2019-08-09T16:38:00-07:00
I see…that the results of studying the Holy Qur’an (research and reinterpretation of the Qur’an) in our cultural reality in the recent past and present are limited to only two types of results:
The first type is traditional, and the second type is enlightenment
The first type… is one of the outputs of the researcher who relies on the heritage books that have reached us as a stable, well-established and comprehensive basis that provides him with all the information through which he can reach correct results and does not deviate from the religious awareness that society and religious awareness have followed since ancient times. .
The second type… is one of the outputs of the researcher who left the heritage books and began to rely on the studies of Western Orientalists and other historical sources as a scientific and objective ground that provides him with a balance between objective science and religion, through which he can reach correct, objective, scientific results, and It does not deviate from the essence of religion, but rather is an action that contributes to enlightening the Muslim’s awareness.
But the observation…that these results…it can be said that all of their outputs are outputs written by the other and not the outputs of the researcher himself…..because these two types of researchers rely on a basis written by the other, and therefore whatever the results that will emerge from the researcher are… You will not emerge from the ground written by the other, so all the results are the other’s vision of you, and the heritage or enlightenment researcher is only providing the other with the process of effort in studying his book, the Holy Qur’an.
The first researcher relies on heritage books whose origin and source are unknown. Perhaps if he relied on books written by someone currently known to him, it would make sense, but most of their authors from Central Asia are not Arabs, and it is not possible to be certain that they were Muslims. He was only told that so-and-so is a Muslim. Being a Muslim and writing in Arabic made him rely confidently on these books as a firm foundation.
We will leave talking about this type of researcher (the traditional type), as our topic today is related to the second type, which has not been subjected to sufficient criticism, because it disguises itself in a new and elegant garb and relies on knowledge authority surrounded by an aura of propaganda.
This enlightened researcher is somewhat excused. He has grown tired of heritage books, and heritage books no longer meet the movement of the times, and cannot provide answers to many questions that appear in the cultural and scientific scene, and the outputs of heritage books carried out by the heritage researcher have become repetitive.
This enlightened researcher decided to go to another field, to keep pace with the movement of the times, science, and changes, in order to provide him with answers to the questions that he did not find an answer to in the first field.
But where is the problem?!
The enlightened researcher performs the same work and steps as the traditional researcher, the difference between them is only in form… As for the intellectual structure, it is the same for both… and the enlightened researcher’s outputs have become repetitive and consumed.
The enlightened researcher’s problem is in form, not structure
He relies on a ground created by a completely different cultural structure, and he makes this ground a source of knowledge and objectivity. Then his intellectual outputs will be studies of orientalists and nothing more.
Although it is assumed that the enlightened researcher must build a foundation himself, and rely on it in his research… Therefore, you find the enlightened researcher very happy with anything new and coming from those with knowledge and knowledge in the West, not for its value but only because it is new and coming from the West .
This is the reason for the idea of Syriacism with the Qur’an, which has become a trend for this type of researchers and secularists……… It is enough for you to speak this Syriac myth, to make a place for yourself in the world of enlightenment.
This idea about the Syriac origin of the Qur’an’s vocabulary and the disjointed letters… I always find it among secularists and enlightened people, simply because it is a new idea, and it is adopted by Western thinkers and researchers, especially researchers who have the idea of a history of the Syriac civilization of the Arabs, because the Roman era also adopted it.
If you search in the studies that have been written about the Qur’an, you will find that the first study that talks about the fact that many of the vocabulary of the Qur’an are of Syriac origin, by a researcher named Noldeke (The History of the Qur’an), in which he speaks that the Qur’an reveals the secrets of rhetoric if we read the Qur’an from the Syriac vocabulary, and this study is Always the reference of the enlightened, to the extent that they distort the clear meanings of the Qur’an in favor of this orientalist’s theory, and they have come to believe in the result of this scientific and objective study.
