What is the name of the religion of ancient Misr?

What is the name of the religion of ancient Misr?

4/3/2021 0:00:01

Link to the article

What is the name of the religion of ancient Misr?

If you search the Internet for books that talk about ancient Egyptian religion, you will find very many books written by Western scholars that talk about the religion of ancient Misr.

This matter makes us astonished……. How did Western scholars and historians at the present time achieve such accuracy in describing that ancient religion that became extinct, and how they entered into the depths of the heart of the ancient Egyptian man and extracted from him all that faith, and It is as if they were ancient Egyptians and lived the faith of that religion precisely, and practiced the rituals of that religion, then they took a time machine and moved to the present time, and wrote those works from the reality of the experience they lived.

But many Egyptian residents… look at the matter with admiration and pride that there are huge works that talk about Misr and distinguish it with those gods that its ancestors worshiped… and this pride is something that seems somewhat natural to a certain level, but if you increase it, the matter becomes… Abnormal .

When a person mounts a podium and invites people to come before him, and then tells them that your grandfather was a hero and a superhero, it is natural that you will feel happiness and joy.

But when this person exaggerates and says that your great hero grandfather married the mother who gave birth to him, and that he worshiped gods other than your Allah, and that he wrestled with the most powerful gods and defeated them, and that he honored your hero grandfather and gave him the house in which you live, you accept this. The distinguished heroic history that no one has, and at the same time do not reject the idea that your grandfather worshiped those gods and married his mother who gave birth to him, and that the house in which you live was owned by this person, and you consider it a good thing and will not cause Any harm, but it is a matter of pride…. It will not be normal for you.

Because this person made you very proud of your grandfather and your ancient history, and you accepted this showy role in front of people, so that you would talk about this history all the time in front of people, and at the same time you believed false things and accepted them, and they offended you and harmed you, and you did not know it. Because it is possible that this person will demand from you the house you live in, after you accepted in front of all people the validity of this date and did not object to his words… because his words are a legal document.

This previous example is exactly like the history that Al-Masry teaches today in Misr as an official national history that includes information that is described as real, and we have read news that there is a proposal in Misr to teach these deities and teach the Champollion language in schools out of preserving the ancient Egyptian identity.

But the truth is that the Egyptian today lives in a great and sharp contradiction

Between what he studies and his reality…there is no connection between the history of his ancestors and his reality, and there are no traces of influence from the religion of his ancestors with his current religion. For example, he believes in one Allah, but at the same time he is taught history as real. This is that his ancestors worshiped many gods, and naturally this would produce a new character for the Egyptian, divorced from his reality, and in a state of love with those gods whose stories were written by the French occupation.

This natural result…can be clearly seen through a small monitoring of social networking sites.

Example

– There are, for example, pages called (Sons of Ra), and Ra is an ancient Allah worshiped by ancient Egyptian man, according to the French translation.

– There are pages called (Sons of the Holy Aten), and the Aten is an ancient Allah whose ancient Egyptian servant, according to the French translation.

There are groups on Facebook that discuss Egyptian history and continuously publish topics about the gods of ancient Misr that France extracted from Egyptian inscriptions, such as the stories of those gods and their functions, and publish poetic hymns written by the ancient Egyptian for those gods.

– There are groups that include elites, and most of their conversations revolve around the philosophy of that ancient Egyptian religion, for example (light is the union of a shepherd with Isis on the Nitro horizon) and they publish their own poems that contain vocabulary from the names of those gods (O Shepherd, protect your land as long as you are).

There is a secular thinker who admires French secularism. He chose the name Isis for his daughter, and Isis is the name of the goddess of her ancient Egyptian worshipper, according to the French translation.

There are other phenomena that have become clear in reality, and they are a very natural result of the effects of the French occupation on human consciousness in Misr.

Why ?

Because the child completely imitates what his father does… If the father lies, the son will learn to lie as well, and if the father steals, the son will learn to steal as well. And societies are exactly the same as the child. When society gives him a false history and tells him that it is the true history of his ancestors, and in it that his ancestors worshiped different gods and spoke a different language, society will try to imitate his ancestors, because he loves his ancestors, and he will love to worship those gods and he will learn. The language of his ancestors, and he will love to take the same names, and he will love to imitate their marriage, etc.

