2019-06-30T10:54:00-07:00
What is the age covenant?
In the beginning… let us search, research and read about what history says about the Omari Covenant
———————————
What is the age covenant?
Wikipedia
The Omari Covenant is a book written by Caliph Omar ibn al-Khattab to the people of Jerusalem when the Muslims conquered it in the year 638 AD, in which he secured for them their churches and property. The Omari Covenant was considered one of the most important documents in the history of Jerusalem and Palestine and the oldest documents regulating the relationship between religions.
After the Muslims’ victory in the Battle of Yarmouk, Omar, may Allah be pleased with him, entered Jerusalem to receive its keys from the Patriarch of Jerusalem, Sophronius, in 15 AH, and Omar bin Al-Khattab wrote them a letter containing the terms of peace.
———————————————-
What is the text of the covenant?
■ Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyyah – Book of Ahkam al-Dhimmah – 1350 AD
“In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful, and from Him we seek help, the text of the Omar Covenant; this is what Abdullah, Omar, the Commander of the Faithful, gave the people of Ilia’ security… He gave them security for themselves, their money, their churches, their crosses, their sick, their innocent, and the rest of their sect… that their churches shall not be inhabited, nor demolished, nor diminished. From it, nor from its area, nor from their cross, nor from any of their money, and they shall not be forced to convert to their religion, and none of them shall be harmed, and none of the Al-Yahoud shall live with them in Ilia. The people of Ilia shall pay the tribute as the people of Mada’in are given. They shall expel the Romans and thieves from it. So whoever If he leaves them, he will be safe for himself and his property until they reach their place of safety. And whoever of them stays is safe, and he will have to pay the same amount of jizyah as the people of Ilia’ are required to pay. And whoever of the people of Ilia’ wants to go with himself and his property with the Romans and leave their house and their cross-country, then their lives, their house and their cross-country will be safe until they reach He secured them. Whoever among them wanted to sit and paid a tribute similar to what the people of Ilia had to pay. Whoever wanted to went with the Romans. And whoever wanted to went back to his family, for nothing would be taken from them until he reaped their harvest.
And based on what is in this book, Allah’s covenant, the covenant of His Messenger, the covenant of the caliphs, and the covenant of the believers, if they pay the tribute they are owed.
Books and attended by fifteen years Hijra.
Witness to this: Khalid bin Al-Walid, Abdul Rahman bin Awf, Amr bin Al-Aas, and Muawiyah bin Abi Sufyan.”
While Omar, may Allah be pleased with him, was dictating this covenant, prayer was attended, so Al-Batriq invited Omar to pray where he was in the Church of the Resurrection, but Omar refused and said to him: I fear that if I pray in it, the Muslims will prevail over you and say here the Commander of the Faithful prayed.
■ History book collected on authentication and investigation. Tawfiq Edition. Written by Patriarch Evticius, known as Saeed Bin Al-Patrik, and Ibn Al-Patrik is the oldest Coptic historian after the Islamic conquest – 930 AD.
” In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful
From Omar bin Al-Khattab to the people of the city of Elijah (Jerusalem): They are assured that their blood, their children, their money, and their churches will not be demolished or inhabited…etc.
And he brought witnesses… and the gate of the city was opened for him, and Omar and his companions entered the city.”
■ Book of the History of the Copts – Taqi al-Din by al-Maqrizi – 1449
” In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful
Praise be to Allah, who honored us with Islam, honored us with faith, and had mercy on us with His Prophet Muhammad, may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him.
This is the book of Omar bin Al-Khattab, for a covenant and covenant given to the venerable and honorable patriarch, who is (Sophronius), the patriarch of the royal religion, in Tur Zaytoun, in the holy shrine of Jerusalem.
And on their visits that they have, inside and outside, which are the rubbish and Bethlehem, the birthplace of Issa, peace be upon him, and the Church of the Great, and the cave with three doors… before me, north and west, and the rest of the races of Al-Nasarah who are there, and they are Karaj and Abyssinia, And those who come to visit are Copts, Franks, Syriacs, Armenians, Nestorians, Jacobites, Maronites, etc.
This decree was given in the presence of all the honorable companions: Abdullah Uthman bin Affan, Saad bin Zaid, Abdul Rahman bin Awf, and the rest of the honorable brothers, companions.
