07/06/2020 00:00
Now, is the prophecy (the story of the Messenger with the book) able to give us the correct steps in order to decipher the Egyptian inscriptions and read them correctly so that we know the information contents of the book?!
When the West discovered the Rosetta Stone, it was then able to decipher some hieroglyphic symbols by matching some hieroglyphic symbols with phonetic values in the Greek language.
Example: If we assume that Arabic writing represents hieroglyphs and English writing represents Greek writing.
When the two writings match (ptlymos – Ptolemy).
The value of the hieroglyphic symbol will be (b) = p
The value of the hieroglyphic symbol (s) will be = s
When the West carried out this process and reached the value of some hieroglyphic symbols… it did not do anything important or useful.
In other words… understanding the phonetic values of nine symbols is a work that is worthless and has no importance in deciphering Egyptian inscriptions. You need to understand the phonetic values of all the symbols… and then the stone is useless, because it is possible through guessing to reach the phonetic values. For some symbols, but to no avail.
Hieroglyphic symbols contain more than 5000 symbols.
If you have 5,000 unknowns inside a mathematical equation, and you arrive at the values of 9 unknowns, you will never be able to solve the equation. Also, through 9 unknowns, you will not be able to know the value of another unknown.
in another meaning
If we assume…….that the process of knowing an unknown leads us to know the value of another unknown. That is, the process of knowing the values of 9 unknowns will lead us to know the value of another unknown, so that we have the values of 10 unknowns, then through knowing the values of 10 unknowns it will lead us to know the value of another unknown so that we have the values of 11 unknowns, then knowing 11 unknowns will lead us to know the value of another unknown so that we have values. 12 unknowns, and so on until we arrive at knowing the values of every 5,000 unknowns in the equation, so that we can solve the equation once and for all…. This process was not the process that the Rosetta Stone provided to us, and the Rosetta Stone can never provide this process for us.
in another meaning
Example: If we have this equation
x + y + z + q = 35
If we know the value of (x), and let us assume that the value is (2)… then we will never be able to know the values of the rest of the unknowns (y, p, q), and we will not be able to know even one other unknown.
Even with guessing it is not possible, because (r, p, q)… can take a very large and fantastic number of possibilities…. even one unknown.
This example is for four unknowns, so imagine the idea with 5,000 unknowns and you only knew 9 unknowns.
In our case, we have a bigger problem if the language is not known
If we assume the same equation as the previous one, and replace the number (35) with an unknown word, which is (L), it will be the symbol of the original language.
(x + y + p + q) = (l)
If we know the value of (S) and it is (2), it is completely impossible to know the value of all the symbols of the equation (Y, P, F) or even just one symbol, as the other side of the equation is unknown (L)… The language is completely unknown.
Therefore, there is no meaning to knowing the values of 9 symbols, and it has no importance or benefit until it serves us in order to lead us to know the value of even one symbol.
So what is the solution ?
We need… more than 5,000 bilingual stones (a stone in which there are two texts on the same topic and written in two different scripts and in two different languages), similar to the Rosetta Stone.
Provided……….that each stone among these stones is different from the other stone in terms of the subject of the text, and there is a royal frame in the hieroglyphic text, and within the royal frame there are symbols different from the symbols present in the royal frame in the other stone.
Or in other words…we need to match 5,000 words written in hieroglyphs with 5,000 different words in Greek writing.
Why ?
Because languages contain approximately 30 phonetic outputs……..and the ancient Egyptian could create only 30 symbols (letters) so that he could write anything he wanted in his language……..but the problem is that the number of hieroglyphic symbols (Letters) More than 5000 symbols.
Therefore, covering all audio outputs (30) is not enough, as there are 4970 remaining symbols.
Example :
The West first discovered a stone (a bilingual stone – hieroglyphics and Greek), which is the Rosetta Stone, and it deals with a topic about a king named Ptolemy. Then, after that, the West discovered another new stone (a bilingual stone – hieroglyphs and Greek), which is the Philae Obelisk, and the obelisk deals with the topic. It is about a queen named Cleopatra, which is a different topic from the topic in the Rosetta Stone.
