2018-09-12T09:35:00-08:00
Let’s go back to Taha Hussein.
Taha Hussein did not use the skeptical approach in a good and comprehensive way. He focused on inherited doubt and limited himself to a literary text and did not go far into historical texts and geography. Rather, he also did not go beyond the West’s heritage. He did not doubt the Western history narrative of the region, nor did he doubt the possibility of the existence of a satanic entity in the West that carried out the greatest historical deception and worked hard over many centuries to falsify the history of the region.
Where was the difficulty in Taha Hussein’s thinking?
● Taha Hussein believes that Mecca, that small spot, is responsible for the Arabic language and is the reason why the language of the entire region is Arabic, including Yemen. And since most of the Mu’allaqat poets are from Yemen, it is impossible for the poems to be in the language of the people of Yemen, because the inscriptions of Yemen confirm that they speak A different Himyarite language… But why did he not doubt according to his method…and the question arises: Why are the inscriptions of Yemen not forged, for example?
● What if the real Kaaba was in Yemen?
If it had been in Yemen, perhaps Taha Hussein could have settled the issue once and for all, not Taha Hussein but the entire region, and the fate of the region would not have become like this.
Because in the past there was a satanic mind… If the Kaaba remained in Yemen, the game of forging the inscriptions of the region would be exposed, because at that time it would be logical and assumed that the inscriptions of Yemen would be in eloquent Arabic because it is the environment of the Qur’an, and if they were forged, the game would be exposed very easily.. So whoever Where did the Qur’an come from? Also, because the Kaaba in Yemen is mentioned very clearly in the inscriptions of the region, then it would be natural to say that there was one belief and one language, and it would then be difficult to falsify the inscriptions of the rest of the region.
What is the solution ?
That satanic mind thought… There is no solution except to move the Kaaba to a different place devoid of inscriptions and monuments, a new place and not mentioned in the inscriptions of the region, until the Qur’an and Islam become a new event as if it emerged from a space that has no connection to the region at all, a situation Purely new, a new phenomenon.
Because, as I said, if the Qur’an came from a place full of inscriptions and antiquities, it is natural that there would be an ancient historical extension of the language of the Qur’an and the religion of the Qur’an, and then we will be certain that these antiquities are in an Arabic language, and that the doctrine of the region’s inscriptions must have an extension with the religion of the Qur’an.
That satanic mind thought…..the Kaaba will be in a place to which there is no ancient reference in the region’s inscriptions, a purely new situation, then the region’s inscriptions will be easily forged.
That satanic mind thought……. We will create a new time for the region that will be born from Mecca…and we will eliminate the time of the region completely. We will overthrow the time of the region…a time in which the people of the region will feel that they are a new phenomenon that has no historical extension at all, a phenomenon that has no relation to the inscriptions of the region. We will create a historical narrative for them that speaks About a time before Islam, a novel full of idol worship and gods, and Islam will be a new idea in their minds.
That satanic mind thought… Mecca is the solution…an area devoid of any inscriptions, monuments, and barren… It will be the story of the new era for the region.
That satanic mind thought… After we move the Kaaba, we will flood them with books full of stories of worshiping gods and many, many thousands of idols, and we will tell them that they exist and are mentioned in the inscriptions of the region.
That satanic mind thought…if the Kaaba remained in Yemen, it would be natural for everyone to believe that there is an extension of the faith in the past and not a new situation.
Yes
If the Yemeni Kaaba (the Khalsa) had continued in Yemen, the region would never have fallen into the imaginary, satanic time of Rome. We now live within the time of Rome, which was created by a satanic mind.
If it had continued in Yemen, this current historical and religious dispute would never have occurred in the region.
If it continues in Yemen… Shaytan’s great game will be revealed.
{He said, “By Your might, I will mislead them all (82) except Your sincere servants among them. (83)} [p. 82-83]
{And they plotted their plan, and with Allah is their plan, even if it was their plan, mountains would move away from it} [Ibrahim: 46]
———————–
We will try to search for the real Kaaba in the opposite way. how ?
