1/14/2021 0:00:00
Why has no ancient trace of the prophets mentioned in the Qur’an been discovered to date?!
All these huge discoveries, great translations, and the long period since the beginning of archeology and excavation, but there is no mention of any of the prophets anywhere in the region, as if they are like a historical illusion, and the word of Allah is false and unreal. On the other hand, there are names of kings that are not It is strangely limited, but they are all from strange religions and worship a million strange gods and goddesses.
Because of this strange reality, which contradicts the Qur’an, three types of minds were produced:
1 – A mind that believes that the characters of the Qur’an are fictitious and have no reality.
Most of these minds are researchers and have the status of Egyptologists, such as Zahi Hawass, Majid Al-Khazali, and Firas Al-Sawah.
2 – Aql decided to reinterpret the Qur’an and began to believe that the prophets are only symbols or symbols.
Most of them are enlightened people who believe in a moral, non-corporeal religion.
3 – A mind that combines the two cases. He believes that the prophets are ancient figures, but they carry different names according to Western translations.
Most of them are those who believe in the translations of the West and the Qur’an, but believe that the Qur’an translates the names of those characters differently.
We will talk about the first mind because it is the cause of the other two minds, and we will impose an example, which is Zahi Hawass, the American hat wearer and the former Minister of Antiquities in Misr, as the best example.
Zahi Hawass was in an interview on a satellite channel, and the presenter asked him: Were the prophets mentioned in the inscriptions of Misr?! His answer was with complete confidence: No, and that there is no mention, from afar or near, of the prophets of the Ibrahim religions in the inscriptions of Misr.
Indeed, Zahi Hawass’s answer was almost and somewhat correct, but the wording of his answer was very cunning.
Why ?
Because the question should be asked in a different way, by asking two questions:
* Have the names of characters found in the Muslim Quran been discovered inside Egyptian inscriptions?
Zahi Hawass’ answer will be: Absolutely not.
* Have the names of characters present in the Jewish book been discovered inside Egyptian inscriptions?
Zahi Hawass’s answer will be: Yes, a large number of names.
The difference in the way the question is asked is what will reveal the essence of the game that hid the names of the prophets in the monuments of the region.
Why ?
If you search in the religious book that the West believes in (the Bible) and which is written in a large number of languages, and which the Muslim considers to be the Torah and a book and religion from Allah, you will find that it contains two types of characters:
1 – The first type: royal figures who do not have a religious character and are not mentioned in the Qur’an, and these characters are from everywhere: [Ramesses – Hammurabi – Sennacherib – Sargon – Cyrus – Sheshnak – Nebuchadnezzar…]
2 – The second type: Personalities that carry a religious character and are somewhat similar to the characters of the prophets in the Qur’an. Their names are similar to the names of the prophets in the Qur’an, and their stories carry a general framework similar to their stories in the Qur’an: [Abraham Samuel Solomon Jacob Joseph Moshe….]
As everyone knows, the West is the only one who translated ancient writings in the region, and all discoveries were made by them.
But if you look into the stories of antiquities discoveries carried out by the West, and the West’s translations, you will find an important note, which is:
At the beginning of its entry into occupying the region, the West was able very easily and quickly to discover the names of the first type of characters found in the Book of the Bible in the inscriptions of the region. Western historians have written many historical books about the first type of characters, and Drowning told us that they were extracted from the writings of The ancient region, without attaching the original texts alongside his writings.
For example
The West discovered a piece of hieroglyphic script containing the name (Ramesses), whose name is also found in the Book of the Bible.
The West discovered a painting in hieroglyphic script containing the name (Sheshnak), whose name is also found in the Bible.
The West discovered a cylinder in cuneiform script containing the name (Cyrus), whose name is also found in the Book of the Bible.
The West discovered an obelisk in cuneiform script containing the name (Hammurabi), whose name is also found in the Book of the Bible.
But the West, even today, for 250 years of its translations of the region’s writings and the beginning of archeology, has not discovered a single trace of characters of the second type despite their presence in the Book of the Bible [Abraham Samuel Solomon Jacob Joseph Moshe..]
