The Qibla between reality and the history of printer’s books

The Qibla between reality and the history of printer's books

8/23/2020 0:00:01

Link to the article

If you see the illustration in the picture, you will see two movements, one of which occurred and the other could have occurred, to explain the reasons for the change of qiblah by the Messenger in Medina:

1- The first movement – the movement of natural reality…. (it can happen)

2- The second movement – the movement of history in the printer’s books (happened)

But the two movements are different and not compatible with each other.

how ?!

■ Natural reality movement

This movement could actually occur to explain the reasons for the Messenger changing the qiblah, and it takes four steps for it to occur.

1- The first step

Ibrahim Al-Muslim (Father of Muslims) raised the foundations of the House (Al-Masjid Al Haram) in Mecca.

Mecca = Al-Masjid Al Haram = the first qibla.

2- The second step

Some time before the birth of the Prophet, the qibla changed from Al-Masjid Al Haram to Al-Aqsa Mosque, Jerusalem.

Jerusalem = Al-Aqsa Mosque = the second Qiblah

3- The third step

The Messenger stayed for 13 years since the revelation came to him and the beginning of the call, and the qibla for Allah and the revelation was towards Al-Aqsa Mosque (the second qibla), and when prayer was imposed on the Muslims, the Messenger stayed with the Muslims for two years, and he and the Muslims were heading towards Al-Aqsa Mosque (the second qibla). ).

4- The fourth step

13 years after the revelation was sent down to the Messenger and the beginning of the call, and two years after prayer was imposed on Muslims, the revelation came down to the Messenger and he made him a qiblah that pleased him, and commanded him to change the qiblah… from Jerusalem (Al-Aqsa Mosque – the second qiblah) to Mecca (Masjid Al-Haram – First Qibla).

This is the movement of natural reality, which was supposed to happen to explain the reasons for the Messenger changing the direction of the qiblah… and it is a very sound logical movement.

Why ?!

Ibrahim raised the foundations of Al-Bayt Al-Haram in Mecca, and it is logical that it is the first qibla, and prayer is towards the first qibla (Al-Masjid Al Haram), and any other place that people will go to for prayer other than Mecca will be called the second qibla, so Jerusalem was the second qibla (Al-Aqsa Mosque).

Mecca = Al-Masjid Al Haram = the first qibla.

Jerusalem = Al-Aqsa Mosque = the second Qiblah

■ Movement of the date found in printer books

This movement is the one that occurred in the printer’s books, and it is said that the movement that took place in reality was to explain the reasons for the Messenger changing the qiblah, and this movement needed two steps to occur.

1- The first step

The qiblah was towards Al-Aqsa Mosque from the beginning of the revelation to the Messenger and the beginning of the call to the religion of Islam that the Messenger brought, and the qiblah continued in the religion of Islam for a period of 13 years.

When prayer was imposed on the Messenger through his direct meeting with Allah, the Messenger ordered the Muslims to pray, and ordered them to turn towards Jerusalem (the first qibla = Al-Aqsa Mosque). This direction towards Jerusalem was without a divine command or without revelation. Rather, the Messenger relied in choosing the direction of prayer on The basis is that the Al-Yahoud, who are followers of a religion from Allah that came before Islam, used to direct their prayers towards Jerusalem (the first qibla = Al-Aqsa Mosque).

2- The second step

After 13 years from the beginning of the Messenger’s call to the religion of Islam, and after two years from the obligation of prayer, that is, after the Muslims spent two years facing Jerusalem in their prayer (the first qibla = Al-Aqsa Mosque), the revelation came down to the Messenger and he made him a qiblah that pleased him, and commanded him to change The qibla… from Jerusalem (the first qibla = Al-Aqsa Mosque) to Mecca (the second qibla = Al-Masjid Al Haram).

This is the movement of history that exists and is mentioned in the printer’s books, and it is the movement that we are told happened in reality in ancient times to explain the reasons for the Messenger changing the direction of the qiblah… and it is a movement that is completely illogical.

