2019-01-04T13:16:00-08:00
{Say, “Walk through the earth and see how creation began. Then Allah will bring about the creation of the Hereafter. Indeed, Allah has power over all things.”}
Logical question:
What was the world population in 1927?
According to official sources, officially recognized in references today is approximately 2 billion people.
What was the world population in 1500 AD?
It is said that the population of the Americas before the Europeans invaded their lands was approximately 80 million people.
So the Americas have a population of 80 million
Let us say that the Arab region had a population of 100 million
Let us say that the population of Africa was 100 million
China’s population reaches 120 million
The population of the Indian continent reaches 120 million
The population of Europe reaches 100 million
Japan’s population is 50 million
Russia’s population is 100 million
The rest of Asia has a population of 150 million
And the rest of the world (the islands and Australia) 50 million
Let’s say the total is 1.2 billion people
Approximately the world population in the year 1500 AD was approximately 1.2 billion people.
So what was the world population throughout history?
We do not have accurate old statistics for the population in every place, but we will try to know the census approximately according to a scientific and mathematical approach.
If…we calculate the population increase between the years 1500 and 1927, it will be = 0.8 billion years. Meaning that the Earth’s population increased over the course of 500 years by 0.8 years.
Can we develop a mathematical equation to measure the rate of increase throughout history?
Of course, this can be done, and it will be an equation of the exponential type (xe) and it will be according to the diagram in the picture.
See the diagram in the center of the picture
According to information currently approved in books and by the United Nations, the human population in the first century AD was 500 million people, and in 500 BC the human population was between 170 million and 300 million.
If we calculate the rate of population increase every 500 years, then the rate of population increase will be as follows:
The percentage of increase between (1500 AD) and (1927 AD) —– is 0.6
The percentage of increase between (500 BC) and (1 AD) —– is 0.6
Therefore, there is an approximate constant rate of population increase throughout history, which is = 0.6 per 500 years.
Now we can calculate the number of population throughout history, according to this constant rate of increase, noting that we will exclude the presence of natural disasters, wars, epidemics and diseases that caused a decrease in population increase, then the approximate number of the Earth’s population throughout history will be:
In 1000 BC = 180 million
In 1500 BC = 100 million
In 2000 BC = 64 million
In 2500 BC = 38 million
In 3000 BC = 23 million
In 3500 BC = 14 million
In 5000 BC = 3 million
In 11,000 BC = 4 thousand people (the size of a small village)
But since we are dealing with mathematical statistics, there must be a percentage of error in the results of our equation, and the percentage of error in it will be three times, meaning that the correct result = (result) * (3)
In the year 1000 BC = 180 million * 3 = 540 million
In the year 1500 BC = 100 million * 3 = 300 million
In the year 2000 BC = 64 million * 3 = 192 million
In the year 2500 BC = 38 million * 3 = 114 million
In the year 3000 BC = 23 million * 3 = 69 million
In the year 3500 BC = 14 million * 3 = 42 million
In the year 5000 BC = 3 million * 3 = 9 million
In the year 11000 BC = 4 thousand * 3 = 12 thousand
Rather, we will assume that the population in the year 15,000 BC was 20 thousand people.
This is an approximate, logical picture of the Earth’s population throughout history, and there is no doubt about it for those who practice the scientific method and mathematical logic in studying issues and phenomena. These results are roughly consistent with the picture presented by Western approaches to human history.
According to Western theories, 75 thousand years ago, humans were exposed to a catastrophic volcanic eruption, and only 10,000 people survived, and humans began to spread from Africa to the rest of the world.
But according to Darwin’s theory, which believes that man went through stages of development, and lived through periods of time under many names, Western theories believe that the last stage of man was the Neanderthal man, who became extinct approximately 25,000 years ago from the entire world. A species called Homo sapiens remained to inhabit the Earth, and the world population reached 5 million to 10 million at the end of the Ice Age 10,000 years ago.
However, although the picture we presented about the population size seems logical and scientific and is consistent with Western approaches that have become adopted in education curricula and preferred by the majority of people, the picture appears illogical when projected onto history. There are observations about the perception presented by the West:
● Whoever follows Western research and theories will find that most of them define the time of the world and man today at 10 thousand years, according to the time found in the book of the Old Testament, and this is the time that the Old Testament specified for the creation of Adam. This hypothetical age for Adam is 10 thousand years, and Which also seeped into the time perception of Muslims. When you ask any Muslim about the age of Adam, he directly specifies it as 10 thousand years.
