8/30/2021 0:00:01
Why is the reality of Al-Nasarah in occupied Palestine so strange?
In the beginning…what is the national concept?
The national concept today was defined based on an agreement that took place a relatively recent period ago in Europe, where the national concept was defined on the basis of the existence of a common speech language. Any human group that shares a single speech language was defined by a national term in relation to the language.
If there is a language called (English), then its speakers are called (English).
The national definition that was formulated in Europe and became the official definition accepted in the world, specifically after the West left Europe and occupied the world and disseminated this definition.
The definition of the national concept reaches a level almost close to ethnicity and tribalism…and this has caused confusion and difficulty in separating the national, ethnic and tribal concepts.
What is surprising is that the national concept that the West formulated is largely compatible with the nature of the dominant religion in Europe, or in other words, it adapts to the nature of the religious text that Europe’s multinational societies believe in.
how ?
The reality of Europe is strange… despite its not very large area, there are within it a large number of nationalities that speak a language different from the other, and all of them profess one religion, Christianity, and believe in one religious text, but it is written in all the languages of Europe, and they are all sacred texts to me. those communities.
Something strange
A sacred religious text written in many languages, although in Europe one book in one language was sufficient, especially if it was sacred, as the nature of holiness requires preserving the language of the first sacred text.
Observing the nature of the Bible, and its adaptation to the national reality of Europe, makes us see it as if it were a book made by those nationalities in Europe. It is as if the script of the Bible was written and made in a certain language, and it became a belief for a certain human group, so that a nationality could be created through that language for that human group.
The truth…………… The Bible is the only religious book on earth that you find written in many languages, and every book is believed by a certain human group, and every human group has come to bear the name of the language of this book.
But the reality of this book needs to be read outside Europe as well.
And when we go to see the reality of the Book of the Bible in societies outside Europe, we will find that it is not at all adapted to the reality of Europe…so you find it conflicting with its reality and contradictory, but it seeks to formulate a national concept for societies outside Europe such as the reality of Europe. And expel any other concept around it.
how ?
Let us go to see three cases on earth of the reality of the Book of the Bible and compare it to a case in Europe.
⚫ Syria
There are Al-Nasarah in Syria who believe in the Book of the Bible.
Their Bible book is distinct from the rest of the other Bible books, as it is written in a language called Syriac, and this language does not exist outside the borders of Syria and Iraq.
Al-Nasarah in Syria perform their prayers (inside the church) in the Syriac language… This made the Al-Nasarah in Syria believe that Syriac is a language that came from (inside Syria)… that is, it is a language of Syrian origin.
For this reason
The Christian here says, “I am Syriac.” That is, he is Syrian of Syrian origin
But the language of communication between people in Syria is Arabic.
Even the Christian communicates in his public life outside the church in the Arabic language… He made the Christian in Syria believe that Arabic is a language that came from outside Syria… that is, it is a language that is not of Syrian origin.
For this reason
The Christian here says, “I am not an Arab.” That is, the Arab is not of Syrian origin.
You can diagnose this condition and realize that its cause is linked to the dual relationship inside the church and outside the church…. The method of communication between inside the church and outside the church is not identical or different.
Inside the church in Syria represents to him absolute faith that is separate from reality, and this absolute faith communicates with him in a certain language, but as soon as he goes outside the church to reality, he communicates with it in a different language, so reality outside the church becomes the opposite of faith to him.
A person communicates within the church in Syria in a certain language, which makes him communicate with the absolute spiritual world, and he considers the entire world inside the church to be the world that came from inside Syria, so in his view Christianity has become the origin of Syria and Syriacism is the origin of Syria… while he communicates outside the church He existed in Syria in another language, which brought him into contact with the real, ordinary, dry world, so he considered the whole world outside the Church to be a world that came from outside Syria….So Islam became, in his view, from outside Syria and Arabic became from outside Syria.
So….the different method of communication between inside and outside the church is the reason.
The language within the church is Syriac
A language outside the church is Arabic
⚫ Palestine
There are Al-Nasarah in occupied Palestine who believe in the Book of the Bible.
Their Bible book is different from the Bible book in Syria, which is geographically attached to it, as it is written in the Greek language, and this language exists outside the borders of Palestine in the state of Greece.
Al-Nasarah in Palestine perform their prayers (inside the church) in the Greek language… but the knowledge of the existence of this language outside Palestine made the Christian in Palestine know that Greek is a language that came from (outside Palestine)… that is, it is a language that is not of Syrian origin.
For this reason
The Christian here says, “I am not Greek.”
