2/21/2021 0:00:01
It is natural that geography and the things around us do not have names, because they are irrational. They do not call themselves names and tell us their names.
Geographical locations and things get their names in three ways:
1- As for an agreement between us
2- A name that has been my favorite since the beginning, especially in the names of holy places.
3- There is a force that imposed on people the names of things around us.
The third method is the answer to the question many people ask: Why did people get lost from Al-Masjid Al Haram?
We have been subjected to an occupation, and it is not a normal or natural occupation… but a very malicious occupation… and it came to us carrying a cunning and devilish strategic project, to falsify reality and distort the names of geography and the things around us that we lived with, especially… Names found in the Qur’an or related to religion.
Because the continued existence of the original names… means that the occupation will no longer be able to control and control the people and implement projects on them.
The matter is very simple for any satanic occupier if he thought of a project to falsify the original names of reality… by giving new names to reality and making them official names so that the Sunni people would repeat them constantly… and it is all a matter of time (two generations) until the tongue stops. People start repeating the previous name and then it quickly disappears from their awareness and memory, and the new names take root in their awareness.
This is something that many do not want to understand when we tell them that Cairo’s real, original name was (Misr) before Napoleon’s invasion and the West’s installation of Al-Albani as ruler of Misr.
When the Western occupier came to Misr and the region was an occupier, he came carrying this fraudulent project and giving new names to the landmarks and places surrounding the people, so that the people would lose the first natural names by which they lived, and this work is its job in order to occupy the land, and make the peoples In chaos, subject to the new texts brought by the occupier, which contain the new names that he invented and made into names in reality, so that he can imprison the peoples within his world that he has drawn and the peoples cannot leave it, to ensure control.
The new names for geography and things began to be given officially, by putting them in huge texts inside the printer’s books that Napoleon brought, and they were approved in transactions, evidence, newspapers, books, documents, letters, scientific institutions, schools, etc…. …And so people had to repeat it constantly and continuously since childhood, until the names of the places were lost from their tongue and memory.
Among them was the city (Misr), whose name was changed to the name (Cairo)…… However, despite the adoption of this new name Cairo, the authentic popular memory of the Egyptians continued to repeat the name Misr over Cairo…… When You see an Egyptian from the countryside and tell him where you are going. He will tell you: I am going to Misr… and by Misr he means the city of Cairo.
Example :
Imagine that one day Yemen decided to change the name of the city (Sanaa) to the name (Cairo), and the new name was adopted in newspapers, transactions, documentation, news, channels, and in books.
Then the people of Yemen will have to… repeat this new name in official conversations, and it is all a matter of time (about forty years), until the name Sana’a becomes a thing of the past… but… but people’s popular memory will continue to repeat the name (Sana’a). ) in their normal and informal daily lives.
For example, when a person in Yemen wants to tell his family that he will travel to the city of Cairo in Yemen, he will say: I am traveling to Sanaa.
Now let us assume that ………… after changing the name of the city (Sanaa) to the name (Cairo), and after approximately seventy years, and we obtained an old book, and we found in it a talk about a city called (Sanaa). …Does the author of this old book mean by the city (Sanaa) the city located in Yemen and whose name has now become (Cairo)… Or is it another city located in a place other than Yemen, and say in Iraq or Syria or… Libya?!
This hypothetical example is an answer to the question about why the name of (Al-Masjid Al Haram) was changed to (the Pyramid)
This is why we say that the name of that building located in Misr, “The Pyramid – Pyramids,” is a new, false name that was imposed on the people by an occupying force, and is not the original name.
A new, fake name imposed on people by the occupier
How will we be sure?!
You have logical and realistic ways to make sure of this matter.. How?
When you have something of your own, that is, your property or right alone, you are the owner of the original and true name for this thing, and the name of this thing will be the official name that any other person will call it, even if they speak a different language than you.
Example :
1- Your name is (Magdi), and any person, whether Chinese, Indian, French, or English, will call you (Magdi)… with the same pronunciation.
The owner (you) has imposed the original name of the thing (you) on any other human being.
2- The animal (kangaroo) is an animal that does not live with us, so we do not have a name for this animal, but it exists in one place on earth (Australia), and the inhabitants of that place call it (kangaroo). This name imposed itself on us and we began to call it ( Kangaroo)….with the same pronunciation
The owner (the inhabitants of Australia) imposed the original name of the thing (animal) on any other human being.
