6/20/2020 0:00:00
What is the source of that authority that the West had through which they gained the right to translate the Egyptian inscription?
I believe that this great authority is the occupation authority. The operation took place under a great occupation and under a regime subordinate to it that continued until a long period that ended with its downfall.
But if we ignore this idea, because today we are discussing the scientific foundations of the subject of translation, this will lead us to ask a question:
Was there anyone who could read hieroglyphics in Misr?!
This question is often asked indirectly by many: Why is it that only the West can read the inscriptions of the region… Why do people have many inscriptions and cannot read them?
Thinking about the answer to this question will lead us to understand the basis of the idea of translating ancient inscriptions in Misr.
What is the basic idea that the West relied on to convince Misr, the Arabs, and the world of the validity of the translation of Egyptian inscriptions and the logic of its translation? .
The starting point for the West’s translation of inscriptions, especially Egyptian inscriptions, is based on two fundamental ideas:
1 – The language of the Egyptian inscriptions is an extinct language that no one speaks
2 – The inhabitants of Misr at that time did not know how to read hieroglyphics, and not even any person in the region or the earth at that time could read Egyptian inscriptions.
Because people cannot read the inscriptions, this logically means that the method of decoding the writing is impossible… and there is no creature on earth that can read it directly… and it requires the presence of a genius person who can decipher those inscriptions.
Let us now create a hypothetical experiment that can be conducted in reality
We have a book written in an ancient script by a people who lived 10,000 years ago and whose language has become extinct, and no one on earth can read this writing…….. So the question is: How will we decipher this ancient writing and be able to read the book and know what it was like? The language of this people?!
We will do this experiment, and prepare all the tools, then we will see our realistic, correct, logical steps, and we will also see the wrong steps that we avoided, then we will see the result of the experiment… then we will compare our steps with the steps that the West took… and we will observe. Did the West take the same correct and logical steps as us? We also notice whether the West took the same wrong steps that we avoided, and we watch its result and compare it with our result.
Now let’s start the experiment
We have a book written in an ancient script in an extinct language that no one understands (Arabic), so how will we decipher this ancient writing?!
■ Regarding the language of writing.
If we assume that we are able to decipher and read that writing, then there is no value to our work because we will not know anything from it. There is no difference between the sounds of animals and our reading of the book. There is no cognitive value that we will obtain… because we do not know the language of ancient writing. Just unintelligible sounds. We do not know the meanings of the words and sentences inside the book.
The experience will be without any cognitive value… and it is useless to undertake this experiment, and it is not worth the effort, loss, and time to do it, and it is preferable to abandon it.
In this case, we can create an imaginary language for it, by giving the letters of the book phonetic values, then create a dictionary and assign meanings to all the words of the book. Because he will not be able to discover the validity of the translation….. Because according to experimental information, the language is extinct, and no one will doubt our translation because it is an extinct language… But we must search for a realistic step that confirms to him the logic and validity of our work.
But if we exclude this immoral act, we must adhere to these conditions and we do not care about the benefit or lack of benefit.
We’ll move on to the next step
■ If we think deeply in search of an answer to this problem… we will reach a final and logical answer that it is impossible to translate this ancient writing, and no creature on earth will be able to translate this ancient writing.
Why ?!
Because writing needs a basic condition, which is a living being that reads it, and without this condition it is impossible to read it. A book has a deaf material, and writing has deaf forms that do not speak on their own, and they need a rational living being to pronounce them to show us their phonetic values.
This is according to the conditions of the experiment… (An extinct language and ancient writing that no one can read.
But if the ancient writing language is not extinct and is still alive, then there is some possibility of achieving a translation and reading of that ancient writing, but it will require a very arduous and tiring process through the process of assuming words from this living language and matching them with words in the book to find out the phonetic values of the letters. Ancient writing…so that we can finally arrive at reading a sentence with logical meanings…then all the sentences of the book, so that our reading of the book from beginning to end is correct and free of logical errors in pronunciation and meaning.
So… realistically, we cannot read this book, nor can we decipher its ancient writing… and the experiment has ended up to this point.
But wait…… It is permissible in the experiment to use any hypothetical work that is not realistic but has the quality of reliability.
As long as we are allowed to perform even unrealistic actions and tools… in order to solve this realistic and logical impossibility that prevents any creature on earth from reading these inscriptions, we need the presence of an external and reliable reference that provides us with a direct reading of the inscriptions.
