2018-11-21T06:34:00-08:00
The natural question: How do we read the history of ancient man?
We read ancient human history based on two things:
1- Old texts he left behind
2- A material trace that was used by him and related to him
Now let’s start watching this blindness
● It may be logical that ancient biblical texts are the strongest document that will provide us with a general picture of ancient human belief, morals, and thought, but there are many problems in this process:
First: the accuracy of the translation
The translations may be incorrect and sound, or not 100% accurate… and this makes us definitely enter into a mythological world, especially as we rely on imagining ancient times based on a basic rule, which is evolution… that man was in a stage It is close to animals and its consciousness developed over time until it reached today’s consciousness, and we will assume a mythical world. We will believe, for example, that the Egyptians truly believed that Allah would die, and his body would be divided all over the earth, and his wife would gather his body and cry over it, then put it in a coffin and send it to the Holy Land.
Second: The problem of interpreting the text
Why is it that when we write a topic about something, and when we return to read it after a long time, we feel as if we did not write it? Have you ever experienced such a feeling? I think many have experienced this matter, but have you asked yourself about the reasons for this phenomenon?
When we project our living conversations onto paper in the form of written texts, we have deprived our living language of much information that clarifies the meanings we intended.
Once a living language turns into a textual language, it is exposed to distortion in the true meanings and intentions that were said during direct speech, and the text then needs many tools to help us interpret its meanings and intentions correctly as it was in its direct, living form. We need to know the speaker’s tone, his facial expressions, the culture of society, the speaker’s environment, the speaker’s society, and the surrounding circumstances at the time of speaking…so that we understand the correct meaning of the text.
I will give a simple example… Imagine that you were listening to a conversation between two friends and one of them said to the other at the end of the conversation as a joke: You killed me. Now let us imagine that the dialogue was recorded in text form. If someone reads it in front of you, he will believe that the man was actually killed… while you were a live witness during the conversation and realize the true meaning of the sentence and the circumstances of its saying… that the man was laughing as he uttered his sentence, and it was a metaphor for a prank played by a friend.
This example is repeated constantly in our daily lives, without us paying attention, especially when we transmit conversations to people that we witnessed. We only transmit texts that lack information and circumstances surrounding the text, so the meaning becomes other than the true meaning. Distorted and distorted. It causes many problems.
This is the reason for this phenomenon that makes us feel, when we return to reading texts we wrote in the past, that we did not write those texts. When we write, we drop the texts and do not drop the information and surrounding conditions that created those texts. When we go back to reading them, we read texts that lack the information and surrounding conditions at the time the text was written, and we no longer find the vitality of the text that makes us sense and sense the text.
If we disagree on the interpretation of texts written 50 years ago, then what about texts written 5,000 years ago and perhaps much older?
● As for the material impact, it is the one that provides us with a picture closer to the truth, about human consciousness in ancient times. By the material impact, I do not mean inscriptions, but rather materials associated with ancient people, such as clothing, food, drawings, the house, etc.
Now we will talk about doctrine only
In a previous article, I talked about my discovery of a cemetery containing mummified corpses, which provided me with knowledge about the signs of places where the dead were buried in ancient times. These signs are what led me to another certain conclusion, which is that the mountains of Yemen are filled with mummified corpses in very large numbers. This discovery, in addition to the discovery of many ancient Egyptian antiquities in Yemen, and in very isolated and rugged areas, raised many questions within me, the most difficult of which was: What is the nature of the relationship between Misr and Yemen in ancient times?
Why did I ask myself this question?
The question is very logical… because there are no two places in the region where mummified bodies were discovered (clearly and extensively) like Yemen and Misr. To be more precise, in Yemen the matter appears in a very striking and large way… Yes, it is true… The mountains of Yemen are filled with mummified corpses in huge numbers.
This matter forces any sound mind to automatically ask a logical question…about the relationship and whether there was one common belief. Mummification is a religious ritual and it is natural for the matter to be linked to a common belief. .
I think the answer is very easy and very difficult at the same time
Why ?
Logical question:
Suppose that a thousand years later, a person opened a grave in Misr and found the bones of a corpse inside a white shroud, and another person discovered the bones of a corpse in Yemen inside a white shroud in the same way.
The logical question: Did the owner of the body discovered in Misr worship Amun and Osiris, while the owner of the body discovered in Yemen worshiped Maqqa?
The answer is very clear
This is the same thing with the mummified corpse in Yemen, which is exactly the same as the mummified corpse in Misr, in the position of mummification (joining the legs), in the materials and in the cloth. If there is a difference, it is in details such as the difference between the letter “Ayn” written in script. Naskh and the letter Ain written in Diwani script.
But what about doctrine?
Logic says that the two mummified corpses emerged from one belief, from the same spiritual and existential perception of life, in everything.
The ancient society that was in Yemen and created the mummified corpse had a spiritual, existential and intellectual conception of life…… It is the same spiritual, existential and intellectual conception of the ancient society in Misr from which the mummified corpse emerged.