May Allah’s blessings and peace be upon our Master Muhammad and his family and companions, and praise be to Allah, Allah of the Worlds.
On the twentieth of the month of Rabi` al-Awwal in the year 15 AH.
There is another text mentioned in the book The History of the Copts by Al-Maqrizi that talks about another covenant… which is the Noble Covenant… a book written by the Prophet in the handwriting of Imam Ali.
“This is a book, written by Muhammad bin Abdullah, to all people, as a messenger bringing good tidings and a warner, and entrusting Allah’s trust in His creation, so that people will not have an argument after the messengers.
He wrote it for the people of the Christian religion, and for those who have dissolved the religion of the Al-Nasarah, from the east and west of the earth, near and far, the eloquent and the non-eloquent… So whoever breaks the covenant that is in it, he has broken Allah’s covenant and is subject to His curse.
If a monk, or a traveler takes refuge in a mountain, a valley, a cave, or a city, then I will be behind them, defending them from all jealousy towards them… by myself, my helpers, my family, my sect, and my followers, because they are my subjects and the people of my protection.
….
….
….
It was written in the handwriting of Imam Ali and sealed with the finger of the Prophet.
———————————————-
The Omar era in history books
The covenant was mentioned in history books in more than one form and text, and ranges from short and concise texts, such as the text of Al-Yaqubi, the text of Ibn al-Batriq, Ibn al-Jawzi, al-Maqrizi, and Ibn Khaldun, or detailed texts, such as the text of Ibn Asakir, Majir al-Din al-Alimi al-Maqdisi, and the text of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate.
But according to what many researchers say, there is a difference between the age covenant and the age conditions. Some people confuse the age contract with the age conditions, even though the time difference between them is long.
The first to mention the “age conditions” was Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah in his book “Ahkam Ahl al-Dhimmah,” Ibn Kathir in his interpretation, and Ibn Taymiyyah in his collection of fatwas.
Imam Ibn al-Qayyim mentioned the age requirements in his book Ahkam Ahl al-Dhimmah.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
The people of the Peninsula wrote to Abd al-Rahman bin Ghanam: When you came to our country, we asked you for safety for ourselves, and for the people of our religion, we made a condition for you upon ourselves: that we would not create a church in our city, nor a monastery around it, nor a cell (a building like a monastery), nor a monk’s cell. We shall not renew what has been destroyed in our churches, nor what was in the plans of the Muslims, and we shall not prevent the Muslims from occupying them day or night, and we shall widen their doors for passersby and the wayfarer, and we shall not harbor a spy in them or in our homes, and we shall not conceal the deceit of the Muslims, and we shall not strike. We will not use our bells except lightly in the interior of our churches, and we will not display a cross on them, nor will we raise our voices in prayer or reading in our churches while Muslims are attending, and we will not bring out a cross or a book in the Muslim market, and we will not send a messenger – and the messengers will gather just as the Muslims come out on the Day of Sacrifice and Al-Fitr. We do not have Palm Sunday (a feast for the Al-Nasarah), we do not raise our voices with our dead, we do not show fire with them in Muslim markets, we do not live with them with pigs, we do not sell alcohol, we do not show polytheism, we do not encourage our religion, we do not call anyone to it, and we do not take any of the slaves that took place. The arrows of the Muslims are upon him, and that we should not prevent any of our relatives who wanted to convert to Islam, and that we should adhere to our dress code wherever we are, and that we should not imitate the Muslims in wearing a hood, turban, sandals, or hairpieces, or in their boats, and that we should not speak their words, or adopt their nicknames, and that we should be cut off. We do not part our heads, we do not part our forelocks, we do not tighten sashes around our waists, we do not engrave our rings in Arabic, we do not ride saddles, we do not take or carry any weapon, we do not wear swords, we honor Muslims in their gatherings, guide them on the way, and stand up for them from the gatherings if they want to sit. We do not attend their gatherings, we do not teach our children the Qur’an, and none of us participates in trade unless the business is in the hands of a Muslim, and we provide hospitality to every passing Muslim for three days, and feed him from the average we find. We guarantee this to you for ourselves, our offspring, our spouses, and our poor, but if we change or differ from what we have stipulated for ourselves, and accept security from it, then we have no obligation, and it is permissible for you from us what is permissible for people of stubbornness and discord.