The traditional researcher is with Ibn Katheer, and the enlightenment researcher is with him, we call him, and there is no fundamental difference.. And I do not want to say now to the enlightened one that the orientalists who wrote studies about the Qur’an are the same ones who wrote the books of Ibn Katheer for you…….. The mission of both is to hide the truth of the Qur’an from you.
Why ?
In heritage books…you will find that most of the interpretations of the broken verses found at the beginning of the surahs say that their knowledge is with Allah and that no one knows them except Allah, but Ibn Kathir has another interpretation.
Ibn Kathir says about the interpretation of (Taha) (Taha)… that it is the Messenger who used to pray and recite the Qur’an and pray for a long time, and he used to make himself miserable during it, and from the severity of the pain his feet would swell and break, so he would raise his feet from the ground because of the pain.. Then Surah (Taha) was revealed: “We have not sent down the Qur’an to you so that you should be miserable,” and (Taha) means (Taha), that is, set foot on the ground, O Muhammad.
As for the enlightened one who believes in the idea of the Syriac origins of the disjointed letters, he is now promoting it under the title “Finally these disjointed letters have been interpreted,” especially if it was said by a Saudi researcher, because the Saudi researcher will be in a position (and a witness from its people testified) that he will be neutral, honest, and scientific. ….Because the Qur’an was revealed in Saudi Arabia (haha).
So a word
Taha… Its origin is from a Syriac word that means (I call upon you, O Messenger).
…. Its origin is from a Syriac word that means (O enlightened one)
Note the phrase (O enlightened one)
And how there is intentionality and intention on the part of the drafters of these theories and research, to create a new word that suits this enlightened group, as if these theories emerged from a consciousness that is aware and aware of the needs of this type of researchers and readers…….. It is He addresses this type with the same vocabulary, to give and grant his interpretations acceptance and approval through linguistic programming… because their awareness is based on the vocabulary of enlightenment and secularism.
O enlightened one (haha)
So what is the difference between: Ibn Kathir’s theory (Stay on your feet, O Muhammad), and the Illuminati’s theory (O you enlightened one)?!
Only the form and vocabulary of the language… Love of new and elegant traditions and speech that contains musical words.
This new type of researcher…does not want to exert his mind in research, does not want to think…and does not want to deal with sacred texts with a mind that realizes that their holiness emerged from an eternal truth linked to his ancient ancestors. … He does not want to feel that these texts are the origin and the real chapter from which he emerged… and he is responsible for realizing them himself.
I mean, does it make sense:
That a very sacred text was unable to replace the sentence (This book is beyond doubt) with the sentence (O enlightened one, that book is beyond doubt)?
How do you judge?!
Why does he abbreviate the phrase “O enlightened one” with the phrase “A L M”?
————————————
This myth and this deep-rooted illusion must be dropped and deliberately spread and promoted and made fashionable… to hide the truth of the Qur’an and the truth of what is happening in the region, because this myth is based on the imaginary time that has reached us, and which has made the mind unable to leave that time. The childish, superstitious temporal imagination, which believes that the entire world and earth was Christian and spoke a Syriac language, then Islam came and spoke Arabic, making the entire world Islam and speaking Arabic, and because the latter came, it is certain that it will take things from the former and benefit from it. Because the former has an old experience certificate in religion and writing religious texts.
absurdity
Come out, O enlightened one… from this superstitious, childish imagination, because you are the origin and the chapter, and others are coming to you… but because your ancestors were subjected to a long occupation by an external force, and it was he who wrote a new history for them to erase their memory… and this occupation heritage that His heirs are the ones who created this imaginary temporal imagination for you…in order to remove you from history and time and then the earth in the future.
————————————
Now we will explain the truth of these verses
If you notice that in the English alphabet, we call the letters (BCD GSN)……and these are logical designations…because they are just outputs of sounds.
Logical question
Why do we call some letters of the Arabic language (Ain, Sin, Qaf, Alif, Nun… etc.)… even though we are supposed to call them (Aa’, Sa’a, Qa’, Aa’, Na’), because they are just vowel sounds only?!