Both societies had one religious faith. The topic is very easy, clear, without much talk, and does not require a doctorate from Oxford University.
And whoever wants evidence to confirm more… the story of the wooden coffin discovered in Misr near the pyramid of Saqqara in one of the temples of the Egyptian Allah Osiris, which, as it was said, contained a mummy, but it was stolen. It belonged to a merchant from Yemen named Zaid, who died in Misr and was a representative. Supplying sacred materials and plants that were used in temple rituals. His burial in the cemetery of the Allah Osiris is a tribute to him from the Allah Osiris, and means the existence of a common faith.
It was supposed…that the discovery of the first mummified corpse in Yemen would cause a major shock in our scientific circles, so what if it were a huge number of mummified corpses in the mountains of Yemen.
It is also assumed that the discovery of large numbers of mummified corpses in Yemen makes any human being with an atom of sound mind assert that there was a single human group that inhabited Misr and Yemen and emerged from a single cultural component. For any researcher or scientist, there is a major and fundamental key in the study of history.
But unfortunately the mind is in a very deep sleep.
So where is the difficulty?
The difficulty in the history that the West writes for us, surrounded by an aura of scientific and moral honesty and luxury, has become an intellectual axiom, which makes us lose confidence in ourselves and our thinking, and turns us into beings that consume it, unable to produce or think.
Because according to the history written by the West, in ancient Misr, society worshiped the well-known gods (Amun, Isis, Ra, Aten, Osiris, Horus), while in Yemen, society worshiped (Maqqa Am Sin). I also do not want to open another chapter related to the same topic about language, but we will postpone it to another article.
This history, which the West wrote for us, made us understand the story of the mummy of the Yemeni merchant, which was present in the wooden coffin engraved with writing in the Musnad script in a difficult and different way. The mummified body of a Yemeni merchant placed in the tomb of the Allah of Osiris makes us assume that it is a tribute, because he believes in the revered Allah, but Just as a tribute.
And here is the difficulty
Different gods, different languages….and the same rituals.
How do we resolve this contradiction?
I will tell you how we solve it
When the news spread the story of the discovery of mummies in Yemen, there was a shock in the scientific circles in the West, and it even sounded the alarm bell among them. They were not expecting this thing, and they were the ones who had visited Yemen, toured it, and written its history, and it did not happen to them during their wanderings in Yemen. Discovering any mummified corpses, so that they had prepared for them with historical accounts, and the reason is because the ancients used to place mummified corpses in very far and very high places in the mountains and no one could reach them, and in fact no one of the population would notice them, and they were in very large numbers. . We can prepare a movie and upload it to the Internet, as we open one of the tombs in one of the mountains for the first time and see a view of mummified bodies.
the important
After the discovery of the first body, followed by news of the discovery of other bodies, it required a visit by Western researchers and institutions to Yemen.
The National Geographic Channel presented us with a documentary film entitled The Mummies of the Queen of Sheba, documenting the journey of an English expert and scientist exploring these mummies.
As Western experts and scientists always do, when they introduce themselves for the first time, they paint imaginative, humane, and genius pictures of themselves to the viewer or reader, to give us signals that make us surrender and believe in the stories of their discoveries and results and trust the reasons for their interest and journeys.
The English expert introduced himself as saying that the reason behind his interest in searching for mummies was the death of a friend or relative, which made him think about death and look for mummies in the world…and one day a friend sent him a message telling him that there was news about the discovery of mummies in Yemen. . According to the expert’s words, the news was shocking to him, and that he had never expected the presence of mummies in Yemen… and he had never heard before in history about the discovery of mummies in Yemen.
Of course, this expert is honest about the fact that the West has not previously known about mummies in Yemen, and as we said, the reason is that the locations of the mummies are far away and not within easy reach, and he is very honest about the issue of shock because it will reveal a history that the West does not want us to know.
But he is a liar in the story of his friend who died and that this is the reason for his interest in searching for mummies, and he is a liar in the story of a friend who sent him the news of the discovery of mummies in Yemen on his e-mail, because he works for one Western institution and it takes many names in all European countries and She is interested in antiquities in our region.
The West had written for Misr the story of its history, the story of its gods, and its language, and it had also written for Yemen the story of its history, its language, and its gods. But suddenly we discover a wooden coffin with a mummy written on it in Musnad script, buried in Misr, and we discover mummified corpses in Yemen that are similar to those in Misr.
A very big problem that will threaten the historical narrative written by the West about the region….. So, what is the solution?
1- Regarding the mummy inside the wooden coffin discovered in Misr, we steal it and hide it… and we do not steal the rest of the mummies… and the charge will be against the antiquities thieves.
Because this is the first time thieves steal a mummy. The thief steals treasures and gold. What do they do with the mummy? Why didn’t he steal the other mummies that were buried next to the coffin?!
