2019-07-24T09:53:00-07:00
A long time ago………. I read news that an Egyptian researcher had a YouTube channel and claimed that Sampleon’s interpretation was wrong and that he had a new interpretation of hieroglyphs, and that it would change many concepts about the Pharaonic civilization.
I liked the news very much.
I browsed his channel and saw something new, even if it was simple, but the truth is that I felt that the inscriptions began to speak in a way that felt like they belonged to our world, but not in a sufficient way.
I found it to be a point of light with the appearance of a person who decided to break away from the herd and try to reread the inscriptions and read history.
Especially since we have not written our history yet. They are all Western writings according to an Orientalist, colonial vision full of falsehood and based on a Zionist vision, and we are only reproducing them and believing that they are our history.
But then an idea came into my mind and made me feel terrified inside. What if the West really realizes the correct reading of the inscriptions and gives us fake translations? .
A satanic idea…it will be a malicious act…that will enchant a people and a nation.
Does it make sense ?
For a long time, I have firmly believed that there is a major historical error as a result of archaeological discoveries, which have been elevated to the status of postulates and upon which we have based our perceptions…or as a result of readings imposed by the current national situation, which is required to commit to formulating a limited history within the boundaries of geography. Modern politics, and it caused all this historical chaos in the minds of the people.
I cannot rule out intentionality and intent in the forgery, which has political backgrounds. Today we are witnessing lively the largest historical fraud, fraud and forgery carried out by the Zionist entity. Some have recently seen how its representative at the United Nations held up a coin and a coin. It is the size of a button and says that it is from the first century AD and has a Hebrew inscription on it proving the Jewish identity of Jerusalem.
I knew that the idea would arouse ridicule among some people, especially people who always mock conspiracy theories, but at the time I was thinking about the issue from the perspective of its connection to the ambitions of international powers…and the Zionist entity, which was founded on a false religious and historical idea, is the best example of that. we say.
And I realized that those who mock this idea do not feel the value of this matter as a security loophole in the consciousness of the people, through which the West can easily infiltrate any place in the region by playing with the historical imagination of the people by inventing a new history that will serve as an ideology that the West can spread in the countries of the region to create… A new imagination that serves their project.
I was thinking with the mentality of strategic projects targeting peoples and nations.
So I asked myself:
What if the West told us that the rulers of Misr, for example, were European through forging inscriptions and the DNA testing process? I think this would be an idea that would be reinforced in the Egyptian imagination, with the fact that his civilization was built by Western man and he had no identity, just always subordinate to the West.
Do you realize where the danger is? .
But after I pondered a lot about the Zionist project that came to occupy the region and expel its people with the legitimacy of a fake book full of fake stories and a fake structure……. I found that it is not unlikely that the West will forge the inscriptions of the region.
The idea has become very possible for me.
Then I considered the topic from its general context…and I saw that almost two centuries ago…the imagination of the peoples of the historical region was simple and did not suffer from complexity and ambiguity as it suffers today from historical chaos. After it was deciphered and interpreted… Inscriptions of ancient civilizations in the region. We now have a new history added to the past history recorded in books, so the process of writing history correctly and accurately and searching for a time line for history has become a very difficult and necessary task.
After long thought and contemplation… I found myself… not at all convinced by the official story of the Rosetta Stone and the explanations around it for logical and objective reasons. I believe that the historical problem began with the Rosetta Stone.
Why ?
It is true…. that most of the inscriptions of the ancient region were deciphered by Western scholars and orientalists, and it is certain that they contain many errors and unconvincing translations…. But the Rosetta Stone is linked to an important point, and it is the most dangerous…. so for hours I feel… It is as if I may be foolish or crazy when researchers and historians do not pay attention to this point.
Rosetta Stone and Champollion
What extraordinary thing did Champollion do?
I thought about the topic…and found that nothing supernatural was presented. It was just a person who uttered one word (Ramesses) only, and we do not know anything else about him after that.
I found that there are stories, articles, and films that talk about Champollion’s genius in an unusual and exaggerated way… surrounded by a great aura.
It was not arrogance on my part… because I was not in a tournament arena, but because it is simply the truth, and many must realize this, because the issue is linked, as we believe, to historical responsibility, and our conversation has nothing to do with the search for fame.
I asked myself afterwards
Why do other Western orientalists who deciphered cuneiform inscriptions and other inscriptions in the region not achieve the same fate as Champollion?!
I felt that there was a very large exaggeration in the story in order to hide something, and prevent any mind from paying attention and turning towards something.
Someone said the word “Ramesses”…and he became a genius.
The feeling inside me increased that there was something suspicious hidden.