And because the West is cunning… and it knew this matter and that it needed more than 5,000 stones in order to carry out scientific work that is proven before reason and global logic… but the West stopped at only two stones, and matched the names of only two kings written in hieroglyphics with the exits. Greek writing, reaching the values of approximately 9 hieroglyphic symbols.
b + i + l + j + m + f + x = ptlymos
k + l + j + f + b + v + t + a = kleoptra
The process also required the West to discover a third stone (a bilingual stone – hieroglyphics and Greek), and the stone dealt with a topic about a king, and let us assume, for example, his name is Darius…. Then it discovered a fourth stone (bilingual) that dealt with a topic about a king, and let us assume, for example, His name is Platonius, then a fifth stone was discovered in the same way, and so on……until it reaches approximately the 5000th stone, which is the last stone capable of containing the last symbols of Misr’s inscriptions that did not appear in the previous stones. .
After these discoveries…the West matches 5000 royal names (words) containing all the hieroglyphic symbols with their corresponding phonetic outputs in the Greek language.
Then the West can correctly decipher Misr’s inscriptions.
Question: What is the conclusion?
The answer: The stone is not important in deciphering Egyptian inscriptions.
Question: What are the reasons for the lack of importance?
The answer: Knowing the values of 9 symbols cannot decipher even another symbol, and we have more than 5000 symbols, in addition to the problem that we do not know the language of the inscriptions, so one side of the equation is completely unknown.
Question: What is the solution?
Answer: We need to match 5,000 different names written in another script and in another language with 5,000 words written in hieroglyphs.
Under a very important condition… the match must be within one document of the same age, meaning that the word written in hieroglyphics has the identical word written in a different script and different language underneath it… so that we can be sure that the two words are of the same chronological age.
We should not be given a paper document…….in which there is a word written in hieroglyphs and underneath it is a word written in another script and in another language.
Because someone can make a fake paper document, and make it look old, which is easy, and write us 5000 hieroglyphic words and under 5000 words in other writing.
Therefore, we need approximately 5,000 stones, such as the Rosetta Stone, because all Egyptian writing was on stones and walls.
So why all this fuss over the Rosetta Stone, after we discovered that there is no scientific importance to the Rosetta Stone and the Philae Obelisk?
It is media propaganda carried out by fraudsters and thieves when they make a big media sensation about worthless goods for the sake of customers, so that they come to them and believe the value of their goods and buy them without thinking.
The two stones are fake and made in the West.
And you have Misr in front of you today… Every day we read about an archaeological discovery in Misr… but for 230 years, no other coincidence has appeared like the coincidence of the West discovering a bilingual stone written in hieroglyphics and Greek.
{And what was revealed to the two angels in Babylon, Harout and Marout, and they did not teach anyone until they had said, “We are only a test, so do not disbelieve.”}
——————–
If the stone is fake and the elephants’ obelisk is fake, and it is impossible to translate the Egyptian inscriptions unless there are 5,000 bilingual stones that resemble the Rosetta Stone, then how can the “story of the Messenger with the book” found in the Qur’an be translated from Egyptian inscriptions when we do not have any stones? Is it logically impossible to translate Egyptian inscriptions?!
No…not impossible at all
how ?
If we recall our previous conversation about Champollion’s method of deciphering Egyptian inscriptions, we will find the following:
Through the Rosetta Stone and the Philae Obelisk, Champollion achieved knowledge of the phonetic values of approximately 9 hieroglyphic symbols by matching two Greek names located inside two royal frames.
And because, as we know, the process… requires 5,000 stones in order to match the 5,000 names written in hieroglyphic symbols with their corresponding phonetic outputs in Greek writing… So Champollion shortened this long and difficult process in making such discoveries… ..And he came up with a very short solution, a magical alternative to the story of 5000 stones.
how ?
