2019-12-18T14:55:00-08:00
This is a real, proven reality, and a project has worked hard to hide it by writing a new, imaginary, hypothetical history and then forcing people to believe in this new history, because the Western strategic mind says:
“To liquidate peoples, we begin by erasing their memories, then we destroy their books that contain their culture and history, then someone else comes to write other books for them, give them another culture, and invent another history for them, and then after that the people begin to gradually forget, who he is!, and how. It was!, and the world around him will quickly forget him too.”
now
When you have a real proven reality that you perceive with all your senses, then a hypothetical and paper history is written that contradicts this reality, and this history forces the mind to believe in it, it makes the mind suffer from an inability to understand reality and analyze the phenomena around it.
This new, true, fixed reality, the history that was written tried to address the contradictions that would appear in the mind while thinking about it within the history that it would write, and it is natural that these treatments will cause historical complications among those who believe in it, because they are treatments within a virtual reality and it was not actually in it. reality .
For example, the logical mind will ask:
■ Why was Coptic not reformed except during the reign of Al-Albani?
The treatment of history was: The Pope of the Coptic Church carried out the reform process out of fear for it after it was influenced by the Arabic language and the introduction of words into it.
But it is an absolutely illogical answer.
Why did fear appear over Coptic after 1,200 years, and why was the reform not completed 500 years ago? Then, if the fear was really about it being influenced by another language, why were they never afraid of Greek, because the Pope reformed Coptic with the Greek language, so why is there no fear at all of Greek, but fear? From Arabic.
Believing in this illogical historical treatment to hide this new reality will create within the believers of the Church a complex of hatred towards Arabic…but strangely enough, they have no hatred towards Greek, even though it is not their language, far from them, and does not belong to them at all. They do not feel hatred towards it.
Also, the treatment of history was: the process is called reform… and this name is nothing but within the historical treatment of the new, established reality.
But it is an illogical answer
Because the language is not formed in the blink of an eye, and the language of a society changes through reform.
Believing in this illogical treatment to hide a new reality will cause the mind to become obstructed in interpreting reality, because the word “reform” is evidence that the process is a connected, ancient, previous context that occurred at this time, and the mind will believe that the existence of a need called reform will change the language of an entire society.
■ Why did the Coptic calendar not appear until the era of Al-Albani?
The treatment of history was: The Pope of the Coptic Church carried out a reform of the Coptic calendar by order of the Albanian ruler.
But it is an illogical answer
Because it is the same idea as reforming the language… it imposes the existence of an ancient context for the calendar and reform was made only for it. That is, the Copts lived for 1,800 years according to a wrong calendar, and the Church of Rome was correcting the calendar for 1,800 years, but the Copts were not interacting with reality and did not think about making reform.
Belief in this illogical treatment to hide reality will hinder the mind, because it will believe in the existence of a calendar context before Al-Albani and a previous time, even though in reality there are no documents proving this calendar except during the era of Al-Albani.
■ Why was the first Coptic church built during the reign of Al-Albani?
The treatment of history was that the Copts were suffering from persecution by the Mamluk era, which Al-Albani came and eliminated, and he implemented a policy that was contrary to them and witnessed tolerance.
But it is also an illogical answer
Because where were the churches before the Mamluks…. There must have been churches before the Mamluks and they existed in all parts of Misr. But they are modern churches of recent age. As for what is said about churches in remote, populated areas in Sinai, they are very recent, even if an ancient history is made of them.
——————————
These illogical treatments within the hypothetical history that were presented, which aimed to hide a new reality, are the reason why the mind suffers from an inability to interpret reality and answer many questions imposed by reality, and these questions have quick, mythical answers from within the hypothetical history that was presented to people and Which contains the errors of those processors other than the previous region.
Among the realistic questions that arise are:
■ Why is the number of those who call themselves Copts so small and incomparable, despite 2000 years of their written history?
The answer: Persecution for 1,200 years, and there is the story of the Islamic conquests that is everyone’s reference for interpreting reality.
But if 10,000 people had lived 1,300 years ago, their population today would have been the population of two countries, but the number of Copts is so small that it cannot be compared at all.
