Why can’t Zahi Hawass and Ahmed Al-Tayeb meet each other?

Why can't Zahi Hawass and Ahmed Al-Tayeb meet each other?

2022-05-07T09:35:00-08:00

Link to the article

Why can’t Zahi Hawass and Ahmed Al-Tayeb meet each other, even though they play the same engineering role?

The truth is that the current religious institution has been subjected to severe criticism by many thinkers and researchers on many issues, religious, historical, etc., over many decades, and this accumulation of criticism over decades has become easily accessible to many people. All the time, and it is used continuously to attack that institution and its men.

Continuous criticism that has been ongoing for many decades has created a state of awareness among many members of society that increases every time. They feel intense resentment towards that institution and its men, to the point where they find themselves forced to move to an institution other than the institution of religion, specifically the institutions of science, and They then search for other new meanings related to religion, history, and truth.

Because science and religion… currently… do not coexist or meet

Whoever leaves the institution of religion moves directly to the institution of science.

This separation between the two, and the lack of intersection between them, is the reason why you see all the satellite channel dialogues in which a man from the religious establishment and a man from the scientific establishment are hosted, always ending in quarrels and without agreement.

The phenomenon of people who are dissatisfied with the institution of religion and critical of it and its audience, moving to another institution, which calls itself the institution of science, but incorrectly. Rather, the truth is that they did not move to another institution, they are in exactly the same institution, and their transfer is only formal.

how ?

the truth ……. We do not find any fundamental difference between a religious institution such as (the Church or Al-Azhar) and a scientific institution (cultural institutes) in structure, function, and cognitive content. It is true that they are two institutions separate from each other and do not intersect, but they are one architectural structure with one function in many ways. Just different.

See the picture in the article

When France and Britain divided the world and the region, the two agreed to create two worlds, each world with its own knowledge, its own ideas, and its own institutions, on the condition that each country is responsible for one world, and on the condition that both worlds do not meet or intersect, so that each country can The power of creating masses for its ideas that revolve around its orbit, and the other power cannot steal the masses of the other power, because each world is separate from the other and there is no commonality between them, because if there are things in common between the two worlds, this enables the other power to penetrate its world and steal its masses. A believer in her thoughts and knowledge.

So

France designed the pre-Christian world and created for it a line of thought separate from current religions under the title of secularism, and Britain designed the post-Christian world and created for it a line of thought linked to religion under the title of the Church, and the two agreed to separate universality with a very solid barrier ( The Cross), which is the birth of Jesus.

Now let us see the two institutions that sponsor the knowledge of France and Britain

Religion Foundation – Britain

– The institution specializes in knowledge of the post-Christian world (religion and history)

– Have specialists (lawyers) for the post-Christian world

– Specialists must appear in a different and distinctive way from the rest of the people, in terms of appearance and dress (they have beards and mustaches – they wear turbans – long robes – they carry a scepter)

– They have titles that are distinct from the rest of the people (Sheikh – Imam – Pastor – Pope).

I once read a funny story mentioned by one of the men of Al-Azhar, that one day he was riding a car driven by a horse, and there was a person following him until he disturbed him, and when he stopped, he said to him, “What do you want?” He said to him, “I want to ask you about a religious issue,” and he said to him: “Go ahead,” and when the person asked him The man replied to him: Allah knows best, and the person said to him: How do you not know? You are not wearing the turban of Al-Azhar. The man of Al-Azhar had no choice but to take off the turban and said to him, “I am now without a turban.”

This story shows you the extent of the influence of dress on the awareness of the masses, and how dress creates a great cognitive aura for a person in front of people.

– So the importance of this distinction and difference in their appearance, dress, and titles from the rest of the people lies in order to create a huge religious aura for them in front of the people, giving them a superior cognitive authority over the people in the name of religion, so people easily believe everything they say.

– They have an audience of people who believe everything they say very easily

Science Foundation – France

– The institution specializes in knowledge of the pre-Christian world (religion and history)

– Having specialists (lawyers) for the BC world

– Specialists must appear in a different and distinctive way from the rest of the people, in terms of appearance and dress (no beards or mustaches – they wear suits – scarves – hats)

– They have titles that distinguish them from the rest of the people (doctor – professor)

The importance of this distinction and difference lies in their appearance, clothing, and titles from the rest of the people, so that they create a great, huge scientific aura for them in front of the people, giving them a superior cognitive authority over the people in the name of science, so people easily believe everything they say.

– They have an audience of people who believe everything they say very easily

The two……. One structure, one function, one results, and one audience. The only thing different is the form.