If you search in some historical references about the history of Misr, written by the Greeks, you will find them saying that when the Greeks occupied Misr, the Egyptians worshiped 1000 gods, but according to what the French occupation extracted from the writing of ancient Misr, the ancient Egyptian worshiped many hats, such as: the shepherd of Amun, the Aten, Hathor, and Horus. Ptah Osiris Isis Nephthys Anubis Thoth Geb.

But the question is: What is the name of the religion that included all these gods, and what did the ancient Egyptian call it? Did the ancient Egyptian actually worship all of these gods or did he know them?

Let us leave the books and everything that is said to us, and leave the role of the parrot that repeats everything that is said to it, and respect our minds and use them in searching for the answer to that question.

– The first point

Why did the ancient Egyptian religion completely disappear from reality and did not continue to this day, and we did not learn about it until after France occupied Misr and translated the inscriptions of ancient Misr?

Why did that religion not leave any clear influence or effect in the hearts and minds of people, and no isolated society appeared that worshiped a Allah named Amun, Osiris, or Horus, and why did the names of those gods not exist in the tongue of any human being on earth before the French occupation translated the inscriptions? Misr ?

.

If we think about the subject of religion, we will find that religion is a form of higher consciousness, or a superstructure, and the superstructures are difficult to disappear from any society, because they are very solid structures that maintain their continuity and move in society from one time to another… that is, they go with History is on a completely parallel path.

But this solid upper structure that was in Misr (religion), which lasted for about 6000 years in Misr, suddenly disappeared from Misr and without any scientific, logical and realistic explanation, and had it not been for the French occupier, we would not have known any information about this religion. France revived it into existence.

Not only that… When we look at religion in ancient Misr from the reality of the written texts and the deep rituals of the dead in the cemeteries, we will find that it seemed very, very deep in the ground, and there is no such depth anywhere on the earth, that is, it is rooted in the earth. Without the rest of the places.

If religion in general is a solid superstructure that is difficult to disappear, then how will it be possible for a superstructure that is at the same time very deep and pervasive in Misr, and then suddenly disappears from Misr?

It is completely illogical and completely unrealistic. There is a fundamental reason that explains this strange matter.

– The second point

The truth is that the idea of the extinction of a civilization as an explanation would be illogical.

Because life is the only system on Earth that does not disappear. All systems, whether natural, plant, physical or chemical, disappear except for life on Earth.

Therefore, human society is not a static entity, but rather a living, continuous entity that does not disappear. This society gives birth to a first offspring, and this offspring will give birth to a second offspring, and the second offspring will give birth to a third offspring, and so on until today.. That is, there will be continuous and continuous living communication. On earth, how did this upper, prayerful structure disappear into a living entity, and connection and continuity with that ancient Egyptian religion be lost?

Don’t tell me that rituals can change with, I’m talking about a very deep belief in man related to the gods, I’m talking about one very clear mustard seed that still remains of that ancient religion, actually confirming the existence of that religion and belief in the past in the land.

Hinduism, which is said to be the oldest religion on earth, is 5,000 years old and still exists to this day, and its adherents believe in the same Allah 5,000 years ago and practice the same rituals. So why did the ancient Egyptian religion disappear?

– The third point

It is true that many believe in the stories of the Greek world, which worshiped a large number of gods with multiple functions, but the idea of the existence of a society that believed in that number of gods seems to us to be something that is not realistically possible and did not happen, for several logical and realistic reasons:

Firstly……. Because a society that believes in gods and every Allah has a function is likely to suffer from contradiction and conflict due to the intersection between the functions of gods, and a society like this with this crowd of gods, how will it live, continue and survive? It is preoccupied with worshiping All the gods.

Secondly… How did gods appear at once in any society? It is difficult to imagine the idea that a society one day decided to worship 15 gods at once.

The reality is that society will initially believe in one Allah, then over time it will include another Allah to worship, until it reaches 15 gods, for example.

But the reality is that before society moves to the second Allah, it will be very difficult for it to leave the first Allah and will remain with the one Allah.

