9/13/2020 0:00:00
First, this is a link from Wikipedia about Nouh’s Ark. I hope to read the contents of the link, because the material in the link is the general picture that everyone has and is known to researchers.
https://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A9_%D9%86%D9%88%D8%AD What is the importance of a story? Nouh ?
If you read the previous link, you will notice the interest of Western researchers in searching for Nouh’s Ark mentioned in the Book of the Al-Yahoud (the Old Testament), and their searches for the Ark make you feel that they are certain of its existence, even though they somehow do not belong purely to the Book of the Al-Yahoud, because the Book of the Al-Yahoud is a book that did not It came out of their European environment, but they believed in it in a very strange historical circumstance, and also the general Western cultural structure believes that religious books are merely fairy tales that do not express reality.
Also, the idea of searching for and finding a very old ship seems to be a funny idea because the process of finding a ship that is 7000 thousand years old seems difficult and impossible, because the possibility is high that it will not survive given its age, as there are ancient ships that have been damaged and disappeared while they were 500 years old. A year, so how about a ship that is 7,000 years old, for example.
Also, searching for a specific, ancient ship on Earth would be a meaningless and fruitless idea, because how will we be sure that it is that ship? The possibility is very high that we will find the remains of many ancient ships everywhere, so who can tell which one is that ship?
So why did this Western scientific mind insist on searching for Nouh’s Ark and knowing its location?!
If you read the contents of the link… you will notice that the West’s search for Nouh’s Ark in earnest began after Napoleon’s invasion, or specifically after the West’s translations of the region’s ancient writings.
Approximately after 1830… and to this day the West is still providing us with articles or documentaries that talk about Nouh’s Ark from a scientific aspect. Not the scientific materials that Western scientific institutions provide us with, but even cinematic films that mimic the story of Nouh or stories similar to it.
What is the West’s method of research?
Most of the Western scientific institutions that talk about the story of Nouh from a scientific aspect deal with the story found in the book of the Old Testament… and they ignore the existence of a large nation on earth that possesses a religious text that talks about Nouh’s Ark, and there was a nation that did not exist on earth, at least until If the West does not believe in the Qur’an, then scientific institutions should deal with religious books on the same level. But this is a strange and suspicious neglect, since the book of the Al-Yahoud, which the West believes in, is a scientific document or the only document on earth that talks about the story.
Indeed, when Western scholars are searching for the location of Nouh’s Ark, they rely on the Jewish book (the Old Testament), which the West believes in, and the Jewish book was the author of the story.
They deal with the Jewish book, but they convinced people that it is the oldest document that deals with the story.
What are the things that the West has achieved as a result of the research?
The results of the West’s research on the subject of the story of Nouh and the Ark reached three things. The first thing was the discovery of a new historical story to add to the story of Nouh in the Old Testament, the second thing was the discovery of possible locations, and the third thing was a scientific result.
1- The first thing (discovering a new historical story)
The West discovered in Iraq clay tablets with ancient texts on them, and when the West succeeded in deciphering them, it was astonishing. It found in it a story about an ancient flood that seemed similar to the story of Nouh, but it differed in the names of the story’s characters and places.
Thanks to these clay tablets, the cuneiform writing was deciphered, and the coincidence was that it contained the story of a flood.
The truth is that it is not one story, but rather several diverse stories, because the West, after discovering the first story of the tablets, found several flood stories told in the cuneiform writing in Iraq. In fact, Greek books appeared talking about the story of a flood in Iraq… and the stories are all different.
■ The first story (clay texts)
A king called (Ziusuda) was described as pious and fearful of Allah, and devoted himself to his service in humility and reverence. He was informed of the decision prepared by the council of gods to send the flood, which was accompanied by storms and rains that lasted for seven days and seven nights. This flood swept the earth, where (Ziusuda) was described as the person who preserved On the human race by building the ship.
■ The second story (clay texts)
The person of Gilgamesh was commanded by the gods to build a ship, and to leave the possessions, and that he carried on board the ship the seeds of every living thing, and that the ship that he built would be as wide as its length, and that abundant rain fell…etc. Then the ship came to rest on Mount Naseer (Nizir) [which is a generation between the Tigris and the Zab lower].
