06/09/2020 00:00
Umm al-Qura and its relationship with Al-Masjid Al Haram:
Real history
Understanding the discourse of the Qur’an… especially the story of Musa?!
Why the story of Musa?
1- Because the story talks about the nation’s memory.
{And We gave Musa the Book after We had destroyed the first generations, as insight for mankind and guidance and mercy so that they might remember.}
2- The Qur’an talks about the science of the first centuries, and it is an important reference to the correct history of the nation.
{He said: What is the matter with the first centuries? (51) He said: Their knowledge is with my Allah in a book. My Allah does not go astray nor forget.}
Therefore, knowing the true and correct history that took place on earth is very important for knowing Al-Masjid Al Haram.
Therefore, this was an important introduction to knowing the history of previous nations that used to make pilgrimages to Al-Masjid Al Haram, and the relationship of this idea to the name (Umm al-Qura)?!
What is the relationship of Umm Al-Qura to Al-Masjid Al Haram?!
Firstly
In the beginning… I will talk about the history of my idea regarding Umm al-Qura.
The truth is… When I heard this name (Umm Al-Qura), I was not convinced that this name was a description or name of Mecca at all…. And I do not know why I felt something completely illogical in the naming.
It is very important… to convey any honest experience, whatever it may be… because honest experience can be built upon for knowledge… Therefore, we build knowledge on false experiences, and this makes our outputs far from the truth.
Maybe because… the picture of Mecca was of tents and several houses, so why was it called Umm al-Qura? How was it Umm al-Qura?! ..Are there villages around?! .. Around Mecca is a simple Bedouin world and there are no villages?! Is it, for example, the mother of (Taif and Medina)… So why did the history make Medina and Taif not belong to Mecca and a different world, so how could it be the mother of the villages and its surroundings?! Then Medina is a city and not a village. This means that it is assumed that when Mecca is the mother of villages, then when the Messenger is sent in Mecca he is directly a messenger for Mecca, Taif and Medina… That is, what is around Mecca is the same religion as Mecca… but what is around Mecca is different from… The religion of Mecca… Then the Qur’an speaks that the Messenger led the villages (Mecca) to warn it and warn what is around it (Taif and Medina), so where is the rest of the world… meaning the message is limited to that place only, so are we Muslims because we are around Mecca… So how was Umm al-Qura at that time, when it was a very remote and small area compared to cities in the region, different from its surroundings? So how was Umm al-Qura at that time?!
It also means Umm al-Qura… it is supposed to be a city in Yemen… because according to history, Yemen is the first origin of the Arabs… so logically, a city named Umm al-Qura should emerge… because it is the origin of the Arabs, the beginning of the Arabs.
The word Umm al-Qura is very large in a story that made the great ancient world very narrow and confined to a narrow place that suffocates the mind and spirit as a reality, and it also made the great current world of reality around Mecca very narrow in a city that seemed to us small and modern that did not fit the word.
———————
These were almost unorganized and disorganized thoughts that were running through my mind without me focusing on his relationship to Al-Masjid Al Haram, and without me feeling that they were developing in my mind over time.
—————————-
So the topic is related to the history presented to us………..and now we need to know the story of Umm al-Qura in order to know the place where Al-Masjid Al Haram is located.
The story of Umm al-Qura… its meaning can be understood through two things:
1- Reading the flow of real history.
2- Through popular heritage and the heritage of reality.
If we start searching in folklore, we will find the following:
In Misr, there is a well-known phrase that is always said by its residents. The phrase (Misr is the mother of the world).
I find that this phrase is not a spontaneous, contrived, alien, or political statement.
Why ?!
Egyptian society is a religious society like any other society in the region, and the phrase (Misr is the mother of the world) is always said in the context of cultural conversation and love for Misr, and is not used in political positions. This makes it difficult to imagine the idea that society in Misr will compete with Mecca religiously in this way. The word and he tries to steal this name from her.
I mean, the phrase could have been (Misr is the whole world), but the cognitive phrase’s insistence on the word (mother) is, for me, an old memory. It is a phrase that emerged from the depths of the collective unconscious in our culture. It is old information that is summoned from the old collective unconscious.
This sentence contains old information and knowledge, and this information is still alive with us in reality.
Misr, the mother of the world… is an ancient memory in our culture.
Of course, this is not considered conclusive evidence by some, but this phrase can be considered an important clue that is used in research in order to reach the correct result in knowing the location of Umm al-Qura.