So Abd al-Rahman bin Ghanam wrote to Omar bin al-Khattab, and Omar wrote to him: That I grant them what they asked, and attach to them two letters that I stipulate upon them in addition to what they stipulated upon themselves: that they should not buy anything from our captives, and whoever intentionally strikes a Muslim has renounced his covenant.
Abd al-Rahman bin Ghanam implemented this, and the Romans who resided in Mada’in al-Sham agreed to this condition.
Imam Ibn Taymiyyah said: “Regarding the conditions of Omar ibn al-Khattab that he stipulated on the people of the Dhimma when he came to the Levant, and he stipulated that they should be in the presence of the Muhajireen and the Ansar, and he must work according to the imams of the Muslims, according to the words of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace: “You must adhere to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the Rightly Guided Caliphs after me.” Hold on to it, and bite on it with your molars, and beware of newly invented matters, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is a misguidance.” And his saying, may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him: “Imitate those after me, Abu Bakr and Omar,” because this became a consensus among the companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him. And peace be upon those who do not agree on misguidance based on what they transmitted and understood from the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
——————— I finish ——————-
Almost everyone agrees on the story of the conquest of Jerusalem, the Muslim armies, and the arrival of Omar to Jerusalem… and there is no doubt about the authenticity of this date… and there is also no doubt about the existence of the Omar Covenant, but there is doubt about its text, and there is doubt about Age requirements.
———————————————-
Now…what are the important notes in these previous texts?
● The first person to speak about the Omari Covenant was not a Muslim man, but rather a Coptic Christian historian… the son of the Patriarch in the year 940 AD… and he wrote it in Arabic.
● All of the Muslims who mentioned this era lived in one and very close era of time.
Ibn Taymiyyah – Ibn Al-Qayyim – Ibn Kathir – Al-Maqrizi – Ibn Khaldun
● The presence of many Christian historians who mention the covenant and are interested in talking about it.
● The text of the Testament differs from one historian to another, although Turkey claims to have preserved a manuscript of its original text.
● There is a difference regarding the name of Jerusalem from one historian to another (Elijah – Jerusalem – Jerusalem)
● Most of the books that mentioned this covenant… are printed by the Misr Press… Bulaq and Al-Tawfiq Press.
Al-Maqrizi Coptic History Book – Al-Tawfiq Edition – Misr
Al-Maqrizi’s Book of Plans – Bulaq Edition – Misr
The Book of Ibn al-Batriq – Al-Tawfiq Edition – Misr
———————————
Let’s start… with the patriarch’s son
Who is the son of the penguin?
Patriarch Evtechius…and his nickname is Saeed Bin Al-Patrik.
He has two names………..a Greek name and at the same time an Arabic name.
He chose a name for him… Saeed… but his fame is Ibn Al-Patrik… as if he wanted to keep up with the authors of the Islamic heritage, who have a nickname that begins with the word “son”… Ibn Taymiyyah… Ibn Khaldun… Ibn al-Jawzi… Ibn Kathir… Ibn al-Batriq.
Ibn al-Patrik is known in most books as the oldest Coptic historian after the Islamic conquest in 941 AD. (Note the word “Islamic conquest”).
His book is called: The Collected History of Authentication and Verification.
In the same traditional way found in the naming of Muslim heritage books… even in the way of convincing the reader that it is true.
For example…there is Sahih Al-Bukhari, and here is the history collected on authentication.
What does Ibn Penguin say in writing?
I will cut out part of it:
Then the Muslims were contacted by the arrival of Omar ibn al-Khattab, and they met Omar ibn al-Khattab, then they marched to Bayt al-Maqdis, and besieged it. So Sophronius, the Patriarch of Bayt al-Maqdis, went out to Omar ibn al-Khattab, and Omar gave him security, and wrote to them a letter that reads as follows:
In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful
From Omar bin Al-Khattab to the people of the city of Elijah (Jerusalem), that they are assured that their blood, their children, their money, and their churches will not be demolished or inhabited….etc.
And he gave witnesses.. The gate of the city was opened for him, and Omar and his companions entered the city. ”
Now notice the text….. It narrates the events of the conquest of a city by the Muslims and calls it Bayt al-Maqdis, but as soon as he moves on to narrating the text of the covenant, he writes the text in the words of Omar under the name (Elijah).