We will try to search for it in the Greek myths that they wrote about the region, and we will try to capture the truth after dismantling the structure of those myths… This method will lead us to present another case that closely matches the case of the religious time gaps that we talked about in our previous articles. I preferred to choose it specifically and link it to our topic about Mecca and Jerusalem, so that it would be a basis on which we can confidently build our imagination because it is easier and not thorny because it is not linked to different religious narratives. This case is about three legendary narratives for a specific place and for me it also represents three time gaps.
But before that, the myth must be defined
What is the legend?
I would like to draw attention to a very important point, that the word legend that appears in the Holy Qur’an does not mean stories at all. The word “legends of the ancients” in the Qur’an has a completely different meaning, and for this reason I thought of replacing it with another word to prevent confusion, but the matter would take a long time and I preferred to keep it because It will match the meaning for many.
I have my own definition of myth, but I prefer to write it at the end of the article, after we get to know the common knowledge of the meaning of myth, and follow the current approach to understanding myths.
Historian Ahmed Daoud says about the legend: The legend is a true record of specific historical events that have often been subject to improvements in language, style, and poetic imagination, while definitely preserving the historical material to be recorded. It is subject to research and scrutiny before it is adopted and preserved in temples as an essential part of the heritage that plays educational, pedagogical, and religious roles. . Ancient myths reflect real historical events, and only the researcher and historian must know how to extract historical material from them.
As for a myth: a popular tale created by the imagination that varies in intellectual and taste levels from a backward environment to a more civilized environment. It is transmitted by people across generations, adding to it and subtracting from it, to eventually emerge as a mostly oral popular production.
There are those who define the myth as a story linked to ancient gods, and that the characters of the myth were essentially ancient gods worshiped by humans, and it is a story told by the gods. As for Strauss, he says that the myth consists of three things: structure, symbols, and meaning.
As for the thinker Lukacs, he presented to us a new concept, which is superstructures, by which he means: the higher forms of consciousness represented by (religion, mythology, and art), which cannot be removed from any society at all, and these superstructures give their presence to reality with every transformation. Or a development in the infrastructure of society that takes many different forms over time.
Accordingly, myth is a superstructure, a higher consciousness, that cannot be removed from any society. Myth continues to have an influence throughout history, but the myth can take on a new form other than the first form, while the myth retains its basic structure (structure).
Myth is like language…a living organism that develops with time. Just as the vocabulary and structures of the language develop while retaining the rule, the symbolism, characters, and scenarios of the story develop while maintaining the original structure.
Can you explain more?
We will try to get to know the legend more through an example that talks about three legends that take place in one place, an ancient legend, and we will see how it has undergone transformations throughout history while its basic structure remains.
The legend is the legend of the founding of the city of Carthage.
Important note: This legend was transferred from Greece, and we do not know if this belief really existed, because there is nothing in our heritage and local archives that confirms this, and there are no inscriptions that confirm it, and we can say that we do not know the original truth… because there is no Interest in archaeological excavation. However, despite this, I believe that the form of the initial myth will not be difficult to imagine because it will be similar to the rest of the myths and religions of the ancient region, and the closest to it will be the myth of Isis, Osiris, and Horus.
1- The legend talks about a queen named Elissa, the daughter of the king of Tyre. She quarreled with her brother, who also killed her husband, so she decided to leave her homeland with her treasures, and after a long journey, she anchored the ships on the coast of North Africa in present-day Tunisia. She decided to establish a city and called it Carthage, or “Qarat Hadasht.” The first legend written by Greek historians says that Alyssa negotiated with the ruler of the country to grant her land on which to build her city, but the king refused to give her more than the area of an ox hide, so Alyssa accepted that to the astonishment of her companions, but the princess was harboring a smart plan that would enable her to reach the city of Carthage. So Alisa cut the bull’s skin into long, fine strips that surrounded the area of the plateau. Then the king of the country asked to marry Alisa. Since the princess was determined to remain faithful to the memory of her husband and fearing that her refusal would bring destruction to the city, she chose to commit suicide, thus preserving at the same time her covenant with her husband and the city. Which I founded.
This is the legend as transmitted by the Greeks, but note the legend of a queen whose husband is killed by her brother, almost like in the story of Isis, Osiris, and Horus. She leaves for a place and lines a city with the skin of a bull, then commits suicide because she refused to marry the ruler of the country out of loyalty to her husband.
