2019-07-18T14:26:00-07:00
What is the meaning of this similarity and identity between the hieroglyphic writing found in Misr and the Musnad writing found in Yemen?
Before entering into the answer to this question, let us talk about things and phenomena around us that I find appropriate before answering the previous question.
I have an opinion, and I don’t know if some people agree with me… that the failure to understand many of the phenomena around us and reach a true awareness of them is because we think on a basis that has been created with wrong definitions, terminology, and names.
I believe that these phenomena can be understood very easily, and will no longer be difficult to understand…if we redefine things and terms, and especially return the names of things to their previous true names…then This procedure becomes approved in the media, school and educational curricula…then it will be easy to realize and assimilate it into the collective consciousness of the people.
Why names of things in particular?
A name is not just a physical sound, a name is a template…. Within it there is a sound, a history, a time, knowledge, a feeling, a feeling, and a psychological connection to the thing.
When you change the names of familiar things with new names, you will erase the history, time, knowledge, science, and psychological connection that exists within a person towards this thing, and you will create a new history and a new knowledge of this thing for the person, and a new feeling, feeling, and connection will be generated. I am new to being a human being towards this thing.
We notice this thing in many events around us, and the closest example of this is…. in some people’s comments on some of my articles. There are those who say that the mind agrees with some things, but there is no feeling in the heart, and this thing is a result of what we said previously.
In many of our topics, we return the names of things to their true names…but there is no feeling, because things no longer have their previous names, and have begun to bear new names, and naturally they have begun to contain within them a different feeling and feeling. And a new, different psychological connection towards her.
This phenomenon… is a very simple example… of the meaning of knowledge.
I believe that knowledge cannot be achieved by humans except through two things:
1- A transmitter of information
2- Sense of information
– The carrier of information… is language… is names
When I tell you: This is a fish.
You now have information that this thing is a fish… but the knowledge is still not achieved
– As for the feeling of information… it is experience.
When you catch the fish and watch it in the sea and observe it, you have acquired knowledge about the fish.
That is, another example:
If your father advised you based on his experience and told you some wisdom.
Your father has given you information. You know that it is true because you trust your father, but you do not feel it, meaning you do not understand its meaning well, and you consider it to be true words but not binding.
But if an incident happened to you that completely coincides with your father’s wisdom, then you remember your father’s words, and say: Now I know my father’s wisdom… indeed, it is correct… then you will have achieved complete knowledge.
The name of the thing = information + feeling.
And when the name of something is changed to another name… knowledge disappears.
And if we want to restore the name of the thing… knowledge will not be achieved by returning the name alone… we need to sense and feel… and this matter… explains to you the difficulty of understanding some things and explaining some phenomena.
I do not want to prolong the topic too much, but what I want to say is that I have now deliberately adhered to the names of the inscriptions of Misr and Yemen, which have reached us, and I do not want to say now that they are not the real name, and that they are forged names.
But let me ask a question:
When you hear the word hieroglyphs, does a magical Greek world come to mind directly, similar to the world in cartoons? And when you hear the word Musnad, does a world completely different from the world of Misr come to your mind, but magical mixed with a little reality?!
——————
There is a clear, very prominent, very bad, dangerous and even destructive phenomenon in our culture when we deal with history, especially in societies whose countries contain ancient inscriptions.
The truth…there is nothing more beautiful or better than her
When the truth disappears, it creates an imbalance in the balance of nature and man together, and I believe that any intellectual chaos in any society is only due to the absence of facts from society, and society will not return to balance unless the truth returns and its knowledge.
When you look at the pages of history, in Yemen, Misr, Iraq, and Syria, you feel as if you are in a match and a competition… who is the first, who is the best, who is the most beautiful, who is the most civilized, you feel great regret, that public awareness of the old is limited to brilliance and brilliance. In front of the other, and not at all interested in realizing the truth, extracting knowledge and information, or solving problems and issues.
I believe that there is an organized awareness that wants our societies to continue in this way when dealing with ancient history.
This phenomenon… has not been faced with any serious attempt to stop it by thinkers and researchers in a clear and prominent scientific manner, in order to move awareness from this bad place to another place in the understanding of history… because the continuation of this phenomenon constitutes a danger. On communities.
Yes…dangerous…because the topic has evolved into writing magical worlds full of symbols, and societies drink these materials while they believe and are very convinced that humans and ancestors in ancient times lived in those worlds, and this matter will make societies separate from reality. Exactly, and you live in wandering…and I say this from a security mentality…and not from the mentality of a reader or researcher.
You will say… Every free person writes and it is not important, but the problem is not the writing. The problem is that there is a strong, binding cognitive authority that parallels the authority of religion, which instills these ideas as if they were true, and this authority is coming from the West, as many know that the complex Al-Khawaja is here with us, and the authority for information that is written in the names of foreign people is very great, especially if it is in the names of well-known Western universities or scientific institutions, or mass-produced documentaries.
This authority can say anything and believe it as if it were a truth from Allah.
