3/11/2021 0:00:01
The myth of the Hyksos and their invasion of Misr.
If you notice France’s translations of ancient Egyptian inscriptions after their invasion of Misr, you will find that the first thing France did was compile a list of the names of the kings who ruled Misr, and that list includes very many names of kings, and it is not possible to memorize all of them by the average person in Misr, and it requires… Specialized, but the truth is that there are some famous kings on the list, which the average person in Misr or in the region cannot not know, and among those names are:
Khufu Khafre Menkaure
Akhenaten
Hatshepsut
Nefertiti
Tutankhamun
Ramesses
Thutmose
Ahmose
Cleopatra
There are approximately ten names, and each king among these has a well-known story, and that story is present in the imagination of the Egyptian person.
Khufu….. he built a pyramid… and his name is now given to the name of the pyramid
And Akhenaten…..he was the one who united the gods in Misr
And Hatshepsut….she made the most famous trip outside Misr
And Tutankhamun…the owner of the most famous tomb
You often find in Misr today places and buildings bearing the same names as these kings, especially places and buildings that carry a function similar to the story of these kings. For example, if a person wanted to start a travel and tourism agency, he would choose the name of his agency after Hatshepsut because she was the first to undertake the first tourist trip. If there is a person who wants to sell antiques and gifts, he will choose the name Tutankhamun.
Even when current events are taking place or intellectual, historical, and religious issues are being addressed, the names of these kings are often invoked, not the rest of the kings of Misr, to create a context for those events and issues. For example, when talking about the history of monotheism and the personality of Ibrahim, you will find a lot raised. The topic of Akhenaten, and when the issue of women assuming the rule of a country is raised, the topic of Hatshepsut is raised, etc.
The important thing is that among these ancient kings, there is a king named (Ahmose), and perhaps some do not know who Ahmose is. He is one of the kings of ancient Misr, and he is one of the most famous kings of Misr, because he expelled invaders who invaded Misr in ancient times and they were (the Hyksos). .
You will almost hear this name a lot in the coming period, because a television series about it will be shown during Ramadan this year 2021, and it is subject to criticism from followers before it is shown through my reading of some people’s comments on advertising pictures for the series because its features are not Egyptian, due to not choosing a suitable character. To play the role of Ahmose and because of other things.
The truth is that it seems strange to me to produce such a series and show it in Ramadan, but I think that Ramadan has become the best period for showing series, because the volume of watching series in Ramadan is great, and therefore making a series about it seems to me intentional and not a random choice, and I think This character was brought about because of his story, which fits current events, because this king had annexed Anatolia to his kingdom.
Perhaps the series comes as a response to the Turkish series that have become widely watched and are invading our societies, because they create Turkish heroes in people’s imaginations who are linked to religion, the caliphate, and fighting the enemies of the West, so they have begun to attract a large audience, such as (Ertuğul and Mehmed the Conqueror). ….The truth is that these Turkish series are produced by Turkey and target the audience of the region in particular, and their purpose is not artistic work, but rather their purpose is political and propaganda in the first place, that is, they carry a propaganda function for Turkey, in order to improve Turkey’s image, and through this it can influence Soap operas are able to find a foothold, and Turkey’s intervention in the region is facilitated after it was able to gain popularity through its television heroes.
The truth is…. that most Turkish series deal with fictitious stories of fictitious characters, not real stories and characters, and they were written by authors 230 years ago and the printer printed these stories, for the same propaganda role that Turkey is currently playing.
But what about (Ahmose), is he a real character and his story is real?
First, let us review the official history found in the main history sources.
———————–
– Who is Ahmose?
Ahmose I, (meaning son of Yah) was a pharaoh of ancient Misr and the founder of the Eighteenth Dynasty. He was a member of the royal family of Thebes, the son of Pharaoh Seqenenre and brother of the last pharaoh of the Seventeenth Dynasty, King Kamose. During the reign of his father or grandfather, Thebes rebelled against the Hyksos, the rulers of Lower Misr. When he was seven years old, his father was killed, and at about ten when his brother died for unknown reasons, and he ruled for only three years. Ahmose I assumed the throne after his brother’s death, and after his accession he became known as Neb-pity-Ra (Master of Power, Ra). The name Ahmose is a combination of the syllable ‘ah’ and the plural form ‘-muse’. The syllable ‘ah’ refers to Yah.
