it except those who were given it, after the clear proofs had come to them, out of envy among themselves. So Allah guided those who believed to the truth to the truth, with His permission, Allah guides whom He wills to a straight path. }
3- The Torah is guidance and light for people, not a Yemeni book
{Indeed, We have sent down the Torah, in which is guidance and light. The prophets who submitted to those who were Al-Yahoud judged by it, and the Rabbis and the Rabbis, because they had guarded themselves from the Book of Allah and were witnesses to it. So do not fear people, but fear Me, and do not exchange My verses for a small price. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – those are the disbelievers.}
4- The Jewish book is a toy so that people think it is the Torah
{A Book whose verses are explained in detail. We recite in Arabic for a people who know. And among them is a group who twist their tongues with the Book so that you may think it is from the Book, but it is not from the Book. They say, “It is from Allah,” but it is not from Allah, and they say lies about Allah while they know.}
—————————-
■ According to Ahmed Daoud
I believe that it is completely one structure… according to Ahmed Daoud and Al-Rubaie… based on the theory of evolution and on relying on and trusting the texts of the occupying other, neglecting reality and neglecting the readers.
But Ahmed Dawoud is distinguished by his passion for the theory of evolution, and this theory is the core of his production. He reads history in a purely evolutionary way in understanding religions, myths, and languages.
He relies to a large extent on the Greek books of the West that were written about the region in reading history, and this thing made him see the world in a Greek way and that all of this world came out of the Syriac (Greek) civilization.
He believes that everything found in Greek books are correct texts written in ancient times, and he believes in their truth even if they make him enter a magical space. He believes that reality in ancient times was subject to those laws found in Greek books… because of the size of the Syriac-Greek books that It is the foundation of civilization.
This was reflected in his production and theories
He believes, for example, that the geography of the Book of the Al-Yahoud is in Asir, and he believes that the Book of the Al-Yahoud is called the Torah… just like Al-Rubaie’s theory.
It is believed that the Arabic language at its beginning was called (Arabs)… because at the beginning the word must be different from the name it is today, because the law of evolution will impose the logic of changing from the original word until its name becomes (Arabic).
He also believes that the Syriac language, in which the Jewish Book was written, is a language prior to Arabic, just as Fadel al-Rubaie believes that the Jewish Book is the Torah and precedes the Qur’an.
But for Ahmed Dawoud, he specializes in languages and mythology.
Ahmed Dawoud, because he specializes in languages, also believes that the beginning of the language was a different language that is not spoken today… because awareness depends on evolution. For example, he believes that the first language must contain vocabulary different from today’s vocabulary… and today’s vocabulary has evolved from that ancient vocabulary.
For example, according to his logic…that in the first language, humans used to call an animal that barked “dog.” Then the language developed and people began calling it “dog.”
This is the fundamental concept of language perception according to Ahmed Daoud.
But the truth is, I do not know why he does not want to understand that there is no word for legend in Arabic according to the definition he provides, and that it is a story that carries within it an ancient truth, because the word legends in the Qur’an means writings.
This is the point he does not want to understand
Because the essence of the matter… Where are the writings of ancient Greece that can be trusted in order to write a correct history or know the movement of religions?!
nothing
Ahmed Dawoud relies on books written with a very modern printer, but he believes that they are texts that describe an ancient world, so how can it be scientifically possible to produce correct theories of an ancient reality through texts from a modern printer?!
Where are the writings of the ancients, which contain all those stories that he calls legends, treats of them, and believes that they were the imaginations of man on earth?!
nothing
Ahmed Dawoud, because he does not want to reach rectangle (2)… This thing has made its location become in rectangle number (3)… and all of its production is confined within rectangle (3) and will not leave that circle.
how ?!
The word “Legends of the Ancients” in the Qur’an means the writings of the ancients. It means that the Qur’an says to Ahmed Daoud that what is in the Qur’an is present itself in the writings of the ancients and in a clear Arabic tongue (Arabic language)… and they are the first names with which man was found on earth… the first language ( first tongue)
It means that the word (Adam) has been in people’s consciousness since ancient times, and the ancient nations knew a person by the name (Ibrahim)… by this name.
The ancient nations knew that the universe had a Creator and one Allah, just like Ahmed Dawoud today.
But Ahmed Dawoud does not want to read the reality of the region well, and he does not want to understand the meaning of the first names and the meaning that the doctrine does not develop and the beginning is one doctrine, one language, and only one point.
This thing made him believe that all the Asakir written by the Greeks and written by the West from the inscriptions of the region are true and that they were the stories of the ancients, and this thing made him believe that all peoples had one similar myth in creation and so on… and the similarity between them is evidence of It is of one origin and within it is reality.
His words are very true… but not as he imagined
Because all these myths emerged from only one origin, which is the West, which enchants people with a fairy-tale world only… and Ahmed Daoud believes that they are stories that took place over many centuries and took evolutionary forms until they reached today’s form.
There is a truth that exists behind those myths, but that truth that Ahmed Dawoud did not realize… is that there is a hidden, clear truth, and there is a Western consciousness that tries to invent magical stories that are similar to this clear, hidden truth… so that Ahmed Dawoud believes that the world He followed this evolutionary method of understanding the world until he reached the current model.
Now Ahmed Daoud is in the last rectangle, and when he reads the West’s translations, he will believe that the West told him the truth, while the West presented him with a false magic story… and he believed in it and believed it was real, and this thing made him believe:
That the word (Haw) means the earth and the mother, and the origin of the word Eve came from the word (Haw) and Eve means the earth and the mother. Indeed, the word “living” has its origins in Eve, which is a symbol of fertility for the first man.
The word “Hour” in Al-Arabah has a Syriac-Arabic origin (because the Syriac language in which the Jewish book was written preceded Al-Arabah)…and its origin is (Haw), which means fertility and life.
But he does not know that the Westerner invented the name (Ho) for him only, because he trusted the Westerner absolutely and believed his stories and believed that man in ancient times could think in such a way that the Westerner invented for him, but because of his cunning and his awareness that the theory of evolution has become the people’s belief, he He invented for the people myths bearing names modified from original names present in the people’s tongue or in their sacred text, because he knew that thinkers whose method was based on a fundamental basis, which is evolution, would believe in them and would believe that the current names present in the people’s tongue had an ancient origin, according to what the Westerner wrote.
Ahmad Daoud will see the story of the two gods (Damt and Hu) as similar to the story of (Adam and Eve), even with the names being similar in kind, and therefore it is certain that they are of the same origin… and the story of (Damt and Hu) is the true origin of the story of (Adam and Eve). .
Although the Qur’an does not speak at all about Eve and does not recognize this name.
Ahmed Dawoud does not know that the West gave him a magical, imaginary story from his imagination to make him think in this wrong way, after they forged the writings of his first ancestors.
{A Book whose verses are explained in detail. We recite in Arabic for a people who know. But the devils disbelieved, teaching people magic.}
This is the true summary of Ahmed Dawoud’s production, and this is the true site from which he will never depart… Rectangle No. (3), and he does not know that it is inside a tight square designed by the West… and will never depart from the circle of the Zionist project… Who doesn’t want people to leave it.
{A Book whose verses are detailed, an Arabic Qur’an for a people who know (3) a bringer of good tidings and a warner, but most of them turned away, so they did not hear (4) and they said, “Our hearts are hidden from what you call us to, and in our ears is deafness, and between us and you there is a veil, so act. Indeed, we will work.” {If We sent it down as reciters in Arabic, that you may understand.}