The difference between the incident and this historian is 300 years, a difference that is not large. Is it possible that the name of Jerusalem has changed during this period?!
This means that her name at the time of writing this history and text by the historian, is supposed to be the same…or the historian should not mention her by two names.
It is not normal… as if he were a man who only typed, an irrational machine, because if he were rational… his name would be the same in writing.
The text should be like this:
——————–
Then the Muslims were contacted by the arrival of Omar bin Al-Khattab, and they met Omar bin Al-Khattab, then they marched to Elijah and besieged it, so (Sophronius), the patriarch of Elijah, went out to Omar bin Al-Khattab, so Omar gave him security, and wrote to them a letter that reads as follows:
” In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful
From Omar bin Al-Khattab to the people of the city of Elijah (Jerusalem), that they are assured that their blood, their children, their money, and their churches will not be demolished or inhabited….etc.
And he gave witnesses.. The gate of the city was opened for him, and Omar and his companions entered the city. ”
——————–
Or he was supposed to talk about this point, given that its name in the past was Elijah and now it is Jerusalem.
This historian describes the Patriarch… as the Patriarch of Jerusalem… and it is known that the designations of the Patriarch are the same and accepted in the Church. Patriarch of the East… Patriarch of Antioch… Patriarch etc.. and do not change.
Is he the Patriarch of Jerusalem or the Patriarch of Elijah?
Also, despite the fact that he is a Christian historian…but he does not know it as Jerusalem, according to the history known in the Church…that is, it would have been better, when narrating history before the text of the Testament…to mention to us its name, Jerusalem, which is known to them.
The rest of a point from Ibn al-Batriq’s book, the collected history of authentication and investigation. I will extract part of the writing for you
He says :
When the Romans converted to Christianity and the daughter of Helena, the mother of Constantine, established churches, the site of the rock and its surroundings were in ruins, and they threw dirt on the rock.
So my people said: We will build the mosque and support the rock at the qiblah. Omar said: No, rather we will build the mosque and support the rock at the end of the mosque. This is because the rock was sacred to the children of Israel and it was called the Holy of Holies, because it was the rock about which Allah spoke to Yaacoub, and he called it the Gate of Heaven, and it was a temple for the children of Israel, and they used to venerate it and make it their qibla.
Notice how he precedes the conquest with a story that Christianizes the Romans and that credit goes to the Romans for building churches. Also notice how he is keen to make Al-Aqsa Mosque a building of Omar, and how he attributes the mosque to the Romans and the children of Israel and talks about the existence of a sacred temple.
———————————
As for Al-Maqrizi… the sheikh of historians in Misr
Al-Maqrizi mentions the text of the covenant in the Book of Plans and another text in the book The History of the Copts, and they are different.
■ Al-Maqrizi’s Book of Plans – Bulaq Edition
“Christian scholars of news mention that the Commander of the Faithful, Omar ibn al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, when he conquered the city of Jerusalem, decreed for the Al-Nasarah a guarantee for themselves, their children, their wives, and their property, and that all their churches shall not be demolished or occupied.”
■ History of the Copts… Al-Maqrizi… Edited and presented by Mina Effendi Iskandar… Al-Tawfiq Edition (Copts Press 1890)
We mentioned it previously
Now notice
The clear difference between the two texts…even though there is one author.
In the first text, it says the Patriarch of Jerusalem, and in the second text, the Patriarch of the Melkite Sect.
Notice the second text… it mentions the phrase… (Al-Quds Al-Sharif)
Don’t you find that it is a very modern phrase?
Note that the book on the history of the Copts was written by a Christian, and after research we found that this researcher only reviewed this book and it is not known.
Now…..Re-read the end of the text in the Coptic History book
What did you notice?! …It was written by someone yesterday, who lives in the neighborhood next to yours.
“This decree was given in the presence of all the honorable companions: Abdullah Uthman bin Affan, Saad bin Zaid, Abdul Rahman bin Awf, and the rest of the honorable brothers, companions.”
A funny sentence… (in the presence of all the Companions)… as if someone wrote it in the police station today.
