2020-04-04T09:35:00-13:03
In our previous conversation on our channel on the topic (What is the book), we came to the scenario of the imaginary story that took place in Mecca, in which Mecca denied the book in its hands, relying on the discourse of the Qur’an, on the time and history that was presented to us, and on the rules and theories of the Western approach. In linguistics, they are:
[There was a large and important meeting in the past in Mecca… on whoever reads ancient, heavenly sacred tablets, and the Messenger Muhammad was able to copy those tablets and write them correctly, and he read them in the correct and correct manner that is consistent with the modern language of his people. And this work was inspired by Allah, while the Messenger’s people rejected the work of the Messenger Muhammad, and denied him, because they wanted it to be done in the old foreign language even if it was not understood… and they said about him that he came with an old alphabet. And they fought the Qur’an of the Prophet Muhammad. ]
Therefore, the fundamental controversial point in the story of Mecca… and the Qur’an places it as a fundamental controversial point, which is the language and the correct interpretation of the book.
The Qur’an rejects the ancient foreign language… which was the language of previous books that caused distortion in the meanings. It adopts the eloquent language, which means the modern spoken language of the current colloquial language that people speak in their daily lives. It confirms that the Qur’an was transferred from stone tablets. It is sacred (the Preserved Tablet) and that the language chosen to write the Qur’an is sound, as has been the custom known since ancient times. It also confirms that its interpretation is correct and that it is also from Allah.
We asked an important question… What is the importance of this result that we have reached by relying on the methods of the West, and the historical narrative that we imagined had occurred in Mecca with the Messenger, so that we may realize new information about the book and be able to access it and approach it? ?!
I believe that we can know that book about which there is no doubt that was before him and they disbelieved in it, and encounter this book and find out its location, if we rely on an indirect and intelligent method of research.
how ?!
The story must be correct because the Qur’an is a correct text, the history that we have received is correct, and the West’s theories are correct.
But if we assume that there is doubt about the validity of history and Western theories because the Qur’an is the only correct text…then this imaginary story that we have woven will be close to being true, and the Qur’an emerged from this imaginary story that we believe. That it took place in Mecca, in which the inhabitants of Mecca (the Messenger’s people) rejected the Arabic Qur’an, the modern language of the book, and disbelieved in the Prophet Muhammad’s recitation of the book. The essence of the dispute is not over a new religion, as they are on one religion, but rather the essence of the dispute is over reading the book, and Therefore, the infidels of Mecca must have another, different reading of the book, and it will be a foreign reading in the ancient language, and it will remain to this day.
Now the very important question……Are there Muslims who officially even today, and at the same time, possess a book in a different language than the Qur’an that exists among the majority of Muslims?
If we research the reality well and think and contemplate the reality in great depth in search of these Muslims who have a book that is different from the Quran and that confirms the logic of this story that we imagined had taken place in Mecca…..it will lead us to discover something important and striking… …….. This discovery may make us re-understand the Qur’an’s speech and rewrite the story that took place in Mecca in a completely different way… and relying on a new and different approach.
Why ?!
I believe that our problem lay in history and reliance on the theories of Western approaches to linguistics and the history of languages and the plans of Western scholars in classifying the world’s languages and the relationships between them as universals… which led us to that story and caused us great difficulty in understanding the speech of the Qur’an. Rather, it is a disability.
We were walking and thinking soundly and correctly based on our firm belief in the validity of history, time, and Western theories… Then history and Western theories clashed in understanding the Qur’an’s correct speech of advice, which made us imagine a story that took place in Mecca that was compatible with the Qur’an’s speech, and We made the Qur’an’s discourse compatible with things outside the Qur’an (history, time, and the ways of the West)…and it produced for us a somewhat correct story.
And this is the problem that the Muslim falls into…. The Muslim is based on knowledge from outside the Qur’an, from time, history, and scientific theories, and these things create his mind of knowledge and his intellectual imagination, and this imagination is present while reading the speech of the Qur’an, and makes him adapt his mind to The speech of the Qur’an is to see imaginary images that are compatible with the speech of the Qur’an and believe that they are correct and identical with the world that exists outside the Qur’an, and from here the Muslim’s convictions arise and make him believe that this is the speech of the Qur’an.
It is assumed that the Muslim must reform his view of the world outside the Qur’an and formulate correct scientific rules and theories before he begins to understand the speech of the Qur’an, so that he can understand the speech of the Qur’an, because the Qur’an emerged from a true, realistic, sound world… and there must be a correct interpretation of the world outside the Qur’an. And understand his correct movement.
Therefore, we believe that it is necessary to fix those things that exist outside the Qur’an before understanding the Qur’an’s speech.
——————–
Regarding the Western approach to linguistics
We believe that this Western approach was developed in this way to hide the truth of the Qur’an and other facts on earth………..and so that the message of the Qur’an does not reach people properly…….because I see that the mind that Based on this approach, it is not possible to reach the true story of the Qur’an and understand the discourse of the Qur’an.
how ?!
The Western approach to understanding language is based on three points:
● Language was acquired by humans from animals
I believe that this point is taken for granted in the awareness that was founded on Western approaches. …But the question is: If every animal on earth has a language to communicate between itself and its members, then the bear has a language with another bear, and birds have a language, and insects have a language.
How did bees acquire a language that communicates between them?
How did animals acquire this language of communication?
And did every animal acquire it from another animal?!
Is it possible that animal communication languages are innately present in them?!
If man is part of the animal kingdom, then why cannot man be considered in this matter as part of the animal kingdom, and look at the language that man possesses from the same perspective with which he looks at the languages of animal communication…and what applies to the rest of living creatures? Does it also apply to humans?
Why is language not an innate nature found in humans?!