That is, we need a rational living being to read this writing to us, and as we said, this being does not exist… because currently there is no creature on earth that can read… and because it is permissible in the experiment to use any work other than Realistic… We will create a time machine… and enter the time machine and go to the past and take the person who wrote this reliable book, bring him to the future and make him read this book in front of us.
But we have to be careful. We must not bring anyone else. We must bring the owner of the book because he may be a stranger and a visitor to that country. Because this writing will not be his official writing. He cannot read this writing. Also, there may be someone inside. This experience is an enemy of ours, and the Allah of Time entered with us, and sent a person from his side from the present to the past in the time of the author of the book…and we waited in the past until we carried out the experiment and traveled from the present to the past, and we took him and we We do not know, and when we brought him, he deceived us into thinking that he was giving us a correct reading, while it was fake.
This is one of the conditions of the experiment…to make our work and steps very reliable.
The answer is very correct and logical, and its logic depends on the conditions set by the experiment, which allowed the use of unrealistic tools in order to reach a final and confirmed solution to this problem.
Now….what will be the mission of this person we have brought into the future?
The man’s task is to take two steps:
Pointing with a finger to every word in the book, then reading it to us directly at the same moment… so that we know all the phonetic values of the letters of the writing… the task is completed.
Now….we will be able to read the book…but we will not understand the meanings of the words and sentences inside the book.
Now the very important question:
Can we implement this unrealistic work (a time machine) indirectly, that is, we simulate (a time machine) so that it is a realistic simulation that can be done in reality?! .
Or is it possible to search for a realistic step that can be taken realistically that is completely similar to the “time machine” step that we took that made us able to decipher ancient writing?
Yes… through an intermediate language and writing.
how ?
If we return to our hypothetical experiment…but the experimenter decided to prevent us from using that unrealistic condition, because solving the problem would become very easy, and the prize he would award was large, and he asked us to look for a realistic step.
But we were greedy for the big prize… so we entered the (time machine) without the experimenter knowing and went to the past… but we did not bring the man who owned the book so that the experimenter would not see him, but rather we stayed in the past for some time with the author of the book, and we learned. We read ancient writing and learned its language, and we realized the general meaning that the man talks about in his book.
So that we do not return to the present and that the experimenter does not discover that we have gone to the past…we have to make an identical copy of the book….Why?
Because if we return to the present from the past and we know how to read writing and decipher ancient writing… and we begin to read the ancient book directly and pronounce the letters of the writing, the experimenter will doubt, because there must be a scientific reason that made us able to read the book and decipher its writing. Easily and simply, because the reality says that there is no one who can read the book at the present time, and whoever can read the book and decipher its ancient written letters must have been able to do so after effort and not that easily, and after scientific and logical steps and discoveries.
But what is the benefit of making a copy of the book?!
It is true… If we made a copy of the book in the same font in which the book to be deciphered is written… then logically and naturally we would not have done any work….. We can take this step in the present without the need to travel to the past.
So what will this version be like?
We will write an identical copy of the book, but in a different font from the font in which the old book was written… and we will say that the owner of the book wrote it.
The person with the experience will doubt… because he wants one book in a specific handwriting, and it is illogical that the author of the book wrote the book in two handwriting?!
It is true………the experimenter gave us one book in a specific old script, and it is illogical to convince the experimenter of this version without him doubting, because it is not possible for a person to write one book in two different versions of the script…so it is not possible to have A society that writes in two handwriting at the same time.
The copy will become suspicious, because it is illogical, and the experimenter will know that we used the time machine in the experiment, and it is not permissible.
We will say to the person with the experience… that this copy was written by a visiting person from a far away place who came to visit the author of the book, and he is from a different country whose people wrote in a different script. He wrote this copy after he read the book and admired it, so he decided to make a copy of the book for him to read. The population of his country.
But how can a visitor be from a different people when he writes in a different script and in one language, the same language as the author of the book?!
True…so we will write an identical copy of the book in meaning only…but in a different language and in a different font…then the person who experienced it will not doubt…and the idea is logical…
But the matter is illogical…. So how can you make a copy of a book in a modern script and in your current language, because the appearance of your language in the past indicates that there is a society like the current society that can read this ancient writing, and writing a copy in your current script will raise suspicion that you have traveled with it. Time and know how to read and you want to deceive him with this copy because it is written in a modern script?!
