11/26/2020 0:00:00
The question that still confuses me is how the phenomenon of Greek civilization existed, and what are the factors that led to the emergence of this unique civilization without the rest of the world and in a sudden manner.
This is a question, but in an inflected form, that was posed by the English philosopher Russell, in an attempt to explain the phenomenon of Greek civilization and the reasons for its unique appearance in Greece and not in the rest of the world, in an attempt to search for the natural and logical factors that led to this unique appearance in science, literature, poetry, philosophy, etc. Etc.
There are many Western scholars who have asked such a question, and the answers were varied, depending on the point of view. There are those who explained the reason as geography, climate, and trade, which created an open society with scientific free thinking…. And there are those who said that it is Greece is a civilization created by the Renaissance in Europe.
Yes, there are those who say that it is an innovative civilization created by the imagination of elites in Europe.
Why ?
The picture that this history painted in our minds and imagination when thinking about Greek civilization is: the entire world on the entire earth was living in intellectual, scientific, religious, cultural, and cognitive darkness, backwardness, magic, and sorcery in a form closer to animal societies…. ….Only there is a bright point of light on earth called Greece. They excelled in everything, in thinking, logic, science, literature, culture, democracy, ethics, etc.
This is an established image for everyone… and it is the same image that was in the imagination of the English philosopher Russell when he asked that question, and it is a question that imposes itself strongly, because it is natural that any human being would ask such a question to explain that unique bright spot surrounded by a dark world that… History painted it in his imagination.
Imagine with me…an entire ocean is dark and inside the ocean there is one bright point!! …And here comes the logical question:
How can a logical and natural explanation be provided for the appearance of that bright spot within that dark ocean?! .
Searching for an answer is difficult, because there is no temporal or spatial context around that point that is connected to it, and explains the reasons for this sudden appearance of that point.
how ?
When interpreting this civilization and the reasons for its emergence, we must search for an ancient, temporal and spatial context that is connected to this point, and this context does not exist.
For example, it has no spatial context, no temporal context…there is no connection.
There is no ancient context for religion in Greece…..there is no chronological context
They have a religion that is unique from the rest…. There is no spatial context
There is no ancient context for calligraphy in Greece…there is no chronological context
They have a font that stands apart from the rest….there is no spatial context
There is no context for language in Greece…there is no chronological context
They have a language that is unique from the rest…there is no spatial context
There is no context for man in Greece….there is no chronological context
Greek is different from the rest…there is no spatial context
There is no temporal context and no spatial context for Greek civilization, even with its European surroundings, in other words…..there is no temporal and spatial connection of this civilization with another.
This conclusion…there is no temporal and spatial connection for this civilization..
What does this mean ?
In short……… Greek civilization is a virtual history that exists inside books and has no connected reality, except stories inside printer paper, a Western project that was launched by the emergence of the printer and the West’s departure from Europe to occupy the world and carry out a knowledge obliteration in order to impose this world. The phantom.
Why ?
I will give you an approximate example so that the idea becomes clear.
If you ask me… Is the state of ancient Yemeni civilization like the state of Greek civilization, and what is the explanation for the reasons for the emergence of ancient Yemeni civilization?
It is true………….that the West has made the emergence of Yemeni civilization as sudden as the case of Greek civilization, and Western scholars are still presenting theories to explain the emergence of Yemeni civilization in 2000 BC. This appearance caused inability and difficulty in The explanation for its sudden appearance…but the truth is, when we look at the Yemeni civilization with a simple look…we will find its situation completely different from the Greek case…and it was not a sudden appearance, but rather had an ancient, connected temporal and spatial context.
how ?!
First of all, let us temporarily abandon the story of the West’s translations of the inscriptions of Yemen and the region in general.
If you take a simple look at Yemen, you will find the following:
■ There is an ancient context for religion in Yemen… There is a temporal context
It has a common religion with Misr….There is a spatial context
With a simple look, you will find that many traces of the Sphinx are discovered in Yemen with inscriptions in Musnad script, and mummified bodies are discovered in Yemen in large quantities and preserved in the same way as those found in Misr, and this indicates the existence of an ancient religious context in Yemen, and there is a context My place is through the lack of uniqueness in religion in Yemen from the rest of the world.
■ There is an ancient context for the calligraphy in Yemen… There is a chronological context
It has an identical line with Misr….there is a spatial context
With a simple look, you will find that the script in Yemen is completely identical to the script in Misr, but it appears to be a developed stage of the script in Misr…. This indicates the existence of an ancient chronological context for writing in Yemen from which it emerged, and there is a connection with Misr in Writing and the lack of uniqueness of calligraphy in Yemen from its surroundings.