There are texts that say that it was not Gilgamesh, but rather a man on the island to which Gilgamesh traveled who told him the story of the flood (Utbcham)
■ The third story (printer texts)
In the first half of the third century BC, during the days of King Antiochus I (280-260 BC), there was one of the priests of the Babylonian Allah Marduk, called Berossus, who wrote the history of his country in Greek in three parts and based the book on the story of The flood says:
There lived a king named “Axiso Thos.” This king saw in the sleeper’s vision that Allah was warning him of a flood that would flood the earth and destroy crops and livestock, so he ordered him to build a ship to shelter in during the flood…. So this king built a ship that was one hundred and thousand yards long and four hundred and forty yards wide. He gathers all his relatives and friends in it, and stores a supply of meat and drink, in addition to living creatures, including birds and four-footed animals.
And the flood drowns the earth. The ship settles on a mountain, where he, his wife, his daughter, and the helmsman disembark, and the king prostrates himself before his Allah and offers sacrifices.
2- The second thing (discovering sites)
Locations for Nouh’s Ark have been identified by Western scholars based on popular narratives and the Old Testament.
■ Ararat location (Armenia, Türkiye)
This site was identified by English researchers because they heard the belief of the inhabitants of Armenia (Al-Nasarah), who believe in the Old Testament, in the existence of the Ark on the top of Mount Ararat.
In 1829, philosophy professor Frederick Parrott climbed Mount Ararat in search of the Ark. He was considered the first person in the modern era to undertake this mission. Parrott did not see the Ark, but he said, “The Ark may be buried under layers of ice at the top of the mountain.”
The historian James Price followed suit in 1876. He found a piece of wood at the top of the mountain, and Price was convinced that it was the remains of the ship.
■ Durupinar website (Türkiye)
In 1959, Americans Ron White and Dawoud Fasold discovered traces of what might be Nouh’s Ark in eastern Turkey, after a Turkish farmer pointed out the presence of something strange whose features appeared prominent after an earthquake shook the region.
In the September 1960 issue, Life magazine published on the second page an investigation into the news of the discovery of Nouh’s Ark, along with publishing some pictures. Wyatt visited the ship’s site in 1977 and confirmed that the ship’s location is about 6,300 feet above sea level and about 200 miles from the sea. Dr. Salih Beraktutan, head of the Geology Department at Ataturk University in Turkey, also confirmed that the ship’s age is estimated at more than one hundred thousand years. The famous archaeologist Ekrem Akorgalem also confirmed that the ship is one of the oldest ships made by man and must be preserved
The discovery of the ship was announced by the largest Turkish newspaper in 1987, and it is now a ship recognized by the Turkish government, considering it a national treasure and heritage. It has established a park for it to accommodate a large number of tourists and to emphasize the importance of the site.
3- The third thing (the scientific result of the research)
■ It was believed that the Book of the Al-Yahoud was the oldest document talking about a flood, but ancient cuneiform texts were discovered on clay that were older than the Book of the Al-Yahoud talking about the flood.
■ After the discovery of clay tablets in Iraq and learning about the story of a flood, many Western scholars and others in the region began to believe that the story of Nouh in the Jewish book was stolen or copied from ancient stories in Mesopotamia, and that the Al-Yahoud took it from Babylon during the period of the Babylonian captivity and They twisted it.
■ Almost……. A story similar to the story of Nouh and an ark has been mentioned in the legends of some ancient peoples and in the folk stories of isolated peoples and tribes all over the world, and most of them agree on the destruction of people by the Al-Jibt (Egypt) of water and the escape of the survivors in an ark that docked. On top of a mountain.
■ Egyptian civilization is almost the only ancient civilization that did not talk about the story of the Flood in general, and did not talk about a story similar to the story of Nouh.
■ The search for the site of Nouh’s Ark is still ongoing, because the site in Armenia is completely devoid of traces, and the site in Turkey has proven that a formation resembles the bottom of an ark, but it is a natural formation similar to it that exists in many places, and is not a fossil skeleton of a ship.
—— — — — —
Now let us…discuss the research methodology and our ways of thinking that contradict the West’s discoveries and the results the West has reached in order to reveal the extent of the deception they are committing.
■ If you notice that most of the West’s determinations of the ship’s locations are based on the Old Testament narrative and popular beliefs, and when a location is determined by the West, it becomes the faith and belief of many, including Muslims, because of the power of the media they possess, which can publicize the sites and make These geographical locations are convictions that amount to faith.
The best evidence is that many Muslims believe that the location of the ship is on Mount Ararat in Turkey or Armenia.
■ If you notice that most of the stories of the Qur’an are discovered in Turkey in a striking way, such as the Companions of the Cave in Turkey, the story of Nouh in Turkey, the story of Ibrahim in Turkey, etc.