—————-

The truth is that I see no difference between Zahi Hawass and Ahmed Al-Tayeb, as both are in the position of a religious sheikh. The only difference is that the first specializes in pre-Christian religions and wears a hat and gives fatwas to the masses, while Ahmed Al-Tayeb specializes in post-Christian religions and wears a turban and gives fatwas to the masses.

About two years ago… An argument occurred between Sheikh Al-Azhari and Zahi Hawass, which was reported by the media and social networking sites, when Sheikh Al-Azhari told a media outlet that the Sphinx is a symbol of our master Idris. Zahi Hawass had no choice but to go out to the media and say this is not true, and Egyptian civilization did not Never remember any name of the prophets.

But the important thing in that debate is that, when a satellite channel hosted it to respond to that Sheikh Al-Azhari, Zahi Hawass said a sentence: The history of ancient Misr is my specialty, and no one should issue a fatwa about the world of ancient Misr except me, and the Sheikh of Al-Azhar should care about his specialty.

So, really… Zahi Hawass, the Mufti of ancient Misr, and Ahmed Al-Tayeb, the Mufti of modern Misr, are two separate worlds that do not intersect, and each world has texts, knowledge, religions, a sheikh, a mufti, and a listening audience.

————————

two weeks ago ……. I was reviewing a speech by one of the men of this institution, whose name is Khazal Al-Majidi, in an interview with him on the Russia Today channel, and I was reading the comments on the video, and I found an audience that had the same characteristics as the audience of the religious institution, the same mind, the same logic, and the same tools, swallowing everything in the name of science. He describes these materials as what we need in our cultural reality.

So we believe……. The institution run by Zahi Hawass and others in the region such as Khazal al-Majidi and Firas al-Sawah, which is called the scientific or cultural institution, needs this period of much greater criticism than the criticism directed at the religious institution, because it plays a role no less dangerous than the role of The clergy, because of the size of the audience they have begun to attract, and because of the extent of the falsehood and unscientific methods they use, and because they wear a new, different appearance that suggests science has now possessed superior authority over the masses.

Are Zahi Hawass and Khazal Al-Majidi scientists?

no ………. The word “scientists” or “thinkers” cannot be applied to them, as these people did not produce any personal knowledge. All they have is that they went to the West and studied very modern sciences written by Western scholars, then they returned to their homelands holding titles distinct from the people (Doctor, Professor) and They wear Western clothing (a scarf, a suit, and a hat), and the media now hosts them, introduces them to the masses, and gives them a scientific aura, and they have never been exposed to any scientific criticism at all.

What concerns me about the men of this institution now is one point:

If you follow the conversations of the men of this institution on satellite channels, you will find that most of them have fixed sayings, and they always repeat them from time to time to the masses, with a sarcastic smile on their faces that shows a state of absolute confidence in what they say, and these fixed sayings are:

– The characters of the stories of post-Christian religions were not mentioned in the writings of pre-Christian civilizations

Archeology has proven that post-Christian religions stole from the stories of pre-Christian religions after modifying them and attributing them to themselves, creating stories similar to the stories of ancient religions.

———–

1- Regarding the first statement, which is: The characters of the stories of post-Christian religions were not mentioned in the writings of pre-Christian civilizations.

Example: The Egyptian civilization did not mention the names of the prophets in its texts.

The most famous phrase that Zahi Hawass always repeats, and this phrase is always found on the tongue of Zahi Hawass on every occasion and time. He says it while belittling everyone who says other than this.

What is the starting point of this saying?

As we mentioned previously, when France and Britain decided to divide the world, they also decided to divide the world intellectually and create two separate, non-intersecting worlds, so that each power could create a public separate from the public of the other power and with nothing in common between them, so it is very natural that it is not mentioned. Any name of the prophets, the connection between the two worlds must be cut off, a crossing between the two worlds must be prevented.

How can France, which adopts a line of thought separate from the current religion, then decide to reveal the names of prophets in the ancient world that it built? How will it lead the masses that adopt its non-religious ideas that it built on the ruins of the ancient world, when it has revealed religious names in the ancient world?

2- Regarding the second statement: Archeology has proven that post-Christian religions stole from the stories of pre-Christian religions after modifying them and attributing them to themselves, creating stories similar to the stories of ancient religions.

Example: The Jewish religion was stolen from the stories of the Sumerian religions, and the story of Mushi in Judaism is nothing but the story of King Sargon of Iraq.

