3/23/2021 0:00:01
The truth is that the first time I thought about studying the issue of shrines and shrines seriously, it was during my visit to one of the villages in the regions of Yemen, when I saw in the village an old dome, which they say is the shrine of a well-known saint in that village, and because I stayed in that area for about a month, this thing It enabled me to tour many other villages in the same area, and I noticed that there were other domes, similar to the dome that I saw in the village where I stayed, and when I asked people about it, they said that it was for saints as well.
This observation raised questions in me about understanding this phenomenon, and I began to think about this phenomenon seriously.
I made a comprehensive picture of that area, and found that the distances seemed small between each dome and another, or between one saint and another, and they were separated by a distance of approximately 7 kilometers. This means that the phenomenon appeared to be organized rather than a phenomenon that in reality occurred randomly, spontaneously, and automatic .
So I asked myself questions:
– Why did all these saints appear in this region at once and at the same time, during the time of the construction of the domes, and their appearance suddenly stopped, and the appearance of the saints did not continue again in that region in another time in which the architecture was different from the domes so that we can see the movement of reality, Instead of this time that stopped at one architectural style and one form only?
– Wouldn’t it have been enough to have one dome in that area, if there had actually been a good saint in the past… instead of these saints arranged approximately every 7 kilometers?
– Is it possible that blind coincidence, which is behind this operation, could cause the death of righteous saints in this order and order, and then each one would be buried close to each other and a shrine would be built for him in one form, which is the dome?
– Was there an intelligent awareness behind this phenomenon, and he was the one who manufactured those domes to be close to every geographical area in that region that includes within it a human group who needs a dome of their own, close to them?
——————–
The truth… is that the phenomenon of shrines and shrines of saints is not limited to Yemen, but rather it is a phenomenon that exists in almost the entire Arab region, from Yemen to Morocco.
How do we understand this phenomenon?
Upon careful observation of this phenomenon in all Arab countries, we will find that they all have the same formal characteristics that are identical throughout the region, and the way society interacts with these shrines and shrines is the same throughout the region, and their impact on society is the same.
how ?
1- Regarding the formal characteristics of shrines and shrines, we will find that they all have the same formal characteristics.
Based on the style of an architectural dome, there is a person’s grave in a corner, covered with a green cover, and some of it is surrounded by an iron structure that allows people to see the grave.
As for the characteristics of the person buried in the shrine and shrine:
– Regarding identity
The graved person… could be: prophets, family members, righteous saints, Sufi leaders.
– Regarding fame
The graved person…is either a famous person known within a global geographical scope, or a popularly known person within a wide geographical scope that includes a country, or a popularly known person within a narrow geographical scope.
As for famous people on a global geographical scale, their fame came from the narrative of Islam that the Muslim knows and which has reached us from the books of the printer… such as the shrine of the Prophet in Saudi Arabia, the shrine of Hussein in Iraq, etc.
As for people who are popularly known in a wide geographical area that includes one country, their fame came from a mixture between printer’s books and popular stories… such as the tomb of Sayyed Al-Badawi in Misr, the tomb of Ahmed bin Alwan in Yemen, etc.
As for people who are popularly known within a narrow geographical scope in an area, their fame comes from a purely popular narrative… such as the shrines of righteous prophets and saints who are known in narrow areas in all countries.
#The truth…the fame of these characters in the Muslim reality, which was embodied by his shrines to them in reality, makes us ask logical questions:
For example, the Holy Qur’an is considered the holiest text that a Muslim possesses, and this sacred text that every Muslim possesses, contains the names of the personalities of prophets and messengers from Allah, and this means that those personalities must have a fame that exceeds the fame of any other personality.
Among these messengers and prophets, he is Muhammad, who has a famous shrine that is universally known to every Muslim and is not disputed by any two Muslims. It is located in Medina Saudi Arabia, and every Muslim is interested in visiting that shrine and shrine.
The strange and wondrous thing is that there is a very famous shrine, in fact it is the most famous shrine mentioned by the Muslim, the most sacred text is the Qur’an, and it is (the shrine of Ibrahim), the father of Muslims, but the Muslim does not care about it at all, and does not believe that the shrine of Ibrahim is a place that contains… A shrine and grave for Ibrahim, like the rest of the shrines that Muslims believe in in reality. Rather, the Muslim believes that the shrine of Ibrahim is a stone with two footprints on it only in Mecca.
Also, what is strange and strange… is that the rest of the characters in the Qur’an that Allah speaks to the Muslim do not have shrines and shrines that are universally known to Muslims as is the shrine and shrine of Muhammad. Rather, they exist within a narrow and local scope. Rather, there is a shrine and shrine for one Prophet. In several places in the region……….there is the shrine of Prophet Shuaib in the Levant and Yemen, and there is the shrine of Prophet Hud in Iraq and Yemen.