This is not… Rather, the discoveries in Turkey, in which it is said that the events of the story of a prophet occurred there, are consistent with the book of the Old Testament or the New Testament that the West believes in, in a striking way, after improvements and details from the story found in the Qur’an were added. To give Turkish geographical locations a new mixture that combines the story in the Old Testament and the Qur’an.
For example… The Companions of the Cave presented the youths of Greece in Turkey with the same story found in the Syriac sources, and the story of Ibrahim and Sarah in Turkey with the same sources in the Jewish writers.
Have you asked yourself why?
The truth is that the essence of the matter lies in two things… The first is closely related to the issue of distorting the geography of the prophets and their stories, which is something that many do not pay attention to. The second is that the matter is only tourist propaganda, Turkey’s need for tourism in its country. As you have read, the site that was said to be a place has been transformed. Nouh’s Ark has become a tourist attraction, and the Turkish government has officially recognized it as well as Nouh’s Ark. It is easy for any country to cooperate with Western scientific and media institutions to promote a place, and to summon researchers to write books about a place, so that the place becomes an established reality and a destination for people.
■ If we assume that we found an old ship in southern Iraq, the logical questions are:
Will the West then say that the ship is Nouh’s Ark, Gilgamesh’s Ark, or Ziusuda’s Ark?! .. I think the West will say so, and whoever believes the West’s translations will say that it is the ark of Gilgamesh, and many will say so, especially our people in Iraq who believe in the West’s translations.
So the question is: Why will the West not say that it is Nouh’s Ark and will say that it is Gilgamesh’s Ark, but if it discovers a ship in Turkey, it will say that it is Nouh’s Ark?
Why, when a discovery is made in Turkey, do we believe that it is Nouh’s Ark, and we do not say that it is the ship of an ancient Turkish figure named Ataturk or Genghis, while when we discover a ship in Iraq, we do not say that it is Nouh’s Ark, but rather the Ark of Gilgamesh? …Is it because Turkey does not have ancient writings, while Iraq has ancient writings, and in this way Turkey monopolizes the sacred religious text while Iraqi monopolizes the West’s translations? Although the West talks about ancient civilizations in Turkey with these strange names, it did not invent a name for Turkey different from the name of Nouh’s Ark as we have?!
Why, when a discovery is made in Turkey, do they make people believe that it is the geography of the Qur’an prophets, and people are convinced of this thing, while when we discover a place in the region, we do not believe that it is the geography of the Qur’an prophets, but rather the geography of strange names, and people are convinced of this thing, even though Turkey does not speak Arabic, and The Qur’an is Arabic in the same language as our region, which means more Arab geography than any other place and with the same names in the Qur’an?
■ If we assume that the story of the flood that the West discovered in the cuneiform texts is true, then the logical questions are:
Why did the clay tablets remain to this day from that ancient age and did not disappear even though they were made of clay, but the wooden ship that Gilgamesh or Ziusuda built that they talked about in the tablets did not remain?
If the West is so sure of the Sumerian story about the flood, why is it not searching for the Ark of Gilgamesh or the Ark of Ziusuda in Iraq, but it is still searching for Nouh’s Ark even though it is known that it is a story adapted from a Sumerian story?
Why is the West abandoning the search for the Ark of Gilgamesh and not abandoning its search for Nouh’s Ark?!
Why does he insist on searching for Nouh’s Ark, even though he has discovered older documented texts that make searching for Gilgamesh’s Ark better than searching for Nouh’s Ark?
Rather, why is he searching for Nouh’s Ark, when he has not yet found Gilgamesh’s Ark?
Rather, why is the West searching for Nouh’s Ark or Gilgamesh’s Ark?
This question…. is the essence of the story….. Why is the West looking for Nouh’s Ark or Gilgamesh’s Ark?
—— — —
When the West claimed to discover clay tablets in Iraq, which led to the deciphering of cuneiform writings and the story of a flood discovered in them… its main purpose was a fundamental point that many did not realize, which is:
The story does not originally talk about the stories of civilizations for entertainment, as the West depicted it, and every civilization brings out its innovations to people, but rather it talks about the story of the first beginning of man, and the first beginning of man logically imposes the belief that the place in which the events of the story took place was the first beginning of the first man.
This idea may be understood by a Muslim, but not well, and he may not comprehend it, but the effect of this story is indirectly forcing him to believe in the subconscious in the indirect result made by the West, which is that the Sumerian civilization is the oldest civilization on Earth.