What we mean is that there is a previous reference time that exists in the mind of the Western researcher, and he is the one who imposes himself on theories and tries to give this time scientific foundations and references, and this matter is no longer hidden from anyone, and an approximate example of this is when we find it clearly in science. The genome that the West is publishing today and imposing its foundations and terminology that it has placed in university education curricula, where we find the story of the Jewish genetic mutation. After they were unable to impose the logic of the history of the Old Testament and Allah’s chosen people, they are establishing scientific legitimacy for the existence of something called (the Jewish gene). As scientific evidence, the Old Testament confirms the existence of a historical human group called the Al-Yahoud, even though Judaism is only a religion and not a race, nation, or people (there is a Chinese Jew, there is a European Jew, there is an Arab Jew, and there is an Ethiopian Jew).
● As for the other point, the mathematical logic that we used in studying the population census throughout history was also carried out by Western methods, and it is logical that we will reach a small point in the census of twenty thousand, for example, and this makes us believe that there is a human group in a certain area and it has multiplied. And all of humanity came out of it. Because our arrival to this small number of people and our assumption that they are distributed all over the earth in a sudden manner, makes the matter completely illogical, as in every place a human being appears without a common origin for all, as if he suddenly appeared all at once.
But in order to circumvent this natural logical perception, they made them assume that the spread of humans was at an evolutionary stage very prior to modern humans. 70,000 years ago, humans began to spread everywhere on Earth, and after they spread across the Earth, humans went through the same evolutionary stage in Every place on Earth until the year 25,000 BC. Neanderthals suddenly became extinct from the entire Earth, and suddenly Homo sapiens, modern humans, also appeared in all the world at the same time, and in the year 10,000 BC, the human population in all the world reached 10 million people, distributed in all parts of the world. All over the earth.
This perception seems to me completely illogical… If evolution is the ladder of life, is it reasonable that evolution is an act that occurred a number of times at the same time and that man appears everywhere… We will accept the theory of evolution, but what prevents us from believing that modern man It appeared in one place and from this place it began to spread across the earth over long periods of time?
I do not want to dwell too much on this topic because my main topic is not the theory of evolution or about man and his origin. My main topic deals with history and reading history.
——————–
Let’s talk about the history of the Americas
If someone asked us the following question:
Where did the indigenous people of the Americas come from?
His quick and clear answer will be… that the inhabitants of the two American continents came out of the red circle in the picture, specifically from the Bering Strait, which separates Asia and America, and a human group crossed the strait in a historical period when The strait was icy, making the two continents connected, which facilitated their crossing and spread across the two continents.
The answer will not be difficult at all for everyone… right?
——————–
There is an important note:
Our previous question, in my personal opinion, is an immoral and impudent question, if we ask it out of astonishment and astonishment at the presence of human beings on that land, because it is only the European’s question and not the question of the rest of humanity, but if we ask it out of knowledge and research into human history, then there is no problem. Because astonishment and astonishment are the creation of the European, we are still studying the world according to the view of the European who deceived humanity with the story of the new world and his discovery of a new world different from the old world, and this view is very old and deeply rooted within him, and is reflected to us by the names of the religious books that established his mind and His thinking from the Old Testament to the New Testament. Europeans are in a continuous movement throughout history to create a new world of their own that erases any old world.
——————–
■ For me, the history of the American population is evidence of the invalidity of Western theories about human history and of the invalidity of the history found in the Old Testament and in the history of the so-called Greeks.
According to history… when the European invaded the coast of the Americas, the population was approximately 80 million people in the year 1500 AD. They are spread across the length and breadth of the two continents. In plains, forests, valleys, mountains, coasts, and on the banks of rivers.
The two logical questions:
1- In your opinion, how much time did it take for humans to spread across the length and breadth of the American continents, to form and settle human populations everywhere?
2- How much did it take for people on the American continent to create a cultural, linguistic, and religious split from the first group that crossed the Bering Strait?
1000 years?!
This is a very short period of spread over a very small geographical area, estimated at the size of a city with an area of 2000 km2.
2000 years
Also few
5000 years is also a little short
The topic is much older, more than tens of thousands of years old
Unfortunately… today we do not have confirmed information about the inhabitants of the two American continents before the Europeans invaded them… We do not have historical records about their languages, religions, culture and knowledge, because when the Europeans invaded them, they carried out a comprehensive process of erasing their knowledge. Intentionally, the Spaniards completely burned the written texts of the Incas and Aztecs, and nothing remained of them. Imagine how the population of America decreased from 80 million people to 5 million people after the white man entered them, due to the operations of genocide, destruction, killing, and the spread of epidemics and diseases among them.
Even the texts written by Europeans about the indigenous inhabitants of America after their arrival there as invaders are all forged and fictitious, to create a new imagination and image of these inhabitants that erases the first, old and natural image. The Europeans have written a lot about them, but it is forged and false to create a historical break between them and their ancient history.
