5/15/2020 0:00:00
[There was a large and important meeting in the past in Mecca… on whoever reads ancient, heavenly sacred tablets, and the Messenger Muhammad was able to copy those tablets and write them correctly, and he read them in the correct and correct manner that is consistent with the modern language of his people. And this work was inspired by Allah, while the Messenger’s people rejected the work of the Messenger Muhammad, and denied him, because they wanted it to be done in the old foreign language even if it was not understood… and they said about him that he came with an old alphabet. And they fought the Qur’an of the Prophet Muhammad. ]
Therefore, the fundamental controversial point in the story of Mecca… and the Qur’an places it as a fundamental controversial point, which is the language and the correct interpretation of the book.
The Qur’an rejects the ancient foreign language… which was the language of previous books that caused distortion in the meanings. It adopts the eloquent language, which means the modern spoken language of the current colloquial language that people speak in their daily lives. It confirms that the Qur’an was transferred from stone tablets. It is sacred (the Preserved Tablet) and that the language chosen to write the Qur’an is sound, as has been the custom known since ancient times. It also confirms that its interpretation is correct and that it is also from Allah.
—————————
Why did we draw a hypothetical novel about the story of the people of Mecca denying the book in his hands, what is its importance, and on what basis will we draw it?!
We know the story of the people of Mecca denying the Qur’an, but the story of Mecca did not give us any story about their denial of the Book, so it must be drawn.
We will draw it relying on the speech of the Qur’an only, as he is the one who gives us information about the book and the dialogues of the infidels in their denial of the book, and then we will be able to draw a hypothetical story close to the truth that took place in Mecca.
As we said at the beginning of the topic… it is important to draw a hypothetical narrative around the story of the people of Mecca denying the second thing given to the Messenger?!
Why ?
Because when we draw the story that took place about the infidels denying the book in his hands, relying on the speech of the readers, then we will be able to imagine the shape of the book more and we will be able to know details within the story that will help us approach this book in order to reach it.
Therefore, we believe that we are now creating a story based on the discourse of the readers… because we will live within it and it will help us reach the book.
Based on our assumption of the previous story?!
We have come to understand the qualities and characteristics of the book, which is (an ancient book of the writings of the ancients on a tablet and composed of verses, and these verses are of two types, clear and similar)… and it is in an Arabic language.
But you are very surprised by this story… How is it possible that there was a purely Arab environment in Mecca… and there are disagreements over an old book that they inherited from the writings of the ancients, whether it is Arabic or non-Arab… And how is it possible that there was an environment with an eloquent language? Arabic and you want it non-Arab.
We built this story in this way… on the basis of the Qur’an’s speech, and relying on our belief in history in general and the history that talks about the story of the Messenger in Mecca, and on the basis of the Roman time that we are within.
Therefore, it is logical that the solution to this contradiction in this story that we assumed, which is consistent with the speech of the Qur’an and is consistent with the environment of Mecca that has reached us, will be based on the approach of Western sciences in language.
The West’s approach is based on the fact that the language develops… and the phonetic manifestations of the language’s vocabulary change with time… and the current language of any society becomes different from the ancient language spoken by their first ancestors who lived centuries ago in the language of the society. …So this ancient book…there is ancient language in it.
Therefore…the logical explanation…is that the Messenger’s people in Mecca wanted to preserve the ancient foreign language, the first original language of the book, which developed into the Arabic language that became prevalent at the time of his mission…and the Messenger… He wanted to make the book in Arabic, which had become the language of society, while the residents of Mecca wanted to preserve the first foreign language of their ancestors.