And also the sentence… (the rest of the honorable brothers)… haha
Also notice… how Omar concludes the text of his letter, as if he were a person present today, and concludes his correspondence with someone on WhatsApp with the sentence:
“May Allah’s blessings and peace be upon our master Muhammad and his family and companions, and praise be to Allah, Allah of the worlds.”
It means one of two… Either Omar means by companions people who lived in the past and did not meet them like we do today… Or Omar prayed for himself and became aware of the same awareness as our modern awareness.
This phrase is very recent and it is impossible that it was on the lips of someone who lived in that period
■ There remains a point that I insisted on mentioning
It is the noble covenant mentioned in the Coptic History Book… on the basis that it was written by the Messenger in the handwriting of Imam Ali.
Regardless of the beautiful and elegant speech, morals and laws in it, we are not in this arena…but…if we go back to reading the text of this covenant……..we will find written at the end of the phrase “Liberated in the handwriting of Imam Ali and “Sealed with the finger of the Prophet.”
Very funny……… The Prophet fingerprinted the document.
Did you know
That the fingerprint was not known until the nineteenth century?!
■ There is a final point in the book The History of the Copts by Al-Maqrizi
He says in a conversation about Jerusalem:
“The Massih…the root of it is Masih, but the Arabs manipulated the word and pronounced it Masih.”
Is there a Muslim who describes his Holy Qur’an as manipulation and distortion?
He says about the conquest of Jerusalem:
“When Omar ibn al-Khattab conquered the city of Jerusalem, he wrote to the Al-Nasarah a guarantee for themselves, their children, their women, their property, and their churches. He sat in the middle of the courtyard of the rubbish church. When the time for prayer came, he went out and prayed outside the church, on the stairs outside its door, then he sat down. He said to the patriarch: If I had prayed inside the church, the Muslims would have taken it after me, and said: Here Omar prayed.
The patriarch advised him to make the place of the rock a mosque, and there was a lot of dirt on top of it, so Omar, may Allah be pleased with him, took some of the dirt in his garment, and the Muslims quickly removed the dirt until nothing remained of it. Al-Aqsa Mosque was built at the rock in front of the rock, and when the days of Abd al-Malik bin Marwan came, the rock was inserted into the precincts of the mosque.
Then Omar came to Bethlehem, and prayed in his church at the tree where Christ was born, and wrote a record for the Al-Nasarah…etc.
Now notice
I think that every Muslim believes that it is Al-Aqsa Mosque and it is mentioned in the Qur’an… but this text tries to make you believe that Omar and Abdul-Malik were the ones who built Al-Aqsa Mosque… and they called it Al-Aqsa Mosque. Is it possible that this is a Muslim historian who throws away the text of the Qur’an and claims that Omar was the one who built it?!
Note also… The Patriarch is credited with determining the location of Al-Aqsa Mosque. And he was the one who pointed it out… Because Omar is an Arab man who is still new to religion, people for the first time know religion, because the Patriarch preceded Omar in religion and has culture.. And he does not know how to build.
Also note this text: “And he sat in the middle of the courtyard of the garbage church, and when the time for prayer came, he went out and prayed outside the church, on the stairs outside its door, then he sat down and said to the patriarch: If I had prayed inside the church, the Muslims would have taken it after me, and they said: Here Omar prayed.
Did Omar know at the time that he would be a famous figure and that there would be those who would consider him a central, sacred figure for him to say these words?!
It is as if a modern mind attributes modernity to the past, according to what it sees of today’s reality.
Finally, an important note remains:
Throughout history, Omar ibn al-Khattab sat in the city, lying down with a stick in his hand, looking at the conditions of the people… and he did not travel anywhere, he did not like to travel… introverted and isolated… he hated traveling… and did not want to meet. With the people in his caliphate… and he does not want anyone to see his picture… he only directs his caliphate by remote control from the city. They did not travel to Iraq, Yemen, Misr, or anywhere… and in the blink of an eye he decided to travel. To Jerusalem, whoop……to Jerusalem, and he cuts the ribbon to open the new time for Jerusalem and the new history, and announces his presence and the presence of Muslims, then signs a covenant and sleeps in a courtyard near the Patriarch, and tells a story with the Patriarch, and announces the construction of a mosque, and confirms that… The Al-Yahoud have a right there, then he returns to his tent in the city.
