3/15/2021 0:00:01
What is the difference between the Holy Qur’an and the Bible?
It is true that there is some similarity between the Holy Qur’an and the Book of the Bible in the story of creation and the stories of the prophets, and there are many who believe that they come from one divine source, but the question is:
Why are there two similar books from one divine source but with differences? How can there be one Allah who revealed two books with differences? Did Allah issue a book and then update the information, wording, style and language of the book?
The idea I have about the concept of religious text…makes me think that this formal similarity does not mean that they are from the same source at all. It is related to the importance of the accuracy of the information in them. It is related to the existence of a fundamental difference between the two.
This fundamental difference can be well felt and understood from a very important observation provided to us by an American doctor in this link.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10159215017777154&id=679387153 The doctor, during his speech in which he reviewed the beginning of his story with Islam, which was when a friend sent him a copy of the Qur’an, said that he was not interested, as he knew that it had been written Religions contain the same stories, such as the beginning of creation, etc., and he began to browse the Qur’an and understand its meanings. He made a very important remark, which is:
“I believe that the Qur’an is talking about the story of the beginning of creation that is known to us, but it seems that the author of the Qur’an has a problem in understanding the story…. There is something wrong with it.”
This American doctor is very honest in his observations…and reveals to us the essential difference in the matter, and it is certain that this doctor was a scientific researcher and thinker as well, more than he was a researcher of form and decoration, otherwise he would not have said those words while comparing the story In the Qur’an and the story in the Book of the Bible.
The doctor summarized for us the answer to our previous question, which is:
There is a fundamental difference between the discourse of the Qur’an and the discourse of the Book of the Bible.
The truth is that many researchers and thinkers in our society, such as researchers in religions and history, have not reached the level of awareness of the meaning that this doctor has reached in understanding the essence of the issue, when directing their research into the historical and religious issues related to the Book of the Bible, with the entry of the Zionist narrative into the region. presented by the West.
Not only researchers, but ordinary people, everyone starts from that formal, verbal, and decorative similarity between the two books in their belief that they are two books from one source, and this belief will be completely reflected in their perception of the world around them in understanding historical and religious issues, and that understanding will emerge in the books. And books that contribute to stabilizing the Zionist narrative.
If we go to the Qur’an and the Book of the Bible and carefully consider the discourse in the two books, we will find a truly fundamental difference between the two.
1- For example, if we look at the vocabulary of the Qur’an, we will find that it is very simple and the words are general, and there is no great celebration in establishing complex vocabulary and special nomenclature. It is an innate, primitive speech, as if he speaks with a tongue that is the first on earth, which knows no borders or nationalities. No identities, no differences, and no differentiation.
For example, the Qur’an speaks in vocabulary (village, city, mountain, sky, land, plant, people, people, crops, sea, water, trees, soil, sun, moon, stars) and without adding other labels to those vocabulary.
It describes the surrounding world…..without borders, nationalities, or identities, and without specification or discrimination (rain revives the earth, the sun and the moon, the mountains, the seas, the heavens and the earth).
He addresses people…and does not distinguish them by spatial or temporal boundaries, nationalities, or identities. He asks them to look at the world around him and at himself, and when he describes them, he does not describe them in terms of nationalities or borders, but rather in terms of faith ( O people, O mankind, O children of Adam, O you who have believed.)
He talks about the contexts of things without an evolutionary mechanism.
2- But when we read the speech in the Bible…we will find that it is the exact opposite of the Qur’an speech, a modern political speech that is completely similar to the Sykes-Picot speech.
For example, if we look at the vocabulary of the Bible, we will find that it is very crowded with special names. It contains very, very many names for peoples, peoples, and lands. There is a great celebration in mentioning complex vocabulary and special names, and it speaks in a number of tongues that know borders, nationalities, identities, and Differences and differentiation.
For example, the Bible talks about (the names of many cities, the names of many countries, the names of many peoples, etc.) with the addition of descriptions to those words such as (my people, your land, etc.)
It describes the modern world…..which has borders, nationalities, and identities, and without specification or discrimination (the land of Elam, the land of Canaan, etc.)