Then I came to a firm belief that the key to history exists in Misr, for many reasons, including:
1- The size and quantity of the huge Egyptian inscriptions and antiquities, which are full of drawings, give us a new addition to understanding history in a greater way than anywhere else……And there must be archaeological evidence in the inscriptions of Misr to decipher some of the inscriptions of Iraq, the Levant, and Yemen. Many puzzles from history.
I asked myself…….. Does the presence of special departments in Western universities that study antiquities in Misr under the name of Egyptology cause any surprise?!
Yes…it is surprising
The truth is, when I was reading the ancient history of the entire region, I found that it was very similar in the nature of religion. There is one nucleus and there are three main gods in every civilization, including Misr, and I asked myself with amazement: Why are there three symbols? .
But I find that Misr seems somewhat different to me. I feel that there is something wrong inside me. What is the reason for this feeling and where did it come from?
After deep thought…..I knew the reasons for that feeling were because of the names of gods, kings, and language.
The question has become big internally and is strongly asked:
What if Champollion’s work is incorrect, suppose there is another completely different reading?!
For example, I can change one letter and replace it with a letter that comes from almost the same output, and I will produce a completely different reading for you……So what if we replace the letters with similar letters that come from the same output, and I will produce for you a huge amount of readings..Does he realize This much matter?
The Egyptian researcher on his channel… began to present a different, interesting reading that made you feel its vitality and that you began to feel it and that it was very close to you. As for Champollion’s method, it produced a language that you did not feel, and he attracted me in his research to the word poetry. He believed that it was the correct translation that She is the star of Sirius.
The feeling that the Egyptian researcher gave me…made me realize the magnitude of the game if it had actually been completed…it is great magic…it generates magic inside your mind…with different reading and providing a different interpretation, as if you are entering To another different world.
It’s a scary feeling if we imagine the idea
The average reader does not realize that the inscriptions of all ancient civilizations did not write the phonetic letters in their inscriptions…so he finds it difficult to spell the correct word…but the writer knows how to read the text correctly…because it… His letters and he is accustomed to drawing them in this way.
Example….like the Arabic language, which addressed this point by inventing diacritics (fatha, dhammah, kasra, and sukun). For example, we pronounce the word (qalam) in the form (qa – la – m) meaning the writing pen, and we can pronounce it in another way ( Qa – l la – m) meaning trimming… according to the context of the sentence and the meaning, because it is our language and we know the correct reading, and this is what was present in all ancient inscriptions.
For example, when you read research on the Internet about translations of the Gilgamesh tablets, you will find the translation process in this way:
Several vowel letters are placed after each consonant letter……. and even consonants, as each letter is within a group of letters similar to it in output and close in sound.
Therefore, you can assume tens or even hundreds of thousands of translations of the inscriptions that could be created in this way.
The Rosetta Stone is also said to be a stone with one subject written in three languages… and it was written in three different scripts… hieroglyphics, demotic and Greek, which is the reason why Champollion and the West were able to decipher hieroglyphic writing by comparing it to the Greek language.
I thought a lot….and found that this story poses logical questions.
● What are the reasons that made the author of the inscription write one inscription in three different inscriptions that talk about the same topic?
● What is the cognitive, religious and political value that makes someone do this work?!
This question is logical because the story of the Rosetta Stone is very rare. We have not yet discovered other ancient stone tablets that are written in Greek and hieroglyphic script and talk about one topic. There is only one Rosetta Stone.
We do not find any other traces, and throughout the area there are two different inscriptions on the same topic. We do not find, for example, a clay, stone, or wooden tablet written in cuneiform script and underneath it written in hieroglyphic script, and it talks about one topic, given that kings from Iraq ruled Misr for a period, as history says?
● Why did the meeting with Greece take place in a single inscription, written by a Greek king?!
Because throughout this period of time…….there is no material evidence confirming a meeting that took place between the residents of the region……even if the history books written by the West talked about this period of time, about the control of an Egyptian king over the Levant and Iraq. ….. Or about the control of a Babylonian king or an Akkadian king over Misr or Yemen.
Because we are very surprised… during this very long period of time… which amounts to five thousand years and perhaps more… but we do not find a cuneiform inscription in Misr or Yemen written on the walls of temples, nor We find hieroglyphic inscriptions written in temples in Iraq and the Levant, and we do not find an inscription in the Musnad script in Misr or Iraq and the Levant… We do not find the pattern of sculptures and inscriptions of the Fertile Crescent entering Misr. Likewise, we do not find the pattern of Egyptian sculptures entering the Fertile Crescent or Yemen .
Forget the story of discovering tablets with these scripts in different places… like those five cuneiform clay tablets discovered in Misr or the Egyptian inscriptions discovered in Yemen… because they may have been transferred at a different time and it is logical…… I am talking About inscriptions in temples. By virtue of the presence of a Babylonian or Akkadian king who ruled Misr, or an Egyptian king who ruled Iraq, the Levant and Yemen… or a Yemeni king who ruled Iraq.