The matter is not limited to the characters of the Qur’an. There is the story of Islam, which started from Mecca, which is considered the second text that reached the Muslim after the Qur’an from the printer’s books, and the story contains famous characters. But what is strange is that there are single characters who have shrines and shrines in many places. In the region……………there is the shrine of Hussein in Iraq, the Levant, and Misr.
But the important questions that a Muslim must ask are:
Why does a Muslim believe that shrines contain graves of famous figures, but when it comes to (the shrine of Ibrahim) mentioned in the Qur’an, he does not believe that the shrine of Ibrahim is a grave with his body in it, but rather he believes that the shrine of Ibrahim is a stone with footprints on it?
Why does a Muslim believe that all the shrines of all the prophets mentioned in the Qur’an are grave shrines that exist in reality today in the countries of the region, but Ibrahim is the only prophet whom the Muslim believes that his shrine should not be a grave shrine, but rather it should be a piece of stone with footprints on it?
Why is the only shrine on which all Muslims agreed, of all the characters in the story of Mecca that arrived from the printer’s books, is the shrine of Muhammad located in Saudi Arabia, but Muslims differed in determining the locations of the shrine of the rest of the characters in the story of Mecca?
#Also, noting this formal conformity in the region makes us ask logical questions:
Why are shrines associated with the architectural style that has domes, as if there was a main condition that required the construction of a dome in order for the place to be a shrine and a mosque? ……. Or is it because the matter is related to the necessity that the architectural style for worship and the spiritual atmosphere should be in the style of domes?
But the shrine was linked to the style of domes, because it was originally a common architectural style in any ancient building?
But I think that the matter is not an ancient architectural style known for building places, because the question is: Why were the homes of the residents of the region not domes?
I believe that domes are a special architectural style, and were made to be a special building style for something related to worship only… while there were many building styles other than domes, but they were not used.
But if domes were designated in the past to be an architectural style for places of worship and not a style specific to building people’s homes, is the purpose of this architectural style in order to give any place holiness in the subconscious, because it is the style that was planted in the subconscious of Muslims for the sake of worship and holiness? ?
But the problem……….. is that domes are not a style specific to worship among Muslims, but rather they are the architectural style found in the West in building churches, such as the Vatican and the churches of Jerusalem in Europe and elsewhere, but rather the style of temples of other religions.
What is the secret behind the domes and this architectural style shared with other religions?
If we examine the style of domes found in Muslim shrines and mosques, we will find three observations:
– First observation: There is a great similarity in building style between many of them.
For example
1- There is a clear correspondence between the architecture of a mosque in Iraq and the architecture of the Jerusalem Mosque
2- There is a clear correspondence between shrines in Iraq and shrines in Iran.
3- There is a clear correspondence between the buildings of ancient mosques in the same country.
– Second observation: The architectural style of domes causes confusion in some cases among people.
For example
1- There is confusion among Egyptians today between popular memory and the printer’s books in naming the Cairo Citadel, in which there is a mosque. The Egyptians call it the Citadel of Muhammad Ali Pasha, while the printer’s books call it the Citadel of Saladin.
2- There is confusion among Yemenis in naming a mosque with a dome, between the Apostolic Mosque and the Omari Mosque.
– Third observation: The architectural style of domes is the style that brought Muslims alone, to the exclusion of other religions, into historical problems with other religions about who has rights, and made them like thieves.
For example
1- Al-Quds Mosque (the Dome) in Palestine… got the Muslim into trouble with the Western Zionists who say that it was the location of the Temple of Sulaiman… according to what the printer’s books say.
2- The Umayyad Mosque (Al-Qubba) in Syria… got Muslims into trouble with Al-Nasarah who belong to the religion of the West, and who say that it was originally the Church of St. John, but after the Islamic conquests it was transformed into a mosque… according to what the printer’s books say.
3- The Hagia Sophia Mosque (the dome) in Turkey… got Muslims into trouble with the West, who say that it was originally a Christian church and was turned into a mosque, but after the conquest of Constantinople, Muhammad the Conqueror ordered it to be converted into a mosque… according to what Printer’s books say so.
4- Babari Mosque (Dome) in India… got Muslims into trouble with the Hindus, who say that it was originally a Hindu temple, but after the entry of the Mongols who brought Islam to India, it was turned into a mosque for Muslims… according to what the books say the printer .
What is the secret I wonder ?
Why is the Muslim alone and not the rest of the religions…….. He becomes a thief and a thief always with the buildings of the domes, and he has stolen the land of other religions, and he must return it to the other religions, according to the date that the printer’s books say.