Now let us move on to the same legend, but in a different guise, and it tells about the founding of Africa (Tunisia).
2- The legend tells of a Himyarite king named Africa. He went to Africa, conquered it, killed its king, and populated it with his Berber people. Tunisia was named Africa after him, which is the same name as Tunisia in ancient times.
Now notice with me how the legend has become. In this legend, we are talking about a king, not a queen, and he is from the Tunisia-Africa line and is named after him. This time, he did not die or commit suicide, but rather killed the ruler of the country.
Notice the correspondence between the symbols of the first and second legend
● The hero of the first legend is a queen, and the hero of the second legend is a king
● We are still in the same place and geography, Carthage and Tunisia
● There is a queen in the first legend and there is a king in the second legend.
● The queen is the one who ruled Carthage, and the king is the one who ruled Tunisia (Africa).
But the difference between the two legends
● In the first legend, the name of the city was not after the queen, unlike the second legend.
● In the first legend, the queen asks the ruler of the country for land, and the land is taken away by trickery, and in the second legend, the land is taken away by force.
● In the first myth, the queen commits suicide and remains the ruler of the country, and in the second myth, the king does not die, but rather the ruler of the country is killed.
● The last difference is the original homeland of the hero of the legend. The original homeland of the queen in the first legend is Tire Lebanon, and the original homeland of the king in the second legend is the land of Himyar.
But there is a note: Note with me that the name Africais appears to be a Greek word, as it is not a common name, especially since the letter F is a definite article in the Greek language, and the letter (S) is at the end of the word, which is common in the Greek language.
This makes us ask an important question: Did our heritage consist mostly of translations from Greek books, and did we in ancient times translate the word (phoenix) from Greek writings into the word (donkeys)?
Now let us move on to the same legend, but in a different guise from the previous two legends, and it tells about the founding of the city of Kairouan.
3- The legend tells about the Islamic conquest of Africa and the story of the leader Uqba bin Nafi, who conquered Africa and the birds and animals left after he called on Allah and laid the border on the city of Kairouan.
Then Ibn Khaldun came and added to the legend the story of Uqba with the ruler of that region, Kusaila, when he ordered him to slaughter the ram himself. Kusaila became angry, so correspondence began with the Franks and they showed him the opportunity. He gathered an army and followed Uqba and his companions. Then a battle took place between the two at the city walls, and Uqba was killed on the spot. A lazy hand in a one-on-one duel.
Now notice the similarities between the third myth and the previous two myths.
● In the first legend, there is a queen, in the second there is a king, and in the third there is a military leader who holds religious veneration.
● We are still revolving around the geography of Tunisia…….. In the first legend, the city of Carthage is planned, in the second the city of Africa, and in the third, the city of Kairouan is planned.
● With an addition from Ibn Khaldun, he made the legend different. He says that Uqba asks the ruler of the country to surrender, and in the first case, she asks the ruler of the country for land.
● In the first legend, she takes the skin of a bull, and in the third legend, the ruler of the country is asked to slaughter a ram, and the ruler of the country wipes his face with the ram’s skin.
● In the first myth, the queen dies by suicide, refusing the ruler’s request to marry her, and in the third myth, the leader dies at the hands of the country’s ruler.
● There is a note: Notice how the name of the Himyarite king Afriqis matches the name of the city of Kairouan, but in reverse
Africa = Riq (because the letter F is a definite article and the S is a meaningless addition in the Greek language)
The inverse of raq is qir
Kairouan = Rayq = Qir (alif and nun are also suffixes found in the dialects of the region in the past, such as shamsan, which is the sun)
There is a note about the third myth:
The legend was progressing quietly and did not arouse anger or discontent. As an obstacle throughout history, a man seemed to have a moral character, until Ibn Khaldun came and gave the legend an ugly and provocative form, completely deliberately. Ibn Khaldun wanted to create a provocative history and link it to Europe in many aspects. He gave Rome a moral side by helping Kusayla, who was insulted and belittled as a legendary hero. Then Ibn Khaldun gave the character Kusayla a new title, which is the European (Kasayla al-Urbi), a title that came from The word Europe… European… As for the other point, which is the most important to me, it borrows many things from Homer’s Greek Iliad…. He borrows from it the duel between Hector and Achilles, and turns it into a duel between Uqba and Kasila, and no one needs intelligence to know that Kasila is nothing but Achilles and Uqba is nothing but Hector… Even the name Ksila is close in pronunciation to the name Achilles, (Ksila = Achilles), even in the way he wipes the ram’s skin, he borrows from Homer’s Iliad the way Achilles wipes his face with the dress of the friend who Hector killed, a sign that he will take revenge on Hector.