Third… It is not possible for a society to believe in many gods, because the matter is logical and will be the logic of ancient man, and ancient man will think logically and say: If there were two gods, life and existence would be corrupted, and I would not exist, and this existence would not have existed. This stability appears if there are a number of gods.

These three points that we raised make us re-ask the question:

So……….Where did this religion come from to Misr, which was extracted by the French occupation, and reality, logic, and scientific thinking completely deny it?

We have only two possibilities: Either this religion was real and our thinking and logic were wrong, or it was an imaginary religion and the Egyptians were enchanted.

The second possibility is the stronger possibility and that there is a game in the matter.

———

What if we took some Egyptians like Zahi Hawass, and the group (Sons of Ra), and Egyptians who are fans of the ancient Egyptian religion and its philosophy, and told them: that all those gods that the French occupation extracted were lies, and that there was no one who lived in Misr who knew them. And that the ancient Egyptian worshiped one Allah….. I wonder what their response would be?

Naturally, their response will be: This is a lie and a falsehood, and these are the words of a hateful person who wants to fight our identity and the history of our ancestors.

But if we assume…. that there is a person named Suleiman, and he was one of the ancestors of the present-day Egyptians, and an ancient inscription is written about him, and we go to the Qur’an to understand him, we will see the scenes of Zahi Hawass’ group clearly.

1- Now if you read the Qur’an’s speech on the issue of magic, you will find that he is talking about people who followed what the devils recited to the King of Sulaiman, and that these devils, with this recitation, are teaching people magic.

The speech speaks that the basis of the magic that afflicted people came from a recitation by demons against the King of Sulaiman, and the reasons for the recitation being the cause of magic are because the demons disbelieved (they covered it and hid it), and it is certain that after their disbelief, they recited a false recitation based on the information of the King of Sulaiman.

The real information in the writing of one of the Egyptians’ ancestors turned into false information, and people believed that false information that said that this man was a person named Thutmose and he worshiped several gods.

People became enchanted after believing the falsehood

(And they followed what the Satans recited over the kingdom of Sulaiman, and Sulaiman did not disbelieve, but the Satans disbelieved.) They teach people magic.

2- If the devils taught people magic because of their incorrect recitation of King Sulaiman, then this means that the people have become enchanted… correct? ….But what if a person came and did not disbelieve, and recited a correct recitation that showed the magic that occurred on the writing about King Sulaiman, one of the ancestors of the Egyptians, and removed the magic of the devils and brought out to the people one of their first fathers who worshiped Allah and who was hidden from them. ..So what will be their response?

Naturally, their logic will be that this is a lie, and the truth will be described to them as magic, because they became believers in the magic of demons, and they believed that it was the truth that their early fathers (Sulaiman, for example) worshiped.

(And when Our verses are made clear to them, they say, “This is nothing but a man who wants to turn you away from what he used to do.” Your forefathers said, “This is nothing but your fabricated fabrication.” And those who disbelieved said to the truth when it came to them, “Indeed, this is Nothing but clear magic. And We have not given them any Book, but they study it, and We have not sent to them before you any warner. And those who lied Before them, and they did not reach the level of what We had given them, so they denied Your Messengers, so how can it be reprehensible?)

(Their messengers said: Is there any doubt about Allah?) The Creator of the heavens and the earth has prayed to you to forgive you of your sins. He delayed you for an appointed time, until they said, “You are only human beings like us. You want to turn us away from what the servants of our fathers did.” Then bring us clear authority.)

3- What if that person read (recite) to them what is truly present in the Kingdom of Sulaiman that they have, and told the people who are enchanted at the present time (the afterlife), that their first ancestors (the first religion) did not believe in gods and did not worship those Gods, but they believed in one Allah named (Allah)… What would be their response?

It is natural that their logic will be one of astonishment and disbelief, and they will say that this is a lie and fabrication on his part, and the truth will be described as magic, because they have come to believe that the natural thing is the worship of many gods, and that the ancient natural reality is that the ancients worshiped gods and not One Allah.

