2019-02-24T09:09:00-08:00
If some of our sisters in Iraq are disgusted by the repeated talk about falsifying history and that most of the region’s geography is originally in beloved Iraq, then we are not disgusted yet and we will never tire of dropping the fake Zionist history narrative about the region, including Iraq.
There is a new trend in the historical writings of some of our people in Iraq. It is very strange, I swear. It is a new phenomenon for me, and I do not know if it is old. I mean, does it have its basis in the writings of the imams’ heritage, or is it a modern phenomenon?
I have no problem with any historical reading…because your history is my history as well, and when all history is in your geography, there is no fear at all, because you are me, and your geography is my geography, and your homeland is my homeland, and your history is my history, and what you say will be an address for me.
No problem at all
As long as history is outside the Zionist narrative.
But the real problem is… for those who write history and believe that they are returning their true history to their homeland, but they do not know that they are writing a Zionist history and establishing a Zionist narrative… here is the problem.
Questions for these writers from beloved Iraq
What would it mean if Yemen was in Iraq, Misr was in Iraq, the Prophet Muhammad was in Iraq, Mecca was in Iraq, and Bakka was in Iraq?
What benefit would there be to Iraq if the entire story in Iraq and all the names of cities and places in the Qur’an and in heritage books were present in Iraq? Do you need recognition from the whole world for this matter? Is the matter a boast, for example? Is the issue based on indisputable evidence, but is the issue still a possibility?
Assuming that all your statements are correct, what will be the result of them… that is, what then? … Has the issue ended simply by saying that Yemen, Misr, the Kaaba, Muhammad, and the Arabic language are in Iraq? That is, what benefit will it bring to Iraq, the region, and history? … In other words, does our arrival at this result mean that the story is over? We have fixed something and something new will result from it.
Let me be frank with you.
Iraq is an authentic and solid people whose strength is unbreakable, and if the events that took place in Iraq had taken place in another country, it might have collapsed. This only indicates that we are facing a solid and stable society that can be born again in any situation, a society that is deep and rooted in the land, history and Not fleeting in history. No matter how much the West tries to break its power, it will not be able to.
But perhaps the circumstances that happened in Iraq are the reason that created this new phenomenon in writing history among some of our brothers in Iraq and it has become popular. They are trying to protect themselves by surrounding themselves with everything that is found in the book of the Qur’an, as if they are trying to contact Allah so that He can protect them by redefining the date .
No problem at all
History has no value to us
If it has no benefit on reality, meaning if history does not show us a tangible truth or treat anything, then they are stories for entertainment only and everyone can write history as they wish, if history is not for knowing our cognitive, religious, and social context. Linguistically, it is of no use.
I am more concerned with the history of Iraq than these writers are with their own history, because they are unaware that they are establishing a Zionist history on their homeland without knowing it.
They have not yet realized that there is a Zionist project that entered the region carrying an imaginary and false historical narrative, and through the legitimacy of this narrative, it expelled a people from their land, and the same thing will happen in every homeland in the long term.
I hope you feel the reality today
The West came to us with a historical narrative as a legitimate claim to the land.
Imagine this thing?
A despicable, malicious and cunning movement that no one has carried out throughout history except the dogs of the criminal West… They prepared for a day like this after they brainwashed us with Zionist historical narratives… and had it not been for their preparation for centuries, they would not have dared to enter the region. .
By Allah, the historical Zionist novel will turn the entire region into small, devastated, destroyed and displaced pieces… because it is a novel written by a cunning, satanic mind… that wants to occupy and settle the region over a long period of time, and has a long soul… a project. Occupation and settlement strategy.
the important
We will not discuss history this time…. We will try to discuss the way of thinking about history, because thinking is more important to us than writing history, because we are convinced that our problem with history is in thinking and not in the sources of history. Logical thinking is destructive to us because of the Zionist narrative and its strong authority over history. The mind, which made the mind always come up with a corrupt reading of history.
In a series, I will convey to you some of the historical writings of our Iraqi brothers…and we will treat them logically.
We will quote this article, which is popular on social media.
—————————————–
Article written by Brother Mohamed Akachat
You disgust us with your ignorance, our rabbis!!!!