There is absolutely no clear landmark or prominent monument, such as a large temple or a large building, or an inscription depicting a Babylonian or Sumerian king with an Egyptian king in distinctive Egyptian clothing… that conclusively confirms the existence of a meeting and communication.
not only this
Rather, we do not find that small sign that we are looking for, which confirms the existence of a meeting between the peoples of the region, through even a small inscription in which those lines come together inside a stone, clay, or wooden tablet, as happened with the story of the Rosetta Stone, written in three languages and three scripts.
We do not find any ancient relic (stone tablet or clay tablet) throughout the area, written in two different scripts and talking about one topic, like the Rosetta Stone?
In other words……. We do not find, for example, a clay tablet written in cuneiform script and underneath it written in hieroglyphic script, and it talks about one topic, by virtue of the fact that kings from the Fertile Crescent ruled Misr, or kings in Misr ruled the Fertile Crescent in this period of time, as you say. history books?
Even the wooden coffin discovered in Misr near the Saqqara pyramid in one of the temples that the West called (the temple of the Allah Osiris), which, as it was said, contained a mummy, but it was stolen. It belonged to a merchant from Yemen named Zaid who died in Misr and was an agent for supplying materials and plants. The sacred one that was used in temple rituals… The wooden coffin is engraved with inscriptions in Musnad script only.
So you wonder how this honor was given to a man to be buried in the temples of the Allah Osiris, but his coffin does not contain hieroglyphic inscriptions. It is logical for the man’s name to be written in the Musnad script, assuming that the man is from Yemen, and Yemen was written in this way as a tradition that obligates others to bury him in his country’s script or building. On his will… But it is also logical for the man’s name to be written in hieroglyphic script next to the Musnad script, as happened with the Greek ruler, and given the way he was buried in the tomb of the Allah Osiris, there is no objection to writing in hieroglyphic script, especially since he was buried in the tomb of the Allah Osiris. Osiris is a tribute from the Allah Osiris, and his coffin must also be honored by engraving hieroglyphs on it… Indeed, his burial in the cemetery of Osiris means the existence of a common faith.
It means more….. It does not make sense at all….. Five thousand years ago, not a traveler, person, merchant, sailor, king, ruler, or envoy from Iraq, Misr, or Yemen thought of writing on a stone or clay tablet or Wooden, and he collects two different lines in it during his visit or travel to another place…..as a document, a treaty, a tribute, a souvenir, or even for the sake of entertainment and knowledge.
Do you understand the meaning of 5 thousand years without such a thing happening?!
● Then why did the coincidence with the Greek language occur in the Rosetta Stone, which contained Greek writing with hieroglyphic writing and spoke of one topic…and it is a very distant and very modern language whose contact with the region is very short compared to the languages and writings of the region which is very close to Misr. And continuous with Misr over thousands of years?
The topic doesn’t make sense at all
● Why is there no ancient Greek manuscript or ancient Greek book, which has almost the same condition as the Rosetta Stone?!
● Why is there not even ancient Greek writing that interpreted hieroglyphics? Isn’t that strange and suspicious?!
● Why is there no book in the ancient Greek library that explains hieroglyphic writing?!,
As long as Greece was continuous with Misr, according to the history that was presented to us… because with reason and logic… if it had existed, it would not have caused this uproar over the Rosetta Stone, and it would have been the main key that is credited with deciphering the hieroglyphic writing, because it is in a state… Its existence……The story of deciphering the hieroglyphs will be very easy, and it is a common culture that exists among the Greeks and is recorded in their books.
Is there something really strange?!
The other important thing in the story is time… because this stone is the document that confirms that civilization in Misr was contemporary with Greece, meaning that at the time the Greek world appeared on the stage of history, they went to Misr and the people in Misr were writing in the language. Hieroglyphs while they write in Greek letters.
● Is it possible that the Egyptian, at the time of Ptolemy’s entry, was still writing a very primitive script, while the Greeks wrote in a very advanced script?!
Weren’t the Greeks in constant communication with Misr, and the Greeks were learning and taking their knowledge from Misr, and there was civilizational and cultural communication…but the Egyptians had not yet developed their writing.
illogical
We come to the important question about time.
● What if you imagined that the story was not like that? ……meaning that the meeting of Greece with Misr did not take place until after Misr changed its writing and began to write with other, very different letters. Then it would be the biggest historical lie, and it would destroy an entire history, the form of consciousness of an entire people and nation, and cause them to become lost.
After all those questions
I reached a firm conviction…that the Greeks’ knowledge of Misr was at a time when Misr was no longer written in hieroglyphics…otherwise the Egyptian civilization would have recorded this encounter, or the Greeks would have recorded the encounter and written in the same script as Misr. ….And they transmitted to us many hieroglyphic translations.