I will pause at this point for a moment to discuss it because of its connection to our previous conversation about the name (Misr) and the relationship of the topic to the theories that many like to talk about and promote from modern historical fashions, which say that the Misr of the Qur’an is not the Misr of today.
At first, I am surprised by these people whose minds are stuck on books, and who do not want to think carefully about reality and ask logical questions about reality:
Why is there a popular cultural insistence among a people of 90 million and the surrounding world to name the city of Cairo (Misr)… even though its name is (Cairo)?!
Because the topic is an authentic and ancient popular memory, and people have continued to repeat it despite the colonial occupier, through his Albanian tools, changing its name from (Misr) to Cairo… in order to make (Cairo) an official name in transactions until the original name begins to disappear. Its previous name was in people’s memory and tongue, but the people of Misr and its surroundings continued to repeat its original name… Misr.
In addition to the name, the phrase “Misr is the mother of the world” continued…in the tongue of its residents, which is a recall of old information that people in all the region lived by.
Also note with me how malicious and cunning the West is, even if it knows the truth:
The people who promote this theory, the Misr of the Qur’an, is not the current Misr. They rely on the information that (Misr was known in ancient times as the land of Jibt)… and this thing, as we know, is due to the imaginary time and the chronological order of religions created by the West…. and they use as evidence the West’s naming of Misr in their languages. (Misr)
But they don’t notice the reality.
The West calls Misr in their languages (Misr)… Therefore, the Egyptian today is required when speaking in other languages to say that he is from Misr and not from Misr, and so on until the name (Misr) takes root in order to erase the name (Misr) from reality. It replaces the name (Misr)…and this is the fundamental reason that created this false awareness among these people……even though the Egyptian government is supposed to demand that Western countries change the name of Misr in their languages to Misr, because it is the official name, and You must respect me and call me by my real name… just as Greece did with Macedonia, with which it entered into a crisis demanding that it change the name of its country.
This insistence in European languages on the name (Misr)…is because the ancient civilization of (Greece) that was contemporary with Misr was called Misr by the name (Misr), and because the West is the heir to the Greek civilization, so the name (Misr in all languages) was officially adopted.
Although all European languages are approximately 300 years old…and at that time when the languages of Europe were officially established, they had to call Misr “Misr” in their languages, because in that period in which they established their languages and created dictionaries for them, the name Misr is Misr, but the West did not respect the reality at that time, so the whole West decided to open 2000-year-old ancient books written by Greece and decided to commit to calling Greece “Misr.”
Now notice that the languages of Europe are the heirs of Greek and Roman civilization.
If you look at some European countries, you will find a note:
There is Albania, which is within Europe, unlike Turkey, and as we know that the majority of Albanians are Muslims, and they and the Turks are of the same origin, and the Albanians flaunted that they were in the Turkish army and were famous by the name Arnaout, but despite the fact that they are Muslims and historically linked to the Turks, they are called Misr is called (Misr) in the dictionary of their official language and their language today, although they should know Misr as Misr and not Misr exactly like the Turks, because the Turks call Misr in their language as Misr.
Also, Bosnia and Herzegovina call Misr in their languages, even though they are Muslims, and the history of Muslims has been associated with the name Misr, not Misr.
Also Malta… Malta is a European country, and its language is like an Arabic dialect and any Arab understands it clearly, and any Arab who travels to Malta will find that it is an Arabic language, and this means that the Maltese are not heirs to Greek civilization, They are supposed to call Misr Misr in their language, but they call Misr Misr.
So the issue is political and has nothing to do with history or truth
But… if we agree that the West, which is the heir to Greek civilization, loves its ancient Greek heritage and preserves it, so it decided to adhere to the designation of their ancestors, which is (Misr)…. But what is strange and astonishing is that the West did not always adhere to the designation of their ancestors, Greece.
All European languages call Misr…….Misr…a Greek name
But all European languages call Cairo….Cairo…an Arabic name
Europe is supposed to call Cairo in its languages “Heliopolis” or “Memphis.”
Why ?!
Because the West is not concerned with legislating the legacy of their Greek ancestors, and is not at all interested in adhering to the names of Greek civilization… and is not concerned with historical facts… the West is only concerned with distorting reality… with cognitive obliteration only… and removing the original names that were created. reality .