Why ?

Because Ibrahim raised the foundations of (Al-Bayt Al-Haram) in Mecca, and it is logical that it will be called (the first qibla) and will not be called (the second qibla)…. And Jerusalem should not be called (the first qibla), but rather it should be called (the second qibla). .

And praying towards (the first qiblah, Al-Masjid Al Haram)

Also, when prayer was imposed on the Messenger… it is logical that the Messenger would directly know that prayer is towards Al-Masjid Al Haram, the first qibla, that is, towards Mecca, without even needing to think, meaning that the child would know this without difficulty… but what is illogical is that he was unable to realize this. The thing is, it is also illogical that the Messenger, whose mission is to deliver the message of a divine religion, would rely on the authority of a religion other than Islam (Judaism) and make it a criterion in his choice of the direction of prayer.

Jerusalem = Al-Aqsa Mosque = the first qibla

Mecca = Al-Masjid Al Haram = the second qibla.

—————————

Now we have two movements, the first a logical and realistic one that could happen in reality, and the second one is illogical and unrealistic, but it happened in reality. What are the reasons for this contradiction, how do we explain it, and how do we solve it?!

The reason for the contradiction is the second movement, because the second movement carried out the matter in only two steps, while the issue of changing the qiblah in general requires at least four steps…so the matter cannot happen in two or three steps, but rather in four steps or five steps, etc.

The second movement erased two previous steps, which were needed to explain the reasons for the change in qiblah in a logical and realistic manner.

But the second movement assumed from the beginning that Jerusalem was called (the First Qiblah), but its name was not (Al-Masjid Al Haram) but rather (the Al-Aqsa Mosque), because if its name had been (Al-Masjid Al Haram), how could it be possible that the Messenger would change the (First Qiblah) that was in it (Al-Masjid Al Haram)? To (the second qiblah), in which there will be a mosque other than (Al-Masjid Al Haram).

After this assumption, Mecca became directly the “Second Qiblah” and its name is not “Al-Aqsa Mosque” but rather “Al-Masjid Al-Haram.” Because if its name was (Al-Aqsa Mosque), how is it possible that the Messenger would change (the first qibla) in which it was (Al-Masjid Al Haram), to (a second qibla) in which it would be (Al-Aqsa Mosque).

How was she able to erase the previous two steps?

The second movement was able to erase the previous two steps through a clever and cunning trick.

We believe that the second movement only changed the names of the locations (first, second) in order to carry out the process of changing the qiblah in just two steps.

how ?

It is assumed that during the steps of the second movement, it must restore the original names of the places… through the process of logical equality.

The first qibla = Al-Masjid Al Haram

The second qibla = Al-Aqsa Mosque

So

If Jerusalem is (the first qibla), then it must be (Al-Masjid Al Haram), and if Jerusalem is (the Al-Aqsa Mosque), then it must be (the second qibla).

Meaning

whether

Jerusalem = the first qibla = Al-Masjid Al Haram

Mecca = the second qibla = Al-Aqsa Mosque

and

Jerusalem = Al-Aqsa Mosque = the second Qiblah

Mecca = Al-Masjid Al Haram = Al-Masjid Al Haram

now

Let us return to the second movement, relying on this sound logic that we have arrived at, so that we can see its steps.

So if:

Jerusalem = the first qibla = Al-Masjid Al Haram

Mecca = the second qibla = Al-Aqsa Mosque

How is it possible that the Messenger would change the correct qibla in Jerusalem, which is Al-Masjid Al Haram, towards which Allah commanded him to turn his face, to a second qibla?!

And this is illogical

But if it was:

Jerusalem = Al-Aqsa Mosque = the second Qiblah

Mecca = Al-Masjid Al Haram = Al-Masjid Al Haram

We will come to a logical question: Who replaced the first qiblah in Mecca to a second qiblah in Jerusalem?

The answer to this question will lead us to the first logical movement that could occur in reality and convince any person to explain the reasons for the Messenger changing the qiblah, which would require four steps to occur.

