2019-07-30T13:31:00-07:00
Who is Abdul Rahman inside ?
I was always asking myself questions that I found involuntarily imposing themselves within me, as if they were imposing themselves around Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhel’s unreality.
● Why did Abd al-Rahman choose a far away place, which is Andalusia, to flee to, and travel that distance alone? Didn’t he find another place close to him? After all that distance, he became the ruler of Andalusia and the people welcomed him to rule?
● Couldn’t the residents of Andalusia rule themselves without the presence of Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhil? Couldn’t the tribes there that supported Abd al-Rahman appoint someone from among them as ruler in Andalusia?!
● Is it necessary to be an Umayyad man in order to be received in this way and become ruler with such ease? ?!
Let’s read a summary of Abdul Rahman’s biography.
He was born in the Levant, and it is said that one of his relatives received a prophecy saying that an enemy would come from the east and eliminate the Umayyad rule. However, an Umayyad boy would be able to establish it again in Andalusia, and when he saw Abd al-Rahman for the first time upon his father’s death, he saw in his face the signs that This indicates that he is the intended Umayyad.
When the Umayyad state fell at the hands of the Abbasids, the Abbasids tracked down the Umayyads and eliminated them for fear that they would try to regain their kingship. Abd al-Rahman fled with a brother, two sisters, and his two sons until he reached a village on the Euphrates, and one of his slaves snitched, so the Abbasids pursued him, and they found no escape except for them. Crossing the river. While they were in the middle of the river, the police tempted them to return for safety, so his brother returned for fear of drowning, but the Abbasids killed him, while Abdul Rahman succeeded in reaching the other bank.
Abd al-Rahman fled from them and moved from place to place for five years in North Africa, with his uncles in Tripoli, Libya, then he landed on a broom until he reached Ceuta.
There he sent a message with his servant to the followers of the Umayyads in Andalusia, asking them to support him and pave the way for his entry into Andalusia. So his servant presented the message to many people from the Mudhara tribes, but they were afraid of his arrival so that he would not dispute the rule with them. His servant presented the message to the Yemeni tribes, and they agreed and supported him. He entered Cordoba after defeating its ruler, then expanded into the cities of Andalusia, eliminated opponents, and eliminated revolts that had arisen. on him .
Among Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhel’s most important works are the Rusafa Palace, Al-Masjid Al Haram in Cordoba modeled after the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus, and the Wall of Cordoba. He died in Cordoba and was buried in the Cordoba Palace.
This is Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhel briefly, and I do not want to go into much detail of his story, but his story cannot answer my previous questions accurately, because we will delve into the interpretation of texts to answer those questions.
But I think there is another question that haunted me as well:
Why is he called the Falcon of Quraish?
I think it’s an important question, and I don’t know why no one has asked this question.
Why did they call this man… the Falcon of Quraysh… Why did the Quraysh wait 200 years for a man to appear and be called the Falcon of Quraysh? Why did the title not appear during the Umayyads’ presence in Mecca?!
Why specifically the Quraish falcon, and not the Quraish lion, for example?!
Why was he called by this name and not called by another name, and what is the significance of this title?!
● History books described Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhel as being blond, tall, thin, one-eyed, with a long nose and two braids.
One-eyed falcon?!
Doesn’t it seem that the description is similar to what the West translated from Egyptian inscriptions, and wrote for us the story of the Allah (Hor), who was in the form of a falcon, and the Allah (Horus) fought a battle with the Allah (Set), and in it (Set) gouged out one of my eyes? Hoor), after which he became one-eyed.
Abd al-Rahman (the Quraish falcon)… He was one-eyed and sluggish (long-nosed) and had two braids. The one-eyed Hawar (the hawk) had the (sharp) beak and had two braids.
The Allah Hur (the falcon) was symbolized by the disk of the sun and he is said to be the son of the sun Allah, and Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhil (the falcon of Quraish) is from the descendants of Abd Shams.
The feminine form of the name Hoor (the falcon) will be Hawraa.
Did you know that Abdul Rahman Al-Dakhel’s wife (Saqr Quraish) was named Hawraa?
Hoor should be his wife’s name…Hawraa lol
Saqr Quraish hid his real name (Hoor) and chose an Arab Muslim name (Abdul Rahman), but he forgot to give his wife a name different from Hawra.
Hur Quraish was in a battle with Set al-Abbas.
—————————————
What does our time look like?