This makes us ask an important question: Did Ibn Khaldun at that time believe that the city of Toroada was the same as the city of Carthage, so that he borrowed from Homer’s Iliad? Even the pronunciation of the two cities was similar as well. (Carthage = Troy) Knowing that Herodotus spoke in his history about the inhabitants of that country and that they spoke about their origins coming from Troy, or was Ibn Khaldun only transferring historical narratives from Greek books?
● There remains a very important point in common between the three legends, which is Greece. In the first legend, we find that it was transferred from Greece. As for the second legend, it talks about a Himyarite king whose name appears to be a Greek name. In the third legend, we also find features of Greek translations.
As if they were novels that came out of the world and mythology of Greece
As for the differences and inconsistencies between the third myth and the previous two myths
● The original home of the hero of the third myth is Mecca, the first is Tyre, and the second is Himyar.
Now let’s dissect the three myths
According to our previous definition of myth, the three myths must originate from a previous myth linked to ancient gods, and the characters in the three myths are multiple images of ancient gods.
But if the three legends are of the same origin, how do we explain the lack of similarity between them in many aspects?
When we review the three myths, we will find that the first world seems more fantastic. Then we move to the second myth and the fantasy becomes less, until we move to the third and it seems less fantastic. How do we explain this?
Does the passage of time make the events of the story more distant from reality, making it more fantastic? If so, then we believe that the passage of time makes the percentage of distortion greater and greater. Basically, it is just one legend.
When we dissect myths, we will find that they consist of the structure, symbols, meaning, and message of the myth. The structure of the myth is (belief), while the symbols of the myth are composed of three:
1- Establishment of the city
2- Population migration there
3 – The origin of the doctrine of the permanent city
The legend did not agree on the origin, so let us try to reread the three legends and correct them.
The first myth transmitted by the Greeks talks about the origin of the queen from Tire in Lebanon, but let us adopt the legend that is closest in time, about the original homeland of King Africa, which is Himyar. Can we put Tire in Himyar? . Of course, it is possible, because there are also pictures in Yemen. Here we have reached a correspondence in origin between the first and second legend, about the origin of the founder, and about the first homeland of the city’s inhabitants, which is Yemen. There is a note when I say the origin of the population, I mean the mother geography that The faith was born there.
This means that the faith of the inhabitants of that region will always be in parallel with Yemen, as the source of the faith comes from Himyar.
Now notice how the third legend links the founder of the city of Kairouan with the faith, and how this man became revered in North Africa. Notice how the legend of Uqba proceeds in a manner consistent with the first and second myths and is not a deviation. The founder of the city is always linked to the faith, so everyone who builds As he plans the city, he establishes a new time for the belief, and every time comes with the destruction of the first time and the destruction of the first building.
There is another very important point in the three myths, which is the symbolism of the ruler of the country before the entry of the gods. Many read the myths with a logical mind, and the myth is never read according to logic. I often read from the writings of some people about a myth from Alyssa to the Himyarite king to Uqba, they introduce appendages to it other than It is true, for example, they write that the ruler of the country in the legend of Alisa is a barbarian king, on the basis that there were residents in that region and they had a ruler, although the legend does not say it, but they insert this thing into the legend to create a division between the newcomer and the original, and despite the fact that The legend of the Himyarite king who killed the king of Africa says that he settled Berbers there.