You will need the previous two lines that were cleared.

Now the logical question:

Why did the second movement do this illogical thing?

Or the question in other words: We believe that the occurrence of something illogical gives us an indication that there is a deceptive game… But if we assume for the sake of assuming that Mecca is not Al-Masjid Al Haram and Jerusalem is not Al-Aqsa Mosque……… then why did the history writer need to He made the second illogical move to convince Muslims of them… despite its illogicality and which would raise doubts… and he could have chosen the first logical move that could happen in reality and which would never raise doubts?!

Is the history writer stupid to arouse Muslim doubts?

Here lies the devilish game

The writer of history is not stupid at all, but rather very cunning, because he knows that the first movement is foolish and will not raise suspicions, but his mind is very cunning and strategic, and it is absolutely not permissible to write it, as he chose the second movement with the illogical things it contains and tried to Implementing the process in two steps, through the process of changing the names of the sites, for the sake of a greater strategic goal, which is the plan for the Roman calendar… and the order in which religions appear on earth.

In other words, to make Judaism a religion that preceded Islam on earth, and to make Islam and Muslims a new phenomenon on earth and history. They came after Judaism and the Al-Yahoud in Palestine and the whole earth, and their appearance was the result of the call of the Messenger who was born in Mecca.

how ?!

Because if the writer of history made:

Jerusalem = Al-Aqsa Mosque = the second Qiblah

Mecca = Al-Masjid Al Haram = Al-Masjid Al Haram

So the logical question is about changing the qiblah to Jerusalem… and this will make us go to the first movement that has four steps, and among those steps is the step that occurred before the birth of the Messenger, which is that there are those who changed the qiblah from Mecca to Jerusalem. And the Messenger came to repeat the first Qibla.

This means two things:

1- That before the appearance of the Messenger of Mecca, Islam was widespread on earth, but there were those who changed the qiblah for them, and the land from Mecca to the Levant is inhabited by Muslims, and the Messenger came to an originally Muslim society to restore the qiblah to them, and he did not come to a society of idols, polytheism, and fetishes.

This is strictly prohibited……… The appearance of Islam in history and time must have occurred with the appearance of the Messenger of Mecca only after previous religions, and the appearance of Muslims on earth must have occurred with the emergence of Islam in Mecca, and their presence on earth. The state they are in today came after the Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah.

Otherwise, how will I convince the world and Muslims as well of the legitimacy of the Zionist entity, which came with a global history that Judaism appeared before Islam, and that the Al-Yahoud were living in the Levant before Muslims and Arabs, and that they returned to their land that had been settled by Arab Muslims?

With this, the Al-Yahoud will have appeared in time and history after Islam and after the Muslims and Arabs in the region, and this will lead us to another problem that Al-Nasarah who believe in the book of the Al-Yahoud (the Old Testament) have also appeared in the region after Islam and the Arabs, and this idea is written. Red… It is forbidden to even approach it, and then I will not be able to occupy Muslim and Arab countries, and I will not be able to activate any cunning projects in the region.

2- This thing also means… that a non-Muslim entity from outside the region is the one who changed the qibla of Muslims from Mecca to Jerusalem… because it is impossible for a Muslim society to emerge from it with a force that would change its religion and its qibla.

This is also forbidden… because the issue of changing the qiblah must be made an internal matter between Muslims and Arabs.

Therefore, there is no solution except to write the story of the historical second movement that is present in the printer’s books, with its defects and contradictions… but on the basis of:

● Make the reference for the first appearance of Islam in Mecca depend on what the Jewish religion has achieved as a first starting point so that Muslims and Islam can continue the historical movement within Roman times and continue within it the discourse of the Holy Qur’an… on the basis of implanting a very important and dangerous fundamental idea in the mind of the Muslim… ….It is that Judaism is a religion revealed by Allah before Islam, as evidenced by the fact that the Al-Yahoud have a book that is almost similar to the Qur’an and contains the same stories of the Qur’an, but in a different style.