If one of the German researchers sees that time in the mind of a Muslim is a sweeping, sealed torrent, and Muhammad al-Jabri sees time as circular in the mind of the Arab, while Muhammad Arkoun sees it as a legendary time in the mind of the Muslim.
I see time in the mind of a Muslim as a sweeping torrent that begins at one point and ends at a point, and above that torrent there is a magical circular ring. The torrent pushes that ring while it remains in place, producing a continuous circular movement.
Time moves in a circular manner in place, making us live within repeated historical circles and move through their symbols, reproducing the novel.
The image of this time that I find in the Muslim mind, I extracted through reading and reviewing Islamic history.
But the question that arises is why time was formed in this way
In the mind of the Muslim, there is a fundamental reason that made time like this, so that it is the primary responsible behind making the Muslim produce reality in a way that appears circular and repetitive? And did history really proceed in the same way that history presented to us?!
I believe that searching for an answer to this question will lead us to a conclusion that a German researcher came up with, saying:
“All ancient historical records were created at one time, almost at the advent of the printing press, and were projected into ancient times, by repetition.”
This is the true interpretation of the image of time that I found inside the Muslim mind among readers of history.
Not a real time, but an imaginary, repeated time… like repeated circular rings… and the reason those circles stopped above the torrent… was only because the story is modern and not old… it is still connected to us today.
The appearance of the character of Horus in the character of Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhel is evidence that this character was created specifically after the West’s translations of Egyptian inscriptions and their writing of those magical stories about the religion of Misr…and those magical stories of the gods were transformed into stories with characters bearing… Names from reality and geography from reality….. until those magical stories extracted from the Muslim book are embodied in people’s imagination.
————————–
How can you research history and obtain results that are closer to honesty and truth?!
I think that the missing point for many is that true history is not read from modern writings, but rather from the first main sources, from the first copies………of manuscripts……. The first manuscripts that are written must be read. I witnessed the events… and through these sources it is possible to build correct historical knowledge… Because it will be based on those sources only, and any books that come after them… are worthless… because they will be additions from the imagination of their author.
Therefore, let me convey to you a summary of an entire chapter from a book entitled (The Islamic Revolution in the West)… by a Spanish researcher named Eugencio Olague… and we know the confiscation that makes it one of the scientific conditions to rely on to reach results that are close to the truth.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
● All historians who studied the Arab conquest of Andalusia relied on a Latin text written by Bishop Isidoro Bassens, a specialist in the history of his time. During his narration, the bishop enumerates in two titles the number of his works on various topics, but they are all missing.
A text by the bishop has been transmitted to us, and it narrates events up to the year 754 AD, through many manuscripts, all of which came later than him. But there are two manuscripts that can be relied upon as evidence. The first is in the Madrid Library in Spain, and the second is in the L’Arsenal Library in Paris.
The first manuscript was rewritten in the 14th century AD, and is more complete than the second, half of which was lost.
Father Florez included this text in the eighteenth century in his major work (Holy Spain).
In 1882 AD, the Frenchman Father Tayand, a scholar of ancient texts, issued the two manuscripts in two facsimiles, with long and large comments.
● In addition to these Latin documents……. The oldest texts that Spanish historians relied on date back to Arab authors and in the Arabic language in the eighth century.
1- Among them are texts attributed to Ibn Habib (835 AD), who introduced the Maliki school of thought to Spain.
But the Dutch orientalist Renard Duzi (1860 AD) has proven, through his research on the history of Spanish literature, that these texts date back to (891 AD)… and that they are texts written by a student of Ibn Habib.
2- There is another Arabic text attributed to an Egyptian scholar, Ibn Abd al-Hakim (871 AD).
3- Another Arabic text is entitled (Hadiths of the Imamate and Politics), and is attributed to the historian Ibn Qutaybah (828 AD – 889 AD). Douzy proved that Ibn Qutaybah did not write those hadiths, but they were written in the year 1062 AD by Ibn al-Raqqa’.
● As for the ninth century, there are no texts that talk about the eighth century in Spain except for two Latin texts:
The Chronicles of Alphonse III and the Chronicles of the Town, these two texts were written by monks who lived in northern Spain.
The news of Alphonse III may have been written by the king himself, the king of Esther and Lyons in 910 AD, and it is believed that he inspired another man to write it.
The narration of this text begins in the year 672 AD – 872 AD, and was written in the year 883 AD.