I wonder what is the reason?
Why does coincidence always appear in the book of the West (The Bible), and why does this coincidence always occur in the characters of the first type that are present in his book and are not mentioned in the Qur’an?!
Why does this coincidence not occur with the West in the second type of characters, even though they are also present in his book and whose names resemble the names of the characters of the Qur’an?
Why does this reality revealed by the West always believe the Book of the Bible that the West believes in only the first type of characters, and never believe the Bible book regarding the second type of personalities that are similar to the personalities of the readers?
These questions will facilitate reaching the true and certain answer to our question: Why has no ancient trace of the prophets mentioned in the Qur’an been discovered to date?!
First, let us create a comprehensive historical picture.
When the Europeans left Europe to occupy the rest of the world, they made two discoveries on earth and we were convinced of them:
1 – Geographical discoveries…… The West convinced the world that when it decided to travel around the world, it discovered a new world or a new geography, and that it was the first to discover it, and no one on earth had discovered it before, even though it was a land inhabited by people.
These discoveries began with the discovery of America, then Australia, New Zealand, etc.
The West called itself by several titles (the first to discover the Earth).
Columbus was the first to discover America
James Cook was the first to discover Australia
Vasco Digama was the first to discover the Cape of Good Hope
The West obtained the legitimacy of occupying the land under the pretext that it had discovered it and had the right to occupy it.
2 – Temporal discoveries….. The West convinced the world that when it decided to invade the earth, it found writings on the earth, and when it deciphered them, it discovered new times on the earth, and that it was the first to discover those times, after those times had been unknown for many centuries, so it could not. Someone before the West could decipher these inscriptions and extract their contents, even though they are writings found in a land inhabited by people and it is inconceivable that they are unknown to them.
These temporal discoveries began since the West invaded us and deciphered the region’s inscriptions.
The West called itself the first to discover ancient civilizations. It also called itself the father of chronology.
Champollion is the first to decipher the inscriptions of Misr (the father of Egyptology) Smith is the first to decipher the cuneiform script (the father of Sumerian science)
The West obtained the legitimacy of writing history and time on the pretext that it was the first to discover it and was the one who had the right to write it.
Now, after reviewing these two discoveries, we will ask an important question:
If the West, in its geographical discoveries, lied to us and claimed that it was the first to discover a land inhabited by people, and convinced us of this idea, in order to give itself the legitimacy of its occupation of the land and theft of the land… then has the West also lied to us, in its temporal discoveries, and claimed to be the first to discover Those writings and he discovered those times and convinced us of them, to give himself legitimacy in writing history so that he could steal ancient times through his book, the Bible, in order to steal the earth as well?
If you notice most of the Western scholars who discovered the names of the first type of characters found in the Book of the Bible within our ancient monuments on earth, you will find that most of them are French.
Champollion discovered Rameses
Montet discovered Sheshnak
You will find that most of the antiquities discovered by the West and claimed to belong to the first type of person found in the Book of the Bible are only one sample and not many antiquities, and most of them are in French museums.
Hammurabi’s Obelisk in France
A painting of Poplar Basin in France (remember the name of Sheshenq).
……….
What is the relationship between Sholomon and Sheshnak?
Two characters are present in the Book of the Bible, which the West believes in. This book is largely written in European languages only, with the exception of a few languages outside Europe, including (Hebrew, Syriac, and Jebetic).
By understanding these two figures, we will know the extent of the West’s contradiction and confusion, and we will realize the extent of the historical dilemma. The Zionist entity affiliated with the West, which was founded on the idea that it was an occupier of the region in ancient times in Palestine that the West discovered, as a legitimacy that gives it the right to occupy the land?
Who is Sholomon?
(Sholomon) in the Book of the Bible was a king who had a very huge kingdom on earth. (Sholomon) represents in the Jewish consciousness the symbolism of politics, rule, and a symbolism for the state, unlike the character (Mushi), which is considered a religious symbolism in Judaism.