During his reign, the Hyksos invaded and expelled them from the Delta region, and Thebes regained its sovereignty over all of Misr and its lands previously subject to it from Nubia and Canaan. He reorganized the country’s administration, opened quarries, mines, and new trade routes, and began massive construction projects of a kind that had not been undertaken since the Middle Kingdom. Ahmose’s reign laid the foundations for the New Kingdom, under which the Egyptian state reached its zenith.
– The Ahmose family
Ahmose descends from the Seventeenth Dynasty of Thebes. His grandfather, Seqenenre Taa, and his grandmother, Titi-Shri, had more than twelve children, including Seqenenre and Iahhotep. The brother and sister married according to the traditions of queens in ancient Misr, and they gave birth to Ahmose I, Kames, and many female daughters. Ahmose followed his father’s traditions and married several of his sisters, making his sister Ahmose-Nefertari his main wife.
They had many children, including females, Ahmose-mertamun and Ahmose-Set-Amun, and males, Si-Amun, Amenhotep I, Ahmose-ankh, and Ra-mus, and they may also be the father of Motonfert, who married Tuthmosis I. It seems that Ahmose Ankh was the crown prince of Ahmose I, but he died between the years 17 and 22 of the reign of Ahmose.
Ahmose I was succeeded in ruling by his eldest surviving son, Amenhotep I.
There was no clear dividing line between the Seventeenth Dynasty and the Eighteenth Dynasty. Writing later during the Ptolemaic era, Manetho argued that the eventual expulsion of the Hyksos after nearly a century of presence and the restoration of Egyptian rule over the entire country was an event large enough to justify the beginning of a new dynasty.
– Military achievements of Ahmose
1- Expulsion of the Hyksos
Seqenen Ra was the first to start attacking the Hyksos to fight them and get them out of Misr. He was killed in one of his battles with the Hyksos. Then his son Kames continued the war until he cleansed Upper Misr of the Hyksos. Then Ahmose expelled the Hyksos out of the country. Ahmose went with his armies when he was about 19 years old. He used some modern weapons, such as chariots, and many of the people of Thebes joined the army. He and his armies went to Avaris (currently San al-Hajar), the capital of the Hyksos, and defeated them there. Then he pursued them to Palestine and besieged them in the fortress of Sharuhin, and reunited them there until they surrendered and did not The Hyksos appear later in history. This battle was around 1580 BC.
Ahmose developed the Egyptian army. He was the first to introduce chariots to it, which were used by the Hyksos and were the reason for the Hyksos’ victory over Misr. They were drawn by horses. He also developed military weapons using arrows equipped with a piece of iron on the arrows. Then he began to fight the Hyksos, starting from Upper Misr, and the people rallied around him. So he trained them efficiently until they became strong and skilled warriors. He continued to fight the Hyksos from Upper Misr until he reached the capital of Misr at that time, which the Hyksos established next to the current city of Zagazig. He continued to fight them until they fled to the northern delta, which was behind them, Sinai, and then to Palestine. Ahmose did not return until he was reassured on the eastern borders of Misr. It was safe from them and from their attacks after eliminating them. After the expulsion of the Hyksos, Ahmose arrived with his army in the country of Phenicia. He also attacked Nubia to restore it again to the Kingdom of Misr, whose borders reached the south to the second cataract. Ahmose’s campaigns were depicted in the tomb of two of his soldiers, Ahmose ibn Ebana and Ahmose ibn I toasted
After Ahmose finished his wars to expel the enemies and secure the borders of Misr, he turned his attention to internal affairs, which were dilapidated during the period of the Hyksos occupation. He reformed the tax system, reopened the commercial roads, and repaired the water canals and the irrigation system.
He also rebuilt the temples that had been destroyed and made Thebes his capital, and Amun was the official deity of his time. Ahmose’s rule lasted for a quarter of a century and he died when he was approximately 35 years old. After Ahmose expelled the Hyksos from Misr, he returned to the country in 1571 and headed for internal reform, which made historians consider him the founder of the modern state.