Thus, the religion of Islam that Allah revealed in Mecca will complement what the Jewish religion that Allah revealed in the past, and the Muslims in the entire region will be an extension that came after the Al-Yahoud on earth.

For this reason, the Messenger of Mecca headed towards Jerusalem on the basis of the Jewish reference that they were praying towards Jerusalem, and the writer of history made the name Jerusalem the first qibla….. relying on the idea that Jerusalem is a holy land for the Al-Yahoud and Judaism, and Allah has made it a holy land. In the past for the Al-Yahoud, before the arrival of the religion of Islam, they chose another holy land for themselves, which was Mecca.

Thus, Jerusalem became the first qibla… based on the fact that Judaism was the first religion revealed by Allah and for which Jerusalem was a holy land, and its previous holiness, which was before the emergence of Islam in Mecca, was confirmed through the speech of the Qur’an as well, when Allah blessed it and named it ( Al-Aqsa Mosque around which we have blessed. Thus, Jerusalem and Mecca became sacred to the Muslim… according to this temporal, historical and religious logic that was implanted in the mind of the Muslim… and with confirmation from Allah through the speech of the Noble Qur’an.

Jerusalem became the point of contact between the Islam of Mecca and Judaism, which confirmed the unity of the religions revealed by Allah, and created a single partnership between Islam and Judaism in religion, the Creator, and the Book in the Muslim mind and in the global consciousness, by virtue of it being sacred to the Muslim who calls it his Allah. (Allah) in the Holy Qur’an (Al-Aqsa Mosque), and sacred to the Jew who calls it his Allah (Yahweh) in the Book of the Old Testament (Jerusalem).

And all this for one thing, which is……. scanning the ancient historical context of Muslims before Jerusalem (i.e. the two previous steps).

The history writer knew that his historical narrative that he wrote for the Muslim in order to convince him of the story of the change made by the Messenger of Medina was full of contradictions and illogical… and that he would not think about the previous two steps, which he had erased… but he was confident that it was not against them. There is a way in the illiterate.

Those two previous steps that were erased from the mind of the Muslim (the ancient context of the Muslim) before Jerusalem… required writing a major historical procedure to explain the reasons for the great spread of Muslims in the land. The Muslim needs to understand the reasons for the presence of the phenomenon of Islam in the entire region to a greater extent than the rest of the religions. Although it is a religion that appeared after other religions representing minorities, in order to prevent Muslims from even thinking about proposing the idea of the previous two steps to explain the reasons for this great spread of Islam.

Of course, the solution was not difficult, because peoples love heroics and supernatural things that give themselves glory and heroism and give themselves a value connected to the unseen through miracles… And the Muslim will easily accept a miraculous and heroic story that convinces people of the explanation for this great spread of Islam, so the story of the conquests was written. Islam, which made the earth, in 100 years from the borders of China to Morocco, the religion of Islam in Mecca (a miracle), and this story contained the biography of very extraordinary heroes who became an example of heroism and pride in the mind of the Muslim, and it became difficult for the Muslim to abandon this extraordinary, heroic history. .

——————–

So what is the story?

He wrote the story of Mecca by giving up this title (the first qibla) and granting this honor to Jerusalem, so Jerusalem became the first qibla, to convince the audience of the logical reason for the Messenger… changing the qibla to Mecca, so Mecca became the second qibla.

But he forgot that this trick would not continue and that this contradiction must be revealed one day.

how ?

For two reasons:

1- The first reason

Because if the logical mind accepts these two locations, the logic of reality says that Mecca must be the first qibla.

This logical contradiction, which the history writer resorted to while he knew it, is because Mecca is not Al-Masjid Al Haram and Jerusalem is not Al-Aqsa Mosque.

The history writer….. erased the historical context before Jerusalem, in which Al-Bayt Al-Haram was located, and did not explain the reasons for the fact that the qiblah was towards Jerusalem.