Therefore, the Zionist entity affiliated with the West, in its attempts to create an identity for this alleged entity in order to preserve it and establish the legitimacy of its existence on earth, devotes its entire historical and archaeological interest to the subject of (Sholomon and his kingdom) to strengthen the national symbolism and the concept of the state, among the Al-Yahoud, in addition to its very great interest in searching for Antiquities (the Kingdom and Temple of Sulaiman), to prove the historical right to existence.
The interest of the Zionist entity in the Department of Antiquities is very great, as international Zionist organizations provide huge financial grants to researchers and excavators from the universities of the Zionist entity who are busy searching for the Kingdom of Sulaiman.
In the Zionist entity there are two types of researchers:
1- A researcher has a Bible book in one hand, and a digging and excavation tool in the other hand.
This type of researcher is an absolute believer in the Book of the Bible and treats it as a book containing real scientific, historical, chronological and geographical information, and relies on it to search in Palestine for the Kingdom of Sulaiman.
Today, all researchers of this type are almost reaching a state close to insanity… The long period of research and the large scale of excavation that they carried out, without discovering even a small trace of the huge kingdom of Sulaiman, put them in a state of conflict between faith and reality.
2- A researcher holds a scientific method in one hand and the other hand holds a drilling and excavation tool.
This type of researcher is the one who does not rely on the Book of the Bible literally, and deals with the tools of the purely scientific method, in their search for the kingdom of Sulaiman and his kingdom in Palestine.
All researchers of this type, after the long period of research and the large volume of excavations that they carried out, but without discovering any small trace of the huge kingdom of Sulaiman, almost reach a firm conviction about two possibilities:
The first possibility: Either the Book of the Bible is a book of myths and is not true.
The second possibility: Either the Book of the Bible is somewhat correct, but it does not talk about a huge kingdom, but rather it talks about a very small village, but there are those who historically expanded it.
But our researchers do not want to be convinced of the first possibility. They have faith in the Book of the Bible, and some of them have faith in the second possibility, but many of them found that those possibilities are incomplete and there is a forgotten third possibility, which is:
The third possibility: The possibility that (the Kingdom of Sulaiman) was in a place other than Palestine.
From this controversy, many theories emerged from our researchers, which believe in the third possibility, talking about the geography of the Jewish book in a place other than Palestine, such as (Asir – Yemen – South of the Jazira).
Such as Fadel Al-Rubaie, Salibi, Ziad Minni, Ahmed Dawoud, etc.
Who is Sheshnak?
(Sheshenq) (950 – 929 BC) An Egyptian king whose origins go back to a family from the city of Ihnasia, whose founder (Buyo Wawa), the fifth grandfather of Pharaoh Sheshenq, came from one of the oases of the Libyan desert, and the Greeks knew him and called him Susakos.
His lineage: Shishang ibn Nimrod ibn Shishang ibn Bathut ibn Nabanshi ibn Mawasata ibn Buyo Wawa.
Sheshenq was able to assume the rule of Misr and carry the title of Pharaoh, and thus established the rule of his family, the Twenty-Second Dynasty in the year 950 BC, which ruled for nearly two centuries.
The circumstances of his rule….. During the rule of the Twenty-first Dynasty, which lasted approximately one hundred and thirty years, during which events ravaged Misr from within and without, corruption spread throughout the state, taxes burdened the people, which led to the disintegration of the country, and the Pharaoh found no alternative but to try to solve the problems peacefully, and through them he was forced to A truce was also made with Israel, whose power was growing in Palestine under the rule of Dawoud. During this period, Sheshenq appeared and married the daughter of the Pharaoh Susens II, the last king of this dynasty, and announced the establishment of the Twenty-Second Dynasty. This was around the year 940 BC.
Regarding the age of the dynasty founded by Sheshenq, Manetho assigned the Twenty-Second Dynasty to only one hundred and twenty years, but the currently accepted chronology makes the period exceed two full centuries, from 950 BC to 730 BC.