Also the answer: Because the Egyptians were Al-Nasarah, and when Islam came, Islam was imposed on all Egyptians except for a few who survived.
Why, then, have the few remained today?!.. It is assumed that 1,300 years of this policy will not leave any Copts in Misr.
Also the answer: Because Islam is a true religion. But the true religion is the religion of the first nature, and religion is a superstructure that imposes itself strongly in reality
■ Why was their presence limited only within modern political borders, and they did not deviate from the rule of political borders imposed by the colonizer?!
The answer: Because they are residents of Misr.
But the question is: Are the Copts a religion, a race, or a people?!
If it is a religion, then religion is only a belief, then why were they called Copts?!
If they were a race or a people, why was their presence confined within the borders of Sykes-Picot, and why did these people, who were people with their own ancient identity, adopt a religious book (the Old Testament) belonging to another people (the Al-Yahoud)………. Why did they not Do they have privacy? Rather, their privacy is linked to the book of a people and race different from them?!
Why did their privacy make them adopt the book of other people’s religion, and this book that they believe in is similar to the book of the majority of the population of Misr (the Holy Qur’an)?!
Why does their national specificity become invisible with the book of other people (the Old Testament) and the language of this book (Hebrew and Greek), but their specificity becomes present with (the Holy Qur’an) and its language (Arabic), even though the book of the Old Testament and the Holy Qur’an appear similar? In topics.
■ Why do they speak Arabic like any other Arab person and the tongue of 90 million Egyptians, while Coptic is limited to the scope of religious rituals?
The answer: Because the Arabs were behind making Misr’s language Arabic, and because of this situation they began to speak Arabic, and Coptic was confined to religious rituals.
But why is the Coptic language limited to Misr only, why does his surroundings not speak the language of his book… How did his language disappear and become confined to a religious book?! .
Because in the past, the land was one, and all the land was open, with no passports, no borders, or anything modern.
Is it because it is the language of a religious book only?!
But Arabic is also the language of a religious book? …But there is such a thing as text in the real, natural language of people that exists in reality, and you can read the Qur’an easily without the need to learn the language.
But….. the book of the Al-Yahoud, a group that carries a different religion from the Copts, but it resembles the Qur’an in its topics and was written in Hebrew, and the Copts need to learn their language to understand the first text in which their Hebrew book is written, but at the same time, the language of the Qur’an is the language of 90 million people. He is Egyptian and can read it very easily.
Was Misr speaking in the language of your religious book?!
But… Why is the Coptic religious book in a different language from the language of the same book found in the Levant and Iraq for Al-Nasarah?
Why… their language is confined within the borders of Sykes-Picot mentality. It is as if it were a reality imposed by a political state that is aware of borders, rather than a natural state that is unaware of unnatural borders.
Why…..the Coptic language can never be compared to the language of the inhabitants of Misr and the surrounding region?!
—————————————-
The main question: Why did the Copts wait 1,800 years to take these radical practical steps?!
If this new reality had not been addressed within the hypothetical history presented to people, this inability to explain reality and answer all these questions would not have occurred.
Because the Coptic language did not appear in Misr until after Napoleon’s invasion, and it is a purely Greek language that was established as the language of a religious book. The Coptic calendar did not appear and be dealt with until after Napoleon’s invasion, and no church was built in Misr since the beginning of history until after Napoleon’s invasion. .
All of this is a new reality that was created in a very old world, Misr, and it appeared after Napoleon’s invasion. The makers of this new reality tried to hide its newness and give it a place within an old world, through all this history that was brought out to people by Napoleon’s printer and Al-Albani.
Yes…this religious, temporal, linguistic and historical game…is the project that Napoleon came up with and which no force would have been able to implement except after forging the Egyptian inscriptions.
{The people were one nation, so Allah sent the prophets as bearers of good tidings and warnings, and sent down with them the Book with the truth, that He might judge between the people in that in which they differed, and they did not differ in it except those who were given it after the clear proofs had come to them, out of envy among themselves. So Allah guided those who believed to the truth to the truth, with His permission, Allah guides whom He wills to a straight path. }
.
.
.