Now look at the picture
We have the disjointed letters (asq) present in Surat Al-Shura
How does a Muslim read it?
Ain Sin Qaf
correct ?
Now let’s do an imaginary experiment
We assume that one country has come to rule the Muslims and Arabs… and has decided to make a modification to the script… it will not modify the entire script, but rather it will modify only one letter… it will replace one letter from the current script in which we write… and it will also be imposed on the writing of the Qur’an. …..The topic was accepted by everyone.
The letter that will be changed is the letter (A)……and we decided to replace it with another symbol, which is drawn (a human eye).
Instead of this shape (A), we will draw (a human eye)
Now imagine
After implementing the amendment… the beginning of Surat Al-Shura in the Qur’an will be written in this form:
(Drawing of a human eye)
How will you read it?
Will you read it……. (Ain Sin Qaf)….or will you read it……(Ay) Sin Qaf… (eye) Sin Qaf?
Of course you will read it… Ain Sin Qaf
This is the meaning of the words of Allah Almighty (These are the verses of the clear Book. We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’an so that you may understand.)
(The human eye drawing) reads (eye), not (eye)
We will read it exactly the same way we read it before modifying the font.
We do not recite it (asaq) (asaq) in a coherent manner, we read it in fragments, as we inherited the reading from our ancestors, because this is how we recite the fragmentary verses that come at the beginning of the surahs in that way.
Ain Sin Qaf
now
After that change the letter of the Qur’an
How will we read the word in the Qur’an that contains the letter (A) in the new form?!
Example
(Drawing of a human eye) Allah
So…will we read it (Arabic)….or….will we read it (Arabic)?!
We will read it, of course (Arabic)
Just as we used to read the Qur’an in the past, before the font was modified, and the new shape of the letter ‘Ayn has nothing to do with the way we pronounce the Qur’an…it is just a symbol and nothing more……..and we only read the letter (A) with (Ain) in the verses. The fragment at the beginning of the surah….just that.
This is the first rule of reading the first writing that was revealed from the beginning in a clear Arabic language without any crookedness. This writing, which was called the Torah… and which was falsely called hieroglyphs.
What is the importance of mentioning these broken verses at the beginning of the surahs of the Qur’an?
When you think very deeply… in order to reach the essence of the problem that we have or where the problem began… you must come to the realization that the essence of the problem lies in the existence of an old archive that was deliberately hidden and then wrote for us and for the world a new hypothetical novel that contains the history of humanity. Even today. The importance of the archive is that you will know the memory of man on earth, and this is something that many people do not realize how dangerous it is, because hiding a truth written in very ancient times means that you will build false perceptions and theories and plant them in the human mind. Therefore, if there is a divine mission and a human mission, it is based on recovering this hidden archive.
But if you want to solve any problem… you have to go to the root of the problem, and our problem is in the truth of our initial, founding text… and the truth of the text begins with the letters (verses) and not with the words and sentences. This is the fundamental reason for which the broken letters appeared at the beginning of the surahs of the Holy Qur’an……..The discourse of the Qur’an wants to solve the problem for us from its roots, because the Zionist game started from the letters and their fake, fictitious translations of the region’s inscriptions.
{That book no doubt guidance for the righteous}
The measure of the idea’s reach depends on the answer to the following question:
Can it be said that the Syriac myth has fallen completely and without any return?!
I pray to Allah to guide everyone
{These are the verses of the clear Book. We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’an so that you may understand.}
{The people were one nation, so Allah sent the prophets as bearers of good tidings and warnings, and sent down with them the Book with the truth, that He might judge between the people in that in which they differed, and none differed in it except those who were given it, after the clear proofs had come to them, out of envy among themselves. So Allah guided those who believed to the truth to the truth, with His permission, Allah guides whom He wills to a straight path. {You do not guide whomever you love, but Allah guides whom He wills, and He knows best who is guided}
.
.
.