Rather, they will be disgusted by the presence of the name of Allah and will be repulsed when reading the name of Allah in writing about their first ancestors, and they will prefer the presence of the names of the gods that the devils invented for them and rejoice in them.

(In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful, the Holy Qur’an and the Qur’an, the Remembrance. Rather, those who disbelieve are in glory and discord. How many generations have We destroyed before them? Then they called out to you and there was no escape. And they marveled that a warner from among them had come to them and said: This is the magic of a liar. He has made the gods his Allah and a limit. Indeed, this is something wondrous. And a group of them set out to walk and be patient with your gods. Indeed, this is something that will not be heard. This is ours in the Hereafter. This is nothing but a fabrication to which the Message from among us has been sent down. They are in doubt as to your remembrance, but when they have tasted your torment.)

{And when Allah alone is mentioned, the hearts of those who do not believe in the Hereafter revolt, and when those besides Him are mentioned, then they rejoice.}

(And when you read the Qur’an, We placed between you and those who do not believe in the Hereafter a concealing veil. We have enclosures over their hearts lest they understand it, and in their ears is definiteness. And when you mention your Allah in the Qur’an alone, and And I will turn away from them. We know best what they will listen to when they will listen to you and when they will be saved. When the wrongdoers say, “If you follow Except a man who has been bewitched. See how they have given you examples, and they have gone astray. You will not be able to find a way.)

[Surat Al-Isra 45-48]

———————

Now………Does the Holy Qur’an respond to the group of Zahi Hawass who are enchanted by demons, with the same three realistic and logical points that we spoke about previously?

Yes

– The first point

If religion in general is a solid superstructure that is difficult to disappear, then how can it be a solid superstructure that is, at the same time, very deep and penetrates the earth and then suddenly disappear?

The first nature on earth that continues to this day

(Faqim and Jahk for the religion of the Hanifa. Allah created the people for whom they were born. Do not change them for the creation of Allah. To Him is the religion of the righteous and the righteous.) ـــَــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ),

(Indeed, the religion is with Allah – Islam, and those who were given the Book did not differ except after Allah had come to them. In envy between them, and whoever disbelieves in the verses of Allah, then surely Allah is quick to reckon. So if they dispute with you, say, “I submit.” I have directed my face to Allah and to those who follow us, and say to those who have been given the Book and to the unlettered ones, “If you have accepted Islam, then indeed, if you have accepted Islam, then it has been lost.” They will guide you, but if they turn to you, then it is only upon you. convey the message, and Allah is All-Seeing of His servants.)

[Surat Al Imran 19-20]

– The second point

Human society is not a static society, but rather a living society that lives on the earth, and this society produces offspring, and this offspring gives birth to a second offspring, and the second offspring gives birth to a third offspring, and so on until today….. There is a continuous and continuous living connection. On earth, how did this living connection disappear in Misr, for example, and the present day has lost connection with that ancient Egyptian religion?

People are still connected to the first offspring on earth, and the present is still connected to the first religion.

This is Ibrahim’s call to his descendants to make him a great Muslim mother.

{And when Ibrahim raised the foundations of the House and Ismail, “Our Allah, accept from us. Indeed, You are the Hearer, the Knowing. (127) Our Allah, and make us Muslims to You and from our descendants a nation submissive to You. Show us our rituals and turn to us. Indeed, You are the Most Merciful. (128) Our Allah, and send among them a Messenger from among themselves who will recite to them Your verses and teach them the Book and the Wisdom and purify them. Indeed, You are the Mighty, the Wise.}

– The third point

It is not possible for a society to believe in many gods, because ancient man had innate logic, and ancient man would think logically and say: If there were two gods, life and existence would be corrupted, and I would not exist, and why would existence, the earth, and the world around me be so stable?

There will be no faith in two gods, let alone ten gods.

(And to Him belongs whoever is in the heavens and the earth, and who is with Him. They will not be too arrogant to worship Him, nor will they be dismayed.) They glorify Allah night and day, and you do not know whether or not they have taken gods from the earth. They will be spread out, if only they had been in it. There are no gods but Allah. They would have corrupted you. Glory be to Allah, Allah of the Throne, above what they describe. He is not questioned about what He does. And they are asking whether or not they have taken gods besides Him. Say, “Bring your righteousness.” This is a reminder of those who are with you. Many of those before me, nay, most of them do not know the truth, so they turn away.)