The West calls Cairo the name of Cairo……. because the West knows that the name Cairo is not the original name of Cairo, which was Misr… Therefore, there is no problem for the West in adopting this name… but rather because it is the official approved name that exists in history. The imaginary one who wrote for the region… Cairo of Al-Mu’izz and the history of the Ayyubids and the Mamluks, etc.
I mean, for example… If the Egyptian revolution in the 1950s had called Misr a country (Bot)… Then be sure, all European languages would have called Misr “Bot” and not Misr.
I will also give you from our cultural memory… regarding Yemen, and that the name is old in the memory of people in all the region and they want to erase it from reality.
The story of the Sphinx statues… The riddle contained the name Misr… and this indicates that the people had the name in their ancient tongue?!
Why ?
Because the discovery… is not a recent discovery.
I mean, people believe that the matter is related to Islam in the right of Mecca, which is the reason that made the name Misr on the tongues of the residents of the region.. But the discovery relates to ancient Yemeni antiquities written in the Musnad script… buried deep.. I mean, people inherited the name from ancient times…. I mean From the time before the Islam of Mecca
Also notice the funny thing… in the story of the wooden coffin discovered in Misr, which had inscriptions in the Musnad script… which was said because he was a Yemeni merchant… haha… because the Egyptian 2300 years ago during the era of the entry of Greece… wrote on the coffin That a Yemeni man wrote the name (Misr)… and wrote the name of Misr… but did not write the name of his country (Misr or Kemet)… Rather, this same Egyptian, at the same time, wrote the name of his country as Kemet and Misr in hieroglyphic script.
A mockery
There are also some of those who have this belief and who have a wrong temporal imagination… starting from the principle that the Prophet called it the country of the Copts.
The truth is that the Prophet did not say it… Rather, the Prophet of the Ottoman printer that came with the invasion of Napoleon and his soldiers is the one who drew the borders of the region and the borders of Misr currently. He is the one who called it the land of Jupiter with the same foreign name, Misr…….. The Prophet of the Napoleonic Ottoman Printer He was the one who called it the country of Jibt, after the same name they invented.
As for the true, original prophet, he rejects the name of the Jibt that came recently from a criminal and immoral foreign invader, namely Napoleon and his people, the people who forged the book whose verses were detailed as an Arabic Quran for Napoleon’s people who know.
{Have you not seen those who were given a share of the Book? They believe in Al-Jibt (Egypt) and the Taghut (Dometic) and say to those who disbelieve, “These are better guided to a way than those who believe.” Those are whom Allah has cursed. And whoever Allah curses, you will never find a helper for him. Or do they have a share of dominion, so if they do not give people a filth? Or do they envy the people for what Allah gave them of His bounty. We gave the family of Ibrahim the Book and wisdom, and gave them a great kingdom.}
While the true, original Messenger…….follows the word of Allah and rejects the name Al-Jibt, and this name could not have appeared on his tongue, and it is impossible for the Prophet to deny Allah’s verses in a foreign tongue, which he calls Misr, the mother of villages.
{Enter Misr, Allah willing, safe}
In short, I mean… the West is busy obliterating and removing the words of the Qur’an from reality… and this Western conscious work that exists behind the labels and which wrote all this history for people… is behind the making of this wave about that the Misr of the Qur’an is not the current Misr.. Which is adopted by our historians, readers, and researchers… whether it is a conscious or unconscious adoption.
—————————-
Now let us return to our topic… Umm al-Qura and the real, real history.
If you look at the history written by the West of ancient times in the region, you will find that the picture that the West painted for us is approximately as follows:
Such as a person suddenly opening his mobile phone to receive breaking news about several sudden explosions in a city. Or like a person who suddenly wakes up from sleep to find himself in a room in which there are several people he does not know and who speak in strange languages, or like worms that suddenly came out from everywhere and multiplied and decided to create a geographical space for themselves within which they are confined.
The West has written history for us… in a way consistent with Darwin… so that it seems that there was a sudden agreement that took place in the region between races… and there were several papers in a bowl, and on each paper was written the type of calligraphy and… The type of belief and the type of language….and each ethnicity must choose a random sheet of paper…and each person’s share will be according to what is on the sheet….Misr’s share was hieroglyphics, the Fertile Crescent’s share was cuneiform, and the Cuneiform share was Misr’s share. Yemen belongs to Al-Musnad and the Phoenician share goes to Morocco. Everyone went out on stage at once to prove their theatrical presence in life or to the reading public.