If Ibrahim was the one who built the house in Mecca, then it is assumed that he went to Mecca when the Messenger was born.

The question is: Who transferred it to Jerusalem?!

The writer of the story tried to prevent this question from being asked… although there was another option, which he rejected because of his desire to write a new history of Islam.

Yes…..in order to make the story begin from Jerusalem with the emergence of the new Islam from Mecca.

So that what came before Mecca…is devoid of Islam, that is, the entire historical context is erased from the Muslim’s imagination…and the Muslim feels that he is fresh and was born with the birth of Mecca, and the Muslim’s imagination starts from the story of Mecca only.

And he made the pre-Islamic era of Mecca…polytheism and idolatry…people know nothing about it except idolatry, polytheism, and disbelief…There is only a religion that Allah accepted from Allah, Judaism, which began from Jerusalem (Jerusalem according to the Kharrat of the infidels of the West).

And then the Muslim’s imagination began to associate with Allah……… with the religion of Judaism, so the Muslim accepted the idea of Jerusalem being the first qibla… But Allah, out of His love for Muhammad, the Messenger of Mecca, and in order to entertain him and entertain him, because of his boredom, decided to He orders him to move the qiblah to Mecca without a logical reason… like this with this logic.

Or by the logic of the development of religions that was implanted in the mind of the Muslim. Every religion from Allah develops and must have a different update from the previous version in the holy places, language, and rituals.

The Muslim agreed to this divine Darwinian plan and was obligated to follow the Messenger, the Messenger of Mecca, who carried out this work recorded in the printer’s books.

The Muslim’s temporal and historical imagination began with the Jewish context, and he was convinced that the gypsy Al-Yahoud, who did not know prayer or the qibla, were facing Jerusalem, and because their religion came from Allah, it is certain that the beginning was like this.

Thus, the idea of the first nature that Allah created people with, the idea of Ibrahim being neither a Jew nor a Christian, but a Muslim, were cut off from the Muslim imagination, and the idea that the first house established for people had its foundations raised by Ibrahim.

So you concealed from within the Muslim his true nature on earth… through a criminal entity and a satanic occupier, who came up with a plan to erase it from within him, through the deception of Judaism and its false book that he wrote with his own hand, in disbelief, trickery, deception, and spiritual and intellectual penetration… for the sake of… He convinces the Muslim that it is a religion and that it is a book from Allah… until he washes the Muslim’s mind and plays with it this devilish, cunning, criminal game.

This deception prevented the Muslim from asking the question: If the house was in Mecca, how did the qiblah turn to Jerusalem and those around it?!

If Mecca is Al-Bayt Al-Haram, then why was it not called the first qibla, but rather called the second qibla, and Jerusalem was called the first qibla?!

The answer to these questions is… because Mecca is not Al-Masjid Al Haram and Jerusalem is not Al-Aqsa Mosque.

It is just a hypothetical novel that was implanted in people’s minds through printed books, and because it is an untrue and unrealistic novel, it has caused severe obstruction in the Muslim mind in arriving at the logical answer.

2- The second reason

The writer of history forgot something very important… that the letter of revelation indicates that the Messenger was not satisfied with the previous qibla, and that the issue is related to those who were given the Book, and that they conceal the truth (continuation) while they know.

The question is: If we assume that Al-Aqsa Mosque is Jerusalem, is it possible that the Messenger was not satisfied with Al-Aqsa Mosque, which Allah blessed around it?!

And this is something that the history writer did not pay attention to…… Therefore, the history writer made the Messenger of Mecca change the qiblah like this moodily without a convincing reason except because the revelation commanded him to do so.

The Muslim did not pay attention to this thing either… in the Qur’an’s speech, because the Qur’an talks about three mosques and not two mosques.

Al-Masjid Al Haram, Al-Aqsa Mosque, and Dirar Mosque

Yes, Dirar Mosque

Dirar Mosque is the mosque that the writer of history tried to hide from history and from the mind of the Muslim during his thinking… which provides the true, logical and realistic explanation… of the reasons for the Messenger’s dissatisfaction with the direction of prayer he was facing… And the revelation told him to turn his face toward Al-Masjid Al Haram.