According to what was said, Champollion came to understand the original language of the Egyptian inscriptions only, and he knew that it was the language of (Jabit).
After Champollion received an archaeological stone from Misr (a monolingual stone, not a bilingual stone) that contained a royal frame and inside it were four symbols, and among those symbols there was a symbol repeated twice at the end of a word, and he had reached its phonetic value when he unwrapped the stone. Rashid, who is the voice director (S)…and because the hieroglyphic symbols are pictorial, when Champollion contemplated the first symbol of the word, he found it similar to the image of the sun, and because Champollion was specialized in the language of Gebet, and according to Champollion’s words, the sun is in the language of Gebet. It means (Ra), then Champollion said, Is the word in this royal context the name of the king (Ra MSS), the very famous king in Egyptian history who was talked about in Greek books?
According to the story, Champollion managed to read the first word in the Egyptian inscriptions directly, and he read the word (Ra – MSS) without the need for a bilingual stone to perform a matching process, but rather after he reached the original language of the inscriptions according to his words and by matching the symbols. With a language called Jibt.
Example: If we assume that Arabic writing represents hieroglyphs and English writing represents Greek writing.
1- Rosetta Stone
b + i + l + j + m + f + x = ptlymos – within one document
And he came to the realization of knowing the value of the symbol (S).
S = s —– Single document input – audio value
2- The stone that reached him
(Sun) + (symbol of an unknown image) + S + S
According to what we were told, Champollion’s genius lies in only one point:
Champollion was an intellectual and had previously loved reading history, including the history of ancient Misr, and this was what benefited him. One day when he was a teenager, he read a Greek book about an Egyptian king named (Ra’msees).
After a long time…and when an ancient stone arrived to Champollion from Misr, and the stone contained a royal frame and inside it were four symbols, Champollion took these intellectual steps:
– We have a royal frame… and it is certain that inside it is the name of a king
The name consists of four symbols
– The king’s name ends with a repeated consonant vowel (SS)
– The first symbol is a circle that looks like the sun and in the language of Jebet (Ra).
– We know from our strong cultural background the name of a famous Egyptian king, which is (Ra’msees), and the name begins with (Ra) and his name ends with a well-known, repeated consonant symbol (SS) and in the middle is the symbol (anonymous).
These steps were arranged quickly in Champollion’s mind, and with a fleeting glance, Champollion’s genius mind reached: Is the name in the royal frame the name of King Ra’msees, the most famous king who ruled Misr in ancient times?
(Sun) = Raa —- two documents – meaning value
(Sun) + (symbol for something unknown) + S + S = Ra’msees — two documents
Then (the symbol of something unknown) = m —- two documents – an audio value.
At the same moment, he confirmed this fact, when he saw on his table a picture of a royal frame drawn by one of the scholars of Napoleon’s campaign, which contained three symbols.
(ibis bird) + (same symbol as unknown object) + s
It contains the same symbol found in the royal frame, which has an (s) at the end of the word, and the intermediate symbol is (the symbol of the unknown thing), and the first symbol is the image of (the ibis bird)… So Champollion took the same previous steps.
– We have a royal frame… and it is certain that inside it is the name of a king
– The name contains three symbols
The king’s name ends with a consonant letter (S).
– The middle symbol is a consonant vowel (m)
The first symbol is an image of an ibis bird
We know from our strong cultural background, which we learned from reading the history of Misr from Greek books… that the ancient Egyptians sanctified the lapis bird, and its name among the Egyptians was (Thuth), and we also know from our cultural background, which we learned from The Greeks wrote… The name of a famous Egyptian king is (Thuthmos).
The name in the frame begins with (Thuth) and its name ends with a consonant (S) and a middle letter (m).
These steps were arranged quickly in Champollion’s mind, and with a quick glance, Champollion’s genius mind reached: So…it is logical that the name in the royal frame is actually the name of King Thuthmos, the second most famous king who ruled Misr in ancient times.
