1/25/2021 0:00:01
Why are the Roman ruins in the region strange?
It is easy for anyone, even if he is not an archaeologist, to know the Roman antiquities with just simple observation, and the reason is because they have one well-known architectural style. They are the only antiquities in the region whose identity, affiliation, and time cannot be mistaken by the eye, unlike the antiquities. Others whose nature and affiliation cannot be determined and require specialized scholars to determine their identity and time.
Roman monuments are almost the only monuments in the region that the average person can easily determine their identity and time, and do not require a specialized scientist to understand their identity. They are considered the only monuments that unified the region architecturally, historically, chronologically, and politically. There are no monuments in the region that have an architectural style. One, it can unify the ancient cultural, architectural and political reality of the region except the Roman ruins.
If we go looking for Roman antiquities in the region, we will find that they are present in almost all of Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Misr, Libya, Tunisia, and Algeria, and most of these antiquities have one architectural style that is characterized by the presence of five things in them: (columns, a paved road between the columns, arches). , amphitheatre, temple).
But when we examine these antiquities at each site, we will find that they contain a single time stamp, and also contain a number of functional, architectural, and temporal errors.
For example, most of the sites of these monuments contain many stones lying on the ground, and there is no realistic and logical meaning for the presence of those stones lying on the ground, because there is no suitable place for them in the core of the buildings around them.
The buildings also contain missing places of stones in a way that suggests that they have been demolished due to the factor of time or due to another factor that demolished them, but the truth is that most of them are not fragments, but rather complete missing pieces, and the architect was the one who stopped completing the building only and did not It was demolished. It was not complete until it was demolished due to an external factor, because there are no remains of the missing parts of the building on the ground around the place.
How was it destroyed, and where are the remains of the buildings’ deficiencies?
Also, the Roman monuments in the region do not contain any real functional meaning for ancient humans. Their functional meaning did not appear until recently after some countries decided to invest their sites for tourism and holding concerts. There is no functional meaning to the arches and columns except an artistic painting that is intended for decoration more than meaning, and there is no functional meaning for buildings, as most buildings have no roofs, so how can this building be an ancient religious temple without a roof, when the building is exposed to the natural elements of rain, wind and sun? And snow?
We also find Roman ruins in the region in remote and desolate places devoid of population centers, although some of them were recently approached by residential communities, but 100 years ago they were far from people, and as evidence there is no ancient trace of a person who lived for a long period of time in those areas. Places where antiquities are located.
The final note is that we do not find in the countries where Roman antiquities exist any antiquities belonging to other time periods with the same clarity and prominence as Roman antiquities, and this is the most strange thing in the matter.
What is the explanation?
The fact that our analysis of the Roman antiquities makes us believe that these antiquities are fake, and that they were built by Western architects in a relatively recent period, and approximately when the West occupied the region, when the region was suffering from weakness, illiteracy, backwardness, and a lack of population.
We believe that the purpose of this work is to create fake antiquities in order to confirm a fictitious historical era, and to write a new and fake history for the land linked to the history of the West, because we believe that the Roman civilization is fictitious and there was no Roman era that ruled the region according to the date written on the printer. But it is natural that the presence of such antiquities will realistically embody this imaginary history in people’s minds, and after that it will be difficult to erase this history from people’s imagination with the evidence of those Roman antiquities that exist in reality.
The Roman ruins in the area were built approximately 300 years ago, and have no historical, functional or meaning value. Just stones, columns, and buildings without roofs, and around them are stones on the ground that give people the feeling of their antiquity and that they are the remains of the demolition of those buildings, while Western engineers placed stones around them to suggest that they are ancient and that they fell due to the factors of time, and all of this is to embody the historical illusion that the printer produced. And to confirm the fictitious historical memory that the Napoleonic printer produced for a nation that was subjected to the project of erasing its memory, after its time and its true ancient history were stolen after its ancient written archive was falsified, and the book from which it emerged was hidden.
{He said: What about the first centuries? * He said: Their knowledge is with my Allah in a book.}
{Do you build with all rent? – a sign that you are tampering with * and you establish factories that you may immortalize.}