In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful
The story of Musa and Pharaoh happened in “Misr.” This is what the Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah said and the Muslims agreed with them with all “naivety.” And even though our Most Gracious Allah bestowed upon us the Book that dominates their books, we have not stopped making their books an argument for the Holy Qur’an… But if you looked closely at the available scientific, historical and Qur’anic facts, you would find that what the Jewish and Christian clerics (and the “scholars” of the Islamic sects) believe to be true is in fact a distorted truth to the point of an accursed monster…
And because they were lost, and because they were so lost, they forgot that they were lost, so they lost us with them… I love the land of Kanana, but the truth is told in another place, and the evidence is our book, and with it their books, and modern science…
Therefore, I invite you, dear reader, to put aside our inclinations and what we think is “surely true” and let us see:
First: The story of Musa and Pharaoh:
It was said that the story happened in the land of the “Egyptian Republic”, wasn’t it?
After more than 200 years of archaeological research, exploration, and decoding of hieroglyphic writing: there is no “single letter” that speaks of a person named Musa, Youssef, Haroun, or any character mentioned in the heavenly books, and this is despite the fact that researchers were able to find out even The way the ancient Egyptians dressed… Even the word “Pharaoh” does not exist in the Egyptian language, and the closest word to it is the word “Barau”, which means: the big house…
But when you take an impartial “archaeological” look, you find that the story of Musa is recorded in… Ashurbanipal Library in “Iraq”: A child was thrown into the water by his mother, and the king’s wife picked him up. After a number of events, he became a “king” named “Sargon of Akkad,” the king of Akkad b. .. Iraq, but the rabbis of the “three religions” tell you: No, my beloved, the story happened in the land of the Republic of Misr without the slightest accountability for what they inherited.
Second: The story of Nouh:
The same thing, the story of the flood is mentioned in all civilizations, but the only story similar to what is found in the heavenly books is a story recorded in… Iraq: The Epic of Gilgamesh…
Third: The prophets of Allah Almighty: Yunus, Zakaria, Daniel, etc.:
The Pontiffs of the Three Religions tell you that the people of Israel lived in “Palestine,” which Allah Almighty gave them after he liberated them from slavery in “Misr,” but when you review the books of the People of the Book, you find, for example, that:
Yunus was sent to Nineveh in… Iraq.
Zakaria was sent to Babylon in…Iraq.
Daniel was sent to…Babylon in..Iraq.
Habakkuk was sent to.. Babylon.. Iraq.
Ezekiel was sent to Babylon in…Iraq.
Hajji was sent to Persia…eastern Iraq.
But the “priests of the three religions” cling to the same myth: The children of Israel inhabited Palestine after their exodus from Misr.
Fourth: Sulaiman, Harut and Marut:
More than two hundred years have passed since the beginning of archaeological excavations and excavations in occupied Palestine in search of traces of the legendary King of Dawoud and Sulaiman, and the result: negative zero…but our rabbis are still following in the footsteps of their rabbis, even though they read the saying of the Allah of the Great Throne: And they followed what The devils recited to the kingship of (((Sulaiman)))And ((Sulaiman))) did not disbelieve, but the devils disbelieved. They teach people magic and what was revealed to the two angels ((((((( (Babylon))))))))” “Harut and Marut” “And they did not teach anyone until they had said, ‘We are only a test, so do not disbelieve.’….”
Fifth: Writing the “previous heavenly books”:
Do you know, dear reader, where the Torah was written? In Babylon, Iraq. Do you know the name of the font used to write it? Assyrian square script. Now I will tell you something that many may not know: “The rabbis of Islam and Christianity” say that the Torah was written in Hebrew, right? Do you know how the “Jewish rabbis” call the language in which the Torah was written? Without guessing: Assyrian….
However, they insist that the children of Israel inhabited Palestine after Allah Almighty gave it to them following their liberation from slavery in “Misr.”
Sixth: Sinai and Misr are mentioned in the Holy Quran:
With this sentence, the “priests of the three religions” will try to evade you, relying on the public’s ignorance of history, but let me tell you things that may have been hidden from you:
The “Sinai” Peninsula, currently located within the territory and sovereignty of the Republic of Misr, was named as such in the fourth century AD by a decision of Emperor Constantine following the failure of the men of the church to find the “Holy Mountain” mentioned in the Old Testament (even if the goal of his decision was to find a permanent foothold for his men In that important land with religious motives.
The name “Misr” that we give today to the precious land of Kenana is a name that was coined at the time of Caliph Omar ibn al-Khattab and has remained to this day, that is, after the revelation of all the heavenly books.