(Did they not reflect on the word? Did it not come to them as it had not given to their forefathers? Or did it not come to them when they recognized their Messenger? But they deny it, or they say it is a paradise. Nay, he brought them the truth, and most of them rejected the truth, even if he had followed it. To fulfill their desires, you would have corrupted the heavens and the earth and whoever is among them. Nay, We have come to them with a remembrance of them so that they understand from the remembrance of They are exposed )

————

The last point.

I initially intended to say, [that the ancient Egyptian religion did not leave any impact on the current Egyptian religion], and the truth is that this is half the truth, because Misr has two religions: Islam and Christianity.

1- Islam

It is the religion of the vast majority of Egyptians………but what is illogical is that the ancient Egyptian religion did not show any clear and connected influence with the religion of Islam.

The reasons why this matter is illogical are because there should be a very clear influence from the ancient Egyptian religion on the religion embraced by the majority of Egyptians, not only the Egyptians, but also the religion of the surrounding region of Misr.

2- The Christian

It is the religion of a minority of a society, and the coincidence is that it is the same religion as the French occupation that translated the inscriptions of Misr…. But what is very strange is that the ancient Egyptian religion has a very clear influence connected with the religion of Christianity.

The reasons for this being both coincidence and strangeness: the strangeness is because no trace of the ancient Egyptian religion is supposed to appear on the religion embraced by a minority in Misr, and the coincidence is that this clear trace of the religion of ancient Misr appeared in a minority in Misr that embraces its own religion. The same religion as the occupier and invader who translated the inscriptions of Misr.

how ?

If you read the history that was written about Misr, you will find that history provided us with an explanation of the reasons for the existence of the two religions (Islam and Christianity) in Misr, but it dealt with the two religions with two different interpretations.

– Interpretation of the presence of Christianity in Misr

The history that reached us from the printer tried to put a natural and realistic context for the emergence of Christianity in Misr, by making it have a connection with the ancient religion in Misr, by creating a clear influence of the ancient Egyptian religion on the current reality, to provide a realistic logical explanation that has a context connected to it. The ancient, explains the reasons for the natural presence of this religion in Misr.

He said that the reasons for the entry of Christianity into Misr were that the ancient Egyptians worshiped three hypostases of the gods (Uziris, Isis, and Horus), and those gods and religion are completely similar to the three hypostases in Christianity, to the point that the personality of (Uziris) completely matches the personality of (Christ). Therefore, Misr had fertile ground for embracing this religion, and the Egyptians welcomed this religion 2000 years ago, as a religion that belonged to them and was not foreign.

You can see this thing from this link

https://youtu.be/pKiWABmWDiw – Interpretation of the presence of Islam in Misr.

History did not follow the same realistic explanatory method that it did for Christianity, nor did it make any connection for Islam with the ancient Egyptian religion, nor did it provide a logical explanation about the reasons for Islam being the religion of the majority of the population of Misr…… Rather, it followed a completely different interpretation linked to denying the connection between Islam and the land of Misr.

Where he said that the reasons for the entry of Islam into Misr were the Islamic conquests only. Meaning, there is no similarity between the ancient Egyptian religion and Islam, and therefore it is certain that Misr did not have fertile ground for adopting the religion of Islam.

There is no similarity between the religion of ancient Misr and Islam. The reality is that it is difficult for Islam to appear in Misr, because there is no fertile ground for it, and it is difficult for it to spread in Misr, even if it exists in Misr. It requires strength to spread it in Misr, and this is how it appeared. The idea of the Islamic conquests. Had it not been for the Islamic conquests, Islam would not have appeared in Misr. The Egyptians received Islam through the Islamic conquests as a foreign religion to them 1400 years ago.

The writer of history was able to create a natural context for the religion of Christianity in Misr, by creating a model of three hypostases in the religion of ancient Misr that match very clearly with the three hypostases present in the religion of Christianity, and by creating a character in the religion of ancient Misr (Aziris) that matches the character of (Christ). In the religion of Christianity… in order to give the religion of Christianity an ancient, natural context in Misr (ancient origin), to explain the reasons for the presence of this religious minority in Misr, which carries a religion that is the same as the religion of the French occupier who invaded and occupied Misr.

