2015-10-31T12:37:00-07:00
Vienna Conference between the Syrian situation and the Yemeni situation
The question that imposes itself now in Syria, Yemen and Libya in particular and in the region in general is: Is the developmental, democratic, political and economic situation linked to the internal reform process in the state, or is it linked to the external regional and international situation surrounding the state?
This question was raised at an international symposium on development and democracy that was held in Tunisia about ten years ago, in the presence of politicians and economists from many countries. At that symposium, his daughter, the former Indonesian leader Sukarno, spoke and said that the world needs a new, just world order in which it can Third World countries must achieve developmental and economic development and can create true democratic models that suit the specificities of their societies. In Ali Abdullah Saleh’s recent interview on Al-Mayadeen TV, Saleh spoke about the necessity of talking about an international conference not to solve the internal problem, which he described as easy to solve, but An international conference in the presence of international powers to resolve the conflict between Yemen and Saudi Arabia. Many supporters of the aggression against Yemen mocked Saleh’s speech, just as many on my Facebook page mocked those belonging to the Islah Party and the new secularists, when I spoke at the beginning of the Saudi aggression that Yemen needs… An international conference in the presence of international powers to arrange their interests in Yemen and set the borders of Saudi Arabia in its relationship with Yemen. This conference will be the only guarantee for the stability of Yemen and to ensure the desired radical change in Yemen, because the previous guarantees that occurred between international and regional powers in the past regarding Yemen fell. Because of the shift of guarantor powers from their political path and began to follow the path of other guarantor powers, such as Misr, and also the fall of some powers, such as the Soviet Union and Iraq. This sarcasm in the Yemeni case is the same as the sarcasm in the Syrian case, launched by Saudi commentators and Syrians who love Saudi politics in the region. Or non-Syrians, about the Vienna conference and the results that came out of this conference, and among those results is the secularism of the Syrian state and the preservation of state institutions and that the Syrian people are the only ones who decide their fate, and the fundamental point that they do not want and mock is that the Syrian people He decides his own fate. They now do not want democracy, after they were promoting in the media the dictatorship of the Syrian regime and that the Syrian people want democracy. The reason for their fear at this point is because they were only seeking to overthrow the Syrian regime and did not want democracy, human rights, and secularism. And all the resonant terms and concepts with which they anesthetize the common people, they want to overthrow a regime and create a new regime that follows their political path in the region and the world, and to create a regime that follows their political path, whatever the cost, for they will not hesitate to play with established national, humanitarian, and civilizational values. In Syria, the demographic, religious, sectarian and regional composition will be manipulated, in order to ensure the continuity and stability of the new regime in order to achieve for them absolute subordination to their political path, even if a form of state is produced that resembles the Afghan or Somali situation or any new model. The important thing is that it be consistent. for them. And when the Vienna Conference says that the Syrian people are the ones who decide their fate, this means to them that if the Syrian people enter into democratic elections and Assad enters the elections, the possibility of his victory will be great, especially after many Syrians retreated from their previous positions, and there is no other political figure who will stand by them. With the consensus of the segments and sects of Syrian society, a character has been prepared for this day. So, the point of contention at the conference will be: Bashar al-Assad not running for elections or leaving political life, and this point is what will be discussed in the next meeting scheduled in two weeks.
The speech of his son, the Indonesian leader Sukarno, about the need for a new international order remains unclear. What do you mean by the international world order, and what are its rules that attribute the failure of modernization, democracy and development in third world countries? In the next article