This is surprising
There is no Western historian who has asked a question about the reasons for this sudden appearance in this particular region. Rather, the Western mind does not want to raise such a question. Even our historians have not seriously asked this question. There may be history books that talk about the origins of civilizations. But I mean the reasons for this sudden appearance in the region, in this particular time period, and with this difference?
For example…there is no logical explanation about the origins of religion, language and writing that the West wrote for us, and there is no logical context for them…just a sudden appearance and everyone placing his goods in a market. Region .
You do not know any logical context that explains the reason for the emergence of the ancient belief in Iraq, the Levant, Misr and Yemen, even if the Western mind provides us with a history of stories about gods and belief by linking them to the phenomena of nature as the origin of the first that produced those beliefs.
According to the logic of the Western mind, the reason for the difference in ancient beliefs in the region is because of the different climatic and natural environment. In Iraq, a different belief emerged from Misr because of the climate and nature in Iraq, which is different from Misr and different from Yemen, and so on….
But it is an illogical explanation
Because if nature is the starting point… then we are surprised why there were no gods specific to the Nile or the Euphrates, given that those rivers were very strongly linked to the lives of people in that geography… and why civilizations were not the same in their worship as long as nature was one. ( the river ) ?!
You also do not know of any scientific or logical explanation that would explain to you the reasons for the appearance of this method and those shapes in writing fonts and the choice of them over others. Why this particular method and not another way of writing?! Was there a specific system for choosing writing fonts, or was it a random system?!
Because you do not find in the writings of the West any serious explanation about the reasons for the emergence of the Musnad script, the cuneiform script, or the hieroglyphic script…. Only inscriptions appeared suddenly, and we do not know the eras that preceded them that explain the reasons for these types of scripts.
What is the first source of this appearance… If we assume an ancient, infinite state of time that precedes us… then it is logical that whenever we step back in time, anciently, until eternity… one point must appear to us, which is a logical and natural context for this cultural emergence in Region .
Why ?
This first point is the subject on which the West seems very stupid and very naive… when it writes to the inhabitants of the region their ancient history.
Think carefully with me
We look at the West…as an intellectual structure based on science, logic, and scientific evidence, and from it emerged several genius mentalities, as we believe, that were able to decipher the inscriptions of the region and brought out for us all of this ancient history and were able to interrogate these ancient writings.. And he made it pronounce with the same pronunciation as ancient humans… and this Western mentality is what produced for us several historical theories that explain to us the ancient history of the region.
But this intellectual structure is the same intellectual structure whose scientific and theoretical formation also produced for us scientific theories that unified many things around us.
Think well
● The Western intellectual structure…from it emerged scientists who were able to unify life on Earth, and who were able to link humans and animals with a single origin, with Darwin’s theory of its origin being a single cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye. Darwin’s theory has become correct and is taught in all universities as a fact… and whoever opposes it will be ridiculed. This theory made the beginning of life from a small cell that cannot be seen with the naked eye.
Imagine with me the difficulty of imagining the idea of believing that man, monkey, mouse, and insect were of one origin and one living cell… from which all this biological diversity evolved and emerged.
However, it is a valid scientific theory
● Also, the Western intellectual structure…from it emerged scientists who were able to unify the parts of this vast and huge universe…and they were able to connect galaxies, planets, and stars that are very far away and the distances between them reach fabulous numbers… ……..And it has been linked to one origin, which is the Big Bang Theory… a huge explosion in a part of space between particles that cannot be seen with the naked eye… and no one opposes this theory?! . This theory made the beginning of this giant universe…from an explosion in a small point in space.
Imagine with me the difficulty of imagining the idea that the Earth, the sun, the moon, the stars, and the galaxies are of one origin, and that everything in the universe in the distant past was a small speck. This huge universe emerged from the explosion of a small point in space.
However, it is a valid scientific theory.
But the logical question:
Why, then, is this same intellectual structure based on science and logic incapable, or perhaps very stupid, this time, and has it never thought of uniting the civilizations of the region into one civilization, which are civilizations that are very close to each other and not separated by the vast distances that exist between galaxies and are not at all different from each other? Some of them, such as the vast difference between humans and mice, led to the fact that they are of the same origin.
Why did this mind not think of unifying the region’s civilizations within one scientific historical theory, when this theory is the one from which all the region’s civilizations emerged? ….. Why were they unable to do that, even though it is easier than the theory of a human and a mouse from one cell? Why did they ignore… Why did it not occur to them?! Are they hiding something? .
