5/22/2020 0:00:00
The summary of our previous conversations says that we now face a 98% probability that the story of the translation of the Egyptian inscriptions is the story that the readers are talking about, but we still need 2%, and we also need the legal seal of the readers to confirm the authenticity of the story once and for all.
how ?!
We will take another new path, in researching and examining the details of the story of the West’s translation of Egyptian inscriptions, and the circumstances surrounding that story.
First, let us ask a question as an important introduction before researching and exploring the details of the story of the translation of the Egyptian inscriptions.
Does what the West has extracted from Egyptian inscriptions seem logical and natural?!
If we think about the matter, we will find that the things that the West extracted from Egyptian inscriptions are three things:
1- Language
2- Religion
3- History
Now, if we think deeply about these things that the West extracted from Egyptian inscriptions, we will find the following:
■■■ Regarding the language ■■■
● Where is this language that the West extracted from Egyptian inscriptions in the reality around us?!
There is no clear and visible trace of this language at the present time, neither in Misr nor in the surrounding areas of Misr.
Some researchers are trying to convince people of this language, by writing articles that talk about words in the dialect of the Egyptian population or in other languages that they are derived from this language… but I see it as illogical.
These researchers present words in the language that the West extracted, and they search for words that are mutated and similar to these words on the basis that they are derived from them or their ancient origin may be those words in the language of the Egyptian inscriptions… and here is what is illogical.
Why do words that are 100% identical in pronunciation and meaning do not appear between the words of the languages of Egyptian inscriptions and words that are still present and alive at the present time, but in all cases there is no 100% identicalness, even though it is logical that there are words that are still the same in pronunciation and meaning.
This is something that many do not pay attention to because of the idea of historical development, which imposes that the language will develop and differ in its words and meanings as a long time passes over it. We have criticized this in the theory of language in Western curricula, and we said that the ancient language continues to this day, because there The words “things around us” are fixed and do not develop or change. The mountain 5000 years ago will continue to be called “mountain” in the people’s language until the present time.
Mountain, stone, river, sea, sky, water, rain, cloud etc.
Where are these old names and why did they not continue?!
● The language that the West extracted from Egyptian inscriptions does not appear to have a single objective unity.
For example… any person can recognize a language simply by hearing a person speaking this language without looking at this person.
If I recorded for you an audio file of a person speaking Chinese, you would know that it is a Chinese language or a French language, even though you do not understand Chinese or French…..but you knew that it was Chinese or French because you have a subconscious measure by which you can identify the quality of the language through the sound effect. And music in the language.
But this sound and musical effect does not exist in the language of the Egyptian inscriptions, which is the objective unit in the language.
For example….there is no linguistic unit in the names of the deities in the inscriptions of Misr
There are [Amon, Thoth, Hathor, Nephthys, and Osiris]
Perhaps there is a linguistic unity between the names [Amun and Aton]
But there is no linguistic unity between [Amun and Aten], between [Thoth and Hathor], and between [Nephthys, Osiris, and Sekhmet].
Also….there is no linguistic unit that expresses one culture in the names of the kings of Misr
There is no cultural linguistic unity between the names [Ramses, Thutmose, and Ahmose] and between the names [Menkaure, Khafre, and Jadraka], and between the name [Hatshepsut], and between the name [Tutankhamun], and the name [Akhenaten].
● There is also a strange and anomalous condition in the language of Egyptian inscriptions that does not exist in Arabic or any language in the world…. This condition is the presence of two phonemes that cannot come together in any word in Arabic [a – h].
I believe that the reason is the difficulty and extreme heaviness in any tongue to combine these two approaches in one word.
But in the language of Egyptian inscriptions, this case is clearly found… There are many words in which the letters [A-H] combine.
This is not normal
■■■ Regarding religion ■■■
● Where is this religious belief that the West extracted from Egyptian inscriptions in the reality around us?!
Why didn’t it continue to this day?!
There is no remaining trace of this religious belief in Misr or around Misr, and this is illogical and natural.
Why ?!
Because religion and belief are a form of higher consciousness…that is, a higher structure of consciousness, and the upper structures are solid and run parallel to history and give their impact on society as time progresses. Therefore, they cannot disappear from societies with the progress of time.
Religion is a solid structure in humans, and it is more solid in society. If the individual can change his religion, society solidly maintains the religion.
● The West also talks about more than a thousand gods mentioned in Egyptian inscriptions that the ancient Egyptians worshiped. Herodotus even talks about 2000 gods who were in Egyptian belief when the Greeks visited Misr.
Of course, everyone actually believes what the West says…because Darwinian evolutionary historical awareness made people believe in this thing, especially since the story of general history that was written for people made the reality of man on earth proceed on earth in this way.
When man broke away from the animal kingdom, he began to look at the world around him with amazement. He believed that the sea was a Allah, the mountain was a Allah, the sky was a Allah, the earth was a Allah, time was a Allah, sex was a Allah, beauty was a Allah, etc…. Then after a while. Man’s outlook evolved and he decided to unite the gods into one Allah.
Example: This historical religious awareness that exists in the current collective unconscious today, was clearly summarized by the Syrian poet (Adonis) in an interview with him years ago when he said: One of the reasons for the strange phenomenon of Greece, which was distinguished by reason, science, and philosophy, is that the Greeks believed in the multiplicity of gods, and this provided Great freedom for the ancient Greek made him innovate in reason, thinking, and science, in contrast to society that believed in the monotheism of the gods, because monotheism restricted man and prevented his creativity.