True……..but we will make a copy in a language different from the language of the book and from our language, and in a font different from our current script……..and we will tell him that it is an ancient language, but we know how to read it because it is easier.
But what is the benefit of this version?!
So that we can convince the experimenter of our success, by carrying out a matching process between the phonetic letters of the words of our copy with the letters of the old writing words in the book.
But will there not be a match between any word written in a different language and script with another word written in a different language and different script?!
Rather, there will be a match… There will be a match between the book and our copy in the proper names… because we have read the book and know that the book talks about the names of people, and it is natural that the way the names are written differs from one script to another… but the way of pronunciation The names are the same, no matter how different the language or different script.
But how will the experimenter be sure that a word in the old book is identical to a word in your copy?!
We will write our copy in exactly the same way as writing the book and in the same way. Every page of the old book corresponds to a page in our copy, and every line of the old book corresponds to a line in our copy.
We found an important note in the old book. It contains a mark placed next to the scientific name. This mark will be clear. After that, we will read to the experimenter a sheet of paper from our copy that contains the scientific name written in the old book. After that, we will perform in front of the experimenter the process of matching the letters. The word for the name found in the old book, with the phonetic letters of the word found in our copy.
Thus, the experimenter will be convinced of our scientific and logical step.
But all of this is useless, because how will the experimenter be convinced that our copy is actually an identical copy of the book on the subject? Also, if the copy was written, it would appear modern while we have an old book?
Very true… But we will not write our version in the present… Rather, we will write it in the past when we travel in time to the past… and with the same material with which the old book was written… and we paste the version we wrote into the old book, and leave Our copy is in the past…. and we ride the Allah of Time and return to the present…. but to one day before the time of the experiment, that is, one day before the discovery of the ancient book by the experimenter, and it is certain that the experimenter will discover the next day. The old book is attached to our copy, and the features and characteristics of the old thing will appear on our copy.
And we will get the precious prize…. It is true that we deceived the experimenter because we used a forbidden method (the Allah of Time)… But we will never deceive the experimenter and we will translate the book for him very correctly, translate the meanings for him and make him read the book in the original language. In which the book was written.
————————–
And from here came the cunning idea of Rosetta Stone. The stone was able to create a realistic simulation of the role of a living organism, which is needed in a reality that is devoid of anyone who can read inscriptions, and it reads ancient inscriptions directly.
how ?!
As we talked about in our experience..
The West has completely and identically followed all the steps we took when we wanted to deceive the experimenter… because it is impossible, as we said, to carry out this simulation of the time machine by placing copies unless we wanted to deceive and did not commit to not using the time machine…
But who did they want to deceive the West with this step, and who has experience in the West’s experience?! ..Are we the ones with experience?!
The West made an identical copy of the book in meaning…and made it in a different script and in a different language (Greek), and made the copy with the same material as the book, and made it stuck to the book in one stone, so that we can be confident that it is a single copy of the subject of the book. …and that it is only one age old…and that that language (Greek) was contemporary with the time of the author of the book when he wrote the book.
Then the West convinced the experimenter of the idea of matching in names, and because the hieroglyphs contain circular frames… The West convinced the experimenter that the frames contain the names of kings, and because the Greek text contains the name of a Greek king… so the matching was achieved… and The West began by matching the phonemes of the word Ptolemy in its Greek version, with the symbols of the word found within the frame in the hieroglyphics.
But there is a very important observation… In our work, our steps were within an imaginative, hypothetical experiment that cannot be conducted in reality. It is not possible to bypass the laws of time, and there is no realistic time Allah, so the logical question is:
How did the West travel to the past and do the same steps as us and make its copy stuck to the book? Did it create a time Allah and we do not know?!
It is impossible for there to be a time Allah…and it is impossible that the West traveled to the past, and therefore the West never traveled, and the West did not send any of them to the past as its representative to rule Misr (Ptolemy), and their representative did not write Ptolemy The Greek wrote the stone in the past, and he did not rule Misr and did not know Misr, because the truth is that the West wrote the stone recently and convinced the experimenter that it was from the past and that he had a representative on his behalf who lived in Misr in the past.