(ibis bird) = Thuth —- two documents – meaning value
(Bird) + (symbol of an unknown object) + S = Thuthmos — two documents
(Symbol for something unknown) = m —- two documents – audio value.
In fact, the word is (Ra m ss) according to what he said… and this word made him reach an understanding of the original language of the Egyptian inscriptions, which is the language of Jebet… and in this language there is the word (Ra) which means Sun and the word (Thoth), which means the ibis bird, because this language has been proven to be the original language, because it is the one that led us, as we saw, to the names of ancient Egyptian kings mentioned in ancient Greek books dealing with the history of ancient Misr.
{Among those who are Al-Yahoud, they distort words from their proper places and say, “We hear” and “we disobeyed,” and “Hear without listening,” and “We obeyed” with their tongues and defamed the religion. And if they had said, “We hear and we obey,” and “Listen and we will see,” it would have been better for them and more upright. But Allah has cursed them for their disbelief, so they do not believe except a few. (46) O you who have been given the book, believe in what We have revealed. Confirming what is with you before We obliterate faces and turn them back on their backs or curse them as We cursed the people of the Sabbath, and Allah’s command is in effect. (47) Indeed, Allah does not forgive that anyone associates anything with Him, but He forgives anything less than that to whom He wills. And whoever associates anything with Allah has invented a great sin. (48) Have you not seen? Those who purify themselves. Rather, Allah purifies whom He wills, and does not wrong them even by the slightest trace. (49) Look at how they invent a lie against Allah, and that is enough of it as a clear sin. (50) Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Book? They believe in Al-Jibt (Egypt) and the Taghut (Dometic), and they say to those who disbelieve, “These are more guided to the way than those who believe.” (51) Those are those whom Allah has cursed, and whoever Allah curses, you will never find a helper for him. (52) Or do they have a share of the kingdom, so they do not give people a reward? (53) Or do they envy the people for what Allah has given them of His bounty? Indeed, We have given the family of Ibrahim the Book and wisdom, and given them a great kingdom. (54)}
——————–
So far, Champollion needed only four hieroglyphic words to match them with four other words in other languages… until he successfully deciphered the Egyptian inscriptions, according to their words.
Or in other words… Champollion needed to match only four names of kings written in another script and in other languages, with four words written in hieroglyphs… in order to decipher the inscriptions of Misr.
And the kings are:
ب ( Ptlymos – kleopatra – Ra’msees – thuthmos )
Two kings of Greece, and two kings of Misr, according to their words. Although the names seem to be pure Greek names, the phonemes of the names are Greek.
It is inconceivable that an ancient Egyptian king had a name in the same way as the names of the Greek world. As we know, all Greek names end with the syllable… (yas) and (ws)
Julius – Brutus – Antonius – Eccles – Maximus
How is it possible that an ancient Egyptian ruler did not belong to the culture or environment of Greece and lived in a very ancient time before Greek civilization and before the emergence of Greece, and his name was in the same Greek form (Ramses and Thutmose).
the important
We will write the equations:
b i l j m f x = Ptlymos
k l j f b t r a = kleopatra
Here, the phonetic value of some symbols was arrived at through the exact matching in one document of one age between two words.
(Sun) (symbol of something unknown) xx = Ra’msees
(Bird) (symbol of an unknown object) S = Thuthmos
Now the logical question:
Suppose that Champollion’s words are true, and now let us imagine that the West discovered a third stone similar to the Rosetta Stone, and in the stone there is a hieroglyphic text that contains a royal frame: [(bird) (symbol of an unknown thing) S], and the Greek text talks about a king named (Thuthmos). ).
If we match the two words, would it be the same as Champollion’s step?
(Bird) (symbol of an unknown object) S = Thuthmos
S = S
(bird) = T
The matching was not at all like Champollion’s work in Rosetta Stone, and it led us to an incorrect phonetic value.
So, in his second step, Champollion combined meaning and phonetic value into one word.