{We may see the turning of your face in the sky. We will certainly turn you to a direction that pleases you. So turn your face towards Al-Masjid Al Haram, and wherever you are, turn your faces towards it. Indeed, those who were given the Book know that it is the truth from their Allah, and Allah is not unaware of what they do.}

The Dirar Mosque also provides a real, realistic, logical explanation about the reasons for the Messenger’s change of the qibla and returning it to Al-Masjid Al Haram… because there is an infidel force that built the Dirar Mosque for the Muslims, disbelief, division and preparation for those who fought against Allah and His religion… and made it the qibla of the Muslims, thus repelling the Muslims. About Al-Masjid Al Haram located in Mecca… the first house built for people… and the Dirar Mosque still stands today in Mecca to deter Muslims from Al-Masjid Al Haram in Mecca.

{Indeed, the first House established for mankind is the one in Bakkah, blessed and a guidance for the worlds. (96) In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim.

{And those who have made a mosque out of harm, disbelief, and division among the believers, and as a shelter for those who waged war against Allah and His Messenger before, and they will swear, “We only desire the best.” Allah bears witness that they are indeed liars. (107) Never stand therein a mosque founded on piety from the first day. It is more deserving that you stand therein. There are men who love to purify themselves. Allah loves. Those who are purified (108) Is he who founded his building on piety from Allah and His satisfaction better, or he who founded his building on the brink of a scorching cliff, so it collapses with him in the fire of Hell? Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people. (109) Their structure which they built will remain in doubt in their hearts unless their hearts are cut off. Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise ( 110)}

{And it is He who withheld their hands from you, and your hands from them in the interior of Mecca, after He had given you victory over them, and Allah is ever Seeing of what you do. (24) They are the ones who disbelieved and turned you away from Al-Masjid Al Haram, while the sacrificial animal was withheld until it reached its place. And had it not been for believing men and believing women, you had not taught them that you should tread on them, and a disgrace befall you from them without knowledge, so that it might enter. Allah is in His mercy whom He wills. If they were removed, We would surely have punished those who disbelieved among them with a painful punishment. (25) When those who disbelieved put in their hearts the fever of ignorance, then Allah sent down His tranquility upon His Messenger and upon the believers, and made them obligated to the word of piety, and they were more deserving of it and its people. And Allah is All-Knowing of all things. (26) Allah has spoken the truth. His Messenger has seen the vision with the truth. You will certainly enter Al-Masjid Al Haram, Allah willing, safe, with your heads shaved and cut short, so do not fear. He knew what you did not know, so He made apart from that a conquest soon. (27) It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to make it prevail over all religions. And Allah is sufficient as a witness. (28)} [Al-Fath: 24] -28]

—————————

As for Al-Aqsa Mosque… they placed it in a place far from Mecca, which led to the creation of a contradiction between the speech of the Qur’an and reality, and in order for the writer of history to address this contradiction… he created the story of the magically fast Buraq, who crossed this distance at great speed to give the Messenger a blessing. Allah spoke about it in the Qur’an for Jerusalem… to shorten the great distance between them and make it seem like a very small distance… and it is all because of the story of the fast Buraq… which brought the distances closer.

So the history writer made a mistake and thought that his trick through the Al-Buraq trick would continue………. The mistake was because he made Allah bless two places that were very different from each other through the modern plane trick (Al-Buraq), but he forgot to address the reasons why Allah does not exist. He does not bless Al-Masjid Al Haram and forget it, even though it is Al-Masjid Al Haram, but he blesses what is around Al-Aqsa Mosque.

The reason is because Al-Masjid Al Haram is next to Al-Aqsa Mosque, and the distance between them is simple… and you do not need Buraq to cover that long distance, to make you feel that the journey is fast and similar to the real journey between Al-Masjid Al Haram and Al-Aqsa.