– Mummies of Ahmose
It is believed that Ahmose had two cemeteries, one of which was in Abydos and consisted of a slope temple, a funerary cemetery, and the remains of a pyramid discovered in 1899. It was known that it was his pyramid in 1902 and a pyramid temple. The other was in Thebes and was looted by thieves. His mummy was discovered in 1881 in the Deir el-Bahari cache, along with the mummies of some of the kings of the Eighteenth, Nineteenth and Twenty-One Dynasties. His mummy was identified on June 9, 1886 by Gaston Maspero. The mummy was 1.63 cm tall and had a relatively small face compared to the size of the chest.
——————-
– Who are the Hyksos?
The Hyksos are non-Egyptian nomadic peoples of various origins who entered Misr from the east during a period of weakness during the end of the Middle Kingdom rule, approximately at the end of the Fourteenth Dynasty.
– The origin of the Hyksos
Historical experts did not agree on the origin of the Hyksos. But it is most likely that they have multiple Asian origins, and some of them were Semitic in origin, such that the names of their kings were Semitic Amorite, such as (Saqir Har, Khayan Apophis, and Khamudi), and the Hyksos deities were Semitic, such as (Baal and his maidens), and they moved from Iraq to the Levant and then to Misr. .
They were the rulers of the Fifteenth Dynasty in Misr, but they were of non-Egyptian origins. There are many theories about their ethnic identity.
Most archaeologists and historians tend to consider them a Semitic people coming from Sinai and the Negev, given the names of their rulers. They are Semitic Amorite names, such as Khayan, Sakir Har, Apophis, and Khamoudi, which are considered Semitic Amorite names.
The Hyksos kingdom was concentrated in the eastern Nile Delta and Central Misr, and was limited in area as it never extended to include Upper Misr, which was ruled by Egyptian rulers from Thebes.
– The beginning of the Hyksos occupation of Misr
Manitho says: The Hyksos attacked the land of Misr in huge numbers, which the Egyptians were unable to resist at first. They burned cities, destroyed temples, and captured women and children, after a fierce war with the Egyptians.
The Hyksos took their capital in the eastern Delta, calling it “Zoan,” which was known as Avaris. The Hyksos kingdom was mainly concentrated in the Delta and central Misr.
The Hyksos prevailed gradually, not directly. Lower Misr (in northern Misr) was subject to their direct rule, while Upper Misr (in southern Misr) (Thebes) and Nubia were subject to Egyptian rule.
– Removing the Hyksos from power
During the reign of King Seqenenre II, around 1580 BC, Thebes had reached such a level of power and political standing that a clash with the Hyksos was inevitable. This is what prompted the Hyksos king “Apopi” to make excuses to start the conflict. Seqenenre achieved some success in this conflict, but he was killed in it (1575 BC), in a battle he fought with the Hyksos, and it was noted that there were fatal wounds and injuries in his skull.
He was succeeded on the throne of Thebes by his eldest son, Camus (1560-1570 BC), the last king of the Seventeenth Dynasty. His rule lasted only five years, during which he continued the war initiated by his father. He launched a surprise attack on the Hyksos strongholds adjacent to his borders with army forces and a large Nile fleet. He advanced north until he reached the capital of the Hyksos itself. Ancient texts dating back to his reign speak of his seizure of three hundred boats made of cedar wood, loaded with weapons, gold, silver, and supplies. They also speak of his brutality against the Egyptians who were making peace with the enemy. Meanwhile, his men captured a messenger sent by the Hyksos king to the Emir of Nubia in Kush, Sudan, urging him to attack the country’s lands from the south. Camus did not hesitate to send a force that occupied the Bahariya Oasis, frustrating the plans of his enemies. Then he retreated back to Thebes at the end of the campaign season, after he had eliminated A rebellion by one of his followers. The texts mention the name of Camus and his brother Ahmose – who came after him – at the second cataract in Nubia, which suggests that Camus penetrated into the lands of Nubia until that location.