This idea has become firmly established in the minds of researchers, as the story of the flood imposes the beginning in the subconscious, and removing it has become like disbelieving.
The truth is… I never want to enter into an argument with many people regarding the myth of the Sumerian civilization, which in the reality of Iraq has produced very false ideas that prevent them from understanding the origin of the first story on earth. Rather, it has come to the point that this false history has created awareness of my identities in Iraq, from my observations, the residents of southern Iraq believe that they are Sumerians, while others are Babylonians and the areas close to them believe that they are Babylonians, others are Akkadians, and so on.
(The story of Gilgamesh), (The story of Ziusdar) and (The story of the Greek Berossus), which the West said existed in cuneiform texts and in Greek archives, are a lie and have no truth. They were created solely by the imagination of Western authors, and they established them in people’s consciousness for reasons:
In order to make the story precede the story of Nouh by relying on the idea of ancient writings on clay tablets, and when a person believes in it, he will lose the true story of Nouh, the first in time.
The West deliberately manufactured these Sumerian stories, in order to spread the idea that the Al-Yahoud stole the story from the ancient civilization of Iraq, because according to history, as everyone knows, the Al-Yahoud were taken captive in Babylon (the Babylonian Holocaust), and the possibility is high that they took it from that period.
And this idea has become very, very popular among the cultural and intellectual elites, especially in Iraq, that the Al-Yahoud have stolen the stories of their book from the stories of ancient Iraqi civilizations?!
Of course, the West does not care at all about the Al-Yahoud spreading this idea. In fact, the Al-Yahoud are merely a tool that serves the West’s intellectual and religious project, but the truth is that the West only targets Muslims and readers, but in an indirect way.
how ?!
As long as the book of the Al-Yahoud resembles the readers in the stories of the prophets, when the West says that the Al-Yahoud stole the story, it is nothing but an accusation against the Muslims that they stole the story and their story is fake and stolen from an original story, which is (the story of Gilgamesh).
The question is… How will an Iraqi Muslim steal a story from his ancestors (the story of Gilgamesh) and change it into (the story of Nouh)?! .
If an Iraqi Muslim actually owned (the story of Gilgamesh), he would take the story of Gilgamesh as it is, with the same names, and it would be in his religious book that he believes in, and he would not need to steal it and change it into (the story of Nouh).
Unless the main goal is to say… that the Iraqi Muslim is not originally from the land of Iraq, but rather from another land and they are thieves who stole the land of Iraq and destroyed the Gilgamesh civilization of Iraq and stole the stories of the beautiful and charming ancient Gilgamesh civilizations of Iraq and turned them into the stories of Nouh?!
this idea
If you notice the story of the flood in Iraq, you will find that it is several stories. Every civilization in Iraq mentioned the story of the flood, but in a different way.
And this is illogical
Because if there was an actual text written on tablets about the story of a flood, this means that those texts are very sacred, and not luxury and entertainment, otherwise they would not have been written on tablets, and this sanctity dictates that any mention of the story anywhere in Iraq will be the same recorded story. In the tablets, they will not be changed, as evidenced by the fact that the distance separating the site of Sumer from the site of Babylon in Iraq is a very small distance, and it does not impose a difference in mentioning this story, as evidenced by the fact that the writing script is one, cuneiform, meaning one culture, and it does not require a difference.
The story of Gilgamesh is a false, fabricated, and magical story created by the imagination of the West, with no truth to it.
Now… If the West has convinced you, and convinced some intellectuals, of the story of the Al-Yahoud stealing the stories of ancient Iraq during the Babylonian captivity, then let me tell you the real thief in the whole story?
The West is the thief and the thief…. The West stole the story and recreated it in a different way and with different names similar to the Muslim story and made it in a book called (The Bible – The Old Testament).
So the West invented a prophet named (Nouh) so that his name resembled the name of the prophet (Nouh) and composed a story for him that resembled the story of Nouh among Muslims, so that the Muslim would think that an ancient book had been revealed to him in the past in the past and that his book was called the Torah, while the truth was that the West was able to hide The Muslims had to write their first book, which contains your remembrance, and from which they memorized the Qur’an, then they wrote the book (The Bible)… and they made it in several languages of their own invention and they wrote a completely different story from the original true story of Nouh in the Qur’an, until the matter became difficult. A Muslim must understand the speech and stories of the prophets.
In the beginning… try to make a comparison between (the story of Nouh) in the Qur’an and (the story of Nouh) in the book of the West, the Bible…. you will find two completely different texts, even if there is one idea that combines the two stories.