With the story of Hagia Sophia that it recently raised, does Turkey participate strongly in supporting the image of a Muslim being a thief and a thief, through its recognition of this history that makes a Muslim steal another’s property and turn it into his place of worship?
So…is the real reason the history in the printer’s books, which was written in order to steal the Muslim and expel him from the earth for the benefit of the rest of the religions, after the Muslim lost his true memory?
I believe that the building (Hagia Sophia), which the printer wrote depicted as being a church and became a mosque, and the building (Cairo Citadel), which caused confusion among Egyptians in naming it, can both show us that the architecture of the domes appears to be of the same age with the age of the printer, and it is architecture. Modern architecture, which appeared in the Muslim reality of Europe after the occupation of the region by the West and the installation of Turkish rulers in the region, to be the architectural style specific to the holy places of Muslims, so that it gives the place a permanent religious and spiritual dimension in the mind of the Muslim when he sees it.
We believe that this modern age is the reason that is amazingly capable of explaining all the previous observations:
The modern age… is the reason for the great similarity in building style between many of the mosques in the region, because they are one architectural school and one engineer.
Also, modern age… is the real reason for the confusion among Egyptians in naming the Cairo Citadel between the Citadel of Muhammad Ali Pasha and the Citadel of Saladin, because it is a modern architectural style that entered Misr after the invasion of Napoleon, who also entered with the printer, and during the period of Muhammad Ali Pasha it was Building the castle, and the Egyptians know it by this name while the printer’s books call it the Citadel of Saladin.
So the castle is as old as the printer…but it seems as if the printer existed in order to attribute these huge buildings to an imaginary history, in order to write a new history for the earth, by establishing this new history in the Muslim mind by linking such a huge building to the new history. After which the Muslim mind will not be able to escape from this new, imaginary history.
Also, modern age… is the real reason for the emergence of problems with other religions. Those domes were built for the Muslim, in order for him to be connected to them spiritually and religiously, and he could not escape from their spiritual depth. Then the printer wrote a new imaginary history for them, so that the Muslim would become He is in the position of the accused with other religions and gets them into trouble.
So….the age of the building of Hagia Sophia, the Umayyad Mosque, Jerusalem, and Babari is modern, but the printer’s books had a false history, and the Muslim could not abandon the spiritual dimension of those buildings, and at the same time he could not abandon the history of the printer’s books, to understand that The true story of those buildings and he realizes that their true age is recent and the history written for them is fake.
Conclusion…….. Domes are a modern architectural style, not ancient at all, and were designed to be the style of religious architecture for Muslims, in order to give the place in the Muslim subconscious a sacred, spiritual dimension, by making this style limited to places of worship.
2- Regarding the impact of these shrines and shrines on the societies of the region, we will find that they are identical.
Ideological, economic, historical, artistic and literary influence.
The doctrinal influence… Almost all the societies of the region believed and still believe in the arrival of blessings when visiting shrines and shrines or praying in them, and they believed and still believe in recovery from diseases due to the shrine or the resolution of personal problems for individuals.
The economic impact…Most of these shrines and shrines have an economic aspect linked to the lives of many people. Those who manage the shrine have their livelihood dependent on it because it receives money from visitors, and there are those who have moved their commercial activity to those places because they attract numbers of people. Also, the surroundings of those places have become within the circle of that economic activity.
Historical influence……… Almost societies that have a deep spiritual faith in those shrines and shrines, especially the famous ones, are among the societies that most believe in the history that came from the printer, and live history in their reality.
Artistic and literary influence… A culture of composing poems and chanting songs appeared in society that addressed the names of those characters and those shrines and shrines.
———–
Now, if I go back to my previous question, which I asked during my visit to one of the villages in Yemen: Is it possible that this coincidence, which is behind this operation… could cause the death of ancient saints in this order and system, and each one is buried next to each other and a shrine is built for him in the form of… Dome?
The truth…that these identical characteristics of the shrines and shrines throughout the region, and those identical effects of the shrines and shrines on the societies of the region…makes us believe that the matter appears as if a single project occurred in the entire region in a certain historical period, given the extent of These shrines and shrines are identical in form and effect, and it is not a spontaneous internal work that emerged from the culture of the region’s societies, but rather an external project applied to them.
The function of this project is:
– It is the transfer of society’s belief from the living Allah to the belief in dead creatures, to make them a dead mother who does not move with the living Creator, but rather stops at the dead, inanimate and immobile.
– It also made society relate strongly to those characters, so that it would also make it relate strongly to that new imaginary history that was written for them.
Because the domes are a modern architectural style…we believe that the project appears modern and not old at all, and such a project could not be completed except by an external occupier who came up with an organized strategic project that was applied to the entire region.
Because most of these shrines and shrines have a history older than the age of this modern architectural style, they are completely devoid of any corpse.