■ There is a context for the language in Yemen… There is a temporal context
It has a common language with Misr…there is a spatial context
With a simple look, you will find that the written script in Yemen is completely identical to the written script in Misr… and this identity means the monotony of the language in Yemen and Misr… and this indicates the existence of an ancient chronological context for the language in Yemen, and there is a connection with… Misr in the language and the lack of uniqueness of the language in Yemen from its surroundings
■ There is a context for humans in Yemen…. There is a temporal context
The Yemeni is not different from the other… There is a spatial context
With a simple look… you will find a Yemeni coffin buried in a cemetery inside Misr near a pyramid… and this indicates the existence of an ancient temporal context for man in Yemen who emerged from a point, and man in Yemen is the same as man in Misr… which means… The presence of a connected spatial context and the Yemeni person’s lack of isolation from his surroundings.
What is the conclusion?
There is a natural, realistic, and logical temporal context, and there is also a logical, natural, and realistic spatial context for the Yemeni civilization with its surroundings, that is, there is a temporal and spatial connection to the Yemeni civilization.
This thing that exists in Yemen does not exist at all in Greek civilization, as it has no logical, realistic, natural temporal or spatial connection to Greek civilization… a unique civilization.
It is true……that the writer of history tried to get out of this logical impasse, by trying to provide a temporal and spatial context for Greek civilization…and tried to make a connection with it, but nevertheless… It is a failed and illogical attempt that increases the irrationality of this civilization.
how ?!
The history writer tried to create a context for Greek civilization from our region, by creating a historical moment that made Greece think about traveling to our region to take a context for himself from it, so that he could live in the land and produce this unique Greek phenomenon.
how ?
■ One day… the Greek decided to search for a religion for himself… and when he was unable to create a religion for himself… he decided to travel to our region, specifically to Misr, in order to import religion from it (by importing ancient Egyptian gods).
This is what history said… according to Herotus (the father of history)… but the logical questions are:
Is religion a matter of mood and decision for a Greek to think about searching for a religion, and what was the Greek’s religion before the decision to search for a religion? It is impossible that a person does not have an existential meaning for it. Then, is the issue of religion a difficult matter until he decides to search for a religion? He could have made it for himself. A religion and live by it, especially since the Greek was a genius and innovator. He was able to invent a religion of his own and live by it?
But why did he decide to search for a religion in our region, especially in Misr, why our region and Misr specifically?!
But what is strange is that even though the Greek had imported gods from Misr, he noticed his arrogance and lack of gratitude and tried to forget this act and be disgusted by it. He did not name the gods of his religion with the same names as the gods of Misr, according to Western translations. He named the gods with names from… His innovation, even though he could have created hats for himself easily and without the need to go to Misr and called them whatever he wanted, but he decided to go to Misr to import the hats and then changed their names, but with the same function that exists in Misr.
Also…….. Who went to import the gods of Misr? Is he a Greek person or a king? Because when he imports the gods, what is the guarantee that the Greeks will accept this religion, and the Greeks may have another religion?! .
■ One day….the Greek decided to search for a script..and when he was unable to create a script for himself……he decided to travel to our region and import the script from it (by importing the Phoenician script).
This is what history said…that the Phoenicians were the ones who taught the Greeks to write, because the Phoenicians were the ones who invented writing…but the logical questions are:
Is such a unique civilization unable to invent a written script without the need to travel and have other people come and teach it?!
Does the issue of inventing writing require a unique civilization to do all this travel, fatigue and hardship?!
At the first moment the Greek learned to write from the Phoenician, what did the Greek write from the texts of that time?! And where are those texts that he wrote when he first learned to write? ..
The strange and strange thing is that the Phoenician taught the Greek to write, but the Greek wrote very large texts on paper, while the Phoenician left us only inscriptions with the number of fingers written on stone.
If the Phoenician had written writing on the stones, then it is assumed that when the Greek learned to write from the Phoenician, he would write many inscriptions on the stones, so where are the written inscriptions that were written on the stones in Greece?! …there are no…they are all texts of printed books.