Seventh: The Prophet of Allah Almighty, Joshua bin Nun:
I have been repeating what the “priests of the three religions” said since the beginning of the article: The children of Israel inhabited Palestine after their liberation from slavery in Misr, but a confusing thing stops you: the boy Musa, who is the prophet of Allah Almighty, Joshua bin Nun, is buried here in my dear country, Algeria, specifically in “Tlemcen.” “In the far west???? His grave is a pilgrimage site for the Al-Yahoud to this day!!!!!!
Eighth: Khalil Al-Rahman: Ibrahim:
Ask them about the origin of Ibrahim: Ur of the Chaldeans in… Iraq.
But after all of this, the “priests of the three religions” come and brag about the ignorance they have spread. I wish they would stop there. Rather, they fight any serious, neutral researcher, accusing him sometimes of disbelief, sometimes of heresy, or even ignorance.
I am not underestimating the importance and history of the country of my brothers, “Misr,” or exaggerating the importance of the country of my other brothers, “Iraq.” Rather, it is the state of the truth that must be told. We must study our history based on impeccable foundations, which in our case are: the Holy Qur’an and archaeology. .
This, and Allah Almighty knows best.
—————————————–
1- This writer deals with Misr as a political border. He reads history according to the borders of Sykes-Picot, and according to the names of the countries that emerged as a result of Sykes-Picot. Iraq must have existed in the past within a geographical space similar to today, and if it expanded, it would include the regions adjacent to it. The same applies to Misr, as it reads ancient Misr in its current form today.
This writer… believes that the Qur’an came to dominate the books of the Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah and that it is the proof, but he asserts that the story of Musa did not happen in Misr and there is no evidence for it, and that if we take a neutral archaeological view, we will find that the story Musa blogged in… Ashurbanipal Library in “Iraq”: A child was thrown into the water by his mother and was picked up by the king’s wife. After a number of events, he became a “king” named “Sargon of Akkad,” the king of Akkad in… Iraq.
The writer expresses his anger at the religious leaders who are behind this forgery.
Where is the contradiction?
There is no power but from Allah
How can he claim that the Qur’an came to dominate all books, and say that the story of Musa happened in Iraq, in the character of Sargon, king of Akkad?
Does the Qur’an lie? Because the Qur’an talks about Musa, while the real story that the writer believes is about a person named Sargon, and therefore we have two possibilities: either the Qur’an is a lie or the story of Sargon is a lie… This is the logic and you must research carefully until you reach the correct possibility.
You cannot claim that the Qur’an is a book that came to dominate all books and is the proof. Then you told me about Sargon that he was Musa…… If the Qur’an is dominant and an argument, then logic says that Sargon’s name is not Sargon, but rather Musa.. correct? ….This is according to the writer’s logic
According to the writer… this story was leaked to the Muslims from the books of the Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah… but the writer forgot that 200 years ago, or even 100 years ago, no Iraqi knew a person named Sargon… the West. He was the one who wrote for the Iraqi the story of Sargon…and Sargon is a character found in the Old Testament.
The writer falls into the same mistake with which he criticized Muslims, as he believes in a personality that seeped into him and into his history from the books of Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah and is not found in the Qur’an, which he believes is the proof.
According to what the writer said… the rabbis of the religions are the reason for this falsification of the story of Musa… but the writer forgot that the Western orientalists are considered among the rabbis of the religions as well……. Most of the history writers are Western Al-Yahoud who are Zionists and are of the They write the history of Iraq and the region, and they believe in the book of the Old Testament, and the structure of their historical awareness is based on this book, and they will project the history of their book onto the history of Iraq as well. The rabbis do not have to be precise. There are rabbis who wear scarves, shave their beards and mustaches, and hold doctoral degrees.
According to what the writer said… after more than 200 years of archaeological research, exploration, and decoding of hieroglyphic writing: There is no “single letter” that speaks of a person named Musa, Youssef, Haroun, or any other mentioned character. In the heavenly books, despite the fact that researchers were able to find out even the way the ancient Egyptians dressed… even the word “Pharaoh” does not exist in the Egyptian language, and the closest pronunciation to it is the word “Barau,” which means: the great house.
The writer says that Musa does not exist in Misr, on the basis of the absence of the name in the inscriptions of Misr, so there is no Musa, Haroun, or Pharaoh, while Musa exists in Iraq, but not on the same basis that he adopted in the case of Misr, regarding the presence of the name Musa in the inscriptions of Misr, but rather On the basis that there is a similar story in Iraq.
The height of contradiction
Because we are supposed to find in the inscriptions of Iraq a person named Musa so that we can actually say that Musa is in Iraq.