All the studies, history, literature, and art that Europeans wrote and are still writing about the indigenous people of the two American continents in order to draw a false old world, so that they can ascend to it in creating a new world on the two American continents.
● For example, it depicts the inhabitants of the American continent as practicing ritual slaughter of humans and offering them to the gods, as in the Mel Gibson movie (The Sacrifice).
● A history is written about the inhabitants of America in the handwriting of Europeans, and he claims that they are the first texts he wrote about their first meeting with those inhabitants, while the truth is that they are fabricated, forged and fictitious writings so that these texts serve as a fictitious founding historical narrative for those inhabitants, obliterating their ancient history.
● He claims, for example, that the Inca civilization was 500 years old when the Spaniards came to them, and he makes this age essential information in educational curricula, knowing that the Spaniards burned libraries that contained many of their own books.
It is written in the official history that teaches that the Aztec civilization was approximately 1,000 years old, and the Mayan civilization was 1,500 years old. Even though the texts of the Mayan civilization are thousands of years old, even dating back to the First Migration, then they bring in famous scholars shrouded in a halo of lights to decipher these complex and difficult inscriptions, and they claim that they were able to decipher them, and they extract from these texts fictitious languages and fictitious history and tell the population This is your history… the history of hallucinations and a magical world that does not belong to them.
It is truly a new world, as the Europeans called it, and they were able to create it in the American continents, obliterating the old world that existed in the American continents.
■ Also, the history of the two American continents provides the residents of the region with a simple, vivid, direct and exemplary example, to understand the history of the region and to understand what happened in it in the past. Because what happened to the American continents by the Europeans is exactly the same thing that happened in our region when the Romans tried to create a new era in our region to settle and occupy it.
What happened to us is the same attempt by the Europeans to create a new world on the two continents of America, after they used many means of invading and destroying a written archive, stealing it, and replacing it with fake historical narratives written by them and transmitting them to us through huge translations, to create a new imagination for the inhabitants of the region.
The new world that the Europeans designed on the American continents is exactly the same as the exact New Testament project that they tried to create in our region and is still working today.
The project of erasing the ancient history of the inhabitants of the two American continents by the Europeans was the same as the project of writing the Old Testament by the Romans.
The New World project in the Americas five centuries ago is the same as the New Testament project in our region approximately 12 centuries ago.
The imaginary ancient history of the inhabitants of the two American continents = the Book of the Old Testament
The New World (the two continents of America) = the Book of the New Testament (our region)
It is the truth
——————–
Otherwise, we will talk about our region. We will try to ask the same question that we asked about the two continents of America, to the same person, and try to find the difference between the two answers.
Where did the indigenous people of the area come from?
The answer will be very difficult for him……..and he will think a lot before answering….and he will present to us many theories and research of all kinds and shapes, unlike his previous answer about the population of America. Which was an easy, very clear and quick answer.
Perhaps he will not reach a convincing answer, but rather he will reach the illogical perception that the West is trying to present to the residents of the region through the history that the West wrote and is still writing, that the residents of the region emerged like worms from inside the dirt. The ancient Egyptians suddenly appeared from the soil of Misr, the ancient Iraqis and Syrians suddenly emerged from the soil of Iraq and Syria, and the ancient Libyans suddenly emerged from the soil of Libya, Algeria and Morocco. And they are all like worms.
Rather, the theory of worms developed into a theory that they landed from space. The pyramids of Misr were built by aliens, and the history of the Sumerians in Iraq confirms that they came from the planet Nibro and the Anunnaki came from another world.
There are those who believe this history and the theories that tickle the minds of many and enchant their imaginations (the space landing, haha).
This is for very old times.
But for today’s time, we will try to ask another question
What is the origin of the region’s population today?
This question is different from the previous question, as the inhabitants of the region today in this era are Arabs and do not belong to the geography in which they live. Misr is Arab, and in the past it was not Arab, and the same is the case in Iraq, Syria, and North Africa.
Because the origin of the Arabs is the desert… The origin of the Arabs is the story of Mecca, its events and its history. The Arab era started from there, and before that, the region had multiple identities, cultures and gods… And after the entry of the Arabs with the Islamic conquests, they replaced All that world in their Arab world.
Especially since the historical narratives that established this era divided the region into Arabized and Arabized Arabs, meaning Arabs of origin, and Arabs who were not of origin but were Arabized. And Qahtan, Adnan, etc.