If religion and belief are the first thing any civilization thinks about, then it would have been better for the Greek, instead of making two trips to the region and exhausting himself and his soul, he could have made only one trip to Misr, and imported religion and writing from it as well, according to the popular proverb. (Hajj and selling rosaries), and it is written in the same script as in Misr (hieroglyphics) instead of importing script from another place (the land of the Phoenix)…. Logic says like this… Religion and script are imported from Misr… correct?! …….. But the Greek started importing religion from Misr… Then he decided to travel to another place to import a written script, and this means ….. Either he was stupid… Or perhaps when he visited Misr… He saw Egyptian writing, but he did not like that writing.
■ As for the sciences… the Greek would travel to Misr continuously and always… in order to learn the sciences from the Egyptian priests in the temples, mathematics, philosophy, etc.
But where are those sciences… Where are those books that contain the sciences that the ancient Egyptians left behind in Misr… Misr did not leave behind paper texts in a very large quantity as Greece did… And Misr left behind only inscriptions, and All the contents of the inscriptions in Misr, according to Western translations, are stories that do not enrich or make you fat from hunger… cartoon stories… children’s stories.
Finally…history says that all of this Greek heritage…disappeared suddenly…after darkness descended on all of Europe…and only the scholars of the region (Arab Muslims) revealed it to the world and to the Europeans… Arab Muslim scholars are the ones who deserve the credit before humanity for preserving the Greek heritage.
Now I am looking for the common point… in all this context that history has written for Greece and our region… if you look closely… you will find that it is Misr.
A Greek goes to Misr to import religion, and he goes to Misr to learn sciences from it. Also, the only place that a Greek thinks of occupying and ruling is Misr. There is no Greek state that appeared in the region and is connected with Greece to the Greek states that ruled Misr (the Ptolemies… etc.). .
Why ?!
In the beginning…if you make a comparison between the contact of Greek civilization with Misr and the contact of Yemeni civilization with Misr…you will find the following:
The connection of the Yemeni civilization with Misr… left many material traces on the ground bearing a time scale… which confirms the existence of a real and realistic temporal and spatial connection between Yemen and Misr.
But this very large contact of Greek civilization with Misr… did not leave us with any material traces in Greece bearing a confirmed time scale… which confirms the absence of a real and realistic temporal and spatial connection between Greece and Misr.
There are no written inscriptions on stones in Greece as in Yemen, and there are no mummified bodies in Greece as in Yemen, and there are no written inscriptions similar to the inscriptions of Misr as in Yemen, and there is no archaeological material evidence of the presence of Greece in Misr. Only one stone (the Rosetta Stone) has Greek and Egyptian inscriptions on it…and it did not appear in Greece. Rather, it appeared in Misr during the invasion of Napoleon and his soldiers into Misr and the region, and we did not discover any Greek traces on the stones, except in Misr. Or in Greece.
So, the Greek civilization… a virtual world project… appeared with the advent of the printer… as part of the West’s projects before it set out to conquer the world.
A project within the larger project to write a new history for man and the earth….. after the occupation of the world by the West.
But why was whoever wrote the story “Greek Civilization” preoccupied with Misr?
Because very simply… Misr… is the beginning of civilization… the beginning of the appearance of man on earth… the beginning of religion… the beginning of history… and there was no history before Misr. All the earth.
Misr was created… after which all history appeared.
Search all over the earth…from Japan to China to Australia to the Americas to Europe…you will not find there any clear and real ancient traces of man, nor will you find any ancient writing. For the ancient man in it, and you will not find any corpses of the first man in it……..You will not find anything like what is found in Misr.
that is the true
What is there in Misr?
There is in Misr…the oldest and first book on earth…the book that contains within it the nature of the first man, the tongue of the first man, the memory of man on earth, the true history of man on earth, and the history of the earth.
There is in Misr…the oldest building erected for people on earth…the huge, miraculous building, the first qibla of people, the first qibla of nature…the first qibla of religion.
And for all these reasons… the writer of history tried to establish a large and continuous connection between (Greece) (the imaginary world) with (Misr) (the first real world on Earth)… in order to mix illusion with the first, real, real world. .. so that people are unable to decipher the stories of the huge illusion… for fear that people will realize the truth that exists in Misr, which Shaytan wanted to hide when he sent his soldiers (Napoleon and his army) to occupy Misr and the region… in order to forge the inscriptions of Misr, After they took with them the printer that printed for us all these imaginary worlds that we read today.
{The people were one nation, so Allah sent the prophets as bearers of good tidings and warnings, and sent down with them the Book with the truth, that He might judge between the people in that in which they differed, and none differed in it except those who were given it, after the clear proofs had come to them, out of envy among themselves. So Allah guided those who believed to the truth to the truth, with His permission, Allah guides whom He wills to a straight path. }