——————————-
As for Ibn Taymiyyah’s words, about the story of age requirements
Imam Ibn Taymiyyah said: “In the conditions of Omar bin Al-Khattab that he stipulated on the people of the Dhimma when he came to the Levant, and he stipulated that they should be in the presence of the Muhajireen and the Ansar, and he must work with the imams of the Muslims, according to the words of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace: “You must adhere to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the Rightly Guided Caliphs after me. Hold on to it, and bite on it with your molars, and beware of newly invented matters, for every newly invented matter is an innovation, and every innovation is a misguidance.” And his saying, may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him: “Imitate those after me, Abu Bakr and Omar,” because this became a consensus among the companions of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah’s prayers and peace be upon him. And peace be upon those who do not agree on misguidance based on what they transmitted and understood from the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace.
Notice how Ibn Taymiyyah tries to confirm the history of these conditions by fabricating strange hadiths on the lips of the Prophet.
Did the Prophet know that those who would come after him would be called by us, the Rightly Guided Caliphs… because the word (Al-Rashidun)… We are the ones who gave them this name… This indicates that the writer of the hadith was consciously modern, and began to attribute hadiths with modern awareness. For an ancient time.
Also see……. How the Prophet came to know that the ones who would come after him were Abu Bakr and Omar……… Rather, what is surprising is that the Prophet mentioned them in order, Abu Bakr and then Omar.
This is Ibn Taymiyyah, Sheikh Ibn al-Qayyim, who mentioned the conditions.
Why is this false hadith, and the use of the Prophet to confirm the age requirements? …What is the importance?!
To make Muslims new intruders…they came after the Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah, that is, to create an imaginary time and an imaginary history
——————————-
now
Why is there such interest in the covenant, the conditions, and this story… by Christian historians, to the point of outright lying… and even by Muslim historians whose origins are unknown?!
Of course, a poor Muslim…like a deaf person inside a wedding party…is happy with this history. He rejoices in the conquests… and that Omar was the first to write a document regulating and respecting religions.
He rejoices when orientalists write praises about him, saying that Omar and his genius were the first ruler to recognize religions and set conditions, and that this treaty is the finest that civilization has achieved.
Poor Muslim… More good… He is happy.
The Muslim does not know that he is a victim of a history written by a Zionist mind that planted poison inside honey.
If you observe…….. all the history that a Muslim is proud of and does not raise suspicions about it, that is, you do not find anything distorted in it.. then you would be surprised why….. because the writer of history does not want to make the Muslim doubt history, he wants To make him very beautiful and be proud of him and not reject him…because he has another goal
His goal
First…….. Destroying the sanctities of the Muslim in the Muslim mind and making their value linked to people and situations around which there is controversy, and that their construction is modern.
Secondly… establishing the roots of the Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah in Jerusalem chronologically… and making them chronologically prior to the Muslim presence… and to the time of Al-Aqsa Mosque… so that Al-Aqsa Mosque becomes a new building built on the effects of a Christian and Jewish era… in A time that is not his own…and the Muslim becomes an outsider…the creation of an imaginary history and an imaginary time for Muslims, coming after the Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah.
Don’t make them laugh at you with these stories.
You have a holy mosque with length and breadth…….. Get out of the history books and stay in reality… You are the owner of reality…… As for the Zionist project, it is the owner of a virtual world that exists in books only…. and He may have deliberately immersed you in this world and spread it to you… after creating religious symbols for you and creating stories for them linked to your reality in order to prove his virtual world and influence you and pull you from this reality in favor of his project.
Because most of history….was written by a Zionist project
One final important note remains
The oldest manuscript of this text (the Omari Testament), is found in Astana, Türkiye.
Note……. The Muslim Caliphate Center’s insistence on keeping this document until today and making a luxurious frame for it… Rather, you will find that most of the pivotal forged documents that serve as legitimacy for the Al-Yahoud to steal the awareness of Muslims are present in the Muslim Caliphate.
Of course, it is a fake document made by the Ottomans. Deliberate and intentional lies… They wanted to falsify the minds of Muslims on a large scale through this document… by embodying the illusion of the Jewish Zionist story and the Zionist time… in order to extract and withdraw Muslims from their reality, because the Ottomans were the main and largest part of the game of the Zionist project in the region. …through the trick of religion and time.