The writer is still within the circle of Zionist historical awareness. He believes that Musa is a character from the past and must exist in the history of Misr, but he did not discover the existence of a single letter of a person named Musa. His presence in Iraq is a fact related to the story of Sargon.
Although the writer says that the Qur’an is the proof, the writer does not use this argument… because the story of Musa in the Qur’an is news and not a story that occurred in the past before the revelation of the Qur’an… but rather events that will occur in the same way as what is found in the Qur’an… and Musa is a future character…. This confirms that the story of Sargon, which the West wrote and tried to make it similar to the story of Musa, is a fake story that the West deliberately fabricated, in order to confuse this writer and the rest of the people.
2- The writer says:
Nouh in Iraq. The story of the flood that matches the story of Nouh was mentioned in the Epic of Gilgamesh.
As long as the writer considers the Qur’an to be a proof and dominant, and at the same time believes in the story of Gilgamesh and Attopachim, this is the height of contradiction. If the story of Gilgamesh spoke about a man named Nouh, I would say that the story has some kind of truth, but the height of contradiction is to believe in Nouh and Gilgamesh at the same time. ..One of their stories is true and the other is false and fake.
Give me the name Nouh in the inscriptions of Iraq… there is no.
Isn’t the Qur’an a proof and a dominant authority?
So the story of Gilgamesh is fake and false.
The writer is still within the circle of Zionist historical awareness, as he believes in the flood and that life began with a flood, an ark, and animals according to the narration of the book of Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah… and that Nouh is a character from the past. Although the writer talks about the dominance of the Qur’an and that it is an argument, he does not adhere to the Qur’an… because the Qur’an talks about Nouh as a piece of news and not from the past.
{And recite to them the news of Nouh, when he said to his people, O my people, if my position and my reminding of the verses of Allah are difficult for you, then in Allah I have put my trust, so agree on your affairs and your partners, then let your affair not be a distress to you, then judge for me and do not look back.}
3- The writer speaks:
The Pontiffs of the Three Religions tell you that the people of Israel lived in “Palestine,” which Allah Almighty gave them after he liberated them from slavery in “Misr,” but when you review the books of the People of the Book, you find, for example, that:
Yunus was sent to Nineveh in… Iraq.
Zakaria was sent to Babylon in…Iraq.
Daniel was sent to…Babylon in..Iraq.
Habakkuk was sent to.. Babylon.. Iraq.
Ezekiel was sent to Babylon in…Iraq.
Hajji was sent to Persia…eastern Iraq.
But the “priests of the three religions” cling to the same myth: The children of Israel inhabited Palestine after their exodus from Misr.
Look at the height of the writer’s contradiction……. He says that the Qur’an came to dominate the rest of the books and is the proof, but he uses the Jewish books as evidence for the presence of the prophets in Babylon.
the question :
Did the Qur’an talk about a prophet named Ezekiel, Daniel, Habakkuk, and Haggai?
No… So the writer is also among the category of fraudulent rabbis that he criticizes.
the question :
Did the Qur’an, which came to dominate the books of the rabbis, talk about the Prophet Jonah being sent to the Nineveh region, and did the Qur’an talk about the Prophet Zakaria being sent to Babylon?
No…the writer does not have a clear approach and strict, precise and scientific rules for reading history……..There is a controlled Zionist history.
4- The writer says:
More than two hundred years have passed since the beginning of archaeological excavations and excavations in occupied Palestine in search of traces of the legendary King of Dawoud and Sulaiman, and the result: negative zero…but our rabbis are still following in the footsteps of their rabbis, even though they read the saying of the Allah of the Great Throne: And they followed what The devils recited to the kingship of (((Sulaiman)))And ((Sulaiman))) did not disbelieve, but the devils disbelieved. They teach people magic and what was revealed to the two angels ((((((( (Babylon))))))))” “Harut and Marut” “And they did not teach anyone until they had said, ‘We are only a test, so do not disbelieve.’….”
Very excellent, and the writer’s words are correct, as there is no trace of Al-Yahoud, a Jewish kingdom, or the kingdom of Sulaiman and Dawoud in what is now called Palestine.
But he thinks that Sulaiman is in Iraq, in Babylon… a problem? I mean, what was the Jewish kingdom in Iraq? …Is he trying to root the Zionist history in Iraq?!