This is a natural and logical thing that will happen in reality
Now notice
The residents of Misr, who are the true and original owners of the things, but they rightly name the building by the name (pyramid), assuming that these are the original names for those things in their language, and it is assumed that their names for those things will be the names of any other people, but what is illogical and unrealistic is that the West calls The building is known by the Egyptians as (Pyramid).
The two names are not equal in pronunciation:
The name (Haram) is not equal to the name (Pyramid)… in pronunciation
The real owner (the inhabitants of Misr) could not impose their original names for things, which no one else owns (Haram) on other peoples.
Even if we assume that the name of the building in the past was different, but also the old designations according to Western translations did not impose themselves on any other people on earth.
According to Western translations of Egyptian inscriptions, the ancient Egyptians called (the pyramid) by the name (Mur).
What is the reason that prevented the imposition of Egyptian names on the West?!
The reason is because (the West) was the one who occupied Misr and the region….. Therefore, the occupation reversed the verse. Instead of imposing on them the original names that were on people’s tongues, the West invented false names for the things owned by the Egyptians and imposed them on the residents of Misr and the region. The world, and made its false names its official names, through printer’s books, transactions, documentation, letters, etc., until they became the names circulating in the tongue of all people.
If this same situation happened with us and we found two names with different pronunciations, we have two possibilities:
Or are both names fake, or is one of the names original and the other is fake or made up?
In our case…the two names are all fabricated and fake (Pyramid Pyramid).
Why ?!
If we return to our previous example (about changing the name of the city of Sanaa), and we ask an important question: What if we were a hundred years after the name of the city of Sanaa was changed to Cairo, how would I be sure that its name was (Sanaa) in the people’s tongue in the past and not Cairo?!
This question is similar to our current case, which forces us to ask this question: What is the original name of that building before people’s tongues changed or before Western invaders entered, and how can I be sure that it had names different from the current names?!
In our previous example (about changing the name of Sana’a), we found an old book proving the existence of a city in Yemen called (Sana’a), and we also need an old book in the case of (Al-Haram) proving the existence of original designations before those false designations imposed by the occupier.
This realistic, logical question, and this method, is the essence of the Qur’an’s main speech, and the first revolves around this point about Al-Masjid Al Haram.
how ?
When the Speech of Revelation speaks about the first verse that was revealed to people and says: {And whoever disbelieves, Allah is Free of all worlds}.
The logical question is: What is meant by disbelief in this matter, and what is its relationship to something material in reality? ….. How does a person become a disbeliever in reality?!
Yes, he is declared an infidel by his original name recorded in the book from which the people came
how ?!
This reality that exists around people…there are things and geographical places in it…and it was created by the original, natural language that created this reality…and these people have a religion that has been extending since ancient times, and this religion is the inheritance of their ancestors. The ancients (the first centuries), and their ancestors, wrote the names of places in ancient documents in their original tongue, and it is natural that they are the first, original, endowmental names for geographical places and sacred things that were established from the first day on earth.
We will find these names in the book…in which is the ancient memory of the people and recorded in it is their original memory before the occupier and invader entered.
{That book no doubt guidance for the righteous}
{And We gave Musa the Book after We had destroyed the first generations, as insight for mankind and guidance and mercy so that they might remember.}
Notice……Guidance and mercy that they may remember
{And We gave Musa the Book, but they disagreed about it, and had it not been for a word that had preceded from Your Allah, it would have been decided between them, and they are in doubt about it, doubtful.}
Notice…. there has been a difference in the book….. Therefore it is natural that the difference in the book will change people’s tongue and make their tongue repeat false names for the things around them……. and this explains the reason for all this confusion.
They disbelieved in the book in which were recorded the first words and the first definite names of things on earth.
Therefore, when the revelation speaks about disbelief… it is talking about disbelief in the Book (the ancient book in the example of Sana’a), which contains the rites and rituals of their religion, and the original names of the places and things around them.
For this very important reason, the Qur’an begins his speech with:
{That book no doubt guidance for the righteous} .
And when the speech of revelation says:
{Indeed, the first House established for mankind is the one in Bakkah, blessed and a guidance for the worlds. (96) In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim.