As for the news of the town, it seems less ancient than the first, but it bears the date of the first text in 883 AD, and its author is not known.
At this same date, the novel Al-Razi News stops. It is an Arabic text written by Ahmed Al-Razi, known as Al-Tarikh. This novel conveyed the news of the Principality of Roderick until the year 976 AD, from the eras of the Emirates and the Islamic kingdoms, through the events of the conquest of the Iberian Peninsula. The original text of the novel has been lost, and We only have a poor Spanish translation dating back to the 14th and 15th centuries. This text was published by Pascual Giangos, and Edward Saavedra copied some paragraphs from it, and included them in his study on the Arab invasion of Spain. In the part related to the biography of the last Gothic kings, and the conquest of the Iberian Peninsula.
Al-Razi’s text is divided into three sections: the first section is geography and the other two sections are history, that is, the events of the Iberian Peninsula before and after the conquest. All historians have admitted that the translation of this text into Spanish distorted the original text. And filled it with fraud and distortion.
Therefore, it was important to get the investigator out of it. Thus, Giangos denied that the writer of the text was an Arab. He claimed to be inspired by a historical novel about Roderick, published in 1492 AD. Saavedra believes exactly the opposite, that the historical novel was influenced by this history and not the other way around. As for Mendes, he oscillates between the two, but he tends to believe that the text was written by Al-Razi himself.
● As for the texts written between the 11th and 12th centuries about the events that took place in the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal) during the eighth century, they are entirely Arabic texts.
The 11th century texts summarized what was transmitted orally by Arab families and tribes.
The most complete model in it is the model that Dozi discovered under the title (Group News). It is a narrative work written by an unknown Muslim intellectual around 1005 AD. Among these Berber reports, we can also point out those recorded by Ibn al-Qutiyya, whose origin goes back to one of Ghaytasha’s daughters.
These last two texts were included in the book (Selections of Arabic, Historical, and Geographical Works Published in the Royal Spanish Academy of History)………….. Emil Al-Qantara translated the collection’s news, while the news of Ibn Al-Qutiyah was translated by him. Giangos.
● As for the Arabic texts that were written in a period later than the 11th century, and related to the Arabs’ conquest of Iberia (Spain-Portugal), they rose to the level of scientific research, and thus we can turn the pages of the works of Ibn Khaldun, a historian who some see as (half-Arab), He is a Tunisian intellectual of Iberian origin who lived in the 14th century. He was educated in Andalusian culture, which brought him to the heights of global thought. From other Arab historians, we can rely on the texts of Ibn al-Adhari and Ibn al-Bakri.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
We will quote for you a little of what was mentioned in those sources, along with the comments of the Spanish researcher:
● The myth of crossing the Strait of Tariq
According to (Al-Majwa News), the so-called Ulban Al-Arab loaned four boats, and the maximum capacity of the boat does not exceed fifty people and sailors. In this case, Tariq needs 35 trips to transport his army, that is, about seventy days, because this type of boat needs at least one day to cover the distance, and if we count the weeks with bad weather, during which trips stop, we will reach three months, which is not possible. If sailing was carried out like this, the inhabitants would not have been able to survive a great massacre. This is so that they can receive those who will join them.
Ibn Abd al-Hakim says… that the success of the Arabs in invading the strait is due to a trick (Tariq bin Ziyad’s members used to detain the farmers on one of the islands, then they killed one of them and cooked his body in pots, and in the second pot they cooked ordinary meat). This is in an attempt to convince them that they are cannibals. After the success of the trick, they spread fear in the Iberian Peninsula. Soon, news of the Arabs reached all parts of the island until the Iberians received them with respect to gain their sympathy so that they would not become their meals.
In addition to the fact that this talk is not convincing, it must be pointed out that there are no islands in the strait, and Parsley Island is nothing but a rock.
● The writer of the chronicles of Alphonse III narrates the story of a battle that took place in the mountains of Shatrush, near a cave called the Cave of the Virgin. The Al-Nasarah face enemies whom he calls the Chaldeans and then the Arabs. The battle ends with the killing of 180,000 Arabs, then a mountain collapses on the remaining 60,000 during their withdrawal… crushing them. .