This (Indonesian) religious awareness… is the real reason why our people and researchers surrendered to the results of what the West extracted from Egyptian inscriptions, and made them believe that what the West says is true and there is no doubt about it, and it was the reality of man in ancient Misr. ……..and preventing anyone from suggesting even a 1% possibility that the West is lying.
We believe that this Indonesian awareness is very wrong, and that what the West says is illogical, unnatural, and even false.
how ?!
First…. Doctrine is not an agreement and a certain society has decided on the form of religion, because religion is only the answer to the question of existence and death, and this answer does not develop, but only the knowledge surrounding the answer develops.
The Syrian poet Adonis, who became preoccupied with philosophy and thought, believed that the Greek world was real and existed on Earth and was not just a cartoonish imaginary story. Adonis’s belief in the Greek world, which was created by the West and made it the beginning of Roman times and current global history, made him believe that belief could proceed in this magical, childish way, and that belief was an idea that man in ancient times had decided to adopt, and that man must choose the form of belief based on On the traffic of the imaginary world of Greece.
Secondly… the Greek world that believes in multiple gods cannot appear in reality and existence… No society can appear on Earth that believes in multiple gods, and a society with multiple gods cannot settle, continue, produce, and establish a civilization.
Why ?!
Because a society believes in the multiplicity of gods, a collective consciousness will live in chaos and will not be able to produce normal consciousness and natural thoughts. It will collapse and disappear and will destroy itself, because belief in the multiplicity of gods requires belief in the existence of tasks and influence of the gods, and society will live in a state other than one, and consciousness. There is a continuous overlap in the tasks and influences of the gods, and this makes it a contradictory and conflicting consciousness with itself, and no society or world will be formed in this way.
Third: It is impossible that man in the ancient past would reach the belief of multiple gods. Rather, it is impossible that man at any time would reach this Greek-Indonesian awareness.
Because man in ancient times had the first logical and natural instinct… unity and one Allah, which Adonis criticized and believed did not follow the same laws as the cartoon world of Greece.
Why ?!
As we said, religion is only an answer to the question of existence and death, and ancient man could not believe that his existence emerged from a reality in which there were two or more gods.
Because man’s mind is innate and logical….and logical innateness realizes that his existence will not be the result of the existence of an easy thing……..because the presence of two easy things prevents the emergence of existence and life in a logical manner.
Because it is impossible for a natural life to exist if there are two or more gods. The existence of one or more gods will lead to a conflict between the two gods, conflict, contradiction, and continuous difference in life…and this conflict and difference cannot create a stable natural world. And with this determination… insignificant existence leads to non-existence… This innate logic has existed in humans since ancient times.
This is the nature of natural man…while the unnatural is the Greek world, an unnatural and unreal world that cannot exist in the history of man and the earth, just an imaginary world that exists on paper.
This is the essence of the Qur’an’s speech
{Allah is your Allah, Allah is your forefathers} {And if the truth had followed their desires, the heavens and the earth and whoever is in them would have been corrupted. Rather, We have given them their remembrance, so they turn away from their remembrance.}
{Or have they taken gods from the earth that they are spreading? (21) Had there been gods in them except Allah, they would have been corrupted, so Glory be to Allah, Allah is the Throne for what they describe. (22) He is not asked about what He does, but they are asked (23) Or have they taken gods besides Him? Say, “Bring your proof.” This is a mention of who is with me, and a mention of those who Before me, but most of them do not know the truth, so they turn away.
{Rather, those who wronged follow their own desires without knowledge, so who can guide those whom Allah has led astray? And they will have no helpers. (29) So set your face upright to the religion. Allah has created the way in which He has created people. There is no altering of Allah’s creation. That is the upright religion, but most people do not know.}
Rather, the Qur’an… talks about this innate nature, which the authors of the Book (in the afterlife) began to deny and believe that it is falsehood and magic, after they began to believe that the ancient people believed in gods like the Greeks (like Adonis).
{And when Our clear verses are recited to them, they say, “This is nothing but a man who wants to turn you away from what your fathers used to worship.” And they say, “This is nothing but a fabricated lie.” And those who disbelieve say of the truth when it has come to them, “This is nothing but clear magic.” (43) And We have not given them books to study them, and We have not sent to them before you any warner.) 44)}
{And they were astonished that a warner from among them had come to them, and the disbelievers said, “This is a lying magician. (4) Make the gods into one Allah. Indeed, this is a wondrous thing. (5) And the chiefs among them set out, ‘Go and be patient with your gods. This is something intended.’ (6) We have not heard of this in the afterlife. This is nothing but fabrication. }
—————————
So… the language that the West extracted from the inscriptions of Misr is surrounded by unnatural things. Also, the religion that the West extracted from the inscriptions of Misr is also surrounded by things that are illogical, unnatural, and unrealistic, and even carry the quality of lying… This world of multiple gods is imaginary and unreal. It is realistic and impossible for it to appear on earth in ancient times, so how did the West extract it from the inscriptions of Misr?!
This means….that there is a great possibility that the West has played a big game with the original contents of the Egyptian inscriptions, and it also means that there is also a very high possibility that the readers are talking about (the Egyptian inscriptions) as being the book.
This makes us able…to enter into the subject of research and research into the details of the story of the West’s translation of Egyptian inscriptions, and we possess a kind of steadfastness and a clear vision that makes us able to see the important and accurate observations in the story that took place.