Because the Muslim did not understand the speech of the Qur’an… The Qur’an does not tell him about two mosques… Rather, he tells him about several mosques of Allah, located next to each other, and the place in which those mosques are located, may Allah bless it around it, and among Those mosques…there is Al-Masjid Al Haram and Al-Aqsa Mosque.

When Allah blesses what is around Al-Aqsa Mosque, He also blesses the place where Al-Masjid Al Haram is located. Because around Al-Aqsa Mosque there are the mosques of Allah.

{And who is more unjust than he who prevents the mosques of Allah from being mentioned in them and strives to destroy them? Those are not to enter them except in fear. For them in this world is disgrace, and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment.}

See, the revelation speaks about Al-Masjid Al Haram, the first verse, as being blessed

{Indeed, the first House established for mankind is that which is in Bakkah, blessed and a guidance for the worlds}

And Al-Aqsa Mosque is next to Al-Masjid Al Haram… We blessed it around it

{Glory be to Him who took His servant by night from Al-Masjid Al Haram to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, whose surroundings We have blessed to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing.}

——————–

finally

In order to believe in the story of Mecca, you must believe that Judaism is a religion from Allah that came before Islam, and in order to believe that Judaism is a religion, you must believe in the story of Jerusalem.

Jerusalem became the point of contact between the Islam of Mecca and Judaism, and it is what confirmed the unity of Allah’s religions in the Muslim mind, and it is what created the partnership between Islam and Judaism in religion, the Creator, and the Book in the Muslim mind and in the global consciousness, by virtue of it being sacred to the Muslim who He calls it his Allah (Allah) in the Holy Qur’an (Al-Aqsa Mosque), and it is sacred to the Jew who calls it his Allah (Yahweh) in the Book of the Old Testament (Jerusalem).

But if you knew and were certain that Mecca is the Dirar Mosque… and Jerusalem is not Al-Aqsa Mosque… and that Al-Masjid Al Haram is in another place and next to it is the Al-Aqsa Mosque, you would get out of their game and from the game of the entire history that was written for the earth… And you will emerge from the history books that exhausted you and dizzy your mind, and the history of religions and languages………and you will know that Mecca was only built for the sake of creating a partnership with the usurping, occupying Zionist entity and for the sake of harming Muslims….and You will know the game of the West in the book of the Al-Yahoud and the game of the Jewish religion, and you will know the truth about the true pivotal role that the Al Saud plays within the game. Mecca, which granted the Al-Yahoud a religious partnership with Islam and religion… is nothing but the real partnership between the Al Saud state and the Zionist entity. …who were created by the Zionist West to manage Shaytan’s project on earth……and then you will know the true origins of the House of Saud and that they are the Bedouins..and they are hypocrites and non-Muslims at all and do not believe in anything at all. They are infidels. Rather, they are infidel devils. They do not belong to the region at all. They came from the essence of filth on earth… and they are running Shaytan’s project on earth from inside Mecca.

And you will know that Judaism is nothing but a game of Napoleon and Britain…. and they are nothing but gypsy groups from Central Asia who were convinced by the book of the West, and were imported and settled in the region during the period of occupation of the region for the sake of a satanic political project on behalf of Shaytan.

Final note:

I hope that my words will not be understood… as part of the attempt to normalize the Zionist entity by denying that Jerusalem is the Al-Aqsa Mosque, in order to grant the Al-Yahoud a right… because, as I told you, Judaism is a purely Western creation through a Western force only, and they have no roots in the land. Roma were settled in the region.

As for fighting the satanic Zionist entity, we do not need a sacred building in any land in order to fight the usurping occupier. The Vietnamese fought the Americans because it is their land, and our people in Algeria fought the French occupation and expelled it because it is our land… And we will fight the occupying Zionist entity from the Levant because it is our land. …And we will fight him to the death in whatever land is our right… until we make them subservient.

.

اترك تعليق