It was mentioned in the Bible (1 Kings 14/25-28).
He was a strong ruler who raised Misr’s status. He wanted to extend Misr’s influence over West Asia, so he controlled Lebanon and Palestine. Jeroboam, from the tribe of Ephraim, believed that he was more deserving of the kingdom than Sulaiman, so he revolted against Sulaiman after Sheshenq granted him protection, despite the good relationship that Sheshenq had with Sulaiman.
After Sulaiman’s death, Jeroboam was able to assume leadership of ten Hebrew tribes and become independent, and he called it the Northern Kingdom. In the year 926 BC, five years after the death of Sulaiman, Sheshenq, King of the Southern Kingdom, attacked Rehoboam, son of Sulaiman, and plundered the treasures of the Temple. He destroyed Jerusalem, took its people captive, and took the treasures of the House of the Allah, Judah, the King’s House, and thousands of golden shields made during the reign of King Sulaiman. He also carried out lightning campaigns in which he destroyed them. Dozens of Jewish cities and colonies in the Yazril Plain and the eastern Jordan Valley also appear to have attacked the Northern Kingdom.
The inscriptions on the Karnak Temple indicate that Sheshonq attacked all of Palestine, subjugating one hundred and fifty-six cities, and news of this campaign was recorded on the walls of the Karnak Temple. But we still cannot confirm all the details derived from the Bible due to the many changes that have occurred to it.
While the Bible mentions these events in great detail, we do not find confirmation of them on the Egyptian side, and problems in historical chronology, although limited to narrow time zones, make it difficult to determine the contemporaneity of a particular king with a particular event. In addition, the name Tahpenis cannot be found in hieroglyphs. After a while another simultaneous event occurred;
As (The Bible) narrates (1 Kings, 14:25) “And in the fifth year of King Rehoboam, Shishak king of Misr went up to Jerusalem, 26 and took the treasures of the house of the Allah and the treasures of the king’s house, and he took everything, and he took all the shields of gold that Sulaiman had made. 27 So King Rehoboam worked in their place. Brass shields and delivered them into the hands of the chief guards who kept the door of the king’s house 28.” It seems that the ruin of the holy city was not more important than the loss of Sulaiman’s golden shields, which they had to replace with brass ones. But among the remaining names accompanying the mural on the Perbastet Gate, there is no mention of either Jerusalem or Tell al-Jazari.
These names are usually presented in the form we are accustomed to from the paintings of the conquests of Thothmes III; It is closely linked to the bodies of foreign prisoners whom the king takes before his father Amun-Ra, but this census is disappointing. Among the names of more than 150 places, only a small number can be identified, all of which are located in the hills on the borders of Samaria without reaching the heart of the Kingdom of Israel. There is no hint that they touched Judah at all, but there is mention of a raid on the Edomite region. Even the widespread belief that a certain text could have read the Fields of Ibrahim is today rejected. However, the discovery of a sherd in Megiddo bearing the name of Shashenq leaves no room for doubt that his campaign against the region actually occurred, but it leaves room for speculation as to whether its aim was to restore ancient Egyptian glories, or to support Jeroboam, or whether it was merely a plundering raid.
This is the conclusion
Now let us analyze the history of this man.
– Who is Sheshnak?
A king in Misr, not Egyptian, but Libyan, even though ancient times did not need nationalities, identities, and political borders like today.
-What is his grandfather’s name?
(Wow)
– What are the sources of this man’s history?
The books of Greece, the Bible, and the inscriptions of Misr
What traces did this man leave?
1 – A mural in the Karnak Temple, a huge gate, now known as the Sheshenq Gate. It was called the Victory Gate in his time, and it is part of the extension of the southern wall of the famous Hypostyle Hall. On this gate, as was the custom of Egyptian kings, he recorded news of his victories in Palestine and the history of the priests of Amun, members of his family.
2 – The discovery of his tomb, which was found with all its treasures and was not looted. Because of the size of the silver found in his tomb, he was called the Silver Pharaoh.