But this writer, who is interested in archaeological evidence, is not now interested in the question of whether Sulaiman’s name was mentioned in the inscriptions of Iraq, just as he was interested in the same question regarding Musa in the inscriptions of Misr, which inferred that Musa was not in Misr, under the pretext that he was not mentioned in the inscriptions of Misr.
Because according to the writer’s logic and archaeological evidence, Sulaiman was also not in Iraq, because he was not mentioned in the inscriptions of Iraq.
But… he insists on the story of Harut and Marut, Sulaiman and Babylon, mentioned in the Qur’an… and because Babylon is in Iraq, it is assumed that Sulaiman was in Iraq.
Let’s ask two questions
First, what is the meaning of the story of Harut and Marut mentioned in the Qur’an?
Does the Holy Qur’an talk about Babylon and that it is in Iraq?
no
Where is Babylon?
We will make an agreement with the writer
As long as the writer is inferring the story of Harut and Marut in Babylon, if we discovered the presence of the two kings Harut and Marut anywhere in the region, then it would be logical for this place to be Babylon, right?
This is logic, argument and certainty
5- The writer says:
Do you know, dear reader, where the Torah was written? In Babylon, Iraq. Do you know the name of the font used to write it? Assyrian square script. Now I will tell you something that many may not know: “The rabbis of Islam and Christianity” say that the Torah was written in Hebrew, right? Do you know how the “Jewish rabbis” call the language in which the Torah was written? Without guessing: Assyrian….
However, they insist that the children of Israel inhabited Palestine after Allah Almighty gave it to them following their liberation from slavery in “Misr.”
Baseless talk
The first copy of the Jewish book, the Old Testament, was written in Greek, where the Assyrian square script and the Assyrian language came from.
Of course, the writer says this information, and I am sure that he has not yet read the Hebrew language, because if he read the Hebrew language, he would know very well that it is a mixture of distorted Greek and Arabic vocabulary.
6- The writer says:
The “Sinai” Peninsula, currently located within the territory and sovereignty of the Republic of Misr, was named as such in the fourth century AD by a decision of Emperor Constantine following the failure of the men of the church to find the “Holy Mountain” mentioned in the Old Testament (even if the goal of his decision was to find a permanent foothold for his men In that important land with religious motives.
The name “Misr” that we give today to the precious land of Kenana is a name that was coined at the time of Caliph Omar ibn al-Khattab and has remained to this day, that is, after the revelation of all the heavenly books.
There is no power but from Allah
Who said that Omar bin Al-Khattab named Misr? Are you sure of the date contained in the heritage in order to make it an official document?
—————————————–
Now let’s talk about the end point
What is the problem that the Iraqi researcher suffers from in general?
The main problem is that the Iraqi researcher’s imagination is Jewish, or in other words, purely Zionist, and he does not know it.
Forgiveness…..this is the truth.
The Iraqi researcher today is haunted by a very, very big myth, on which he bases his historical perceptions. This myth is: that the Al-Yahoud stole from Iraq’s ancient heritage.
Huge myth
Because the opposite is true.
Because when the Zionist West came to Iraq and deciphered the inscriptions of Iraq, it was never able to decipher them until today, but out of its cunning and malice it created a fictitious history and claimed that it existed in the inscriptions of Iraq and placed within the history that it wrote for Iraq the names of characters present in the book of the Old Testament, and took The West copied stories and events found in the Old Testament and pasted them onto the history of Iraq, after reformulating them to appear in a new way, with new names, and with a new decor.
The West was able to confirm the stories of the Old Testament through the inscriptions of Iraq. Most of the Old Testament characters are present in the West’s forged translations, so the West confirmed the story of the Babylonian captivity by extracting the name of Bukhtenzare, etc.
The entire world of the Old Testament, including characters, events, personalities, symbols, icons, and geography, is present in the history that the West wrote for Iraq.
The remaining point is the story of Babylon
According to history, the city of Alexandria was built by Alexander and still exists today. Is it possible that the city of Babylon, which was a huge city and was conquered by Alexander, no longer exists today? Is it possible that there is no trace of the city of Babylon?
Where is the Iraqi city of Babylon?
And they are… No sane person believes that huge cities suddenly disappear and have no effect. A village disappears, but a city of the same age as Alexandria and its place disappears from the awareness of the inhabitants of the original geography completely, for it is illusion and madness.
Please… stop using the term (archaeological evidence). Because all writings have nothing but Western-Zionist paper evidence.
O Iraqi researchers!
Decode your inscriptions yourself and then talk to us about real history.