And this logical conclusion that we have reached is supported and confirmed by reality…… There is, for example, a person from that village that I visited, and he actually told me that they discovered a shrine completely devoid of any body, and I saw stories on the Internet about shrines in Morocco and Tunisia and Misr discovered that it was empty, and there were comments from some social media users talking about stories about empty shrines discovered in their areas.
Because the project was aware that our societies have a culture that has great respect for graves, it realizes that all societies in the region will never think of exhuming the bodies of those shrines and shrines that they have, but rather will completely and with great force reject the mere idea of exhuming the remains of that scream…. .. He is very confident that these communities will not know that these shrines are completely empty, and this means that they will not be able to get out of this big game that he played on them.
And the exposure of the game… is linked to the emergence of a new awareness among Muslims demanding the exhumation of the remains of those figures present in those shrines for all people to see, and when those shrines are revealed, they will be certain that all those shrines are completely empty of any corpse, and that All of these buildings are nothing but a relatively recent construction brought by an external entity, in order to transfer society from worshiping the one living Allah to worshiping fictitious names given by their fathers that do no harm or benefit, and also in order to implant in their minds the new imaginary history that its printer brought.
Or to summarize the whole matter in the region and the world:
It is the right of every Muslim everywhere to see what is inside the tomb of the Prophet Muhammad, whose green shrine is surrounded by iron inside a mosque with a large dome and is located in the city in Saudi Arabia.
The House of Saud is supposed to fulfill the desire of all Muslims and allow the Muslims to see the body of their Prophet, who changed the first qibla to Mecca, so that they can be sure that he existed and be sure that his story that reached them through printer’s books is real and not fake… just as Misr allowed the French occupiers, descendants of Napoleon, to exhume the graves of the prophets in Misr, remove their bodies from inside the coffins, and display them in their museums to all the enchanted people in the world.
(Did I not make a covenant with you, the children of Adam, that you should not worship Shaytan? Indeed, he is your clear enemy. This is the beginning of your path of uprightness. Indeed, many mountains have gone astray from you. Have you not been able to understand?)
(Say, O people, if you are in doubt about my religion, then I will not worship those whom you worship instead of Allah, but I will worship Allah.) To Allah who will take you to death, and I have been commanded to be of the believers, and to set your face upright to the religion, and not to be one of the believers. Of the polytheists, and do not leave apart from Allah that which neither benefits you nor harms you. If you do Then indeed you are of the wrongdoers.)
(Say: What do we call upon other than Allah that which neither benefits us nor harms us? And Shaytan led him to the earth, depriving him of a companion whom they would invite to guidance. Say, “Indeed, Allah’s guidance is the guidance, and our command is to submit to the Allah of the Worlds.)
(And they worship other than Allah that which neither harms them nor benefits them, and they say, “These are our intercessors with Allah.” Say, “Shall I repent?” And Allah is worthy of what He does not know in the heavens or on the earth. Glory be to Him, and He is exalted above what they associate with Him.)
(You worship nothing besides Him except names which you have named, you and your fathers. For them Allah has not sent down any authority. Only Allah has the right to rule. He has commanded that you should not worship anyone but Him. This is the upright religion, but most people do not know.)
(And the news of Ibrahim was recited to them when he said to his father and his people, “What do you worship?” They said, “We worship idols,” but we remain He said: Will they help you when you pray? Or will they benefit you or harm you? They said: Yes, we have found our fathers. We are like this for you. He said, “Have you renounced what you used to worship?” You and your ancient fathers are indeed enemies to me except the Allah of the Worlds. It is He who created me and it is He who guides me. By the One who obeys me and gives me drink, and when I am sick, he heals me. By the One who will cause me to die and then bring me back to life. By the One whom I hope will forgive me my sins on the Day of Judgment. My Allah, grant me wisdom and join me with righteousness. (The melody)
(And We had given him guidance before, and We were well aware of him. When he said to his father and his leaders, “What is this?” These are the statues to which you are devoted. They said, “We found our fathers to be worshipers of them.” He said, “Indeed, you were Your fathers were in clear error. They said, “You have brought us the truth. Mother, you are one of the players.” He said, “Rather, your Allah is the Allah of the heavens and the earth, He who created them, and He was suffocating to that for you from among the witnesses.” And He said, Certainly, your sins have turned away from you after you turned away. So He made them an exile except a major one for them, so that they might find a way to Him. Aoun – they said: Whoever does this with our infidelity – he is one of the wrongdoers – they said: We heard, so they remember them, he said to him, Abra This is with our Allah ۤ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۟ ۤ ۟ ۟ Their heads, you already know what these people speak. He said, “Will you worship instead of Allah that which will neither benefit you nor harm you?” What is wrong with you and what you worship instead of Allah? Will you not understand?)