The West convinced the experimenter of this copy, because of the material of the book (stone) and the method of writing, which was an ancient process of writing, namely engraving on stone, which suggested to the experimenter that it was from a very ancient time.
The West was able to create a time machine in this way by making its version appear ancient, and also when it composed an imaginary, hypothetical, unrealistic story like our previous experience, about the kings of Greece who ruled Misr in ancient times, and during a period of rule they wrote this stone… and made this story Fiction is a real historical subject taught in schools and universities. The experimenter was convinced by this story and thought it was realistic, and was deceived.
Thus, the impossibility of deciphering and reading ancient inscriptions was solved through the trick of the intermediate language.
Although we are certain that the stone is fake… but if we assume that the West actually had a time machine… and they took this step while we were confident that they would only deceive us to get the prize and would never deceive us with the translation… so the West did. It seems kind of logical and he was very careful with the same concern as us.
But the West then committed another trick, also by Champollbon, because Champollion then needed many stones with the same Rosetta Stone, and because they were not available, he resorted to matching ancient writing on stone with copies found on printer paper, and the conditions that were met in our experiment were not met. Which requires the same material as the book or Rosetta Stone.
The fundamental reasons that led to the second trick being passed are two things:
1- Not knowing the age of documents.
It is never scientifically or logically correct to match an old document with words found in a modern document, because when we want to match an old document with words found in another document, we need a time scale that assures us that the age of the words found in the other document matches the age of the old document.
In other words, the other document must be the same age as the old document.
This is the main entrance and because of which the West made the Rosetta Stone, and made such a fuss, in order to give its work a scientific approach, because in this way it had given its Greek document (the Greek text) in which its words were found an age identical to the age of the hieroglyphs, or in other words, it had made His language is as old as hieroglyphics.
2- Not realizing the advantage of Egyptian writing that is not available in other writings.
Egyptian writing has the advantage that it carries two values, which are (a phonetic value and a meaning value), unlike other writings that carry one value, which is a phonetic value.
There is no difference between the phonetic value and the meaning value, they are one and the same thing… The meaning and the spoken word in Egyptian inscriptions are one thing.
The meaning is identical to what is spoken directly in the Egyptian inscriptions in one language, and without the need for intermediate language meanings to confirm the meaning of the symbols of the Egyptian inscriptions.
– For example, Champollion, in the Rosetta Stone, made a match between the hieroglyphic symbols with their corresponding phonetic values in the Greek letters (not the meaning).
symbol = audio output
– But in the other piece that he obtained from Misr, Champollion carried out a process of matching the single symbol in the hieroglyphs with the meaning.
code = meaning
Although… the symbol = the spoken word = the meaning
For example, the symbol (image of a human eye)
Voice (spoken) = eye
And the meaning = eye
Ain symbol = eye = eye
The West would not have needed all that extreme difficulty and long time to find out the phonetic values of the symbols if it was truly truthful……because their phonetic value is the meaning that the symbol represents in the Jebetic language, which it claimed was the language of the inscriptions…….. And he would have reached it very easily from the beginning if he was really honest, without the need to make a fake stone (the Rosetta Stone), without the need to tell the story of Champollion and design a statue of him inside the University of Paris, and without the need to make a calendar for the Muslims in Misr who carry the Qur’an with them. And he made their calendar come after the calendar of the Copts, who carry with them the book of the Old Testament in the Jebeti language.
And because we have reached, scientifically and logically, the discovery of this clear forgery, which is completely consistent with our historical readings that took place in Europe and led to the events that led to the occupation of Misr and the region, all of which indicated the presence of strong evidence that there was a global project launched from Europe. It is related to religion and this project is linked to the occupation of Misr and the region and the concealment of a document from the land…. And we have come to discover that the West’s approach is unscientific and wrong in its translation of Egyptian inscriptions, and that the operation is crystal clear that it is a hoax, and the West has carried out the largest operation. Scientific and immoral falsification in history.
All the evidence really and strongly indicates that the Egyptian inscriptions are the book, and we now have a 99.9% probability that the book is an Egyptian inscription, and all that remains for us now is to return to the Qur’an and re-read the Qur’an’s speech and whether it corresponds to these actual events that we have followed. Which revolves around the West’s translation of the Egyptian inscriptions…. Then we must search for the final, certain legal seal approved by the Qur’an, which actually confirms that the Egyptian inscriptions are the book.