But what concerns me now about this phenomenon…the “he was my grandfather” phenomenon…is that I want to tell them something, and I consider it necessary, before entering into my topic, because perhaps there will be people who have this phenomenon and read my topic:
I can write you any history you want and very easily. I can apply an experiment to you and you do not know it, by writing you a huge volume containing a history. And do not be afraid, I will not write it in my name. I will write it in the name of an English scholar. Believe me, you and others will pass on all the information you need. In my book, they are historical facts……. while everything I wrote is just imagination from my brain and has no basis in truth… just a magical world.
Forget the story of the sources, don’t tell me. Professor So-and-so said in his book… These are not sources… Your only source is the inscriptions only… Even if you find a historical reference consisting of twenty volumes.
This is the truth that you don’t want to realize.
Because if you receive a history book, or a historical article, without a picture of the inscriptions from which this history was extracted along with their translations, and you yourself read what confirms the authenticity of what was written, then this is not history… but rather an imaginary, imaginary, magical world… such as An animated cartoon series… nothing more, nothing less… and there is no truth in it.
If a Western scholar wrote a large volume about the life of a king who lived 3,000 years ago, how could he write this history?
You will say from the inscriptions…so…so ask for the inscriptions to be attached so that you can be sure, because if he had carried scientific integrity, he would have attached to you the inscriptions that confirm what he wrote.
——————————-
Now let’s try to answer the question.
In the beginning, there is a note: I put in the picture some symbols of the Musnad inscriptions, just as an example… and not because these are the only identical symbols, because all the letters of the Musnad script have their counterparts in the Egyptian inscriptions.
A long time ago… I was in a discussion with a historian, researcher, and reader of the Musnad script…and because there were questions that were troubling me, I asked him the logical question: On what basis did the ancient inhabitants of Yemen write these inscriptions? What is the criterion that made them adopt these symbols in their writing?!
Of course, the researcher did not give me an answer and he convinced me. After a while, one day, I encountered a lecturer and researcher in the Department of Archeology at Sana’a University, and I asked him the same question. The answers were the same as before, but I was not convinced. All the answers indicated a lack of real understanding of the essence of the question, and they were all outside of Sykes’ mentality. Pico.
Why did you ask this previous question?!
I do not want to speak from a scientific aspect related to writing, we will postpone it for a separate article, but the truth is that the topic made sense to me, and I was surprised at how this topic was so poor in the interests of researchers, and how university departments do not address this topic in their academic subjects.
The logic of my question comes from the structure of the Musnad line itself.
When you examine the datum line, you will see the presence of two symbols, and there are also the same two symbols, but in an upside-down position (rotation at an angle of 180).
This observation makes you ask logical questions:
Why did this situation exist in only two symbols, and the process was not performed on half of the symbols of the Musnad script……that is, that half of the symbols of the Musnad script were in certain shapes, and the other half was the reversal of those shapes?!
This question…will make you go directly to another logical question:
On what basis did the ancient inhabitants of Yemen write these inscriptions? What is the criterion that made them adopt these symbols in their writing?!
Why is it logical?
Because if there was no standard…or reference for the inscriptions, and the process took place spontaneously and randomly…then the phenomenon of the heart would not have been limited to only two symbols, and the process would have been completed on half of the symbols of the Musnad script.
This indicates……….that there is a precise standard adopted in the design of these forms, or a previous reference in the design process… Rather, it indicates that there is a sanctity that imposed these written forms.
If there is a previous reference for the process or a standard… then we have to search for that standard, and the search process requires us to think about two possibilities:
The first possibility… is that the process is linked to the authority of the calligraphy maker himself.
The second possibility… is that the process is linked to an authority from within the line itself.
Research into the first possibility… will lead us to assume that the first person to draw the line had a law… by which he drew those lines… but if we try to find this law… we will not find a law or equation by which the line follows, in terms of its angle and… Its rotation and number of lines.
As for the second possibility……. the existence of authority within the script itself, this would make us assume the existence of an older script, and that it gained its authority from this ancient script.
And if we try to investigate this possibility… we will find that the Musnad script went through three stages… according to discoveries… and a chronological order was established… and we cannot be certain about the ordering process.
But if we adopt this chronological order, and look at all the stages, we will find that they are similar and there is no fundamental difference in the topic, exactly the same lines, and this makes us ask the question again:
If we accept the logic of these time stages established by the West, then we have the right to ask the same question as in the first stage: On what basis were these forms adopted, what is the standard, because the two symbols are also present in the first stage?!
All we have left is this convincing and logical possibility, that there is an authority within the line itself… but the research process will not lead us to results.
Therefore, I believe… that the research process will never reach any real result… unless the researcher leaves the narrow, artificial, and completely unscientific confines of Sykes-Picot, in search of that standard and authority.
And finally
After research outside the borders of Sykes-Picot…we discovered the true standard existed in Misr…and we arrived at the authority within the structure of the script itself…that imposed these written forms on… The Musnad line… and the standard became very logical and final… and no question would be left unanswered.
Now…we will try to answer the question in the picture:
What is the meaning of this similarity and correspondence between the hieroglyphs and the predicate, a similarity, between two writings separated by a great distance?!
First of all, let’s forget the above.
We will draw the complete true story that will answer this question, based on conclusive logic… found in three scientific facts that are absent for many.
But in a future article (so that the article is not long)
.
.
.