But the one thing that many do not pay attention to, and which is not found in the Book of the Bible even if they try to make a similarity with the Qur’an, and which confirms the game of the Book of the Bible, is the speech of the Qur’an telling you that the Ark has been made by Allah as a sign for the people and a reminder for the believers.
{So We saved him and the companions of the ship and made it a sign for the worlds}
{And We have left it as a sign, so is there anyone who remembers? (15) So how was my punishment and vow? (16) And We have certainly made the Qur’an easy for remembrance, so is there anyone who remembers? (17)}
{Indeed, when the waters overwhelmed, We carried you on the ship (11) that We might make it a reminder for you, and an aware ear would understand it.}
This is the answer to the question… Why is the West looking for Nouh’s Ark or Gilgamesh’s Ark?
The West is trying as much as possible to create large and complex research stories, not to convince you that it is looking for a difficult mystery in order to confuse you, while the ship exists in reality and in front of the eyes of the world.
Not only that… but he has been able, through Hollywood, to create magical cinematic films about the story of Nouh that are different from the first reality on earth… They try to create very exaggerated magical images, with characters, clothes, and décor different from reality, in order to prevent your imagination from reaching the story. The reality that happened… with the characters of the story, their clothes, and the shape of the ship.
Even if someone came one day and assured you that it was Nouh’s Ark, it would be difficult for you to believe it because of the false magical images that European movies have created in your mind.
—— — — —
Let us shorten the West’s arduous task of searching for that ship, by asking a realistic question:
Where is the oldest ship in the world that is still well preserved?
in Misr
A large ship was discovered in Misr, still in very good condition, near what is called the Pyramid. It is 43 meters long, and it is not a single ship, but with several smaller boats alongside it.
Although there are no inscriptions on it, according to what the West says, it is Khufu’s solar ship, and the West said that he was using it as a means of transporting him to the afterlife.
Didn’t you ask yourself a question….. What is the relationship of the speech (We are pleased to recite the remembrance) when talking about the story of Nouh and that he abandoned the ark as a sign?
{And We have left it as a sign, so is there anyone who remembers? (15) So how was my punishment and vow? (16) And We have certainly made the Qur’an easy for remembrance, so is there anyone who remembers? (17)}
Allah says that he left the ship as a sign to the worlds, and that that sign reminds him of the people, and Allah has made it easy for us to recite the remembrance and remember the first centuries.
Which Quran facilitates this and how does it facilitate it?
Readers of the Book (people’s first memory)… May Allah facilitate the readers of the Book, because reading the Book is difficult, so the Revelation facilitates reading for us so that we can read the Book… so that people remember the first centuries, so that they may have insight and guidance and know the first beginnings on earth. .
{And We gave Musa the Book after We had destroyed the first generations, as insight for mankind and guidance and mercy so that they might remember.}
Perhaps they remember the story of Nouh and the story of Ibrahim…etc.
{And We gave Musa the Book and made it a guidance for the Children of Israel: Do you not take a guardian besides me? (2) The offspring of those whom We carried with Nouh. Indeed, he was a grateful servant. (3)}
This is the book that was given to Musa after the destruction of the first centuries (Nouh… etc.), from the descendants of those whom we carried with Nouh.
The Qur’an does not talk about a single ship, but rather talks about an ark and a ship.
Astronomy is the plural of astronomy, meaning there are several boats and a ship.
He made the Ark a sign to the worlds, and those boats were also discovered in Misr near what is falsely called the Pyramid of Khufu, and in sizes smaller than Nouh’s Ark…. in a place where there is no water, a valley without crops.
And that ship……. Allah made it a sign in the Book, the verses of which were detailed in Arabic by Qur’an, in the same form, and He left it a sign in reality to be a reminder to the people.
{And We have recorded everything in a Book}
The book that the West hid, forged its original Arabic reading, invented a fake foreign language for it after the occupation of Misr, and wrote the Book of the Bible after it was hidden.
If Khufu was transporting through that ship a natural reality to the beginning of life, then what is the function of those boats next to the ship?
Is it because each compound transfers a part of his body to eternal life as well? A compound transfers a hand, a compound transfers a leg, a compound transfers the eyes, a compound transfers the nose, and a compound transfers the ears?!
Ridiculous….right?!
So is that ship…. (Nouh’s Ark) or (Khufu’s Ark)… Sorry, I mean (Gilgamesh’s Ark)?!