2020-04-01T09:35:00-11:00
Logical question:
How does Ibn Khaldun talk about the Musnad script in such detail, which indicates that he is a knowledgeable person and is well acquainted with this issue? He says that the Musnad script has separate letters and gives us information as a fact that says (and from Himyar Misr learned Arabic writing) and he never visited Yemen.. ..But he lived in Misr for about 25 years and never talks about Egyptian inscriptions…… He does not see the reality that exists around him in Misr, and he does not compare with his scientific mind between the Musnad calligraphy that he talked about and the pen that exists in Misr. ….until he realizes according to his rational, scientific and realistic approach…this approach that Western and Arab thinkers always talk about in lengthy articles that has created for him a great aura and cognitive authority over the minds of our thinkers…until he realizes that the pen of the predicate and The pen in Misr are identical, and that the Musnad pen was born from the womb of the pen in Misr, and that the Musnad came from Misr, and that Himyar, who accompanied the Musnad, was the one who learned Arabic writing from Misr… and not the opposite, according to the words of Ibn Khaldun, the owner of the scientific and realistic approach and The rational…..and until he also realizes that the first pen is located in Misr and all the pens in the region emerged from the pen located in Misr.
Is it possible that throughout Ibn Khaldun’s life in Misr, which was 25 years, they did not notice any ancient inscriptions in Misr?! Is it possible that this man has never encountered, throughout his life in Misr, any archaeological discovery by a simple citizen, nor has he seen any temples in Misr nor visited one of those temples that are very, very high above the surface of the earth and that it is impossible for them to be buried underground?!
Ibn Khaldun knew the Musnad, even though the Yemeni inscriptions and writings found in Yemen do not compare at all to the size of the inscriptions and writings found in Misr… It is true that the inscriptions in Yemen are many, but the ones in Misr are much more prominent and clear. Very, very, and not buried in the ground, but rather very prominent inside very large temples, and it is impossible for it to be buried….. Rather, in places that indicate the presence of very continuous care and attention for it……. And it is impossible to believe that These huge temples were buried under the sand during the reign of Ibn Khaldun. In fact, any ordinary person in Misr, if he dug a place with his hand, would find ancient ruins.
Is it possible that Ibn Khaldun talks about the Musnad script as an Arabic script, but he calls it the Himyarite script and the Musnad script, and he saw it and knew that its letters are separate, and he did not visit Yemen, but at the same time he lived in Misr for 25 years, and he never saw the script that exists in Misr. And he did not see its separate letters either…. He did not see the correspondence between the Musnad pen and the pen in Misr and the clear origins between the two, so that he could narrate to us, according to his scientific, rational and realistic method, that magical fantasy story that talks about the pen’s first journey?!
There is no reality
And there is no knowledge
And there is no mind
Where is this man’s rational, scientific and realistic approach, which our cultural magazines and seminars celebrate?!
Was this man, Ibn Khaldun… working for the benefit of the West, Napoleon, and the French military campaign against Misr and the region, which destroyed the inscriptions of Misr and the region? He does not want any Egyptian, Arab, or Muslim to approach the inscriptions of Misr at all, nor does he want to speak with any reference to the pen in Misr and alert the reader to its presence in the ancient world… nor does he want to provide any real, realistic knowledge about that pen. Rather, he wants to falsify reality and distort the mind… so as not to reach the contents of the Egyptian inscriptions and the truth of the Rosetta Stone that France brought.
Did Ibn Khaldun…want to leave the task of talking about the pen in Misr to other figures of Greek nationalities working for the French campaign?!
This strange, unscientific, and unrealistic approach confirms that we are actually facing an approach based on writing an imaginary virtual world in which the inscriptions of Misr are completely hidden from the reality that is connected to us today.
This approach is nothing but the cunning Napoleonic approach that came with the Rosetta Stone, and is now trying to carry out a process of cognitive obliteration, and write a new memory for the residents of Misr and the residents of the region…. The approach is based on removing people from reality and introducing them into an imaginary, virtual space, to remove their connection. To the land and make it disconnected from their reality, and make the land not belong to them.
The approach is based on writing a new memory, erasing the original memory, in order to prevent any Muslim or Arab from reaching the first pen with which the sacred text they carry was written.
Ibn Khaldun is nothing but an ink and paper character located in France, written and published by a French orientalist in 1856 AD named Catermier.
Abdul Rahman Ibn Khaldoun Al-Katermiri lol
{And they plotted their plot, and with Allah is their plot, even though it was their plot, the mountains would move away from it.}
.
.