The speech of the Qur’an and the Zionist speech

The speech of the Qur’an and the Zionist speech

7/23/2020 0:00:00

Link to the article

Likewise, Fadel Al-Rubaie, who does not know, said something like theirs.

Al-Rubaie says: Ibrahim was the priest of the Maqqa Temple, according to Western translations of Yemeni inscriptions, but the West made Ibrahim the figure of Palestine, etc.

Al-Rubaie says exactly what they say, because he does not know that the Qur’an is talking about the inscriptions of the region, which are in a clear Arabic tongue, and he does not know that the Al-Yahoud and Al-Nasarah are two groups from the West (who translate the inscriptions of the region) who were given the Book of Allah that Musa brought… He came. They have knowledge…but they differed in the recitation of the book from the original recitation and made it in a foreign language out of hatred among themselves.

The Al-Yahoud in the Qur’an are not what we call Judaism today. The Al-Yahoud are a group from the West who changed the language of the original inscriptions and made them in a foreign language, and invented the stories of Hammurabi, Maqqa, Gedrae, and Shalmaneser.

And when the Qur’an says to you: Ibrahim was not a Jew…that is, he was not Hammurabia, nor Ishtaria, nor Maqwiyah, nor Gadkariah, nor worshiped Tammuz, nor Adonis, nor Ishtar, nor Amun. No aton, no uncle, no sin.

As for the Al-Nasarah in the Qur’an, they are nothing but the second group from the West, who wrote a book similar to the Qur’an, containing the stories of the prophets found in the Qur’an, and they made it in a foreign, crooked language (Syriac Hebrew) and named the prophets (Abraham Joseph Samuel)… so that you, the historians, researchers, and Muslims may think so. A book from Allah and from the Book.

And when the Qur’an says to you: Ibrahim was not a Christian…that is, Ibrahim was not a Hebrew and followed the current Jewish religion, and he was not a Christian, nor a Hindu, nor a Sabian.

اترك تعليق