This is the common perception among many, especially among those who are sensitive to the name Arabs, but the truth is that this perception is wrong. Rather, it is a perception drawn by the New Testament project that the Romans carried out only after they were able to create a new time for the region, and obliterate the ancient world with the book of the Old Testament. . All the Romans did was to erase the ancient human migration and settlement of the region, which occurred in a very distant time, and they compressed it into a new narrative that begins with the Islamic conquests and spread it.
It’s the truth…the story is completely different.
I’ll tell you the story
What happened on the two continents of America from time immemorial is exactly the same as what happened in the region in ancient times. The entire region emerged from the Bering Strait as well (which is the place marked in the red circle) in the picture of the Arab world.
The south of the island is the source of the first human migration in the region.
Yes, it is Allah’s will that He wanted that region to be the region’s Bering Strait, and if you do not believe in Allah’s will, then call it coincidence that made that region the human reservoir that will fill the region from a very, very ancient time.
In that area marked with a red mark, a large nation of humans was formed in a very distant time…and from that place many human migrations emerged, spread, and settled in the region. It settled in Misr and spread in North Africa, the Levant, Iraq, and even Spain. It spread across the length and breadth of the region, the same story as the two continents of America.
The story is easy and simple
But the difference in the story between our region and the continents of America is that this large human group that migrated was carrying a religious book with it, and this book is the reason for its survival to this day. Otherwise, its fate would have been the same as the fate of the inhabitants of the two continents of America.
But the Romans hid this book and replaced it with a fake book called the Old Testament, which contains a fictitious and false history. The Old Testament was originally a strategic satanic project to erase and eliminate a large nation, because this hidden book is the document that contains the history of this migration and the history of the first beginnings of this. The great nation.
These human groups that emerged from the Bering Strait in the region in ancient times (south of the island), and settled in the region, left these traces in the region over long and ancient periods of time, and therefore the inscriptions of the region are specific to all the inhabitants of the region, and It is not a case specific to a particular geography, for the very simple reason that these inscriptions were written by many very ancient migrations and spread everywhere.
But this simple and easy story was completely replaced by another complex story by the cunning and cunning of the Romans by creating a new time and a new imaginary history, so everyone believed that the story was modern and that their history was modern.
I think that the difficulty of understanding this simple and easy ancient story is due to the scale of the destructive project undertaken by the Romans in the past and carried out by the West today.
The Romans are behind the story of the Arab and Arabized Arabs, they are behind the story of Qahtan and Adnan, and they are behind the story of the Islamic conquests that they were striving to spread in an unnatural way.
Today, the West is behind writing the story of the ancient history of the region, in which they tried and worked hard to create a special history for a region separate from the rest of the region, by inventing many languages, many religions, many gods, and different stories, in order to destroy this nation.
While the truth is that what happened to the inhabitants of the two American continents in terms of erasing knowledge and history, by destroying their historical records and forging their inscriptions, is exactly the same as what happened and is happening today by the West. All the history that the West extracted from the inscriptions of the region is fictitious, forged and false, all the languages it extracted are fictitious, all religions are fictitious, and everything that the Romans wrote about the region is the same as what the Europeans wrote about the inhabitants of the two continents of America.. It is all fictitious and false history for the manufacture of A fictitious historical narrative for peoples in order to seize their land and their truth.
Note: Do not forget to remember that the Europeans called the inhabitants of the two American continents Red Indians, which is the same name that the Romans invented for the Phoenicians (Himyarites) inhabitants of the region.
All of this is so that the residents of the region do not feel that they were a large nation from ancient times, and the fall of this feeling is in order to dismantle and destroy this large nation, eating it into several small pieces, and turning it into a copy of the two continents of America.
finally :
What I want to clarify in this article is how we read history, because this picture that we presented in the article is the correct beginning for those who want to understand history well, and I do not mean the ridiculous history that the West writes today, as all that exists is Greek hallucinations from the imagination of the West, and the language of monsters. And an imaginary, fictitious, false history from the book of the Old Testament, but rather the real history hidden behind the inscriptions of the region.
Because without tracing the steps of this first human migration that emerged from that red circle in ancient times and settled in the region, you will not understand anything of history, and you will not be able to imagine the topics of the inscriptions, their stories, their language, their religion, and their meanings. You will not be able to realize the earth-shattering truth found in the inscriptions of the region, those inscriptions that the West has turned into witchcraft texts and recites to the residents of the region every day.
{The people were one nation, so Allah sent the prophets as bearers of good tidings and warnings, and sent down with them the Book with the truth, that He might judge between the people in that in which they differed, and they did not differ in it except those who were given it after the clear proofs had come to them, out of envy among themselves. So Allah guided those who believed to the truth to the truth, with His permission, Allah guides whom He wills to a straight path. }
Why was that red circle the starting point?
In the second part
.
.
.