Before him, Champollion had been able to know only the phonetic value of the symbol (S), which is (S), but at that time he did not know what this symbol was, and he also did not know what it was (the symbol of the unknown) or what it represents of something in nature, but he knew the meaning of the symbol The sun and he is (Ra’i).
So why did Champollion not think about the meaning of the symbol (S) as well, when he knew the meaning of the bird meaning (Thoth)… Because the symbol (S) means (Sin) to the Egyptians, and the symbol for the unknown thing is (M), and the word is supposed to be pronounced ( Thuthmeemoseen (Thuthmeemoseen)
Then the reading of the Rosetta Stone frame will be (ptlymoseen)
Explanation example:
Suppose that the hieroglyphic text in the Rosetta Stone contains three symbols:
[ (camel) (room) (sky)]
The Greek text talks about a Greek king named Grees.
Upon matching
(Sky) = S… Correct match.
Now, when the stone piece from Misr reached Champollion, it contained a royal frame with the four symbols inside it:
(Sun) (Symbol of something unknown) (Sky) (Sky)
The symbol for the sun in Jibt is = Ra
The symbol for (sky) in Jabeti is = Sky
And the word is pronounced = (Ra’mskysky)(Ra’mskysky)
And the other word
(bird) (symbol of something unknown) (sky) = (Thuthmsky)
So, Champollion’s first step was completely wrong… In his second step, he combined meaning and phonetic value into one word.
In this ridiculous way and wrong approach (Thoth Mosky), Champollion deciphered the Egyptian inscriptions under the pretext of his access to the original language of the Egyptian inscriptions, which saved him the trouble of discovering 5000 stones like the Rosetta Stone.
So…the matter did not require a big fuss over the Rosetta Stone, and the process of deciphering the inscriptions from the beginning did not require a bilingual stone, nor did it require 5,000 stones like the Rosetta Stone…the process did not require All this long and difficult story, which took 20 years in front of the geniuses of the West, the process required a basic, fundamental idea, which is understanding the original language of the inscriptions, especially since the West, from the beginning, when it came to Misr, was an invader and an occupier… because it believed It is very significant that the language of Egyptian inscriptions is the language of the Jebet, and the language of the majority of Misr’s population (100 million Egyptians) is completely ignored and in a despicable, rude, and thieving manner.
The process is not difficult at all for any Western scientist who is famous for his genius and the founders of the sciences of languages and thinking… as long as he has in mind the idea that the language of the Egyptian inscriptions is Jibt, by matching the symbols of the inscriptions with their meanings in the Jibt language.
The topic is very easy
Bring one of those whom the West called the Copts and let him read the inscriptions. Every symbol is a picture of something, and let him read those things in his language.
Or collect all the royal frames in the temples of Misr…and match them with the names of the Egyptian kings mentioned in Greek books when they visited Misr in ancient times and wrote the history of Misr.
So……….the process did not require invading Misr and making two fake stones. They should have said from the beginning that it was the language of the Jebet….because from the beginning they believed this thing, but they wanted to make the story exciting and interesting. It took a long time to create the story of a genius named Champollion who finally, after much effort, reached the correct jawline.
The important thing is…this great achievement was announced (Ra MSS), haha, and Champollion was honored in a large official ceremony and was honored by the highest political authority in France.
Then Champollion disappeared after uttering the word “Ra MSS” so that he could be busy translating all the symbols of Misr’s inscriptions into the language of Jebet.
After that, Champollion no longer needed 5,000 stones like the Rosetta Stone, after he came to understand the language of Egyptian inscriptions (the language of Gebet), in order to carry out the matching process.
Because understanding the original language of the Egyptian inscriptions will enable us to easily and quickly carry out the matching process that we need… by matching the thing that the symbol carries in the Egyptian inscriptions with its name in its original language.
So Champollion took all the symbols and matched them in this way:
1 – (sun symbol) = shepherd
2 – (apis bird symbol) = Thoth
3 – (Eye symbol) = Eret
4 – ( Password ….. ) = …..