The ruler of the country in the legend of Elissa is only a symbol of a different Allah, and since she is a different Allah, some will say that there must be a people who worship her, and this is not the case. Rather, she is a virtual Allah indicating the victory of the true gods over the virtual gods. This matter is similar to the ritual of placing the Qur’an in deserted places to expel the jinn that inhabit them, and this matter is talked about in the third legend. When he entered Aqaba, Tunisia, he called upon the beasts and animals in the name of Allah to leave the land… and they actually fled from that land. The ancients assumed that mountains and valleys were gods, and the legend of Elissa talks about a large plateau around which Carthage was built. The plateau was the ruler of the country.
The ancients believed that the new earth had gods ruling it, and victory over those gods was achieved by making that land their true faith, and parts of the true gods must be distributed over the entire earth. In the Egyptian myth of Osiris, parts of his body are distributed over the entire soil of Misr, meaning that the belief It will be one throughout that land, which is the doctrine of Osiris. This same method and story occurred in the legend of Elissa when she performed a trick and divided the bull’s skin into small parts and gained a large geographical area. The bull is the symbol of the new gods, and as we know that the bull is a symbol. It is ancient and is present in all religions of the ancient region, and to demonstrate that the new faith will spread over the entirety of that large geographical area.
The conquerors of North Africa in Islamic history were none other than the people who came with the Himyarite king, and they are the same people who came with Queen Alisa. But the legend changes its form and evolves to take on a different scenario and characters, but it carries the same structure.
We are faced with three myths, which have the same structure and tell about the faith, but they take different forms.
Was historical Carthage the same as Kairouan today? Were historians mistaken in their belief that Carthage was in another place?
Without the slightest doubt I have… Historical Carthage is nothing but the current city of Kairouan, and what is called the tomb and shrine of Uqba ibn Nafi is essentially an ancient religious place…an ancient superstructure in that region…older than 1,500 years, but the new history narrative tried to give it a new form and a new image. His holiness is very old and he linked this legendary man to the building of this historic city, and this city that is symbolic of the faith at all times.
But who is Uqba and what is his relationship to this ancient goddess?
Kairouan has another name (Cyrene). I believe that the name came from the name Cyrene (in an old dialect)…which is the name of the phoenix (eagle).
Cyrene in Libya is said to be the home of Saint Simon of Cyrene. Notice how the name Cyrene became Cyrene…and a Libyan told me that it was called Cyrene, so the saint was given that name.
This means that Cyrene is the same as Kairouan… This also means that Cyrene in Tunisia is originally Cyrene… but it is in a different language and dialect, the pronunciation changes, and this thing is known in ancient and current dialects in replacing the last letter nun for definition.
Cyrene……. Qur-Yana…….(Libya)
Gourtaj….. Gour-Taj…..(Tunisia)
Cordoba… Cordoba… (Spain)
Granada… Qor-Nata…(Spain)
Kairouan……. Qir-Wan……(Tunisia)
Qarawiyyin……Qor-Wyin….(Morocco)
They all come from one name… Its origin is Cyrene… the phoenix… the osprey. .
All of them are cities named after the phoenix bird, which was revered by the ancients. Every city they build is essentially a nest for the phoenix…so the city is a nest, so Kairouan is originally an eagle’s nest.
Now I can confirm…that Uqba is nothing but an osprey in a Greek translation, and I can also assert conclusively that the battle that took place between Uqba and Kusaila is the same battle, according to Western translations, that took place between the Allah Horus (the falcon) and the Allah Set (the dog). ) In the religion of ancient Misr, but in a more advanced and modern way (different decor).
Uqba is actually an osprey (phoenix).
Queen Alisa = King Himyari = Conqueror Uqba = Phoenix birds
And Carthage = Africa = Kairouan = the first beginnings of human settlement
Therefore, the original domicile of the heroes must be the same
Sur = Himyar = Mecca = center of faith
Is current Mecca the center of the ancient faith?
The center of faith must be in Himyar
It must be Bakkah in Yemen
Why do I say Yemen?!
But before that… I must talk about a topic that has become necessary and the right time to talk about it has come.
We live today in a world whose concepts are completely different from the concepts of the past. We are witnessing a shift in many concepts that the ancients did not know. The concept of patriotism and political borders did not exist in ancient times, in a time when the land was one… and the people were one nation… and they did not know the logic of I. I am Egyptian and I am Iraqi or I am Syrian or I am Yemeni… because these names did not exist in the past… they are names that we called them in a relatively recent time.
