2021-10-15T09:23:00-09:00
We designed this plan in the picture for Islam, according to the current reality, time, and history that was written for these countries.
According to history
Islam entered the countries of the world in only two ways:
The first method… Islamic conquests (we symbolize them in red)
The second method… Islamic evangelism (our symbol is purple)
The lifespan of those two methods that introduced Islam to the countries of the world is only three ages:
The first age…. 1400 years
The second age….800 years
The third age….400 years
We made 400 years a basic structural unit of time (we symbolized it in light indigo).
And according to reality
We have highlighted the statistics published by official sources, regardless of how accurate they are. We have made the number of Muslims in each country in yellow above the units of time, and we have made the percentage of Muslims in each country in light green above the number.
——————-
In the previous article, we talked about the story of proselytization only, by analyzing this chart…and we concluded that the story of proselytization seems somewhat realistic when comparing the proportions, numbers, and ages between the countries to which Islam came through proselytization. There is an increase It is fixed in numbers, and this constant increase is only produced through realistic movement.
But the story of evangelization is illogical in one point, which is the chronological order… Ancient evangelism produced for us fewer numbers than the numbers produced by modern evangelism… and this is illogical.
In this link
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=905704693699128&id=100027788172171
—————
By date
Islam entered Misr approximately 1,400 years ago after Christianity, through the Arab Islamic conquests, which started from the center of Islam, Mecca, to spread Islam on earth. These conquests reached many countries, including Misr, and thanks to those conquests, Islam spread in Misr.
Also, Islam entered India approximately 500 years ago after the religion of Hinduism, through the Mongol Islamic conquests, which emerged from an unknown and unstable place such as Mecca. These conquests reached many countries, including India, and thanks to those conquests, Islam spread in India.
Now…look again at the chart, and focus only on the countries in the chart whose chronological structure is based on the method of evangelization (red color), which are: Misr, India, and check the number and the number of time units.
If you make a comparison, you will find that the story of the conquests in this scheme seems somewhat unrealistic and illogical, when looking at the numbers and comparing them with the time units. There is a very staggering number that resulted from the passage of one time unit in reality, and there is a sixth of this number that resulted from About the passage of three units of time in reality.
For example
The difference between Misr and India in construction… 2 time units
The difference between Misr and India in number is approximately one-sixth
This big difference makes the story somewhat unrealistic, but if we accept this reality and the method of entry into Islam, then the story can be somewhat realistic, with difficulty, and logically, if the story were the opposite, as the Arab Islamic conquests reached Misr 500 years ago, and the Islamic conquests The Mughals arrived in India 1,400 years ago.
Thus, the story will be somewhat realistic and logical, because the ability of the Islamic conquests to create a number on earth within 500 years will be 100 million, and after 500 years the number will increase to two and a half times to 250 million, and after another 500 years the number will double and Half 650 million.
We will receive a fixed increase rate (double the number + half of it).
It is as if the story of the Islamic conquests had placed a fixed value on the numerical increase of Muslims and the rate of increase of Muslims in every country in every unit of time that passes through any country.
in another meaning
At the beginning of the conquests of the country, which lasted for, say, 70 years, the number of Muslims reached (40 million).
After the conquests, the equation will be:
Every 500 years…the number becomes (double the number + half of it).
If the number of Muslims in Misr is approximately 95 million, then this number is the result of one unit of time (approximately 500 years).
The previous equation, with changing the age of the story, can explain the numbers in India and Misr, but it does not explain the percentage.
how ?
The truth is that when studying this chart, we must realize that the percentage does not change almost every unit of time that passes. In reality, the percentage will remain completely constant in reality no matter how old the age increases, because the increase in the number of Muslims in a country is matched by the same increase in the number of other religions in the same country. .
In other words… there is no significant importance to the age of Islam in any country when trying to study the percentage of individuals because time is not considered an influential factor in making the percentage… but time becomes an influential factor when trying to study the number of individuals .
We can study the percentage of Muslims in Misr on the basis that Islam entered Misr 500 years ago through conquests, and we can also study the percentage of Muslims in India on the basis that Islam entered India 1400 years ago through conquests, and this basis will not affect the results of the study.
Therefore, the question is:
Why is the percentage of Muslims in Misr 95 percent, which is a very large percentage, while the percentage of Muslims in India is 45 percent, which is a small percentage compared to the percentage in Misr, even though the way Islam entered the two countries was the same way (conquests)?
Why did the conquests of Misr achieve 95 percent, while the conquests of India were unable to achieve the same percentage in Misr, and were satisfied with 45 percent?
If we think a little…we will come to an understanding of another factor influencing the lineage industry, and we will reach a point that is difficult to solve.