After the killing of King Seqenenre in his wars against the Hyksos, the Egyptian state of Upper Misr was besieged by the Hyksos to the north and by the Nubian kings to the south, and after the killing of King Kamose, then power passed to Ahmose I, who was only 10 years old, and his mother urged him to train in fighting with the warriors. The ancients, and when he reached the age of 19, some of his men picked up a message sent from the Hyksos king to the kings of Nubia urging them to march on Thebes, which led to Ahmose attacking the Hyksos and defeating them in several battles, and he launched several external attacks on them in their original lands. Ahmose’s efforts were not limited to He then moved to southern Misr and led three major successive campaigns in which he targeted the country of Nubia to discipline its prince who cooperated with the Hyksos against him. Thus, the ancient Egyptian civilization came under the rule of the Egyptian kings of Thebes.
The expulsion of the Hyksos began with a fierce war waged against them by the Egyptians and ended with their final expulsion at the hands of King Ahmose I in the era of the Modern Dynasty, and they did not exist in the history of mankind after that.
– How long did the Hyksos occupation last?
The Hyksos occupation of Misr lasted for about a hundred years, and their stay there was not peaceful. Rather, it was met with many revolutions and resistance from the Egyptian people.
The Hyksos occupation period did not add anything significant to Egyptian history. Rather, it was a period of looting, looting, and vandalism. The Hyksos provided Misr with some of the military technology that was used by the Semitic peoples, including horse-drawn chariots, compound bows, piercing axes, and curved swords.
– After the Hyksos
The Egyptian combat doctrine changed from defense to attack and conquest after it became clear to them that their neighbors from other peoples wanted to occupy their land. Therefore, Misr must be defended by creating a strategic dimension for it in other lands, which made the modern state founded by Kamose, the elder brother of Ahmose, establish a regular, professional and trained army for the first time. In Misr, it happened due to its weapons, which made them expand the borders of Misr and establish the first and largest empire in the world at that time, from Anatolia in the north to the Horn of Africa in the south, and from the Libyan Rocks in the west to the Euphrates in the east. This new army was assisted by combined arms and a naval fleet, because the Egyptian army during the rule of the first pharaohs and even the Hyksos was infantry because the equestrian army was horses and chariots.
Misr’s borders, which included the Kingdom of Kush in northern Sudan, extended to Asia for the first time in the days of foreign conquests as a preventive war against it, until the Euphrates in Iraq in the days of King Thutmose I and his grandson King Thutmose III. He expanded the Egyptian empire to the greatest extent it reached from the borders of Iran in the east to the borders of Tunisia in the west today. From southern Turkey at the hands of King Ramesses II, who defeated the Hittites, to the Horn of Africa to include Ethiopia and Bladpunt.
After the end of the Hyksos rule, the Second Renaissance began in Misr and was the beginning of the dawn of the Egyptian Empire, which knew its greatest extension in the era of the great King Thutmose III, where the Egyptian strategy shifted from defense within Egyptian territory to defense from outside it, so the Egyptian state extended from Iraq to Libya and from Turkey to the fourth cataract in Sudan currently.
——————————
This is the official history written about Ahmose and the Hyksos.
Before discussing this ridiculous history, which is full of scientific, historical and logical errors that many do not pay attention to, we will conduct an imaginary but realistic experiment and ask a general question in it, by imagining that we meet a simple or average cultured Egyptian, and ask him a general, non-specific question: Who is he? The people who invaded ancient Misr?
His answer quickly and without hesitation will be: Hyksos.
The Hyksos is a name that is always present in the imagination of people in Misr or in the imagination of the inhabitants of the region. They are the only people who invaded Misr according to historical records. This name has even been given to any occupation or invasion operations currently taking place by any country or group.
The striking thing is… even though history mentions another invasion of Misr by a non-Egyptian people, the Egyptian will not mention the name of that people, so he does not recall that other invasion. Rather, he does not consider it an invasion, and considers it an authentic part of his history. A great, beautiful and wonderful influence of Misr.
This invasion is the Greek invasion of Misr.
Any Egyptian’s answer to our previous question was supposed to be: The Hyksos and Greece…but what is strange is that the Egyptian’s imagination is occupied only with the Hyksos and does not consider Greece to be invaders.
I wonder what is the reason?
The history that was written and the way this history was written is the reason.
If you notice the way this history written of Misr was formulated, you will find that it is a very intelligent method, and behind the writing of this history of Misr there is an awareness that is very careful in choosing words and very careful in the processes of formulating descriptive sentences.
