12/03/2020 00:00
Is Greek civilization real and appeared in reality, or is it a virtual civilization created by a project of Western elites that was manufactured before the advent of printing?
We have spoken in a previous article about a topic that revolves around this same question, about the natural context of Greek civilization… It is true that we talked about the topic through a realistic, logical reading, and comparison with civilization… but the truth… This is not enough for a final ruling to be made on the matter. Because the issue requires evidence or evidence to confirm this.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=708605356742397&id=100027788172171
But what is the evidence and how can it be created?!
The truth is…the issue of thinking about the nature of the evidence is the most difficult thing in the subject…meaning, what the evidence should be like.
Whoever thinks about it… the first idea that comes to his mind is just a time machine, so that it transports us to the ancient time of Greece and truly confirms this civilization whose news and stories reached us through printer’s books… and this thing is not possible and cannot be. Currently done (on a possible future basis over time).
If you consider the issue well… you will find it difficult to find certain evidence, as long as there are those who talk about their civilization and we cannot easily deny it… but evidence can be found by searching in written records of other peoples who lived at the same time. Greek civilization…and we read what was written about them.
Such a thing also seems difficult……. for several reasons, because we do not have writings except printed books as well.
But there are very ancient writings on stones that appear to be of ancient age, and according to history, the Greeks were contemporary with those ancient writings on stones, although it does not make sense because other peoples wrote on stones while the Greeks wrote on paper and did not leave behind ancient stone writings.
But even if we assume the logic of the matter that other peoples write on stones and the Greeks did not leave stone writings, the search for evidence will also seem difficult, because we do not know how to read those inscriptions.
But if we assume that we are good at reading these ancient writings:
He also knows that the Greek civilization lived through the end of the Egyptian civilization, and they wrote many books about the Egyptian civilization, and Greek historians visited Misr and wrote a lot about it, and recorded therein languages, religions, customs, and the names of Egyptian kings.
Among these people are Herodotus (the father of history) and Strabo, the most famous Greek historians.
Herodotus… wrote about an ancient Egyptian king named (Ramesses)
Strabo… wrote about an ancient Egyptian king named (Ramesses)
Strabo… almost wrote many stories about King Ramses and other ancient Egyptian kings, and most of the stories of ancient Egyptian history are based on stories written by Strabo.
When France came in the modern era… to invade and occupy Misr… then one of its scholars, Champollion, succeeded… in deciphering Misr’s inscriptions and succeeded in making us read Misr’s inscriptions… and we were able to read the name of the most famous Egyptian king… He (Ramesses).
how did it happen ?
When a relic from one of the temples of ancient Misr arrived to Champollion, with (the letters of a word) on it inside a circular frame… Champollion thought about reading it… and the following happened to him:
1- Champollion was fluent in the Tibetan language
2- Champollion was very educated and had read a lot about the history of ancient Misr from Greek books, and he knew the stories of Egyptian kings mentioned in Greek books, and among those kings was the most famous king (Ramesses), about whom Champollion had read a lot.
3- When Champollion saw the monument, he found the first symbol on it (sun), which in the Jebetic language is pronounced (ra’).
4 – The word was contained within a circular frame, and Champollion concluded that the words in the circular frame contained the names of ancient Egyptian kings.
Here Champollion thought and said…. This word reads (Rameses).
Indeed, reading began (Raameses) and Champollion succeeded in deciphering the inscriptions of Misr, and we discovered the stories of the Egyptian king (Raameses), whose name is written in many of the temples of ancient Misr and which Greek historians talked about.
The Egyptian King (Ramesses) was not only talked about by Greek historians, but was mentioned in the Jewish book (the Bible – the Old Testament), the book that the Greek king (Ptolemy) translated into Greek, and King (Ptolemy) is the same king whose name was found written in The Rosetta Stone inside a royal frame with hieroglyphs, the stone with three lines written on it, which was discovered by the French occupiers in Misr.
Now notice…the close connection between the presence of (Greek) and the appearance of King (Ramesses)
Strabo and Herodotus (the Greeks) were the first to speak about King Rameses.
(Ramesses) His name appeared in the Book of the Al-Yahoud when a (Greek king) translated the Book of the Al-Yahoud.
(Ramesses) appeared in Egyptian inscriptions, because Champlebon was educated and was familiar with (Greek) books.
After deciphering the Egyptian inscriptions, Western scholars began reading the stories of Rameses in the Egyptian inscriptions, which are identical to what Greek historians said about King Rameses.
—————————-
Now the fundamental question, which will serve as the final conclusive evidence that we were looking for…and this question:
Is this word translated by Champollion pronounced “Ramesses”?!
Assuming that we cannot read ancient Egyptian writing, we can answer the previous question, if we ask a simple question: How can we distinguish between the names of characters and ordinary vocabulary in Egyptian inscriptions, because Egyptian inscriptions contain very many symbols?!
But how did the ancient Egyptian write? Did he differentiate in the way he wrote people’s names and used regular vocabulary?
Yes, he was discriminating.
When the ancient Egyptian wanted to write someone’s name, whether it was a man or a woman, he would write his name with symbols that began with a symbol for a man or a woman.
If the symbol begins with the image of a seated man, then it is the name of a man (a king or an ordinary person), and if the symbol appears with the image of a seated woman, then it is the name of a woman (a queen or an ordinary woman).
If the word does not begin with a symbol for a seated man or woman, then it is just a regular word (ate, went out, played, … rain, clouds).
Question: Does the word translated by Champollion begin with the image of a sitting person, which he told us reads (Rameses), the name of the most famous king of ancient Misr, after whose discovery the world confirmed the stories of Greek and Jewish books in which the name (Rameses) appears?!
No… So Champollion’s translation is wrong, and the word is an ordinary word written in Egyptian inscriptions. It may mean (listen) or it may mean (life) and it has nothing to do with the name of an ancient character, or an Egyptian king.
How can you be more certain than this fact confirmed in Egyptian inscriptions?
{Among those who are Al-Yahoud, they distort words from their proper places and say, “We hear” and “we disobeyed,” and “Hear without listening,” and “We obeyed” with their tongues and defamed the religion. And if they had said, “We hear and we obey,” and “Listen and we will see,” it would have been better for them and more upright. But Allah has cursed them for their disbelief, so they do not believe except a few. (46) O you who have been given the book, believe in what We have revealed. Confirming what is with you before We obliterate faces and turn them back on their backs or curse them as We cursed the people of the Sabbath, and Allah’s command is in effect. (47) Indeed, Allah does not forgive that anyone associates anything with Him, but He forgives anything less than that to whom He wills. And whoever associates anything with Allah has invented a great sin. (48) Have you not seen? Those who purify themselves. Rather, Allah purifies whom He wills, and does not wrong them even by the slightest trace. (49) Look at how they invent a lie against Allah, and that is enough of it as a clear sin. (50) Have you not seen those who were given a share of the Book? They believe in Al-Jibt (Egypt) and Taghut (Dometic), and they say to those who disbelieve: “These are more guided to the way than those who believe.” (51) }
So how did Herodotus and Strabo talk about (Ramesses), and how did Jewish writers mention the name (Ramesses), and how did Champollion translate the word to (Ramesses) when this name did not exist at all in ancient times in Misr?!
So… Herodotus and Strabo… are names of hypothetical characters only, existing within a virtual world… written by the West to create a fictitious history of the Earth… and the book about the Al-Yahoud is written by the West to create a new religion on the Earth……. In order for the West, through Champollion, to be able to forge the Egyptian inscriptions, which are the book of the first man on earth
All of this is in order to hide the reality of man and the real land, and to create a new, magical, imaginary history for people.