The writer explains the matter by saying: We must not imagine that this is a myth or a miracle. Let us remember that the Allah saved the people of Israel from Egyptian oppression in the Red Sea. Likewise, for the same reasons, the Allah crushed with a huge mountain mass those Arabs who were persecuting the Church of the Allah
● Berber news says that the conquest ended in a dispute between Musa and Tariq, and that this dispute had nothing to do with the problems that accompanied the invasion. Rather, the matter was related to a table that belonged to King Sulaiman and was found in the treasures of the Gothic king. Tariq found it, but Musa took it. From him, and worse than that, he insulted a female subordinate in front of his soldiers and slapped him in the face, and the dispute ended in mutual violence, so they went to the Levant to litigate, leaving Iberia (Spain and Portugal) without authorities.
Musa declared to the Caliph that he punished Tariq in this humiliating way because he was constantly violating the rules and laws. Tariq replied that Qaida was angry because the table was lame, due to the loss of its fourth menu.
In order to rule justly on such an important and delicate issue, the Caliph was preparing to summon the spirit of the original owner of the table in question (Suleiman), but Tariq took out from under his cloak the conclusive evidence of his right, namely the missing foot that he had broken himself.
———————————-
Now… Didn’t you ask yourself what the Spanish wrote about that period?! Have you ever thought about reading the Spanish archives that talk about that period that lasted 800 years?!
Notice…. how most of the Latin manuscripts appeared in the era of the printer, of unknown origin, hidden, transferred, and harboring doubts.
You wonder if it is possible that the Spaniards do not have sources about that entire era… 800 years… except for five manuscripts that date back to the fourteenth century.
And why must the manuscripts be in Spain? Why does the Vatican not have manuscripts written for 800 years? Isn’t Spain subordinate to the Catholics? And where has Europe been for 800 years? The Latins and Greeks wrote huge historical volumes about The region. In detail. They wrote about religions, peoples, languages, and gods, and they did not leave anything that they did not write about in the region. So why did their documentation stop for 800 years?
You are also surprised… The European mind relies on its archive to write history, but this time it relies on an Arab archive that does not know its truth, and this step is not taken by any country.
Look at the absurdity of the information in those manuscript sources: two military commanders are fighting over a table, and suddenly and quickly decide to leave Spain for the Levant in order to seek authority before the king, and one of them takes out the table’s pillar.
Also see the absurdity of 120,000 dead and 60,000 dead because of a mountain, and how the writer of these sources is conscious of the fact that it is a mythical lie. He preempts any question for the reader about the authenticity of this story, but he dyes it with a religious story to confirm that such stories can happen according to law. The Allah found in the Old Testament.
———————————-
I will convey to you one of the conclusions of this Spanish researcher:
“The basic roots of the “myth” of the military invasion of Andalusia originated in Misr, and the Latin writers affiliated with Rome were the ones who most contributed to promoting and spreading this myth.”
I think that the arrival of this researcher in Misr…is close to our perception, which we believe, that the story was written after the West’s translations of Egyptian inscriptions, and in fact the source of the novel is Misr, but not according to what this researcher believes, but rather according to our perception that it is works written by orientalists. West
Because the question is: What is the importance of Latin researchers promoting these stories and myths, according to the researcher’s words, and where are those books that they promoted……. And why do the Latins not promote stories they wrote themselves, instead of importing them from Misr and promoting them… Unless the producer and promoter were the Latins themselves… and they were none other than those who entered the era of the conquest of Misr… after which all this heritage appeared from the printer.
Why are they promoting these stories?!
The saying attributed to Al-Mamun, which he said after he translated the Greek books: “Our goods were returned to us”… is the answer.
Our history is really translations…not our real history. This phrase was put in place in order to convince Muslims and Arabs in a historical period that what was delivered to them is their truth and must be accepted because it is our property and our goods. While the truth is that these are only translations…….of one novel, but the translations were formulated with décor, furniture, geography, and characters with Arabic names only and have no truth to them. The goal was to create a new memory for the peoples of the region.
The goal of promoting these stories was what a Czech historian said:
“To liquidate peoples, we begin by erasing their memories, then we destroy their books that contain their culture and history, then someone else comes to write other books for them, give them another culture, and invent another history for them, and then after that the people gradually begin to forget, who he is!, and how. “It was! And the world around him will quickly forget him too.”
Magic… creating a magical world in the Muslim mind, and preventing the Muslim mind from leaving this world… creating a new memory for the Muslim and the Arab, and creating a new time and history for him… making Western history precede it in His land……. A strategic intellectual project for a future occupation plan
————————-