If you compare the history that was written about the Hyksos who occupied and ruled Misr and the history that was written about the Greeks who occupied and ruled Misr… through vocabulary and descriptive sentences… you will understand the reasons for the Egyptian’s answer to our previous question.
For example
You always find a statement that the Hyksos are not Egyptians, but rather a Semitic race, but you do not find such a statement about Greece, and there is no talk about the ethnic origins of the Greeks as if they were a historically known people.
You always find the word “occupation” to describe the Hyksos’ entry into Misr, but you do not find such a word to describe the Greek occupation of Misr.
You always find in history the word “revolution” to describe the actions of any Egyptian towards the Hyksos, but you do not find such a word to describe the Egyptian’s reaction towards the Greeks..
You always find in history the word (hatred of an enemy) to describe the Egyptian’s feeling towards the Hyksos and their kings, but you find the word (love and reverence) to describe the Egyptian’s feeling towards the Greeks and their kings.
Also, although history says that Greece invaded Misr, ancient Egyptian history did not mention the name of an ancient Egyptian king until he expelled Greece from Misr.
The heroism of the Egyptians appeared when it came to occupying the Hyksos, but those heroism disappeared among the Egyptians when it came to occupying Greece.
The ancient history that was written about Misr takes the Greeks into consideration, compliments them, favors them, deals with them as if they were Egyptians, makes the Egyptians love them and submit to them, and makes the Egyptian respect him.
What is the purpose of writing this history in this way?
The history that was written in this way, its main purpose is to create two historical imaginations in the mind of the Egyptian, in order for the Egyptian’s answer to be that quick answer, and to make him deliberately ignore the Greek occupation, or in another way to create for him two views in reading his reality today.
how ?
Because the history that was written about Misr and the region still includes two other invasions of Misr, and they are still connected to the Egyptian reality until today.
The main purpose of the story of the Hyksos and the Greeks is to create two models in the Egyptian’s imagination for reading his reality, so that he can project them, with all their vocabulary, descriptions, and wording, onto his reality linked to the two other invasions that are identical to the two models in his imagination.
The other two invasions are…the Islamic conquest, and Napoleon’s campaign.
The Greeks are the ancestors of the French, and the West are the inheritors of Greek civilization.
The Hyksos are a Semitic race. As we know, the term Semites includes Arabs, and therefore they are the ancestors of the Arabs.
Then the process of conformity will occur in the imagination of the Egyptian. France is represented by the Greek invasion, which the Egyptian does not consider an occupier, but rather loves and considers to be an authentic Egyptian, and the Arabs are represented by the Hyksos invasion, which the Egyptian does not consider Egyptian, but rather hates, considers him an enemy, hates him, revolts against him, and expels him.
You find this matter clearly, in the mentality of many of the elites in Misr, especially those who are not of Egyptian origin, but rather those who are descended from the remnants of the Turkish occupation and from the Greeks brought by Muhammad Ali Bachel and other remnants of Napoleon’s campaign, and others who also love Reading French translations of Egyptian inscriptions, you will find their minds matching the history written about the Hyksos and Greece.
There are, for example, two famous models: Anis Mansour and Tawfiq al-Hakim. They were famous for those ruptures that Napoleon’s campaign was able to create in the character of the Egyptian, through this history that was written for Misr and which produced these realistic models, after they had been filled in. The Egyptian mind has two hypothetical models…and other elites, especially those who call themselves Egyptologists.
the important
You can notice the reflection of these two hypothetical models on the Egyptian reality, in which there are two other models. The Egyptian reality preserves them… because the Egyptian today is still an extension of Napoleon’s conquest, and at the same time he is Arab and Muslim, meaning he is still an extension of the impact of the Islamic conquest.
Therefore, you find many of those who talk a lot about the Hyksos and the heroics of Ahmose, linking the matter to the Islamic conquests, and your head is always drowned in the Arab and Islamic invasion of Misr, for there is no talk of it except the Arab invasion of Misr, and that Misr was not Arab and its inhabitants were not Muslims. She worshiped Isis and Osiris, and that Misr was called Kmit, and nothing occupied him in his life except that Misr was called Kmit, and its original name was Kmit, and Misr is a Semitic Arabic name, and there was a strong hatred for the name Misr, and for Arabic.