But at the same time, he deliberately did not create a natural context for the religion of Islam in Misr, and did not create a model for it of one continuous Allah in Misr or any logical context, in order not to give Islam a realistic, natural and logical context in Misr (ancient origin), to explain the reasons for it. The presence of Islam as the religion of the overwhelming religious majority in Misr…in fact, it created for them a model of the Islamic conquests that emerged from Mecca. Because if there was a clear influence of the religion of ancient Misr with the religion of Islam, then the reality of Misr does not require conquests.

This gave the minority in Misr, which holds the same religion as the invading occupier who translated Misr’s inscriptions, a historical connection, and gave the religious majority a historical separation.

What is the logical reason?

History…tells us that Misr knew in ancient times a Allah named Osiris (Osiris), and the first ancient people in Misr worshiped this Allah, and when you look into the descriptions of this Allah (Uzair), you will find that those descriptions match personal descriptions. (Jesus) found in Christianity, the religion of the West.

Same character, same birth, same events, ending, etc.

(Osir) is an exact copy of the character (Christ).

also

(Uzair)… He was the son of the greatest Allah

(Christ) …………. is the Son of Allah

When you examine the studies of many researchers in the history and comparative religions, especially from the West, you will find that many of these studies talk about this clear identity between the character (Christ) and the Allah (Osiris).

And many of these studies…when they talk about the history of the Christian religion in Misr and the reasons for its spread in Misr, they provide an explanation and say that it is the realistic explanation, which is:

“One of the most important reasons for the entry of Christianity into Misr and its population’s acceptance of Christianity and its spread in Misr is because the Egyptians in ancient times worshiped a Allah named (Osiris) and he is the same character as (Christ).”

Or in other words………. The Egyptians had an ancient fertile ground for receiving Christianity, that is, Misr was a fertile ground for accepting Christianity, because Misr knew the religion of (Osiris), which resembles the religion of (Christ).

Also, if you read the ancient history written by the West for the inhabitants of the region. You will find that the West has written for us the history of religions that existed in the region, in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere… especially about peoples who inhabited the land before Islam… and those religions had three gods within one framework… Three gods from one family, three gods in one place… All religions have three symbols that people worshiped… and in a way that matches the Western religion of the three hypostases… meaning that the Egyptians had an ancient Allah resembling the Christ of Christianity. Through the character of Osiris, the ancient Egyptian deity.

But the funny thing is that this mind, which provided that long explanation about the reasons for the spread of Christianity in Misr, cannot provide a logical answer to two realistic questions:

1- What is the need of the Egyptian at that time for a new religion, when he already believes in a religion that he inherited from his grandfather, similar to this new religion? If (Osiris) was an identical copy of (Christ), then what need did the Egyptian have to believe in Christ and abandon (Osiris), his original origin?! …Why did the Egyptian not continue to worship (Osiris), the legacy of his ancestors until today, and easily abandon it in favor of a religion from outside Misr (Christ), even though they are two similar characters and there is no need for this replacement?!

2- How did the religion of Christ spread in America, Africa, the Philippines and elsewhere? Is it because its inhabitants worshiped another Allah similar to Osiris as well?!

Does the speech of revelation of the religion of the majority of Egyptians provide you with a logical explanation?

Yes

how ?

When we want to issue a new law that is wrong and contrary to the Constitution, and such a law has never been issued before, and we want to convince people of it, we will carry out a process of emulation of a fabricated law that was issued before to convince people that this new law is a normal situation and has It happened in the past, in order to pass this wrong law.

We compare one thing to another thing before us.

We are likening falsehoods and lies to other falsehoods and lies before us.

We compare one blasphemy to another blasphemy before us.

This is the meaning of Izahion in the Qur’an

We disbelieve in the Book and make it say Uzair is the Son of Allah and we say Christ is the Son of Allah… so that our saying is similar to the saying that we accepted in the Book after we disbelieved in it.