If time is a factor that does not affect the creation of percentages at all, then this leads us to another factor that contributed to the creation of those percentages.
Now, if the conquests were really the way Islam entered India, and let us say that the conquests lasted for approximately 100 years, then the conquests must make the number of Muslims in India (40 million).
The conquests stop……..then after every 100 years the number of Muslims doubles until it reaches 650 500 years after the beginning of the conquests.
Now the question: What was the population of India at the beginning of the conquests?
If the Mongol conquests at their beginning were able to create 40 million Muslims in India 500 years ago, then 40 million would be 45 percent of the population of India, and therefore the population of India 500 years ago was 90 million people.
Even if the population of Misr 1400 years ago was 100 million people, then the Arab Islamic conquests were able, within 100 years from the beginning of the conquests, to make 95 million Muslims in Misr.
But if we assume that Islam entered Misr 500 years ago, through Islamic conquests such as India, and that the population of Misr was 5 million people, then the Islamic conquests were able, within 100 years from the beginning of the conquests, to make 4,750,000 of Misr’s population Muslims, because the percentage of Islam in Misr is 95 percent.
Here is the difficulty in resolving the issue of percentages, even though the method is the same in both countries. Is the matter related to the type of conquests?!
I believe that we can, to some extent, find a solution to the issue of the existence of different lineages between Misr and India, despite the fact that the method of entering Islam is the same in the two countries, which is the Islamic conquests, by searching for those same lineages in the countries to which Islam was introduced through proselytization.
how ?
If you look at the chart and look for ratios close to or equal to the ratio found in Misr and India, you will reach two countries: Indonesia and Ethiopia.
The percentage of Islam in Indonesia is 90 percent
The percentage of Islam in Misr is 95 percent
The percentage of Islam in Ethiopia is 45 percent
The percentage of Islam in the continent of India is 45 percent
now
If the proportions are equal between Misr and Indonesia, and between India and Ethiopia, this does not prevent each two countries from having the same Islamic age, because age does not affect the proportions, and it also does not prevent making the method of entering Islam the same in the two countries.
Now…we have two possibilities for interpreting lineage based on the method of entering Islam:
whether
Islam entered Misr and Indonesia approximately 400 years ago through proselytization, and in fact, 90 percent of its production occurred in the two countries.
(But did an Islamic call reach Misr 400 years ago?)
Or that
Islam entered Misr and Indonesia approximately 1,400 years ago through conquests, and in reality the two countries produced a percentage of 90 percent?!
(But did the Arab conquests reach Indonesia 1400 years ago?)
And but N
Islam entered India and Ethiopia approximately 500 years ago through Islamic conquests, and in reality the two countries produced a percentage of 45 percent?!
(But did the Mongol conquests reach Ethiopia 500 years ago?)
Or that
Islam entered India and Ethiopia approximately 1,400 years ago through proselytization, and in reality the two countries produced a percentage of 45 percent?!
(But did Muslims migrate from Mecca to India 1400 years ago?)
the truth
If we consider the matter in Misr and Indonesia as evangelism, and we consider the matter in India and Ethiopia as evangelism as well, and everyone is of the same age, whether it was 500 years ago or 1400 years ago, because time does not affect lineage, then evangelism has produced for us variable lineage.
How do we explain the variable ratios?
Did a single Islamic evangelist take place in the whole world 500 years ago or 1400 years ago? What type of evangelism was this, and why did this evangelism produce different proportions even though it was one evangelism?
If we consider the matter in Misr and Indonesia as conquests, and we consider the matter in India and Ethiopia as conquests as well, and everyone is of the same age, whether it was 500 years ago or 1400 years ago, because time does not affect lineage, then the conquests produced for us variable lineage.
How do we explain the variable ratios?
Did single Islamic conquests take place in the entire world 500 years ago or 1400 years ago? What type of conquests were these, and why did these conquests produce different proportions even though they were one conquest?
There is one event that took place throughout the earth, whether it was conquests or evangelization, or with some conquests and evangelization that explains these lineages?
I believe that these percentages and the difficult points that accompany these percentages cannot be solved, unless we think from another similar angle, which is that there is a decrease in the percentage of Islam in the country, and not in an increase in the percentage of Islam.
If we think about it, we will reach an interesting point
Why is Islam always the accused, and the one who is required to explain its reality and lineage, while the other is not required to do this, considering that it is a reality older than Islam?
Because there was a project that moved throughout the land, which was carrying a movement of occupation and proselytization of a religion, and this project was carried by a diverse force.
This project… is the project that emerged 400 years ago from Europe and moved throughout the land and was carried by a diverse force.
He follows
.
.
.
.