At the same time, you find many people who talk about Greece and the history of Greece in Misr and their kings linking the matter to Napoleon’s invasion, and your head is always flooded with the impact of Napoleon’s invasion of Misr and its transfer of modernity. There is no talk of him except the French modernity of Misr, and that Napoleon was the one who introduced modernity. To Misr, and that if it were not for France, Misr would not have known the ancient civilization that the Arabs came and hid, and a strange love for France and the West, and a love for Napoleon as well. He never calls his invasion an occupation, but rather a modernization of Misr. Misr is beautiful with the French, and French is the language of culture and science. literature .
You even find that the history that was written for the Greek rule of Misr is identical in its vocabulary with the history that was also written for Napoleon’s invasion…… The modern history that was written for Misr calls it Napoleon’s campaign and does not call it Napoleon’s invasion, and it also calls the French occupation as (the Mandate or Colonialism). He treats Napoleon as a hero and a wonderful character.
So we are faced with neuro-linguistic programming of the imagination, to create a mentality for man in Misr that makes him live inside his imagination, and prevents him from reading reality correctly, so that the Egyptian continues within the project brought about by Napoleon’s invasion, and is unable to understand it or get out of it, and then direct him in a way that is in line with it. With the interests of France.
Let’s get back to our topic:
Is Ahmose a real person, and were the Hyksos a people who invaded Misr?
There was no king in Misr named Ahmose, and there was no people called the Hyksos who invaded Misr, and France invented for the Egyptians a people called the Hyksos so that the Egyptians would forget the real invasion of the French, who invaded Misr with the largest army in the modern era led by Napoleon. And to prevent the Egyptian from thinking in his imagination of conjuring up any Egyptian hero who could expel the Greeks and the French, as they are the real enemy that occupied the reality in which he is now.
Firstly, note the French translation of the two inscriptions in the picture, the first in which the name of King Ramesses is written, and the second in which the name of King Ahmose is written.
Of course, if you notice, you will find that the two frames are similar in two symbols, and the two symbols in the first frame are French pronunciations (mes) and in the second frame (mousse).
We have spoken in many previous articles that in the first frame these symbols are pronounced (we heard), and the second frame is also pronounced (listen).
The truth that many Egyptians do not realize because of the massive washing that was done on them, which created within many of them an inflated self that loves illusion, is that the inscriptions of Misr are not inscriptions of heroism, glories, boasting, and wars, but rather they are ancient religious inscriptions, and it is the first writing written by the first man. in Earth .
There was no one living in all the earth except in Misr, and the beginning of man was in Misr, the first beginning in Misr, and the rest of the world was completely empty of people, and from Misr the first man came out and immigrated and settled the rest of the earth until America and Japan. .
that is the true
The important question is: How is it possible that a place like Misr is the beginning of the first man on earth and that there is a writing in it that is the writing of the first man on earth, at a time when there was no other human living in the rest of the earth, and then history tells us that in that time a person appeared and became A king who united Misr and fought wars against other countries in the land and against other peoples, and in the entire land there was no human being living in it until the Egyptian went to fight him?
If a king really appeared in Misr fighting other peoples, would those peoples be the people of elephants, the people of wolves, the people of lions, the people of crocodiles, and the people of eagles?
Did you know that the sword does not have a symbol in the inscriptions of Misr, and no ancient trace of a single sword was discovered in Misr, and no tomb of a king was discovered in which there was a sword, and no picture of him was found in the inscriptions of Misr, and even military armor was never recorded or discovered But the only thing mentioned in Egyptian inscriptions for which there is a symbol is arrows, but not war arrows, but hunting arrows.
Do you understand this point?
Let us analyze this history to discover the extent of the absurdity, absurdity, errors, illogicality and deception contained within it.
– All people left Misr, so how could a different, non-Egyptian people appear and invade their mother Misr and kill their brothers?
– Misr did not know swords or shields, so how would there be an army of Lahmose to fight with them?
– If the history of Ahmose was recorded in Egyptian inscriptions, then what is the benefit of mentioning his story from one source named (Manetho).
– Why does all this history that was written interact with the current borders of Misr drawn by Sykes-Picot, and it was a recent awareness of history books?