I became convinced that the Rosetta Stone…is the cornerstone.
That stone was nothing but an attempt by someone to decipher the hieroglyphics… and it was not Egyptian… but Greek… it may have been Ptolemy himself.
● But is it possible that a (Greek) ruling king…writes just one stone to confirm his existence in time and history?! ….Why does a Greek ruler link his plan to the line of other countries?!
It is completely illogical…that there is only one stone…is confirmed evidence of the existence of a large and huge history, as there is no other document that confirms the existence of this ruler except only one stone.
————————–
Cornerstone indeed
After a while, while I was continuing the search… I found a very important note… and it made me realize that the game might actually be very big and diabolical.
The observation came to me… while reviewing the Yemeni Musnad script, and because the topic of the Rosetta Stone was on my mind… I felt that the Musnad script was completely born from the hieroglyphic script, but developed from the hieroglyphics.
My feeling of a satanic game increased… and the conspiracy grew
And I asked myself a question:
● What if the language and belief of ancient Misr were similar to the language and belief of ancient Misr?! .
But we do not find any similarity. In Misr, there is Ankh, Isis, Osiris, Tafnis, Tut, Ptah, and Ahmose, all of which are Greek names. While in ancient Yemen, there is Sirius, Suhail, and Rahman.
Where is the mistake?!
The error began with Champollion… who made Greek the standard and reference for deciphering hieroglyphs. Champollion, who flooded the West with legendary stories about his genius in order to prevent anyone from approaching the idea of re-deciphering the hieroglyphs.
I asked myself… If the Greek himself, in the words of Herodotus himself, said that the Greeks took their gods and their faith from the Egyptians… and took their written letters from the phoenixes (the ancient Egyptians used to sanctify the phoenix), then why are the names of the gods of ancient Greece completely different from the names of the gods? Hat of ancient Misr. ?!
I also asked myself……. If the West calls the city of Casablanca Casablanca, does it make sense that after two thousand years we will match the Arabic letters of Casablanca with the English letters of Casablanca and then Champollion comes to Morocco and tells us that the letter (A) It corresponds to the letter (K)?!
I also asked myself …….. Why do the names of ancient Egyptian deities sound as if they are a mixture of a Greek accent and another strange language that the Egyptian does not feel belongs to him (Isis, Thoth, Gebaa, Sisu, Khannas, Tafnes)?!
But Coptic was prevalent in Misr.
I searched and found that Coptic is a purely Greek language…in the same language as the Bible…so that they understand and are fluent in Greek.
Why was it called Coptic?!
Coptic is not the language of ancient Misr, but rather a purely Greek language. Was it called Coptic as a fraudulent name to hide its being the Greek language?
Did they want to further confirm this trick with the story that the Pope of the Church carried out a reform of the Coptic language…and changed it to Greek in the year 1860, so that many believe that had it not been for this reform, the language would have been the language of ancient Misr, different from the Greek language that seems prominent? In Coptic?!
The game grew in my head
And then I came to the conviction… that it was not a person who wrote the Rosetta Stone, but rather there is a political force that has a strategic project… that created the story of the Rosetta Stone… in order to convince the public that it had succeeded in deciphering a very ancient writing.
Because hieroglyphs are not any ordinary writing, but sacred writing, and the sacred will have a game behind it, because the word hieroglyphs, according to the Greek dictionary… (sacred writing).
The topic is related to religious sacred writing
In fact, today there are three religions that are said to be of one origin, but only two religions. The first religion is more expressive of the region, while the other religion is linked to the West and is expressive. About the West…….. There are two religious books that are similar in topics but different in style, language, and details.
So the matter is not simple at all
The topic will be related to a game of religions, history and time, and there is no safety at all in the West, there is no safety for an occupier and a destroyer… It will be a satanic game if it takes place, and it will not cross anyone’s mind. It will be a game of devils and witches.
And after research… really
It was the Rosetta Stone… a satanic game… the biggest historical lie and the biggest scientific fraud designed by the West… a stone written by the West themselves… to create a legal document to penetrate and occupy the region.
The Rosetta Stone… is the sedition that struck Misr and the region, and the West will never hand over the magical Rosetta Stone to Misr… because it will reveal the game that has been played out on the region since the invasion of Napoleon, who designed a strategic project to destroy, sabotage, and occupy the region. .
And then I realized and felt…the true meaning of a phrase a Czech historian says in it:
“To liquidate peoples, we begin by erasing their memories, then we destroy their books that contain their culture and history, then someone else comes to write other books for them, give them another culture, and invent another history for them, and then after that the people gradually begin to forget, who he is!, and how. “It was! And the world around him will quickly forget him too.”
.
.