By the phrase (and whoever disbelieves), he means… falsifying the book or hiding it from people
{And when Allah took a covenant from those who were given the Book that you will make it clear to the people and do not conceal it, so they threw it behind their backs and bought it for a small price, so evil is what they bought.}
And when the Speech of Revelation speaks…about the first House that was established for the people in (Bakkah)…and that (whoever disbelieves, Allah is Self-sufficient of the worlds) he means by the worlds……those who know the Book.
{A Book whose verses are explained in detail. We recite it in Arabic for a people who know. The tongue of the one to whom they turn is foreign, and this is a clear Arabic tongue.}
The people who know = the worlds
A book consisting of verses read in an Arabic language, and there are people who know how to read the book (the worlds).
Therefore, it is natural that when arguing about a place or building, the matter requires an original, legitimate, real, and not a fake, written document that confirms its name and confirms its ownership.
The discourse in the Qur’an……….. talks about things that exist in reality, and talks about the original names of those things that are present in the book.
How can a book talk about things in a book and reality at the same time?
Because the book is written with pictorial symbols of things in reality (verses).
Al-Masjid Al Haram has a pictorial icon in the Book (verse), and the Maqam Ibrahim has a pictorial icon in the Book (verse), and the verses are read in clear Arabic.
■ Therefore, when the speech talks about the first house created for people, he says: {In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim}:
{Indeed, the first House appointed for mankind is that which is in Bakkah, blessed and a guidance for the worlds. (96) In it are clear signs, the standing place of Ibrahim. And whoever enters it will be safe. And for Allah is the duty of the people to perform the Hajj to the House, whoever is able to make a way to it, and whoever disbelieves, then Allah is of no need of the worlds. (97) Say, O People of the Book, why do you disbelieve in signs? Allah Allah is a witness to what you do (98) Say, “O People of the Book, why do you turn away from the path of Allah from those who believe? You seek it crookedly while you are witnesses, and Allah is not unaware of what you do. (99) O you who have believed, if you obey a party of those who were given the Book, they will turn you back into disbelief after you have believed. (100) }
– Say, O People of the Book, why do you disbelieve in the verses of Allah in His Book? (The verses = Al-Bayt Al-Haram)
He talks about disbelief in the verses found in the Book (Al-Bayt Al-Haram).
– Say, “O People of the Book, why do you turn away from the path of Allah?”
He talks about how they keep people away from where Al-Bayt Al-Haram actually is.
■ And when the speech talks about the direction of the Qiblah towards Al-Masjid Al Haram, he says: {And those who were given the Book would know that it is the truth} {And if you brought to those who were given the Book every sign} {Those to whom We have given the Book recognize it as they recognize their children}
{We may see the turning of your face in the sky. We will certainly turn you to a direction that pleases you. So turn your face toward Al-Masjid Al Haram, and wherever you are, turn your faces toward it. Indeed, those who were given the Book know that it is the truth from their Allah, and Allah is not unaware of what they do. (144) And if you brought to those who were given the Book every sign, they would not follow your direction, nor are you. Follow their qiblah, and some of them do not follow the qiblah of others. And if you were to follow their desires after the knowledge that has come to you, then you would certainly be among the wrongdoers. (145) To whom We have given the book recognize it as they recognize their own children. Indeed, a group of them conceal the truth while they know it. (146)}
Those who were given the Book know how to read the Book and read the verses of the Book that were written in clear Arabic… And because they know how to read, they know Al-Masjid Al Haram in the Book (the verse)… and they know Al-Masjid Al Haram in reality as they know their children in reality… but they concealed it. The truth and they know
The book is composed of clear and clear pictorial icons (clear verses), and among those verses is (the verse of Al-Masjid Al Haram), and at the same time these verses exist in reality and are embodied in reality.
Therefore, the speech talks about two identical worlds (book and reality).
Did the West come to Misr to occupy it and to forge the document from which Muslims memorized the Holy Qur’an?
Now…look at the image of the article carefully, so you can understand the game more.
Now…we have a book that contains clear pictures of many things in reality.
I believe that the issue has been resolved once and for all… We have a book that contains clear pictures of material things around us… And all we have to do is search for the verse (that resembles a pyramid)…. and find out its name. The original is in the book, and of course it will be in Arabic.
Then we will be sure of the original name before the West occupied Misr and the region, and before they translated the Egyptian inscriptions and forged them…. and before the printer entered.
Can we say that this matter is evidence that definitively and definitively ends the controversy or doubt?!