2018-11-22T07:28:00-08:00
What is the important and certain information that the West does not want you to realize and feel well after the discovery of so many mummies in Yemen?
He does not want you to realize definitively that the religious faith in ancient Misr and Yemen was the same.
The West will try to divert you from this truth using various methods, theories and information… The West will tell you:
The West will tell you that mummification in Yemen is different from Misr
The West will tell you that the mummies of Yemen may be older than the mummies of Misr
The West will tell you that the materials used in mummification in Yemen are very different from Misr, and some of them are imported from India.
The West will tell you that mummification was an evolutionary stage that humanity went through.
The West will tell you that mummification in Misr is still a complex mystery
All this information, rules and theories are false so that you do not realize that the mummified corpse in Yemen is the same as the mummified corpse in Misr.
because :
– If mummification was different between Misr and Yemen, why were religious ritual materials imported from Yemen? Was the mummy discovered belonging to a Yemeni merchant who was an agent for supplying sacred materials and plants used in temple rituals? It was kept inside a wooden coffin engraved with Musnad script, and buried in Misr. In the tomb of the Allah Osiris, was it mummified in the Yemeni way or the Egyptian way?
Knowing that the mummy was stolen so that it would not be physical evidence that it was the same condition as it was in Misr.
– If the embalming materials in Yemen are different from Misr, is it possible that ancient Misr imported sacred materials and plants from Yemen, while Yemen imported them from India for embalming… Funny talk.
The materials used in mummification are the same in Misr and Yemen, and the most important material in the mummification process is (myrrh), and there was no such thing as India until Yemen imported materials from it. The most important source of this material in the past was southern Arabia.
– If mummification in Misr is a mystery, then to this day we do not know where the mystery lies… What is this complex mystery about mummification in Misr, about which the West every now and then publishes research and news in the media and scientific periodicals, and makes people abuzz every now and then? Think about the topic.
They create a great aura on trivial topics, to make the mind suffer from a disability and an inability to think… because when the West hears it always repeat the word “complex puzzle” and publish it in scientific journals… it makes many people think that if this matter baffles the West, then it must This is the case, and therefore I must repeat their example… the complex mystery… and the difference between mummification in Misr and Yemen, like the difference between washing and shrouding the dead today between Misr and Yemen.
The story is very easy… and there is no complicated puzzle… right?
– The mummified bodies in Misr and Yemen are of the same age…and in the same time period, and the evidence is the mummy of a Yemeni merchant buried in Misr.
The West will tell you that mummification is a stage that humans passed through, and this is not true, because the mummies discovered in the rest of the world are very anomalous cases and not according to the method in the region, but rather they were preserved as a result of a burial process in cold places among the snow, and some of them because of clay. Mummification in Misr and Yemen was based on myrrh.
Likewise, scientific logic dictates that we should not use an anomalous case as a measure of the fact that an area witnessed mummification. The measure is the large number, which confirms the existence of an established culture in society and that culture witnessed a mummification process, because it may be a mummified corpse that was stolen and transported to another place. Far from the thieves of history, to falsify facts and create false and false convictions… and this is actually what the residents of some areas of Yemen used to notice when they noticed strangers coming to their villages looking for mummies to steal. History thieves. But in Yemen and Misr there are very large numbers, and this indicates a well-established culture.
——————–
Now let’s run out of the West’s words
● Suppose that after a thousand years, a person opened a grave in Misr and found the bones of a corpse inside a white shroud, and another person discovered the bones of a corpse in Yemen inside a white shroud in the same way.
The logical question is: Did the owner of the body discovered in Misr worship Amun and Osiris, while the owner of the body discovered in Yemen worshiped Maqqa?
The discovery of large numbers of mummified corpses in Yemen should make logic say:
The two mummified corpses in Yemen and Misr emerged from one belief, from the same spiritual and existential perception of life. And that the ancient society that was in Yemen and made the mummified corpse had a spiritual, existential and intellectual conception of life…… It is the same spiritual, existential and intellectual conception of the ancient society in Misr that made the mummified corpse.
Both societies in ancient times had one religious belief.
The topic is very easy and clear, without much talk, and does not require an expert or scientist who holds a doctorate from the University of Oxford.
And the evidence
The wooden coffin discovered in Misr near the Saqqara pyramid in one of the temples of the Egyptian Allah Osiris, which, as it was said, contained a mummy, but it was stolen. It belonged to a merchant from Yemen named Zaid, who died in Misr, and he was an agent for supplying sacred materials and plants that were used in temple rituals. ……This means the existence of a common belief.
But look at how the West wrote the story of the merchant mummy who was buried in the tomb of the Allah Osiris as a tribute to him from the Allah Osiris… a tribute from the Allah Osiris to the Yemeni merchant by burying him in his cemetery, because the Yemeni merchant does not believe in the Allah Osiris, but rather in the Yemeni gods (Maqqa). It’s just a tribute…the West doesn’t want you to understand
Because if it was just a matter of honoring him… then can it be said that my neighbor in Yemen who went to Misr for treatment and died there and was buried in the Egyptian cemeteries, is the process of burying him in the Egyptian cemeteries a tribute to him from the Egyptian gods (Allah), just a tribute and Is there no belief on his part in the same gods as the Egyptians (Allah) because the Yemeni does not believe in the Allah (Allah) but in the gods (Maqqa)?
Did you get the idea?
Therefore, logic tells us there are three possibilities:
Either the doctrine of ancient Misr is the same as the doctrine of ancient Yemen, and therefore there is absolutely no truth to what the West wrote about the religion of ancient Yemen, or the doctrine of ancient Yemen is the same as the doctrine of ancient Misr, and therefore there is no truth at all to what the West wrote about the religion of ancient Misr. Or that another unknown belief was a shared belief between ancient Misr and Yemen, and there is no truth at all to what the West wrote about the religion of ancient Misr and ancient Yemen.
And any correct possibility among these possibilities…must be one of its automatic consequences…that the West is definitely in a false position.
So… the West today is in a false position and certainly… logically.
And now he is trying… to hide an earth-shattering truth.