But the language of communication between people in Palestine is Arabic.
Even the Christian communicates in his public life outside the church in Arabic…but the Christian in Palestine believes that Arabic is a language that came from outside Palestine…that is, it is a language not like the language of Jesus.
For this reason
The Christian there says, “I am not an Arab.” That is, the Arab is not of Palestinian origin.
A strange reality indeed
If the Christian knows well that the language of communication within the church is not his language and is not a language from inside Palestine but from outside it, then logic says that the language of communication outside the church must be his language, and it is a language from inside Palestine and not from outside it.
But… both languages were not his language and came from outside Palestine.
So what is the language of a Christian?
Why shouldn’t he make the language of communication within the church the same language as the language of communication within the church in Syria, which is very close to him?
Their anti-realistic nationalist feeling… seems less than the situation in Syria. It is weak due to the loss of their own language, distinctive of the Book of the Bible, after another national language in Europe was chosen to be the language of communication for them within the Church.
what is the reason ?
You can diagnose this condition very easily, and realize that its cause is linked to the reality of the land in Palestine.
There is a party that deliberately set out for them a language that they know well as a language from outside Palestine so that they can communicate within the church, so that it differs from the language they communicate outside the church, so that their conflict with reality disappears, because the same party has put half of the Bible book in another language that is distinctive in their reality, and it wants To create a nationality in Palestine with another Book of the Bible, which dominates the reality that exists outside the Church in Palestine, and which no other nationality that believes in the Book of the Bible will struggle with.
That party wanted to create a Hebrew nationality so that it would dominate the Arab reality that existed outside the Church, that is, it wanted to grant the land in Palestine a Hebrew national right, uncontested by a Syriac, Coptic, etc. nationality. Therefore, that party did not create for the Al-Nasarah in Palestine a Book of Babel in a distinct language unique to it. Palestine does not exist outside Palestine, so that the Christian does not struggle with the Jew over the land and does not claim that its identity is Syriac, Coptic, or any other language.
For this reason, the Christian situation in Syria, which conflicted with the reality outside the Church, prevented them from experiencing it, and another situation was created for them, a church in a known European language known as Greek.
So….scientific knowledge of the identical method of communication between inside and outside the church is the reason.
It is known that there is a language inside the church from outside Palestine
It is known that a language outside the Church is from outside Palestine
⚫ Nigeria
There are Al-Nasarah in Nigeria who believe in the Book of the Bible.
Their Bible is written in English, and this language exists outside the borders of Nigeria.
Al-Nasarah in Nigeria perform their prayers (inside the church) in English…but Al-Nasarah in Nigeria know that English is a language that came from (outside Nigeria)…that is, it is a language that is not of Nigerian origin.
For this reason
The Christian here says, “I am not English.”
But the language of communication between people in Nigeria is English.
Even the Christian communicates in his public life outside the church in English…but the Christian in Nigeria believes that English is a language that came from outside Nigeria…that is, it is a language that is not of Nigerian origin.
For this reason
The Christian here says, “I am not English either.” That is, the Englishman is not of Nigerian origin.
Strange case
Although the language of communication inside the church and the language of communication outside it are identical… the Christian does not belong to the language.
You can easily diagnose this situation… and realize that the reason is that the absolute world inside the Church was able to occupy the real world outside the Church, and to dominate reality, a situation that the situation in Syria, which is still struggling with the reality outside, has not yet reached. the church .
So….the different knowledge and method of communication between inside and outside the church is the reason.
The language inside the church is English…. from outside Nigeria
A language outside the Church is Arabic……from outside Nigeria
⚫ England
There are Al-Nasarah in England who believe in the Book of the Bible.
Their Bible is written in English.
Al-Nasarah in England perform their prayers (inside the church) in English…but Al-Nasarah in England know that English is a language that came from (inside Nigeria)…that is, it is a language that is not of English origin.
For this reason
The Christian here says, “I am English.”
But the Christian communicates in his public life outside the church in the English language… and believes that English is a language that came from outside Nigeria… that is, it is a language of English origin.
For this reason
The Christian here says, “I am English too.” This means that the Englishman is not of English origin.
A very adaptive and well-established state that does not suffer from contradiction or conflict
The language of communication inside the church and the language of communication outside it are identical… and the Christian belongs to the language.
You can easily diagnose this condition…and realize that the reason is that this reality was created by the Church, given the state of adaptation and lack of conflict that exists within it.
———————-
Is the Bible a European project created to create differences in the reality of societies and create nationalisms anywhere in the world?