Who discovered the Sheshenq cemetery?
French scientist Professor Monet in 1940 AD.
What is the very strange thing in the history of this man, and what is the relationship between (Heikal Sholomon) and (Sheshnak)?
According to the sources of Sheshenak’s history, there are famous figures and famous sons who lived with Sheshenak during the period of his family’s wisdom and rule: (Dawoud – Sulaiman – Sulaiman’s Temple)
Now notice…with me to this important point.
The Book of the Bible was very truthful in its talk about a person named Sheshnak, and in fact the Book of the Bible was true, so the West discovered traces of this king. However, despite the fact that Sheshnak was a contemporary of Sulaiman and the state of Judah, the Temple of Sulaiman, and the Kingdom of Sulaiman in Palestine, we have not discovered the name of Sulaiman until today. Not even a small piece of the huge kingdom of Sulaiman, and we did not discover a trace of Sulaiman’s temple.
It is strange……….the reality that the West discovered. The Bible believed the first type of characters in it, but it did not believe the Bible regarding the second type of characters in it…even though the two types were contemporaries. For some .
what is the reason ?
If you look at the writings of Western historians, you will find many studies that say that Sulaiman is nothing but Sheshnak.
……..
Now…if we return to the story of the West’s chronological revelations, we will find that if we merely assume that the West, with its revelations, wants to occupy history and time.
If the story of the character of Sulaiman the Hebrew with the Zionist entity affiliated with the West has a political function, we also find that the story of Sheshnak the Berber has the same political function with the French group in Algeria. It is the story of creating identity, national symbolism, and national feeling only, which is needed by the project of creating a national entity for a state, based on the history in the Bible…. So the question:
Why, with its policy, the West was unable to discover the presence of a trace of the Hebrew character Sulaiman, whose name is in the Bible in Palestine, to confirm the legitimacy of its Zionist entity, despite the need of the Zionist entity to prove its existence and establish its legitimacy, but at the same time it was able to discover a trace of the non-Egyptian Berber character Sheshnak, whose name is in the Bible. And the two characters lived together?
Why did the huge Temple of Sulaiman disappear in Palestine, while the Sheshnak Gate (a contemporary of Sulaiman) still remains today?
Could it be that the Temple of Sulaiman was in another place and the geography of its story in a place other than Palestine, according to the theories of our researchers who believe in the third possibility?
Before answering this question, we will pose very logical questions to these researchers:
Why did the Bible believe in the character of Sheshnak and believe in his geography, which is Misr, and we discovered evidence from reality, while the Bible did not believe in the character of Sulaiman and did not believe in his geography in Palestine, with evidence that we did not discover any trace of him?
We believe that these researchers and readers who believe in their theories about the geography of the Bible in Yemen were never able to create a comprehensive framework for the issue, until they knew that the second and third possibilities about Sulaiman and his temple are only two possibilities to prolong the time of understanding the story.
Because… any exploration or research anywhere will be futile and will not yield any results exactly like the result that took place in Palestine.
Why won’t they get any results?
Because if these people had understood the reality of the Book of the Bible with the West, they would have understood the game of devils on earth… and they would have known well that Sulaiman in the Bible is not the Sulaiman who is present in the Qur’an at all, and they would have known that they would never find traces of Sulaiman, because the devils of the West had taken over the king. Sulaiman in the land, and they taught the people magic.
how ?
Understanding the dimensions and objectives of the geographical discoveries carried out by the West on Earth since the invasion of America…..makes us believe that the West’s temporal discoveries will not depart from the same dimensions and objectives as the geographical discoveries.
Is it a coincidence that the West discovers the names of the first type of characters present in his book in our ancient writings and finds traces of them, and does not discover the names of the second type of characters present in his book?
It is not a coincidence at all… and the action is deliberate, intended and systematic, and the reason is:
Because if the West told you that it discovered names of the second type found in its book within the inscriptions of the ancient region, it would lead to mistakes that would fail the game of historical and temporal occupation that it came up with to occupy the land, as happened in Palestine.