Because the survival of the mummy is considered material evidence that Yemen and Misr share a common faith.
2- Regarding mummies in Yemen
We will send an expert and try to establish and confirm information scientifically to falsify the mind when trying to understand history.
The English expert began to show off his intellect in front of the camera and the accuracy of the Western laboratories that sent them samples of the mummy’s cloth and hair, and began the process of exaggerating the issue.
– Wow, mummification is good and different from what is found in Misr
– Wow, perhaps we are facing mummies that may be older than the mummies of Misr
– Wow, the materials used are very different, and some of them are imported from India.
And it’s all a lie within a lie
Mummification in Yemen is the same as mummification in Misr, and there is no difference at all, and the materials used in mummification are the same as in Misr and Yemen, the most important of which is myrrh, and there was no such thing as India until Yemen imported materials from it……. So if The West itself wrote that the wooden coffin belonged to a Yemeni man who was a merchant of materials used in temple rituals, but in the case of Yemen, it says that Yemen was imported from India.
Imagine…Misr imports materials used in religious rituals from Yemen, while in Yemen it imports materials used in religious rituals from India. Funny talk.
.
As for the ages of the mummies…they are all from one time period.
Of course, when the West always writes history, it tries to create inflated selves among the residents of the region, pathological selves… that make the minds of ordinary people and even researchers haunted by the illusion of uniqueness and greatness… thus turning history into a disease… It was my father and my grandfather. ……… It does not attempt to extract knowledge from history and understand the religious, moral, scientific and engineering context, so as not to make people pay attention to what the West wants and is deliberately trying to hide.
When you enter history pages on social media and they talk about the topic of mummification, you find most people’s comments:
Mummification in Misr was a complex mystery
They found a mummified body in Libya, which scientists say is the oldest and most elaborate
– Mummification in ancient Yemen.
And Allah is the One who laughs and feels sad at the same time, meaning the history we have in order to obtain the words: the most complex, the oldest, the most first.
I don’t know what makes people proud of mummification, there is no power or strength except with Allah, a reason for pride?! . And you don’t know what pride is. They don’t want to know anything about history except bragging… even though the issue is not pride… they don’t want to be aware of history and understand our context.
Is there anyone who takes pride in mummifying bodies?
They take pride in preparing the dead, haha
Sickness….. May Allah make the sickest people sick in this way.
I also don’t know…what is this complicated mystery of mummification in Misr, about which the West every now and then publishes research and news in the media and scientific periodicals, and makes people fuss every now and then thinking about the subject.
They create a great aura on trivial topics… to make the mind suffer from a disability and an inability to think… because when he hears the West constantly repeating the word “complicated puzzle” in scientific periodicals… it makes him think that since this matter baffles the West, it must be so, and therefore I must repeat their example…the complex puzzle.
The story is very easy… mummification and that… and the story is over, and there is no complicated story or complex mystery… mummification is the same.
All the mummified bodies discovered in the area came from one time period and were of similar age. The materials used in mummification are the same everywhere. The most important, even basic, of these materials is myrrh. The most important source of this material in the past was the south of the Arabian Peninsula.
The difference between mummification in Misr and Yemen is like the difference between washing and shrouding the dead today between Misr and Yemen.
The story is very easy… and there is no mystery… right?
In the past, there was no awareness like today’s awareness. The earth is one, and history did not read the ancient world the way we want to read it today. We are now living the awareness of Sykes-Picot. This awareness has been reflected in our view and reading of the past. Our imagining that the current awareness of Sykes-Picot forces us to imagine an old Sykes-Picot writing the past as well.
So we imagined Misr as a civilization, Iraq as a civilization, Yemen as a civilization, Libya as a civilization, and Morocco as a civilization, and there is a language in Misr and a language in Iraq and a language in Syria and a language in Misr, and there is a different religion in Misr and a different religion in Yemen and a different religion in Iraq. And in Syria. There is mummification in Misr that is different from mummification in Yemen, and so on.
The truth is that one civilization spread throughout the entire region and settled throughout the region.
The question remains:
How do we solve the previous contradiction: different gods, different languages… and one belief?
Logic and reason tell us three possibilities:
1- The doctrine of ancient Misr is the same as the doctrine of ancient Yemen, and therefore there is no truth at all to what the West wrote about the religion of ancient Yemen.
2- The doctrine of ancient Yemen is the same as the doctrine of ancient Misr, and therefore there is no truth at all to what the West wrote about the religion of ancient Misr.
3- Another unknown belief was a common belief between ancient Misr and Yemen, and there is absolutely no truth to what the West wrote about the religion of ancient Misr and ancient Yemen.
And any correct possibility among these possibilities… must have an automatic consequence… that the West is definitely in a false position.
So the West is now in a false position… logically… and definitely.
What is the importance?
Historical awareness is not valid until we can see the hidden truth that has been deliberately shaking us for many centuries… since the emergence of the Romans.
.
.