5 – ( Password ….. ) = …..
5000 – (mountain symbol) = digout
Thus, Champollion was able to translate all the symbols of Egyptian inscriptions, which numbered approximately 5,000 symbols in the Jebetic language……and he extracted them into a stationery dictionary.
Question: What is the conclusion?
Answer: The reading is completely wrong.
Question: What are the reasons for it being wrong?
The answer: Because Champollion matched hieroglyphic symbols inside a royal frame found in an ancient stone with a king found in a modern paper book, and the name of the Egyptian king was not written inside the ancient stone.
Question: What is the solution?
Answer: There are two solutions:
The first solution: We need to match two names written in one document, in order to make sure that they are of the same chronological age.
and
The second solution is to know the original language of Egyptian inscriptions.
So the essence of the matter is to understand the original language of the Egyptian inscriptions… only.
Is it the language of Jibt or the Arabic tongue?
{A Book whose verses are detailed, an Arabic Qur’an for a people who know}
{Have you not seen those who were given a share of the book? They believe in the Al-Jibt (Egypt) and the Taghut (Dometic), and they say to those who disbelieve, “These are better guided than those who believe in a way.” ¤ And we know that they say that only a human being teaches it. The tongue of those to whom they atheist is foreign, and this is a clear Arabic language.
Although the topic no longer requires quoting from the Qur’an to confirm this logical fact, the picture is very, very, very clear. The natural logical language of the inscriptions is the clear Arabic language.
———————————-
So the important question: Can this prophecy inform us of the essential points we need in order to decipher the Egyptian inscriptions and read them correctly?!
In general………there are essential scientific and logical points that we must realize before arriving at deciphering any ancient writing:
● Knowledge of the original language of Egyptian inscriptions
This is the most important point in the whole topic, so you must be certain of it and this information is firmly established in your mind and not in any other language, no matter how tempted you may be, because the Arabic language is the language of the first innate nature on earth.
For example, many people, including researchers and historians, even if they believe that the West is fake, but they deal with translations of the West that are compatible with their thought, even if the words are Greek foreign words.
No Greek word can be produced from it.
– And prophecy clarifies for us this most important and fundamental point: {Indeed, those who deny Our verses do not hide anything from Us. Is there better for the one who is thrown into the Fire, or the one who comes safe on the Day of Resurrection? Do whatever you wish. Indeed, He is All-Seeing of what you do. (40) Indeed, those who disbelieve in the Remembrance when it has come to them, and indeed it is a Mighty Book. 41) Falsehood does not come to him from before him or from behind him, a revelation from the Wise, the Praiseworthy (42) What is said to you except what has been said to the messengers before you. Indeed, your Allah is the Possessor of forgiveness and the Possessor of painful punishment (43) And if We had made it a non-Arab Qur’an, they would have said, “If only its verses had been explained in detail, is it a non-Arab or an Arab?” Say It is for those who believe a guidance and a cure, and for those who do not believe, there is deafness in their ears, and it is upon them blindness. These are being called from a far place. (44) And We gave Musa the book, but they disagreed about it, and had it not been for a word that had preceded from Your Allah, it would have been decided between them, but they are in doubt about it, suspicious. (45)}
● Know the structure of writing.
This is the second most important point. The symbols of Egyptian inscriptions are pictorial, and many believe that they are expressive, interpretive, emotional, and philosophical symbols whose understanding varies from one person to another. While the truth is that they are phonetic writing that has nothing to do with expression, feeling, or philosophy.
For example, many people, including researchers and historians (among them Ahmed Dawoud), believe that one of the symbols of Egyptian inscriptions, which resembles a knot and which Champollion called (ankh)… is a symbol of life and science.
When they see the symbol in writing… they believe that the inscription speaks about the knowledge that leads us to true eternal life.
In short, they believe that symbols carry philosophical aspects.