This is almost the most famous phrase that Khazal Al-Majidi always repeats, and you always find this phrase on his tongue at every occasion and time, and when I heard it from his tongue in an interview on the Russia Today channel, I saw him saying it while smiling and with a kind of scientific arrogance, as if he was solving a mathematical equation. It is 200 years old, or as if he had discovered a very dangerous physical theory, or as if he had invented a device that works with gravitational energy to solve the energy problem. He said his statement and followed it with the statement: We must use modern science to understand the current religion, so that we can catch up with the nations. As for gagging people’s mouths, it is not… It is considered useful because it exposes science.

What is the starting point of this saying?

As we mentioned previously, when France and Britain decided to create two separate, non-intersecting worlds.

It is true that they are two disconnected and unconnected worlds, but the two powers agreed to create a state of similarity in the events and stories only between the religions that they created for the pre-Christian world with the events and stories of post-Christian religions, and not in the names, in order to find an origin for the new phenomena that they created. Recently, in order to cut off contact with ancient phenomena that still remain today, and to support the theory of evolution that is intended to be disseminated globally.

how ?

If you look at the image of the article, you will find the world divided into four sections

Right – left – center right – center left

It is almost the same as the divisions of political parties

– Right and left… They never meet.

These sites are where the current Islam and ancient Egyptian civilization were established.

how ?

There is no mention of the Muslim prophets mentioned in the Holy Qur’an (Ibrahim, Nouh, Youssef, Issa, Musa) in the writings of the Egyptian civilization or the Iraqi civilization, and there is also no similarity between the religion of the ancient Egyptian civilization and Islam. These ideas are adopted by the Zahi Hawass Foundation.

– Center right – Center left… they get closer to each other.

These sites contained the religion of the West and Egyptian and Iraqi civilization

how ?

The Egyptian civilization and the Iraqi civilization recorded the names of figures mentioned in the Book of the Bible (Sargon, Hammurabi, Ramesses, etc.), and there is also a similarity between the religion of the ancient Egyptian civilization and Christianity (Christianity)… These ideas are embraced by the Zahi Hawass Foundation and the Khazal Al Majidi Foundation.

* The ancient civilization of Iraq mentioned the names (Sargon, Hammurabi, Shalmaneser, Nebuchadnezzar), and these names are also mentioned in the religious Bible.

* The ancient Egyptian civilization mentioned the names (Ramses, Sheshnak), and these names are also mentioned in the religious Bible.

* The ancient civilization of Iraq, its texts mentioned stories such as (the story of Sargon), which is similar to (the story of Mushi) mentioned in the Book of the Bible.

* The civilization of ancient Misr, whose texts recorded a tripartite religion in which the ancients worshiped the Allah (Azir), is similar to the tripartite religion of Al-Nasarah who believe in the God (Jesus).

in another meaning ………. You find that the names mentioned in the Book of the Bible but not mentioned in the Qur’an have been recorded in ancient civilizations, and you also find that the stories of the prophets mentioned in the Qur’an have recorded events similar to them in ancient civilizations, but with different personal names.

So ……. You always find the educated Egyptian elites, followers of the Zahi Hawass Foundation, always saying on all occasions to show their culture, that Christianity spread in Misr, because the ancient Egyptians worshiped a Allah who resembled (Jesus), and this created a ground for Christianity to enter Misr and spread.

Also…you always find the educated Iraqi elites who are followers of the Khazal Al-Majidi Foundation, when they want to show their culture and that they are geniuses, they strongly want to say that Islam has stolen the stories of its religious book (the Qur’an) from the stories of Iraq’s ancient civilizations, but to avoid embarrassment and to prevent collision with the masses. They replace these words with another statement, which is: Judaism stole its religious stories from the ancient civilizations of Iraq.

Does the Qur’an describe these worlds?

Yes

– The Holy Qur’an describes the two worlds that are close together (center-right – center-left)… and for which two similar stories were composed, but with different names, with the word (they imitate), meaning that they created a world that was identical to another world of their own making.

{And Al-Yahoud said Uzair, son of Allah, and Al-Nasarah said Christ, son of Allah. That is what they say with their mouths, imitating the words of those who disbelieve. Before Allah killed them, how can they be fooled?

– The Holy Qur’an describes the two separate worlds (right – left)…which were created, but with different stories and names, and there is no intersection between them with the word (they are not upon anything),

{And Al-Yahoud said is not Al-Nasarah on anything, and Al-Nasarah said Al-Yahoud is not on anything and they recite the Book}

Does the Holy Qur’an describe Zahi Hawass and Khazal Al Majidi?

Yes… The Holy Qur’an describes (Zahi Hawass and Khazal Al-Majidi) as those who do not know (they are not scholars), but rather they only repeat like the sayings of the West (parrots).

{Thus those who do not know say the like of what they say: Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection regarding what they differed over.}

.

.

.

اترك تعليق