– Why did the Hyksos who invaded Misr disappear from all over the world and have no trace of them to this day, while the Greeks who invaded Misr are still present today?
– How was history able to preserve the names of geographical locations and determine their locations today on the map despite the absence of modern maps in ancient times with their names on them?
– How was a Greek named Manetho able to talk about Ahmose even though there was a time interval between them of 1,300 years, and it is not possible for an ancient Egyptian to maintain a living memory of this king, unless his story was recorded in inscriptions, and Manetho must have been able to read Egyptian inscriptions? Why, then, did Maneton not write a book on how to read Egyptian inscriptions, because it would have saved France the trouble of making Champollion to decipher the inscriptions?
—————
Who is this Maniton?
Maniton is an Egyptian historian from the city of Samanoud, Gharbia Governorate.
He was a priest during the reign of King Ptolemy II, around 280 BC, who commissioned him to write the history of ancient Misr. Manetho took this task upon himself and relied in his writings on the documents left by the Egyptian civilization, which were contained in the document storage houses in the temples, in addition to everything he found at hand. In his hands were documents from government departments and others. The original copy of Manetho’s history was lost during the fire at the Library of Alexandria, and only excerpts from this history were transmitted by some historians, including the Jewish historian Josephus in his book “The Response to Ebion,” in which he tried to defend the Al-Yahoud, stating that they were The Hyksos who invaded Misr after the collapse of the Middle Kingdom, and among the historians is the African historian Julius, who quoted in his book some of the names of the kings that were recorded in the original history of Manetho.
————
If you search through all the history that was written except for Misr or elsewhere, you will find a prominent observation, which is… History always talks about buildings that were built or any antiquities that were manufactured, but history soon tells you that those antiquities disappeared as a result of a disaster or burning. Or destroyed by an external invasion.
The huge Lighthouse of Alexandria… disappeared due to an earthquake, and no trace of it remained.
And the huge Library of Alexandria… disappeared due to a fire.
And the huge Hanging Gardens of Babylon… disappeared due to an earthquake
And the Library of Wisdom in Baghdad… was burned and thrown into the river by the Mongols.
Many things are like this, until you believe that they existed but disappeared, and this is the way virtual worlds are written. A history of a new era must be written that erases the imaginary traces of the previous era… and this is Minton’s story.
Where are these Minton manuscripts?
It disappeared due to the fire of Alexandria, but there were those who transmitted some of his writings, such as Josephus.
Josephus……. funny
He did not do anything. He just took the name (Youssef) and added the syllable (ws) to it, and you came up with the name (Josephus), and I can take the name (Yaacoub) and add the syllable (ws) to it and it will become (Jacobus)
The topic is not difficult at all, until it convinces me that a person has a name from the names of the Qur’an (Youssef) and adds the Greek syllable (ws) to it.
finally
If you look at the history that was written for us, you will find a very important note, many things that have recently entered our knowledge or actual events that took place with us in a relatively recent period. You will find that the writer of history wrote such events but put them in an ancient date in a calendar, so that confusion occurs in them. People’s minds believe that these events happened with us, so that an ancient, historical origin for those things is created so that we do not know that they are modern, and so that they forget the modern thing.
For example….if a person named (Khaled) came to us 200 years ago and stole a book, then history also mentions that there was a person named Khaled who came from a distant place 1000 years ago and stole books.
Therefore……… When the Turks made a Turkish calligrapher named (Othman) draw the Qur’an in a new script, history told us that there was a caliph named (Othman) who compiled the Qur’an.
And when history tells you through Manetho:
“The Hyksos, 3000 years ago, attacked the land of Misr in huge numbers, which the Egyptians were unable to resist at first. They burned cities, destroyed temples, and took women and children captive, after a fierce war with the Egyptians.”… So be sure that they are describing to you the events of the modern invasion of Misr by Napoleon. And its soldiers, in which they practiced burning, destruction, killing and slaughter… so that you forget the reality of this modern invasion.
O Egyptian……. There was no people called the Hyksos to invade Misr. The only invasion that took place in Misr was the invasion of the French led by Napoleon.
O Egyptian…. Never forget Napoleon’s invasion of France, never forget the real reality…. And do not let them laugh at you with imaginary stories that make you lose and forget the real reality.