The matter clearly appears to be linked to a certain intellectual orientation and not stupidity, and they must draw history for us like this… that is, they are required to work according to this perception… and it may be because it serves the politics based on divide and rule, and it may be related to something else dangerous. .
But the most important logical question is: Why does the non-Western mind, which believes in previous theories of the Western mind that are difficult to imagine, find it extremely difficult to comprehend the idea of a single source that emerged from the civilizations of the region, especially our historians and those with scientific minds who absolutely believe in theories of the Western mind that are difficult to imagine? With the unity between man and animals, and that the beginning was a microscopic cell from which all forms of life emerged, and the huge universe and those vast distances between the stars and planets were a small point in place and from which all this huge universe emerged)?!
Even if we find a historian and thinker of our own… and he talks about one common origin through matching the symbols and names of ancient languages and the vocabulary of language translations that the Western mind has extracted for us… but it is not in the image that they are talking about. Which they extracted from the writings of the West… because the picture they paint is also illogical.
What I mean by the single source of the region’s civilizations is something completely different.
Because logic, reason, and wisdom…they all say:
The region appeared as a result of only one explosion and not as a result of several explosions… and humans in the entire region existed as a result of one spot (one living cell) and they emerged from it… they multiplied and spread throughout the region and The land was settled… and it carries one religion and one language.
Or in other words:
People did not suddenly emerge all at once, in one moment, like worms or flies, from every spot on the earth. Then they decided to invent a language for themselves to communicate with each other and invent a religion. All people emerged from one spot, one point on the earth, and they emerged from the first group. Humanity appeared at that point, and that first human group had one language and one innate religion, and it multiplied and then spread throughout the earth and settled in it and settled and populated the earth, but it did not lose touch with that first point from which they emerged, and logically it must That the point from which they emerged is the place where the oldest traces of man are located (the oldest building on Earth)… a place of continuous communication (Hajj).
That first point will be called (Umm al-Qura).
Logically, that first point (Umm al-Qura) will be the first human group to appear there, and the first building erected for people and the first book written by people.
Logically, ancient writings will appear around that first point (Umm al-Qura), and they have taken developed written forms over time and have emerged from the first oldest book found in the first point, and those various ancient writings in the areas of their presence were written in different and distant time periods. After a long journey of migration and settlement of this people in the land, there was a need for simpler and easier writings.
Because that first writing found in the first point (Umm al-Qura) has become, in the eyes of the people, a sacred sacred writing that contains their first memory, their first nature from which they emerged, and people will write many advanced writings around the surroundings of that first book found in the first point (Umm al-Qura).
That is, all the writings are specific to one civilization with one belief and one language, but they are advanced writings from the form of their first book found in the first point (Umm al-Qura).
{And thus We have revealed to you an Arabic Qur’an, that you may warn the Mother of Cities and those around it, and warn of the Day of Assembly, about which there is no doubt, a party in Paradise and a party in the Blaze} {And this is a Book We have sent down, blessed is it, confirming what is before it, and that you may warn the Mother of Cities and those around it, and those who believe in the Hereafter will believe in it, and they will guard their prayers.}
{Indeed, the first House established for mankind is the one in Bakkah, blessed and a guidance for the worlds. (96) In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim.
————-
Does reality support this historical idea?!
Yes
1- Notice….. In Misr, we have the oldest building in the region and the world, and it contains the oldest book in the region.
2- There is also ancient writing in Yemen extracted from the writing found in Misr (Umm al-Qura movement)…………… Evidence that it is a single language movement.
3- There are mummified corpses in Yemen that resemble the mummified corpses in Misr, and this indicates that it is (the Umm al-Qura movement)… evidence that it is a movement of one religion.
In Yemen, there are discoveries of sphinx statues bearing Musnad inscriptions, and this indicates that it is (the Umm al-Qura movement)… Evidence that there is one holiness to a place.
A wooden coffin bearing bolster inscriptions was discovered buried next to one of the pyramids, and this indicates that it is the (Umm al-Qura Movement)… Evidence that there has been one pilgrimage to one place since ancient times.
So… the historical theory of Umm al-Qura is very correct, and reality supports and confirms this theory clearly, clearly, and with great accuracy.
Misr is the mother of villages… and Al-Masjid Al Haram is in Misr, and the Qur’an supports and confirms this result and this historical movement.
{And We revealed to Musa and his brother: “Houses for your people in Misr, and make your homes a direction of direction.”}