Because the Muslim will have a historical and temporal connection with his religion, even if the names are not identical with names in the Qur’an, and he will know that his religion is an ancient, connected context, while the West’s game wants to create a new awareness among the Muslim that his religion emerged from Mecca, and remove the Muslim from Connecting to the reality around him and to the ancient writings of the region, religiously and linguistically.
And with time… a controversy will arise about the names of the prophets, between Sulaiman and Sulaiman, for example, and about the nature of the first religion, due to the presence of other religions created by it that attribute themselves to Ibrahim… and then the Muslim will begin to understand the speech of the Qur’an.
The Muslim will know that the Qur’an does not mean this Qur’an, but rather ancient writings (the chapters of the ancients), and he will know that he has memorized the Qur’an from those writings. Then the Muslim will know the meaning of the word (they distort the word of Allah), the meaning of (they distort their tongues with the Book), and what is the meaning of (the Book). His verses have been explained in detail by our readers in Arabic for a people who know), and the meaning of (Indeed, the religion with Allah is Islam, and those who were given the Book did not differ except after knowledge had come to them out of envy among themselves.)
Then the Muslim will realize the truth of the Book of the Bible, and the truth of the languages that were made official for this book… And thus, with time, the satanic game that came with the Zionist entity’s project will be revealed… And the West does not want to take this path, so it decided to prevent the second type of The characters in his book are his claims that they exist in the antiquities and writings of the ancient region, and the claim that they do not exist.
And with this cunning trick……. the West was able to transform the first type of characters present in his book into a historical fact by claiming that their names are found in ancient antiquities and writings in our ancient writings, and by concealing the names of the characters of the readers who resemble the names and stories of the characters of this type. The second in his book, it turned into a historical illusion.
They turned illusion into reality, and turned reality into illusion.
This is the magic that the Qur’an means, which the devils of the West taught people, this magic that people are inside and that created those three minds and made Zahi Hawass deny the existence of the names of the prophets in the inscriptions of Misr with complete confidence.
This is the project that the devils of the West came up with, after they occupied Misr and the region and falsified the phonetic values of the letters of the book, so they hid the name of Sulaiman, and replaced it with the name of one of the first type found in their book (Sheshonq).
A team from the West… changed the phonetic values of the letters in writing the name Sulaiman, then they made the name recited (in the name of a character of the first type in his book), then a team of them wrote a book containing a name similar to the name Sulaiman (Sulaiman) and they wrote the story. It is somewhat similar to the story of Sulaiman in the Qur’an, and thus the Muslim believed that the Book of the Bible was the Torah and a book from Allah from which the Muslims preserved the Qur’an… and they forgot the book that the Qur’an meant.
The traces of the prophets mentioned in the Qur’an disappeared from the earth
{And they followed what the devils recited to Sulaiman’s kingdom, and Sulaiman did not disbelieve, but the devils disbelieved, teaching people magic.}
This is the whole story that is absent from Fadel Al-Rubaie, Ahmed Dawoud, and the rest of the researchers who believe in the West’s book, the Bible, and also believe in the history written by the West.
They should not tire themselves…because the Sulaiman Temple is an imaginary building that did not exist in ancient times in reality. The West seeks to build the Temple in order to embody the historical illusion, and make it alive in the minds of the people so that the project of the Western Zionist entity in the region continues.
And also Sheshnak… a fake, fictitious character that the West relied on and convinced people of his presence in Egyptian inscriptions after they falsified Egyptian inscriptions, and he did not exist in reality, and France placed in its museum fake documents about a king named Sheshnak to prove the reality of this historical illusion as part of an occupation project. Time as a prelude to the occupation of the land and the creation of an entity affiliated with the West.
The French Revolution, which entered the region yesterday as an invader and an occupier through Napoleon, carries the project of creating a national religion of Judaism and a Zionist entity with the character of Sulaiman and his temple. It is the same France that carries the project of creating an Amazigh nationalism and an entity in Algeria with the character of Sheshnak, of Berber origins.