If man… is the first animal in the ladder of evolution, and if man is the first without language… how will he be developed without a language in which he is first, and how will he communicate and understand with others?
For example………..we have animals that communicate with their kind and can determine places and can tell their kind about a place….and they can realize the need of others for food and drink, and they can know the location of danger and tell Other .
Animals have distinctive sounds…so why did the first human not have distinct sounds (tongue = language)….and used them to communicate with others?
● Language is an evolving organism
Yes, language is a living organism……. The meanings of language vocabulary develop and can mutate from the first.
But if language is evolving, was there in the past a single human language from which the rest of the human languages that exist today splintered?
This belief… is completely consistent if we believe that language was an innate nature that existed with humans in the beginning.
Also, the development of language…does not mean the disappearance of the first language, because there are vocabulary around us whose names cannot disappear from the first language that was with man.
If the first human being called “the liquid that descends from the sky” as rain, the word would continue to this day and will not change.
I believe that this development in language is what gave the first ancient texts their sanctity, because their sanctity is linked to the memory of ancient man, and their function is not according to what we thought according to the Western approach of modernity and development, but rather its function is to protect the memory of the first man. And realizing the awareness of the ancient and preserving its first belief… This requires the preservation of that language to understand the memory of the past… and not changing the old tongue and developing it… Preservation does not mean against development… but preservation is preserving the first tongue. With which the doctrine was written.
And this is the point where we made a mistake… because it is very logical that preserving the correct first operative part of the first texts is the correct thing and not changing it and developing it, because changing it is considered distortion and forgery.
● The Arabic language is a Semitic language and developed from previous languages.
The Western classification of languages developed by the West, and the West’s inclusion of the Arabic language in the category of Semitic languages… and this evolutionary plan for languages that was drawn up by the West… and made Arabic emerge from previous languages such as Canaanite, Aramaic, and Syriac. Etc., it is not based on a scientific basis, but rather on the basis of Roman time. It is based on the centrality of the West religiously, temporally and historically, in order to make the rest subordinate and linked to it. The plan depends on the history and time that everyone studies, and the history and time was written by it. The West did not write it as a general reference.
According to current history and time, Judaism appeared in time carrying a book written in Hebrew, Christianity came after it carrying with it a book written in Syriac, then Islam came after it carrying with it a book written in Arabic.
This history and time… makes the ordinary, simple person… believe that the Aramaic language was the only one that existed in the world, then it developed into the Hebrew language, and dominated for a period of time, then the Syriac language developed from it, and dominated for a period of time, and finally The Arabic language developed from it.
So, had it not been for this history and this time……. the West would not have written language plans in this way… and no one, including Western scholars, would have been able to establish correct scientific rules… to understand which language preceded the other, and Which language split from the other?
Here, history and time enter into the issue… it enters into the formulation of the foundations of linguistics according to Western approaches… while history and time were written by people, and we do not realize the extent of the validity of that time and history.
Therefore, it is not possible to formulate a correct scientific approach to understanding language, without writing true history and correcting time.
—————————
Fixing history and time
We talked in our previous articles… about dismantling the Zionist time, and we found in the history of the region three historical gaps related to the three religions, and we talked that if we want to reform time and history, we believe that the issue requires the pressure of history and time. And it will make us have one time gap from which religions emerge.
We said that if we wanted to analyze and describe that gap, we would find that the end of the time gap…in which there are similar historical events.
End of the gap
One appearance of two books (the Qur’an and the Old Testament)
The emergence of several languages at once (Arabic, Hebrew, and Syriac)
One appearance of several kings (Ptolemy, Constantine, Haroun and Al-Mamun)
Here we will notice important points………….. There is a very large match, with only a slight difference in the order, but the quality of the events is identical.
■ When we emerge from this gap… we will encounter kings who performed similar deeds… famous kings… whose names were associated with sacred religious books… and who cared about culture… …and they translated many books.
■ Also, when we emerge from the gap….we will have in our hands…two holy books….very similar in topics………that is, they deal with the same topics, they deal with the same religious stories…… Even if one of them exceeds the other in its historical stories….. The first book is an Arabic Qur’an and the other book is a Hebrew book, the Old Testament.
■ Even the names of the languages of the Bible are similar
Arabic = Hebrew
Important question:
Why, after we emerged from the gap in time… did we get two sacred texts, dealing with the same topic… but in two different languages… and from one Allah?!
Is the origin of the story… a very old sacred religious text that was translated and a new, completely different and forged text was extracted from it… and time was planned in this order… so that no one could access it? For the story of the Qur’an?!
And is the origin of the story and history: What is the first natural and true language of the sacred text… and what is the original religion of the time?!
Is the religious group that we arrived at and believed in our previous article that it will adhere to Islam until today and will possess a sacred book other than the Qur’an, or similar to the Qur’an but in a foreign language, nothing other than Judaism, which owns the book of the Old Testament written in a foreign language, crooked, and similar to the Holy Qur’an?!
I think we have arrived at a logical answer…so the first question is regarding the religious group that will embrace Islam and will carry a book different from the Qur’an.
If we search for a group that believes in Islam and has a book other than the Qur’an, we will never find it… and there is nothing before us except Judaism… which the Muslim believes is a religion from Allah… and it has a book similar to the book of the Muslims, but in a different style. With a crooked foreign tongue.
I believe that it is the true, logical and realistic story that we have arrived at by relying on a new approach completely different from the Western approach, and after reforming history and time, and it is the approach capable of understanding the discourse of the Qur’an correctly and soundly and resolving all the contradictions in the interpretations of the texts of the Qur’an that have come. From the Ottoman heritage books.
So what will be the story from which the Qur’an emerged?!