2019-01-20T00:05:00-08:00
The illusion of imaginary time and imaginary history is the main reason for the difficulty in realizing that the doctrine does not appear suddenly at all, and the linguistic system of the texts of the doctrine does not appear suddenly at all.
Doctrine has an ancient, continuous, uninterrupted context. The context begins at the beginning of the appearance of the first linguistic system from which the sacred texts of the doctrine emerged. This system continues throughout this context from the beginning of the appearance of the first sacred religious text and never disappears until today.
There is no such thing as development in doctrine. This is a lie. Doctrine never develops, because doctrine is only an answer to the question of existence and destiny. It means believing in an absolute existence beyond life and believing in the day of the afterlife, regardless of the nature of the reason. The doctrine remains constant and does not change at all… only knowledge accumulation occurs about the doctrine.
The only thing that changes in the structure of religion is a gradual transition in the process of writing sacred texts from the reference of the first written form in which the sacred text was written, so writing takes multiple forms throughout the temporal context of the faith, and these written forms are considered sacred forms by believers.
Not understanding this thing, in addition to not understanding the trick of imaginary time and imaginary history, is one of the most important reasons for not understanding the existence of a very ancient book of Islam, and not understanding what is the book in which there is no doubt, a guidance for the righteous, and this book whose verses are detailed is an Arabic Quran for a people who know. The difficulty of understanding the true meaning of the Torah and the Enjil , and the failure to understand that the Torah and the Enjil are ancient and sacred scripts, and that the first copy of the Holy Qur’an was written in the Torah script.
It is also the main reason for the difficulty in realizing that the Old Testament book has no relation to the Torah, neither closely nor remotely.
The Qur’anic verse {The likeness of those who carried the Torah and then did not carry it is like the likeness of a donkey carrying books. Miserable is like the people who denied the verses of Allah. Allah guides not the wrongdoing people}, accurately summarizes our previous hadith.
What is the meaning of the word Asfar?
Many still today believe that the books mentioned in the Qur’an mean the books of the Old Testament…wrong.
Asfar is the plural of travel, which is the load of travel, and in colloquial terms, sofar still means the dining table, meaning something that combines and carries several things.
In Arabic, we do not refer to anything related to a book as “travel” or “travels.” Travels in Arabic do not mean books at all, and travel does not mean a book.
This is an illusion and a lie
The verse talks about a different topic and the word means something different. The verse likens an action to an image from life, to a donkey carrying books.
Just a simile.
{The likeness of those who carried the Torah and then did not carry it is like the likeness of a donkey carrying books.}
And the meaning of the verse
● The example of those who carried the Torah for a period of time, then they got rid of this load and carried something else, like the example of a donkey carrying books.
● Like those who used the Torah for a period of time and then abandoned it and used something else, like the donkey that carries books.
● The Qur’an is like someone who used the Torah in the past and then abandoned it, like the donkey that always carries travel loads, that is, the donkey that carries the travel load, because the donkey carries while traveling, then after a period of time it abandons its load (upon arrival), to then carry another new travel load. .
● This verse addresses the original owners of the Torah, who carried the Torah in the past for a period of time, then abandoned it and carried something else. The Qur’an likens them to a donkey that carries and then abandons its burden.
● That is, those who used to write in the past in the script of the Torah, then abandoned it and then moved on to write in another script…they are like the donkey that always carries books, because it always carries and abandons its load and does not retain its load.
● In other words… like those who in ancient times understood the meaning of the Torah, and then do not understand the meaning of the Torah now, their likeness is like the donkey that carries the scrolls, because the donkey carries the scrolls and abandons them after a while.
● In a more precise and brief sense…. Believe me… If the Qur’anic verse had said {their likeness is like a donkey carrying stirrups}, today you would be reading that the book of the Old Testament is composed of five stirrups and not five books.
Muslims are the ones who carried the Torah in ancient times and then put it down. They actually deceived people because of the fake time and history.
Muslims are the donkey that always carries books, and it is not known to this day that he carried them in ancient times.
.
.
.