But the symbols of Egyptian inscriptions are merely written symbols that have only a verbal meaning and do not carry any philosophical or expressive meaning… They are (verses) and their singular form is (verse).
– And the prophecy clarifies this point for us (perhaps you will understand, a book and verses for which you have readers, not philosophy or expressions): {Alif Lam Ra’ ¤ These are the verses of the Clear Book (1) We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’an so that you may understand (2)}
Also, the other important point… is to realize the logical and scientific reason for the presence of more than 5000 symbols in the inscriptions of Misr.
If we have confirmed that the language of the Egyptian inscriptions is an Arabic language, but as we know that the Arabic language contains (only 28 phonetic outputs), then what is the benefit of the other 4970 symbols?!
– And prophecy makes this essential point clear to us: {It is He who has revealed to you the Book, among which are clear verses that are the mother of the Book, and others that are ambiguous. As for those in whose hearts is deviation, they follow what is ambiguous of it, seeking temptation and seeking its interpretation. And none knows its interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in knowledge say, “We believe in it, all of them from Allah.” Our Allah, and none remember except those of understanding (7) Our Allah, let not our hearts deviate after You have guided us, and grant us mercy from Yourself. Indeed, You are the Granter. (8) Our Allah, You will gather people for a day in which there is no doubt. Indeed, Allah does not break His promise. From it are the skins of those who fear their Allah. Then their skins and hearts soften to the remembrance of Allah. That is guidance. Allah guides thereby whom He wills. And whoever Allah sends astray, he has no guide.}
● Knowing the names of the symbols of Egyptian inscriptions (verses)
This point is important…they are Arabic names that exist in our natural Arabic tongue and in the Qur’an…and you should not deviate from this thing, because the Arabic tongue is the tongue of the first nature. in Earth .
– The prophecy clarifies this point for us: {And He taught Adam all the names, then he presented them to the angels and said, “Inform me of the names of these, if you are truthful.”
{Indeed, those who deny Our verses do not hide anything from Us. Is the one who is thrown into the Fire better or the one who comes safe on the Day of Resurrection? Do whatever you wish. Indeed, He is All-Seeing of what you do.}
{And to Allah belong the best names, so call upon Him by them, and leave behind those who deny His names. They will be recompensed for what they used to do. (180) And among those We have created is a nation who guide themselves to the truth, and by it they are just. (181) And those who deny Our signs, We will lure them from whence they do not know.} {Indeed, they are only names you have named, you and your fathers. Allah has not sent down They follow nothing but suspicion and what souls desire, and indeed guidance has come to them from their Allah.
{A Book whose verses are detailed, an Arabic Qur’an for a people who know}
● Knowing the direction of reading Egyptian inscriptions (the book)
It is natural that reading will be from right to left…it is our deeply ingrained culture…and it is impossible…through the logic of reality for this culture to have emerged from a culture that used to write from left to right.
– And the prophecy clarifies this point for us: {And as for him who is given his book in his right hand, he will say, “Read my two books.” (19) Indeed, I thought that I would meet my account. (20) He will be in a contented life. (21) In a high paradise. (22) Its harvests are close by. (23) Eat and drink in peace. (24) And as for the one who was given his book with his left hand, he says, “I wish I had not been given his book (25) and did not know what I calculated (26) I wish she were the judge (27) What availed me was his wealth (28) My authority had perished from me (29)}
———————————-
Indeed…….. We found the prophecy (the story of the Messenger with the book) that exposes the steps of the West. Rather, it provides us with essential scientific points that we need so that we can decipher the inscriptions of Misr.
We have almost finished talking………..but is this enough for us to be certain that (the story of the Prophet and the book is a prophecy) and must happen after the invasion of Napoleon and his soldiers into Misr and the region?! .
No….we need the seal that gives this story (the story of the Messenger and the book) the legitimacy of prophecy.
What do we mean by the legal seal, what is its importance, and how will we obtain the legal seal?
In our next conversation.