I say this…. Because the matter has become like a disease… There is a competition, a duel, and a race in history who glorifies the history of his country… and history was written by and participated in by all the peoples of the region in the first place, but because our international situation imposed political borders on us, and without it, the region would have been a single political geography, and this It made us believe that history was written only in one place without any external influence…but the truth is otherwise…because the entire region emerged from one history…and the region has been a single cultural unit since ancient times.
The history of Yemen was not written by the Yemenis, but by all peoples… because peoples migrated from that history, and likewise the history of Misr was not written by the Egyptians, because the Egyptians migrated from one place to another place to write another history. And so…we are talking about a very distant time.
All the history of the region is your history…. But until today, no one has understood this point… Colonialism created cultural and knowledge gaps around the region that caused a state of pathological historical anxiety.
If we do not understand this…we will not emerge on the path to a true understanding of history.
History is not for show, but for knowledge and understanding of our cultural, cognitive, religious and social context, because searching for illusions will not benefit anyone. Selflessness and the search for the truth is what will make a person more aware and stronger every day he is born.
If the phoenix represents a beautiful cultural symbolism for some, especially Greek lovers and lovers of the story of the two phoenixes in Greek writings, then we must know that the phoenix is symbolic of self-denial, the beginning, and new birth. So why do we not deny ourselves in order to be born again? Why do we not get rid of A satisfactory reading of history that does not search for knowledge, truth, and natural context, but rather searches for glories and illusions that we created civilization. Why don’t we just search for the truth anywhere… so that we can rest.
Why don’t we release the phoenix and break its captivity, because it has become very tired from the long journey made by the inflated self… Let’s let it return to its original nest… Yes, there is an original nest for it… Let’s let it return to its original nest… Somewhere in the region there is a nest… Let us help him search for this place, so that he can return to it, until he burns himself and comes out from under the ashes announcing a new birth, and returns to us strong in real time to break the dirty Zionist time prison… and perhaps a new prophet will be born from under the ashes. .
So let us go to the myth of the phoenix and try to discover the original home of the phoenix. In the Latin dictionary, it is said that the phoenix is a bird that lives in the Arabian Peninsula, and in the heritage narratives recorded in Arabic books, it is said that the phoenix is a legendary bird that lives in the south of the Arabian Peninsula and guards trees. Frankincense.
Therefore, it is very, very logical that the center of the faith (the Kaaba) is the nest of this legendary bird and it will be in the south of the island, because it is the home of frankincense trees and not in present-day Mecca.
In the area of the good trees (Dhul-Khalasa) = Thebes = Gardens of Eden
Now… after all these facts, I must tell you my own definition of the myth:
In my view, myths are nothing but very realistic preliminary texts, and the Greek devil and the West have deliberately distorted them throughout time, and at every time new versions of that distortion are produced.
Finally…the peoples of the region have lost their memory, their self-knowledge, their identity, their knowledge, and their secrets. There was a project organized by mean and satanic forces working for this mission, while the peoples of the region live with positive expectations and never imagined that There may be a force in this world that can withstand all this evil, crime, and ugliness. She had never imagined that there was a satanic entity that could be incarnated in the form of a human or a political entity.
And this satanic entity… He is behind manipulating the geography of primary religious texts, and he is also behind creating new holy places to serve his satanic projects… ancient and modern.
{And those who have made a mosque out of harm and disbelief and to divide among the believers and as a shelter for those who waged war against Allah and His Messenger before, and they will swear, “We only desire the best.” Allah bears witness that they are indeed liars. (107) Never stand therein a mosque that was founded on piety from the first day. It is more deserving that you stand therein. There are men who love to purify themselves. Allah loves. Those who are purified (108) Is he who founded his building on piety from Allah and His satisfaction better, or he who founded his building on the brink of a scorching cliff, so it collapses with him in the fire of Hell? Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people. (109) Their structure which they built will remain in doubt in their hearts unless their hearts are cut off. Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise ( 110)}
Great truth of Allah
I finish