He addresses people…and distinguishes them by spatial or temporal borders, nationalities, or identities, and when he describes them, he describes them in the language of nationalities or borders (O my people, I drove you out of the land of Chaldean), so he attributes the land to peoples. And people.
And when making a comparison between the two
– For example, the Bible uses the letter (Damascus, Jerusalem, Kadesh, Ethiopia, and Eritrea), while the Qur’an deals with the letter (city, village, country, land).
– For example, the Bible deals with the speech (Alexandria), while the Qur’an deals with the speech (the village by the sea).
– For example, the Bible uses the speech (Sodom and Ur), while the Qur’an uses the speech (Al-Qaryatayn).
– For example, the Bible deals with a discourse keen to define identities and nationalities (the Kashmiris, the Chaldeans, the Elamites, the Philistines, the Qedarites, the Jebusites, etc.), while the Qur’an deals with the discourse of (the people, the people, and the people are one nation).
– For example, the Bible deals with the discourse of basic borders of the land (the land of Canaan, the land of Judah, the land of Kedar, the land of a certain people), while the Qur’an deals with the discourse (the land is one)
– For example, the Bible deals with the speech of (Abel and Cain, Joshua, Asif bin Barkhiya), while the Qur’an deals with the speech of (a righteous man, a young man, who has knowledge of the Book)
– For example, the Bible deals with the discourse of linguistic nationalities and that people have become more mature, while the Qur’an deals with the discourse of only two languages on earth, the language of the people and its opposite (Arabic and non-Arabic).
The discourse of the Bible is preoccupied and concerned with the names of special things, concerned with dividing the land into borders for peoples and nationalities, and distinguishing people with special names and separating them. A speech filled with a crowd of complex, special, and distinctive vocabulary. A speech that tells a person about borders, nationalities, identities, and nationalities… while the readers’ speech is busy with general names of things, simple general vocabulary, very simple and brief speech, and elementary general vocabulary. Uncomplicated and undistinguished, an initial speech that addresses the first instinct of man.
This makes us well aware that there is a big fundamental difference between the Qur’an and the Bible, two books that are completely different and even opposite in message, meanings and worldview, even if there are those who try to create a formal similarity between the two to prevent a person from noticing that big fundamental difference between them.
It makes us realize that (the Holy Qur’an) and (the Bible Book) are from two different sources and not from one source, and it is impossible that the source from which the Qur’an came (Allah) will be the same source from which (the Bible Book) came, but rather from a source Different… The source from which it came (the Qur’an) is the Allah of the first nature on earth, while the source from which it came (the Book of the Bible) is the modern political mind.
This difference between the discourse of common sense and the discourse of modern politics, which has led us to the conclusion that they come from two sources and not one source. The first source is the Allah of human nature and the second source is the Allah of the modern political mind. This will make us conclude that it is impossible that the first Allah of human nature will also descend. The discourse of modern politics is the opposite of it, and it is impossible that the Allah of modern politics will bring down the discourse of nature that is opposite to it, and it is impossible that the discourse of the Allah of modern political reason would appear before the discourse of the Allah of nature, the first human. It is logical that the discourse of the Allah of the first nature (the Qur’an) is prior to the discourse of Allah. The modern political mind (the Bible).
This is the summary of the speech of the first Allah of nature in the Qur’an, and it is possible that the American doctor still to this day has not realized the reason for the difference, and you, researcher and historian of the Zionist novel, still have not yet realized….. that the Book of the Bible is not the Torah at all. Rather, it is a book written by the European political mind… after he hid the book from which the Muslims memorized the Qur’an (Al-Naba’), so that he could write his book and make it similar to the Qur’an so that you would think it (the Torah) was from Allah while you did not know. Then he went out to the world to publish this book. And he made it the religion of the people on earth.
{A Book whose verses are explained in detail. We recite it in Arabic for a people who know. * And among them is a party who twist their tongues with the Book so that you may think it is from the Book, but it is not from the Book. And they say, “It is from Allah,” but it is not from Allah, and they speak a lie while they know.}
{And Al-Yahoud said is not Al-Nasarah on anything, and Al-Nasarah said The Al-Yahoud are not upon anything, and they recite the Book. Thus those who do not know say the same as their saying. Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection regarding what they differed about.}