With this work, the West is comparing their current saying with an old saying… in order to convince people that the three current hypostases that exist in the Western religion are a natural event that has occurred on earth, and not a new event that no one has preceded them before… and therefore they decided To compare their current statement with a statement from before……… and in order to convince people that the religion of the West had an ancient origin for the people before Islam in the region, in order to convince people of the religion of the West.

This is the entry… written by the West to convince people that Christianity spread in Misr, because the Egyptians in ancient times worshiped the Allah (Osiris), the son of Allah, who resembles (the Massih), the son of Allah.

The West was comparing their religion (the Massih) to an ancient, false religion invented from their imagination called the religion of (Osiris).

Because the truth is… that the Christian religion spread in Misr and the region, exactly in the same way that it spread throughout the earth, after the white man left Europe to occupy the world, and this religion did not appear in Misr until after Napoleon and his army invaded Misr. And forgery (Egyptian inscriptions).

When you forge an ancient book, you will give your forgery a place in ancient times, and you will make people believe that your forgery was an ancient reality in the past.

For this reason, the West made the Roman calendar… before the birth of Jesus, and after the birth of Jesus… and they put every word they said in their mouths… inside stationary books… and they made a time for it in a calendar.

(A statement with their mouths)…an imaginary world that was not real…and these worlds did not exist on earth, and the West came with a new innovation (fake) that no one had preceded them before.

(And the Al-Yahoud said, “Uzair is the son of Allah,” and the Al-Nasarah said, “The Massih is the son of Allah.” That is what they said. And they contradict the words of those who disbelieved before you. Allah killed them. How can they be defeated?

(And the Al-Yahoud said, “The Al-Nasarah are not upon anything.” And the Al-Nasarah said, “The Al-Yahoud are not upon anything.” And they are delusional. They recite the books. Thus say those who do not know, according to what they say. Then Allah will judge between them. And what is the value regarding what they differed about?)

(And neither the Al-Yahoud nor the Al-Nasarah will be satisfied with you until you follow their religion. Say, “Indeed, the guidance of Allah is the guidance.” You have sold their desires after the knowledge that has come to you. You have in Allah neither guardian nor helper. They are the Book which you recite as it should be recited, and whoever disbelieves in it will be given faith in it. Such are the losers)

(Indeed, the religion is with Allah, Islam, and those who were given the Book did not differ except after the curse had come to them.) In envy between them, and whoever disbelieves in the verses of Allah, then surely Allah is quick to reckon. So if they dispute with you, say, “I submit.” I have directed my face to Allah and to those who follow us, and say to those who have been given the Book and to the unlettered ones, “If you have accepted Islam, then indeed, if you have accepted Islam, then it has been lost.” They will guide you, but if they turn to you, then it is only upon you. convey the message, and Allah is All-Seeing of His servants.)

When did this ancient Egyptian religion and all these gods appear in Misr?

It did not exist in ancient Misr, and no person in Misr knew of it until after the invasion of Misr by France led by Napoleon, and the French occupation falsified the original reading of ancient writing in Misr, and made it a foreign reading…and because people are dumb. They invented for the people all these false, imaginary, false gods, called Egyptology, and they became taught to the people as if they were real on earth.

(And We gave Musa the book after We had destroyed the first generations, with good information for the people, guidance, and mercy. (Perhaps they will remember)

(And if We had made it a non-Arabic Qur’an, they would have said, “If only its verses had not been explained in detail.” A non-Arabic and non-Arabic Qur’an. Say, “He” For those who believe is guidance and healing, and for those who do not believe, there is deafness in their ears, and He is blind to them. They are calling to you from a far away place. And We gave Musa the book, but he differed therein, and had it not been for a word from the Allah that had preceded him. This is a matter between them, and indeed they are in doubt about which there is doubtful. )

(Say: Who sent down the Book which Musa brought, a light and a guidance for mankind? And you were taught what you did not know, you and your fathers. Say, “Allah.” This is a Book that We have sent down, blessed, confirming what is in its hands, and that you may warn the mother of towns and those around her and those They believe in the Hereafter. They believe in it. And they guard their prayers.)

اترك تعليق